Jadwin Gymnasium · at Princeton
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | PRIN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects PRIN 73–68 · win probability PRIN 68%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 140.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: PRIN has more of the edges
STBK 2, PRIN 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
STBK offense vs PRIN defense
Offense 235th of 366 against a defense 115th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: STBK 16.7%, PRIN 17.1%. Forced: STBK 17.2%, PRIN 14.2%
Three-pointers
STBK hits 34.8% and allows 35.7%; PRIN hits 33.9% and allows 31.1%. Threes are 45.8% and 44.5% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: STBK 48%, PRIN 100%. Transfers in: STBK 5, PRIN 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Free throws
Free throw rate: STBK 28.4, PRIN 34.6. Allowed: STBK 35.4, PRIN 34.0
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: STBK 28.0%, PRIN 27.2%. Defensive: STBK 67.7%, PRIN 71.5%
Context
Schedule so far
STBK has played the 204th-hardest schedule, PRIN the 137th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: STBK 50.2 and allows 50.7; PRIN 49.6 and allows 52.0
Home court
PRIN at home. This season: PRIN 0-0 at home, STBK 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: STBK plays 67.3 a game (269th fastest), PRIN 65.0 (344th). Faster games mean more points
Even
PRIN offense vs STBK defense
Offense 177th of 366 against a defense 164th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | PRIN -5.3 | — |
| Total | — | 140.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | STBK 67.5 · PRIN 72.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PRIN -3.0 | — |
| 1H total | 65.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | STBK 31.3 · PRIN 34.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Stony Brook
30 games played
Straight up
15-15
50% wins
Against the spread
18-12
60% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 71-60 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 131.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 79-86 | +20.5 | W +13.5 | 150.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 80-70 | -3.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 58-86 | +4.5 | L −23.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 61-54 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 28 | @ | W 71-68 | +10.5 | W +13.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 75-84 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 77-73 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 78-55 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 55-71 | -10.5 | L −26.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 51-70 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 137.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 59-62 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 57-76 | +11.5 | L −7.5 | 159.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 81-80 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 37-56 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 132.5 | U 93 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 71-75 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 133.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 76-71 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 136.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 112-106 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | O 218 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 95-80 | +3.5 | W +18.5 | 148.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 81-69 | +4.5 | W +16.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 72-68 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 75-76 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 69-55 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 57-69 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 135.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 72-69 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 79-72 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 69-82 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 58-67 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 57-69 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 89-96 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | O 185 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
