John Glaser Arena · at La Salle
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LAS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects LAS 75–71 · win probability LAS 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 145.2
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: PENN has more of the edges
PENN 4, LAS 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
PENN hits 38.3% and allows 32.2%; LAS hits 30.0% and allows 36.5%. Threes are 35.4% and 31.5% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: PENN 50.4 and allows 52.1; LAS 45.4 and allows 55.0
Turnovers
Turnover rate: PENN 15.4%, LAS 18.2%. Forced: PENN 17.3%, LAS 17.2%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: PENN plays 69.3 a game (158th fastest), LAS 66.4 (300th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
LAS at home. This season: LAS 0-0 at home, PENN 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: PENN 83%, LAS 56%. Transfers in: PENN 1, LAS 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: PENN 30.0%, LAS 33.7%. Defensive: PENN 68.7%, LAS 67.7%
Context
Schedule so far
PENN has played the 125th-hardest schedule, LAS the 92nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
PENN offense vs LAS defense
Offense 138th of 366 against a defense 111th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: PENN 33.9, LAS 37.5. Allowed: PENN 27.5, LAS 31.5
Even
LAS offense vs PENN defense
Offense 157th of 366 against a defense 143rd, on the model’s ratings
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelLAS -3.7
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model145.2
Model edge—
Projected score
PENN 70.7 · LAS 74.5
Win probability
LAS 63%
1st half
Spread
LAS -2.1
Total
67.9
Projected score
PENN 32.9 · LAS 35
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 2-8 20% | |
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
PENN 1–3 LASLAS leads · 4 games since 2021-22 · PENN 1-2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2025-26 | LAS 71 @ PENN 73 | PENN -1.5 | PENN W |
| Dec 2, 2023-24 | PENN 92 vs LAS 93 | LAS +1.5 | LAS W |
| Dec 3, 2022-23 | LAS 84 @ PENN 81 | PENN -4.5 | LAS W |
| Dec 11, 2021-22 | PENN 74 @ LAS 76 | LAS -2 | P |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Penn
29 games played
Straight up
17-12
59% wins
Against the spread
20-9
69% covers · avg +3.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
8-21
28% overs · avg −3.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | @ | L 78-84 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 81-106 | +19.5 | L −5.5 | 172.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 83-74 | +5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 84-68 | +4.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 77-65 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 73-71 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 60-77 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-90 | +18.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 74-72 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 69-70 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 79-83 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 80-61 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 76-78 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 81-73 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 84-74 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 63-64 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 60-77 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 67-72 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 91-81 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 173.5 | U 172 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 61-60 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 76-67 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-76 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 169.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 70-74 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-71 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 64-61 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 6 | @ | W 82-61 | +1.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 62-60 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 139.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 15 | vs | W 88-84 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 144.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 70-105 | +25.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 175 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
