Holmes Convocation Center · at App State
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | APP | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNT 71–64 · win probability UNT 72%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 134.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: APP has more of the edges
UNT 2, APP 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
APP offense vs UNT defense
Offense 328th of 366 against a defense 66th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UNT has played the 121st-hardest schedule, APP the 252nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNT 39.6, APP 39.1. Allowed: UNT 45.1, APP 31.2
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNT 16.8%, APP 15.3%. Forced: UNT 21.3%, APP 14.0%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNT 33.5%, APP 32.0%. Defensive: UNT 67.6%, APP 71.0%
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNT 46.0 and allows 48.5; APP 49.9 and allows 47.5
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: UNT plays 67.6 a game (245th fastest), APP 64.3 (358th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
APP at home. This season: APP 0-0 at home, UNT 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNT 45%, APP 25%. Transfers in: UNT 3, APP 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
UNT offense vs APP defense
Offense 165th of 366 against a defense 148th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
UNT hits 28.7% and allows 30.9%; APP hits 30.4% and allows 32.2%. Threes are 32.4% and 45.9% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNT -6.8 | — |
| Total | — | 134.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNT 70.6 · APP 63.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNT -4.2 | — |
| 1H total | 62.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNT 33.5 · APP 29.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNT 1–0 APPUNT leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UNT 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2024-25 | APP 64 @ UNT 68 | UNT -11.5 | APP W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
North Texas
31 games played
Straight up
17-14
55% wins
Against the spread
17-14
55% covers · avg −0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | vs | W 80-53 | -11.5 | W +15.5 | 137.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 64-62 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 64-66 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 49-80 | +14.5 | L −16.5 | 128.5 | O 129 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 74-56 | -16.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 79-71 | -12.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 72-69 | -16.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 77-75 | -11.5 | L −9.5 | 127.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 55-65 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | U 120 |
| Dec 14 | @ | W 58-57 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 60-63 | +12.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 48-57 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | U 105 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 72-67 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 70-74 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 11 | @ | L 67-78 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 71-63 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 81-62 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 59-63 | -10.5 | L −14.5 | 134.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 66-82 | +8.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-72 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 83-86 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 134.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 81-58 | -10.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 76-69 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 65-62 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 71-77 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 73-72 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 79-80 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 62-58 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 62-58 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 74-70 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 84-90 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 174 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
vs
NWST
W 80-53
+15.5
9
vs
LUC
W 64-62
+3.5
12
@
ORST
L 64-66