ME
W 71-60
+7.5
15
@
YALE
L 79-86
+13.5
20
vs
BRWN
W 80-70
+6.5
24
vs
PAC
L 58-86
−23.5
25
vs
BCU
W 61-54
+11.5
28
@
LMU
W 71-68
+13.5
6
@
DUQ
L 75-84
+0.5
9
vs
COLU
W 77-73
+8.5
13
vs
CMU
W 78-55
+15.5
17
vs
UALB
L 55-71
−26.5
21
@
MRST
L 51-70
−12.5
29
@
HAMP
L 59-62
−0.5
31
@
W&M
L 57-76
−7.5
3
vs
NCAT
W 81-80
−3.5
8
@
DREX
L 37-56
−13.5
10
vs
UNCW
L 71-75
+2.5
15
vs
HOF
W 76-71
+11.5
17
vs
COFC
W 112-106
+10.5
22
@
NE
W 95-80
+18.5
29
@
CAM
W 81-69
+16.5
31
@
ELON
W 72-68
+8.5
5
vs
MONM
L 75-76
−2.5
7
vs
NE
W 69-55
+10.5
12
@
TOW
L 57-69
−4.5
16
vs
DREX
W 72-69
+0.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 79-72
+1.5
26
@
MONM
L 69-82
−9.5
28
@
HOF
L 58-67
+2.5
3
vs
TOW
L 57-69
−10.5
7
vs
CAM
L 89-96
−4.5
covered 18didn’t cover 12avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
ME
W 71-60
−0.5
15
@
YALE
L 79-86
+14.5
20
vs
BRWN
W 80-70
+13.5
24
vs
PAC
L 58-86
−1.5
25
vs
BCU
W 61-54
−30.5
28
@
LMU
W 71-68
+0.5
6
@
DUQ
L 75-84
+8.5
9
vs
COLU
W 77-73
+3.5
13
vs
CMU
W 78-55
−12.5
17
vs
UALB
L 55-71
−20.5
21
@
MRST
L 51-70
−16.5
29
@
HAMP
L 59-62
−19.5
31
@
W&M
L 57-76
−26.5
3
vs
NCAT
W 81-80
+19.5
8
@
DREX
L 37-56
−39.5
10
vs
UNCW
L 71-75
+12.5
15
vs
HOF
W 76-71
+10.5
17
vs
COFC
W 112-106
+75.5
22
@
NE
W 95-80
+26.5
29
@
CAM
W 81-69
−2.5
31
@
ELON
W 72-68
−8.5
5
vs
MONM
L 75-76
+13.5
7
vs
NE
W 69-55
−29.5
12
@
TOW
L 57-69
−9.5
16
vs
DREX
W 72-69
+5.5
21
vs
HAMP
W 79-72
+15.5
26
@
MONM
L 69-82
+5.5
28
@
HOF
L 58-67
−15.5
3
vs
TOW
L 57-69
−11.5
7
vs
CAM
L 89-96
+36.5
over 15under 15avg +0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Princeton
28 games played
Straight up
8-20
29% wins
Against the spread
16-12
57% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-15
46% overs · avg −2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 69-104 | +13.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 73-63 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 57-76 | +22.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 69-89 | +2.5 | L −17.5 | 154.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 70-57 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 64-88 | +9.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 75-79 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 74-79 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 58-60 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 58-63 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 68-73 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 56-59 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 61-65 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 30 | vs | W 75-69 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 5 | vs | W 78-76 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 76-60 | +7.5 | W +23.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-87 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 69-71 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 63-53 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 134.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 64-87 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 80-68 | +5.5 | W +17.5 | 139.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 60-61 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 65-89 | +3.5 | L −20.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 65-75 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 137.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 71-80 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 129.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 56-58 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 130.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 82-61 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 142.5 | O 143 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 53-78 | +14.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
AKR
L 69-104
−21.5
11
vs
BUCK
W 73-63
+5.5
15
@
KU
L 57-76
+3.5
18
@
IONA
L 69-89
−17.5
20
vs
NE
W 70-57
+10.5
24
vs
BRAD
L 64-88
−14.5
25
vs
TEM
L 75-79
+4.5
26
vs
UVM
L 74-79
+0.5
30
vs
JOES
L 58-60
+3.5
3
@
MONM
L 58-63
+0.5
6
@
LUC
L 68-73
+1.5
10
vs
MRMK
L 56-59
−5.5
22
@
TEM
L 61-65
+4.5
30
vs
UVM
W 75-69
+9.5
5
vs
PENN
W 78-76
−1.5
10
vs
YALE
W 76-60
+23.5
17
@
HARV
L 80-87
−2.5
19
@
DART
L 69-71
−3.5
24
vs
BRWN
