Jersey Mike’s Arena · at Rutgers · Conference game
Closing line
RUTG -2.5✓ RUTG covered by 8.5
Closing total144.5Under by 19.5
| This season | RUTG | |
|---|---|---|
| 10-14 | Record | 9-15 |
| 10-14 | ATS | 11-13 |
| 15-9 | O/U | 14-10 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: MD 74–74 RUTG · ✓ RUTG (50%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MD | 27 | 30 | 57 |
| RUTG | 27 | 41 | 68 |
1st half: MD 27, RUTG 27 (tied). The model had MD by 0.1 and a total of 69.0 (actual 54).
Team stats
| MD | RUTG | |
|---|---|---|
| 22-66 33% | Field goals | 22-53 42% |
| 7-30 23% | 3-pointers | 5-18 28% |
| 6-13 46% | Free throws | 19-24 79% |
| 41 18 off | Rebounds | 38 9 off |
| 10 | Assists | 12 |
| 4 | Steals | 3 |
| 2 | Blocks | 3 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 10 |
| 20 | Fouls | 13 |
| 26 | Points in paint | 20 |
| 7 | Fast-break points | 14 |
Players
| MD | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solomon Washington F | 37 | 11 | 14 | 0 | 4-7 | 0-1 |
| Andre Mills G | 34 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 3-14 | 1-6 |
| Darius Adams G | 32 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 5-12 | 2-5 |
| Elijah Saunders F | 32 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2-8 | 1-5 |
| Collin Metcalf C | 23 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 2-3 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| David Coit G | 34 | 12 | 2 | 5 | 5-19 | 2-10 |
| Isaiah Watts G | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| Aleks Alston F | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Guillermo Del Pino G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Pharrel Payne, Lukas Sotell, Rakease Passmore, George Turkson Jr., Myles Rice, Jaziah Harper, Nick Blake
| RUTG | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tariq Francis G | 36 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 4-13 | 1-5 |
| Harun Zrno G | 32 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 5-12 | 3-7 |
| Dylan Grant F | 29 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 4-8 | 1-3 |
| Emmanuel Ogbole C | 23 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Kaden Powers G | 18 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 3-7 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jamichael Davis G | 23 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| Darren Buchanan Jr. G | 20 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Chris Nwuli F | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Bryce Ruglass Dortch F | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Denis Badalau F | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Lino Mark G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Gevonte Ware, Dorian Jones, Max Fradkin, Baye Fall
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketRUTG -2.5
ModelRUTG -0.1
Model edgeMD +2.4
L RUTG covered
Total
Market144.5
Model147.5
Model edgeOver 3.0
L Under
Projected score
MD 73.7 · RUTG 73.8
MD 57 · RUTG 68
Win probability
RUTG 50%
1st half
Spread
MD -0.1
tied
Total
69.0
54 points
Projected score
MD 34.5 · RUTG 34.5
MD 27 · RUTG 27
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenRUTG -3.5
1 → MD
CloseRUTG -2.5
1 pt toward MD
Total
Open145.5
▼ 1
Close144.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
MD +120 · RUTG -142
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened RUTG -3.5 · closed RUTG -2.5 · moved 1 toward MDmodel RUTG -0
model RUTG -0
Opened 145.5 · closed 144.5 · moved 1 downmodel 147.5
model 147.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | |
| 2-8 20% | 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 7 since 2021-22
MD 4–3 RUTGMD leads · 7 games since 2021-22 · MD has won the last 3 meetings · MD 4-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2024-25 | RUTG 81 @ MD 90 | MD -8.5 | MD W |
| Mar 13, 2023-24 | RUTG 51 vs MD 65 | MD -4.5 | MD W |
| Feb 25, 2023-24 | MD 63 @ RUTG 46 | RUTG -2.5 | MD W |
| Feb 6, 2023-24 | RUTG 56 @ MD 53 | MD -7.5 | RUTG W |
| Jan 5, 2022-23 | MD 50 @ RUTG 64 | RUTG -5.5 | RUTG W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Maryland
24 games played
Straight up
10-14
42% wins
Against the spread
10-14
42% covers · avg −3.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-9
63% overs · avg +1.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-61 | -28.5 | L −6.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 60-70 | -4.5 | L −14.5 | 144.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 84-64 | -29.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 89-82 | +8.5 | W +15.5 | 146.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 95-90 | -17.5 | L −12.5 | 145.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 74-67 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 61-100 | +14.5 | L −24.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 72-105 | +14.5 | L −18.5 | 166.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 89-63 | -22.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 64-83 | +10.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 83-101 | +19.5 | W +1.5 | 163.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 72-80 | +16.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 28 | vs | W 73-58 | -14.5 | W +0.5 | 154.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 54-64 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 66-84 | +7.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 55-67 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 13 | @ | L 71-88 | +9.5 | L −7.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 18 | vs | W 96-73 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 148.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 70-89 | +18.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 48-91 | +18.5 | L −24.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 63-93 | +15.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 62-82 | +6.5 | L −13.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 67-62 | +10.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 77-70 | +10.5 | W +17.5 | 138.5 | O 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