+1.5
14
@
SMC
L 49-80
−16.5
20
vs
CARK
W 74-56
+1.5
25
vs
EWU
W 79-71
−4.5
30
vs
PV
W 72-69
−13.5
2
vs
HCU
W 77-75
−9.5
7
vs
TCU
L 55-65
−0.5
14
@
USA
W 58-57
+2.5
17
vs
SCU
L 60-63
+9.5
31
@
MEM
L 48-57
+0.5
4
vs
TLSA
W 72-67
+7.5
7
vs
USF
L 70-74
+0.5
11
@
WICH
L 67-78
−2.5
18
@
TULN
W 71-63
+9.5
21
vs
UTSA
W 81-62
+3.5
23
vs
ECU
L 59-63
−14.5
28
@
TLSA
L 66-82
−7.5
31
vs
UAB
L 68-72
−5.5
4
@
RICE
L 83-86
−4.5
7
@
UTSA
W 81-58
+12.5
12
vs
MEM
W 76-69
+9.5
15
@
TEM
W 65-62
+5.5
19
vs
TULN
L 71-77
−12.5
22
vs
FAU
W 73-72
−1.5
25
@
CLT
L 79-80
−3.5
1
@
UAB
W 62-58
+8.5
4
vs
RICE
W 62-58
−2.5
12
vs
FAU
W 74-70
+2.5
13
vs
TLSA
L 84-90
+1.5
covered 17didn’t cover 14avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
vs
NWST
W 80-53
−4.5
9
vs
LUC
W 64-62
−12.5
12
@
ORST
L 64-66
−4.5
14
@
SMC
L 49-80
+0.5
20
vs
CARK
W 74-56
−4.5
25
vs
EWU
W 79-71
+8.5
30
vs
PV
W 72-69
−0.5
2
vs
HCU
W 77-75
+24.5
7
vs
TCU
L 55-65
−15.5
14
@
USA
W 58-57
−20.5
17
vs
SCU
L 60-63
−16.5
31
@
MEM
L 48-57
−32.5
4
vs
TLSA
W 72-67
+0.5
7
vs
USF
L 70-74
−3.5
11
@
WICH
L 67-78
+9.5
18
@
TULN
W 71-63
−3.5
21
vs
UTSA
W 81-62
+4.5
23
vs
ECU
L 59-63
−12.5
28
@
TLSA
L 66-82
+6.5
31
vs
UAB
L 68-72
−1.5
4
@
RICE
L 83-86
+34.5
7
@
UTSA
W 81-58
−2.5
12
vs
MEM
W 76-69
+6.5
15
@
TEM
W 65-62
−8.5
19
vs
TULN
L 71-77
+10.5
22
vs
FAU
W 73-72
+4.5
25
@
CLT
L 79-80
+25.5
1
@
UAB
W 62-58
−22.5
4
vs
RICE
W 62-58
−17.5
12
vs
FAU
W 74-70
+7.5
13
vs
TLSA
L 84-90
+32.5
over 14under 17avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
App State
30 games played
Straight up
17-13
57% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-18
40% overs · avg −1.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 66-82 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | O 148 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 76-54 | -10.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 53-75 | +23.5 | W +1.5 | 147.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 85-77 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 65-63 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 132.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 53-88 | -5.5 | L −40.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 67-75 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 55-67 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 11 | @ | W 67-54 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 130.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 86-78 | +12.5 | W +20.5 | 144.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 67-49 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 137.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 63-70 | -7.5 | L −14.5 | 137.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 81-73 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 81-88 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 52-50 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 102 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 62-67 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 133.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 80-65 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 133.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 73-75 | -7.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 72-58 | -9.5 | W +4.5 | 124.5 | O 130 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 59-43 | -16.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 102 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 70-63 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 66-44 | +7.5 | W +29.5 | 137.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 65-57 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 131.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 65-60 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 131.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 81-65 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 58-69 | -1.5 | L −12.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 93-94 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 187 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 89-74 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 57-60 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | U 117 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 73-86 | -4.5 | L −17.5 | 137.5 | O 159 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CMU
L 66-82
−14.5
9
vs
NCCU
W 76-54
+11.5
11
@
OSU
L 53-75
+1.5
16
@
DART
W 85-77
+6.5
21
vs
CLT
W 65-63
+0.5
24
vs
ELON
L 53-88
−40.5
26
@
MER
L 67-75
−1.5
30
vs
UNCA