W 63-53
+5.5
30
@
COR
L 64-87
−15.5
31
@
COLU
W 80-68
+17.5
7
@
PENN
L 60-61
+2.5
13
vs
COR
L 65-89
−20.5
14
vs
COLU
L 65-75
−8.5
20
@
BRWN
L 71-80
−6.5
27
vs
HARV
L 56-58
+1.5
28
vs
DART
W 82-61
+19.5
7
@
YALE
L 53-78
−10.5
covered 16didn’t cover 12avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
AKR
L 69-104
+16.5
11
vs
BUCK
W 73-63
−10.5
15
@
KU
L 57-76
−11.5
18
@
IONA
L 69-89
+3.5
20
vs
NE
W 70-57
−18.5
24
vs
BRAD
L 64-88
+10.5
25
vs
TEM
L 75-79
+8.5
26
vs
UVM
L 74-79
+12.5
30
vs
JOES
L 58-60
−28.5
3
@
MONM
L 58-63
−18.5
6
@
LUC
L 68-73
+4.5
10
vs
MRMK
L 56-59
−19.5
22
@
TEM
L 61-65
−13.5
30
vs
UVM
W 75-69
+7.5
5
vs
PENN
W 78-76
+8.5
10
vs
YALE
W 76-60
−6.5
17
@
HARV
L 80-87
+33.5
19
@
DART
L 69-71
−7.5
24
vs
BRWN
W 63-53
−18.5
30
@
COR
L 64-87
−7.5
31
@
COLU
W 80-68
+8.5
7
@
PENN
L 60-61
−23.5
13
vs
COR
L 65-89
−1.5
14
vs
COLU
L 65-75
+2.5
20
@
BRWN
L 71-80
+21.5
27
vs
HARV
L 56-58
−16.5
28
vs
DART
W 82-61
+0.5
7
@
YALE
L 53-78
−6.5
over 13under 15avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Princeton has the better starters
Position by position: Stony Brook 1, Princeton 3, even 1
Stony BrookBetterPrinceton
G C. O'Connor8.3 pts · 2.3 reb · 1.8 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Hicke15.8 pts · 5.2 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 85
G E. Simmon6 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 46
→PRINSmall
G J. Stanton11.1 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 64
F B. Ndjonga TR13.8 pts · 5.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 45
←STBKSmall
G L. Clark6.2 pts · 4 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 29
F T. Valentiny4.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 18
→PRINBig
G D. Davis14.8 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 69
F Q. Gorman3.9 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 25
→PRINSmall
F M. Abdullahi9.5 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 54
Stony BrookBetterPrinceton
STBK offense235th of 366 · -7.2
→PRINSmall
PRIN defense115th of 366 · -1.5
STBK defense164th of 366 · -3.7
=Even
PRIN offense177th of 366 · -5.5
Backcourt-1.0 · 2 players
→PRINSmall
Backcourt+0.9 · 4 players
Frontcourt-3.4 · 3 players
→PRINBig
Frontcourt-0.1 · 1 player
Bench-0.4 · 5 players
←STBKBig
Bench-4.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestSTBK betterPRIN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. O'Connor27 minE. Simmon17 minJ. Butler13 minM. Ugusuk11 min · TRK. Price7 min · TRL. Dagostino2 min
Forwards
B. Ndjonga33 min · TRT. Valentiny19 minQ. Gorman19 minJ. Daughtry16 min · TRE. Vatan3 min · TR
Centers
L. Van ElswykNew
Guards
J. Hicke35 minJ. Stanton32 minL. Clark29 minD. Davis28 minS. Whitfield12 minP. Seals8 min
Forwards
M. Abdullahi29 minJ. Huggins22 minC. Happy19 minJ. Hammond7 minC. McSweeney5 minW. Kutzler1 min
Centers
W. HiggsNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.7 #270 | Points per game | 67.5 #324 |
| 1.05 #254 | Points per possession | 1.04 #268 |
| 67.3 #269 | Pace (possessions) | 65.0 #344 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.2 #227 | Effective FG% | 49.6 #260 |
| 34.8 #128 | 3-point % | 33.9 #177 |
| 45.8 #50 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.5 #78 |
| 28.4 #339 | Free throw rate | 34.6 #192 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.7 #181 | Turnover rate | 17.1 #216 |
| 28.0 #267 | Offensive rebound rate | 27.2 #287 |
| 12.9 #216 | Assists per game | 12.5 #254 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.5 #118 | Points allowed | 72.4 #114 |
| 1.08 #168 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #242 |
| 50.7 #138 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #209 |
| 35.7 #291 | Opponent 3-point % | 31.1 #36 |
| 17.2 #135 | Turnovers forced | 14.2 #328 |
| 67.7 #275 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.5 #82 |
| 6.3 #201 | Steals per game | 4.6 #349 |
| 3.6 #122 | Blocks per game | 2.1 #341 |
Stony Brook
15-15 in 2025-26 overall · 9-10 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Campbell89–96
- Lvs Towson57–69
- L@ Hofstra58–67
- L@ Monmouth69–82
- Wvs Hampton79–72
A week or more of rest.
Princeton
8-20 in 2025-26 overall · 5-9 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Yale53–78
- Wvs Dartmouth82–61
- Lvs Harvard56–58
- L@ Brown71–80
- Lvs Columbia65–75
A week or more of rest.