@
AMER
L 78-84
−7.5
11
@
PROV
L 81-106
−5.5
17
vs
JOES
W 83-74
+14.5
21
@
DREX
W 84-68
+20.5
28
vs
MRMK
W 77-65
+9.5
29
vs
LAS
W 73-71
+0.5
30
vs
HOF
L 60-77
−15.5
6
@
VILL
L 63-90
−8.5
8
vs
LAF
W 74-72
−5.5
20
@
RUTG
L 69-70
+10.5
28
@
GMU
L 79-83
+12.5
31
vs
NJIT
W 80-61
+4.5
5
@
PRIN
L 76-78
+1.5
10
vs
BRWN
W 81-73
+2.5
17
@
DART
W 84-74
+12.5
19
@
HARV
L 63-64
+4.5
24
vs
YALE
L 60-77
−10.5
30
@
COLU
L 67-72
−0.5
31
@
COR
W 91-81
+17.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 61-60
−2.5
13
vs
COLU
W 76-67
+7.5
14
vs
COR
W 82-76
+8.5
21
@
YALE
L 70-74
+5.5
27
vs
DART
W 80-71
+2.5
28
vs
HARV
W 64-61
+1.5
6
@
BRWN
W 82-61
+22.5
14
vs
HARV
W 62-60
+5.5
15
vs
YALE
W 88-84
+13.5
19
vs
ILL
L 70-105
−9.5
covered 20didn’t cover 9avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
@
AMER
L 78-84
+7.5
11
@
PROV
L 81-106
+14.5
17
vs
JOES
W 83-74
−6.5
21
@
DREX
W 84-68
−0.5
28
vs
MRMK
W 77-65
−10.5
29
vs
LAS
W 73-71
−5.5
30
vs
HOF
L 60-77
−12.5
6
@
VILL
L 63-90
+2.5
8
vs
LAF
W 74-72
−4.5
20
@
RUTG
L 69-70
−11.5
28
@
GMU
L 79-83
+15.5
31
vs
NJIT
W 80-61
−10.5
5
@
PRIN
L 76-78
+8.5
10
vs
BRWN
W 81-73
+8.5
17
@
DART
W 84-74
−5.5
19
@
HARV
L 63-64
−23.5
24
vs
YALE
L 60-77
−20.5
30
@
COLU
L 67-72
−14.5
31
@
COR
W 91-81
−1.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 61-60
−23.5
13
vs
COLU
W 76-67
−5.5
14
vs
COR
W 82-76
−11.5
21
@
YALE
L 70-74
−6.5
27
vs
DART
W 80-71
−3.5
28
vs
HARV
W 64-61
−13.5
6
@
BRWN
W 82-61
−3.5
14
vs
HARV
W 62-60
−17.5
15
vs
YALE
W 88-84
+27.5
19
vs
ILL
L 70-105
+24.5
over 8under 21avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
La Salle
31 games played
Straight up
8-23
26% wins
Against the spread
14-17
45% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-17
45% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 87-59 | -17.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 73-60 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 63-90 | +6.5 | L −20.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 69-83 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 19 | vs | L 55-70 | +12.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 58-63 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 121 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 71-73 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 60-66 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 132.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 69-64 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 129.5 | O 133 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 60-70 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 72-84 | +13.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 50-102 | +40.5 | L −11.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 75-80 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 134.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 55-77 | +16.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 79-72 | +11.5 | W +18.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 72-84 | +17.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 53-74 | +8.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 78-74 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 67-64 | +9.5 | W +12.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 58-64 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 58-67 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 61-71 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 58-82 | +22.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 68-77 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 61-62 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 59-46 | +3.5 | W +16.5 | 135.5 | U 105 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 77-104 | +8.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | O 181 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 64-71 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 87-84 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 131.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-88 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 80-99 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
COPP
W 87-59
+10.5
8
vs
MONM
W 73-60
+8.5
11
@
TEM
L 63-90
−20.5
15
vs
PSU
L 69-83
−5.5
19
vs
VILL
L 55-70
−2.5
28
vs
HOF
L 58-63
−1.5
29
@
PENN
L 71-73
−0.5
30
vs
MRMK
L 60-66
−8.5
6
vs
DREX
W 69-64
+6.5
13
@
LIU
L 60-70
−7.5
19
@
HPU
L 72-84
+1.5
21
@
MICH
L 50-102
−11.5
31
vs
GMU
L 75-80
+3.5
3
@
GW
L 55-77
−5.5
7
@
URI
W 79-72
+18.5
10
vs
SLU
L 72-84
+5.5
14
@
RICH