L 55-67
−10.5
11
@
ECU
W 67-54
+17.5
14
vs
HPU
W 86-78
+20.5
18
vs
CCU
W 67-49
+13.5
20
vs
GAST
L 63-70
−14.5
31
@
ODU
W 81-73
+9.5
3
@
MRSH
L 81-88
+0.5
8
@
GAST
W 52-50
+0.5
10
@
CCU
L 62-67
−6.5
15
vs
JMU
W 80-65
+12.5
17
vs
ODU
L 73-75
−9.5
22
vs
UL
W 72-58
+4.5
23
vs
ULM
W 59-43
−0.5
29
@
USM
W 70-63
+5.5
31
@
TROY
W 66-44
+29.5
4
vs
USA
W 65-57
+2.5
7
vs
EMU
W 65-60
−2.5
11
@
GASO
W 81-65
+14.5
14
@
JMU
L 58-69
−12.5
19
vs
MRSH
L 93-94
−4.5
21
vs
GASO
W 89-74
+7.5
27
@
TXST
L 57-60
−4.5
7
vs
USM
L 73-86
−17.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CMU
L 66-82
+5.5
9
vs
NCCU
W 76-54
−6.5
11
@
OSU
L 53-75
−19.5
16
@
DART
W 85-77
+21.5
21
vs
CLT
W 65-63
−4.5
24
vs
ELON
L 53-88
−2.5
26
@
MER
L 67-75
−0.5
30
vs
UNCA
L 55-67
−15.5
11
@
ECU
W 67-54
−9.5
14
vs
HPU
W 86-78
+19.5
18
vs
CCU
W 67-49
−21.5
20
vs
GAST
L 63-70
−4.5
31
@
ODU
W 81-73
+17.5
3
@
MRSH
L 81-88
+27.5
8
@
GAST
W 52-50
−38.5
10
@
CCU
L 62-67
−4.5
15
vs
JMU
W 80-65
+11.5
17
vs
ODU
L 73-75
+7.5
22
vs
UL
W 72-58
+5.5
23
vs
ULM
W 59-43
−42.5
29
@
USM
W 70-63
−1.5
31
@
TROY
W 66-44
−27.5
4
vs
USA
W 65-57
−9.5
7
vs
EMU
W 65-60
−6.5
11
@
GASO
W 81-65
+2.5
14
@
JMU
L 58-69
−7.5
19
vs
MRSH
L 93-94
+43.5
21
vs
GASO
W 89-74
+15.5
27
@
TXST
L 57-60
−18.5
7
vs
USM
L 73-86
+21.5
over 12under 18avg −1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
North Texas has the better starters
Position by position: North Texas 4, App State 0, even 1
North TexasBetterApp State
G J. Stevenson17.4 pts · 3.5 reb · 2 ast
Score 94
←UNTBig
G H. Koffi TR12.6 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 30
G C. Chavis TR10.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 53
←UNTBig
G E. Banks6.5 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 15
G C. Franklin6.1 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 47
←UNTSmall
F C. Moodie2.2 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.1 ast
Score 15
G A. Amkou TR5.5 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 74
←UNTBig
F A. Njock2.3 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 37
F R. Robinson7.9 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 65
=No call
C R. Elezaj TR0 pts · 0.8 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
North TexasBetterApp State
UNT offense165th of 366 · -5.0
=Even
APP defense148th of 366 · -3.2
UNT defense66th of 366 · +1.0
←UNTBig
APP offense328th of 366 · -10.6
Backcourt+2.8 · 4 players
←UNTBig
Backcourt-5.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt+0.5 · 1 player
←UNTSmall
Frontcourt-1.5 · 3 players
Bench-0.7 · 2 players
=Even
Bench+0.0 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestUNT betterAPP betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Stevenson33 minC. Chavis27 min · TRC. Franklin25 minA. Amkou12 min · TRE. Horton9 minB. BarnesNew
Forwards
R. Robinson23 minM. Holmes6 min · TRO. NdourNewT. CrumbleNewF. KalajzicNew
Guards
H. Koffi36 min · TRE. Banks26 minC. O'Kelley1 minL. LedfordNewB. KopetzkiNewJ. ColonNew
Forwards
C. Moodie12 minA. Njock11 minD. LytchNewG. ClaytonNewT. NealNew
Centers
R. Elezaj1 min · TRB. ChretienNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.1 #298 | Points per game | 69.3 #295 |
| 1.02 #302 | Points per possession | 1.08 #187 |
| 67.6 #245 | Pace (possessions) | 64.3 #358 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.0 #349 | Effective FG% | 49.9 #240 |
| 28.7 #358 | 3-point % | 30.4 #335 |
| 32.4 #325 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #48 |
| 39.6 #63 | Free throw rate | 39.1 #77 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #182 | Turnover rate | 15.3 #87 |
| 33.5 #76 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.0 #123 |
| 12.1 #282 | Assists per game | 11.4 #318 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.2 #35 | Points allowed | 67.4 #25 |
| 1.01 #33 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #87 |
| 48.5 #47 | Opponent effective FG% | 47.5 #33 |
| 30.9 #32 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.2 #71 |
| 21.3 #6 | Turnovers forced | 14.0 #336 |
| 67.6 #278 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.0 #106 |
| 8.9 #11 | Steals per game | 4.6 #351 |
| 4.3 #51 | Blocks per game | 3.4 #155 |
North Texas
17-14 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tulsa84–90
- Wvs FAU74–70
- Wvs Rice62–58
- W@ UAB62–58
- L@ Charlotte79–80
A week or more of rest.
App State
17-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern Miss73–86
- L@ Texas St57–60
- Wvs GA Southern89–74
- Lvs Marshall93–94
- L@ James Madison58–69
A week or more of rest.