COPP
W 83-61
−6.5
7
vs
GTWN
L 60-70
−14.5
11
vs
ALCN
W 84-64
−9.5
15
@
MARQ
W 89-82
+15.5
19
vs
MSM
W 95-90
−12.5
24
vs
UNLV
W 74-67
+4.5
25
vs
GONZ
L 61-100
−24.5
26
vs
ALA
L 72-105
−18.5
2
vs
WAG
W 89-63
+3.5
6
@
IOWA
L 64-83
−8.5
13
vs
MICH
L 83-101
+1.5
20
@
UVA
L 72-80
+8.5
28
vs
ODU
W 73-58
+0.5
2
vs
ORE
L 54-64
−8.5
7
vs
IU
L 66-84
−10.5
10
@
UCLA
L 55-67
+1.5
13
@
USC
L 71-88
−7.5
18
vs
PSU
W 96-73
+21.5
21
@
ILL
L 70-89
−0.5
24
@
MSU
L 48-91
−24.5
1
vs
PUR
L 63-93
−14.5
5
vs
OSU
L 62-82
−13.5
8
@
MINN
W 67-62
+15.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 77-70
+17.5
covered 10didn’t cover 14avg −3.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
COPP
W 83-61
+4.5
7
vs
GTWN
L 60-70
−14.5
11
vs
ALCN
W 84-64
+1.5
15
@
MARQ
W 89-82
+24.5
19
vs
MSM
W 95-90
+39.5
24
vs
UNLV
W 74-67
−23.5
25
vs
GONZ
L 61-100
+3.5
26
vs
ALA
L 72-105
+10.5
2
vs
WAG
W 89-63
+8.5
6
@
IOWA
L 64-83
+9.5
13
vs
MICH
L 83-101
+20.5
20
@
UVA
L 72-80
−1.5
28
vs
ODU
W 73-58
−23.5
2
vs
ORE
L 54-64
−28.5
7
vs
IU
L 66-84
+2.5
10
@
UCLA
L 55-67
−25.5
13
@
USC
L 71-88
+8.5
18
vs
PSU
W 96-73
+20.5
21
@
ILL
L 70-89
+6.5
24
@
MSU
L 48-91
−2.5
1
vs
PUR
L 63-93
+7.5
5
vs
OSU
L 62-82
−6.5
8
@
MINN
W 67-62
−9.5
11
vs
IOWA
W 77-70
+8.5
over 15under 9avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Rutgers
24 games played
Straight up
9-15
38% wins
Against the spread
11-13
46% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-10
58% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 81-53 | -18.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 72-60 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 84-72 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 136.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 80-71 | -16.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 54-67 | -15.5 | L −28.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 60-85 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 63-68 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 80-65 | +4.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 65-81 | +13.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 60-101 | +25.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 59-81 | +13.5 | L −8.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 70-69 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 65-50 | -20.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 73-80 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 88-85 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 139.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 55-81 | +22.5 | L −3.5 | 149.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 77-75 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 87-96 | +15.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 183 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 62-68 | +17.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 59-82 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 27 | vs | L 79-88 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 75-78 | +11.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 66-98 | +13.5 | L −18.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 68-80 | +12.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
RID
W 81-53
+9.5
10
vs
ME
W 72-60
−6.5
14
vs
LEH
W 84-72
−6.5
18
vs
AMER
W 80-71
−7.5
21
vs
CCSU
L 54-67
−28.5
24
vs
TENN
L 60-85
−10.5
25
vs
ND
L 63-68
+1.5
27
vs
UNLV
W 80-65
+19.5
2
vs
PUR
L 65-81
−2.5
6
@
MICH
L 60-101
−15.5
13
@
HALL
L 59-81
−8.5
20
vs
PENN
W 70-69
−10.5
29
vs
DSU
W 65-50
−5.5
2
vs
OSU
L 73-80
+2.5
5
vs
ORE
W 88-85
+7.5
8
@
ILL
L 55-81
−3.5
11
vs
NU
W 77-75
+6.5
17
@
WIS
L 87-96
+6.5
20
@
IOWA
L 62-68
+11.5
23
vs
IU
L 59-82
−15.5
27
vs
MSU
L 79-88
+5.5
31
@
USC
L 75-78
+8.5
3
@
UCLA
L 66-98
−18.5
7
vs
NEB
L 68-80
+0.5
covered 11didn’t cover 13avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
RID
W 81-53
−5.5
10
vs
ME
W 72-60
+1.5
14
vs
LEH
W 84-72
+19.5
18
vs
AMER
W 80-71
+7.5
21
vs
CCSU
L 54-67
−16.5
24
vs
TENN
L 60-85
+3.5
25
vs
ND
L 63-68
−9.5
27
vs
UNLV
W 80-65
−8.5
2
vs
PUR
L 65-81
−0.5
6
@
MICH
L 60-101
+7.5
13
@
HALL
L 59-81
+3.5
20
vs
PENN
W 70-69
−11.5
29
vs
DSU
W 65-50
−20.5
2
vs
OSU
L 73-80
+1.5
5
vs
ORE
W 88-85
+33.5
8
@
ILL
L 55-81
−13.5
11
vs
NU
W 77-75
+7.5
17
@
WIS
L 87-96
+33.5
20
@
IOWA
L 62-68
−10.5
23
vs
IU
L 59-82
−6.5
27
vs
MSU
L 79-88
+28.5
31
@
USC
L 75-78
+6.5
3
@
UCLA
L 66-98
+21.5
7
vs
NEB
L 68-80
+2.5
over 14under 10avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Maryland
10-14 overall · 3-10 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Iowa77–70
- W@ Minnesota67–62
- Lvs Ohio State62–82
- Lvs Purdue63–93
- L@ Michigan St48–91
4 days since their last game.
Rutgers
9-15 overall · 2-11 in conference · Big Ten Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Nebraska68–80
- L@ UCLA66–98
- L@ USC75–78
- Lvs Michigan St79–88
- Lvs Indiana59–82
A week or more of rest.