L 53-74
−12.5
17
vs
SBU
W 78-74
+9.5
21
vs
DAY
W 67-64
+12.5
28
@
FOR
L 58-64
−0.5
31
vs
JOES
L 58-67
−6.5
3
@
LUC
L 61-71
−7.5
7
@
SLU
L 58-82
−1.5
11
vs
VCU
L 68-77
+3.5
18
@
DUQ
L 61-62
+10.5
21
vs
URI
W 59-46
+16.5
24
vs
GW
L 77-104
−18.5
1
@
DAV
L 64-71
+3.5
4
vs
FOR
W 87-84
+6.5
7
@
JOES
L 76-88
−0.5
11
vs
SBU
L 80-99
−11.5
covered 14didn’t cover 17avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
COPP
W 87-59
+6.5
8
vs
MONM
W 73-60
−10.5
11
@
TEM
L 63-90
+4.5
15
vs
PSU
L 69-83
+6.5
19
vs
VILL
L 55-70
−19.5
28
vs
HOF
L 58-63
−17.5
29
@
PENN
L 71-73
−5.5
30
vs
MRMK
L 60-66
−6.5
6
vs
DREX
W 69-64
+3.5
13
@
LIU
L 60-70
−13.5
19
@
HPU
L 72-84
+6.5
21
@
MICH
L 50-102
−3.5
31
vs
GMU
L 75-80
+20.5
3
@
GW
L 55-77
−18.5
7
@
URI
W 79-72
+15.5
10
vs
SLU
L 72-84
+3.5
14
@
RICH
L 53-74
−20.5
17
vs
SBU
W 78-74
+10.5
21
vs
DAY
W 67-64
−6.5
28
@
FOR
L 58-64
−14.5
31
vs
JOES
L 58-67
−17.5
3
@
LUC
L 61-71
−8.5
7
@
SLU
L 58-82
−13.5
11
vs
VCU
L 68-77
−2.5
18
@
DUQ
L 61-62
−22.5
21
vs
URI
W 59-46
−30.5
24
vs
GW
L 77-104
+34.5
1
@
DAV
L 64-71
+1.5
4
vs
FOR
W 87-84
+39.5
7
@
JOES
L 76-88
+21.5
11
vs
SBU
L 80-99
+32.5
over 14under 17avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Penn 1, La Salle 1, even 3
PennBetterLa Salle
G M. Zanoni12.1 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 48
←PENNSmall
G J. Johnson6.3 pts · 2.4 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 29
G A. Levine8.5 pts · 3.2 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 61
→LASSmall
G R. Dockery12.5 pts · 6.2 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 91
F T. Power16.8 pts · 7.6 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 81
=Even
F J. Brewer11.3 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 75
F A. Gerhart5.2 pts · 4.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 36
=Even
F V. Zanki TR8.1 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 46
F L. Lueth3.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 8
=Even
F A. Finkley TR5.4 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 19
PennBetterLa Salle
PENN offense138th of 366 · -4.1
=Even
LAS defense111th of 366 · -1.3
PENN defense143rd of 366 · -3.1
=Even
LAS offense157th of 366 · -4.7
Backcourt-0.8 · 2 players
→LASSmall
Backcourt+0.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt-0.4 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.6 · 3 players
Bench-1.5 · 5 players
←PENNSmall
Bench-3.6 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestPENN betterLAS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Zanoni29 minA. Levine25 minS. Mohammed16 min · TRJ. Jones14 minN. Polonowski6 minP. Kamin3 min
Forwards
T. Power36 minA. Gerhart20 minL. Lueth17 minD. Scantlebury15 minW. Kruse3 minF. BillyNew
Centers
M. PereiraNew
Guards
J. Johnson30 minR. Dockery27 minK. Burton19 min · TRD. Booker8 min · TRA. Masharaliyev1 minT. MossNew
Forwards
J. Brewer27 minV. Zanki21 min · TRA. Finkley19 min · TRN. Collier14 minE. Rink12 min · TRB. Beatty10 min
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.4 #181 | Points per game | 66.8 #336 |
| 1.08 #196 | Points per possession | 1.00 #322 |
| 69.3 #158 | Pace (possessions) | 66.4 #300 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.4 #223 | Effective FG% | 45.4 #357 |
| 38.3 #13 | 3-point % | 30.0 #342 |
| 35.4 #264 | 3-point attempt rate | 31.5 #333 |
| 33.9 #212 | Free throw rate | 37.5 #113 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #93 | Turnover rate | 18.2 #281 |
| 30.0 #200 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.7 #75 |
| 13.7 #171 | Assists per game | 12.9 #221 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.5 #173 | Points allowed | 75.0 #186 |
| 1.07 #137 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #293 |
| 52.1 #218 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.0 #329 |
| 32.2 #73 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.5 #324 |
| 17.3 #132 | Turnovers forced | 17.2 #136 |
| 68.7 #220 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.7 #274 |
| 6.5 #184 | Steals per game | 6.7 #155 |
| 3.1 #199 | Blocks per game | 2.6 #295 |
Penn
17-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-5 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Illinois70–105
- Wvs Yale88–84
- Wvs Harvard62–60
- W@ Brown82–61
- Wvs Harvard64–61
A week or more of rest.
La Salle
8-23 in 2025-26 overall · 5-14 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St Bonaventure80–99
- L@ Saint Joseph's76–88
- Wvs Fordham87–84
- L@ Davidson64–71
- Lvs G Washington77–104
A week or more of rest.