Bob Carpenter Center · at Delaware
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | DEL | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects DEL 72–72 · win probability DEL 52%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: JMU has more of the edges
JMU 4, DEL 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: JMU 30.6%, DEL 20.8%. Defensive: JMU 70.5%, DEL 68.9%
DEL offense vs JMU defense
Offense 237th of 366 against a defense 154th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
JMU has played the 257th-hardest schedule, DEL the 195th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: JMU 53.1 and allows 49.0; DEL 53.3 and allows 51.5
Free throws
Free throw rate: JMU 35.9, DEL 30.6. Allowed: JMU 40.8, DEL 30.2
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: JMU 17%, DEL 46%. Transfers in: JMU 8, DEL 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
DEL at home. This season: DEL 0-0 at home, JMU 0-0 away
Three-pointers
JMU hits 35.4% and allows 32.7%; DEL hits 36.8% and allows 35.1%. Threes are 42.5% and 46.2% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: JMU plays 67.5 a game (253rd fastest), DEL 65.3 (337th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: JMU 17.3%, DEL 18.3%. Forced: JMU 12.8%, DEL 14.0%
Even
JMU offense vs DEL defense
Offense 181st of 366 against a defense 187th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | DEL -0.6 | — |
| Total | — | 144.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | JMU 71.7 · DEL 72.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | DEL -0.2 | — |
| 1H total | 67.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | JMU 33.6 · DEL 33.8 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
JMU 0–2 DELDEL leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · DEL has won the last 2 meetings · JMU 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2021-22 | JMU 60 @ DEL 81 | DEL -5.5 | DEL W |
| Jan 29, 2021-22 | DEL 85 @ JMU 69 | JMU -3 | DEL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
James Madison
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
13-19
41% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +3.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 71-85 | +8.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 84-70 | -18.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 79-88 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 81-75 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 80-72 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 88-77 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 66-82 | +12.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 67-62 | -14.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 68-67 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 138.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 68-77 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 92-96 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 74-103 | +23.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 78-74 | +10.5 | W +14.5 | 158.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 64-66 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 70-69 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 65-80 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 133.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 72-77 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 83-90 | -4.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 82-57 | -5.5 | W +19.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 73-64 | +9.5 | W +18.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 65-73 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 61-64 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 132.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 73-71 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 81-79 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 69-58 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 67-65 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 80-65 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 82-66 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 68-69 | -6.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 87-72 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 80-86 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 166 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
AKR
L 71-85
−5.5
9
vs
COPP
W 84-70
−4.5
12
@
LONG
L 72-82
−11.5
15
@
LIU
L 79-88
−5.5
18
vs
TOW
W 81-75
+9.5
24
@
FIU
W 80-72
+10.5
25
vs
OMA
W 88-77
+9.5
29
@
GMU
L 66-82
−3.5
3
vs
NCCU
W 67-62
−9.5
6
vs
NORF
W 68-67
−9.5
17
@
ODU
L 68-77
−11.5
20
@
GASO
L 92-96
−1.5
29
@
ARK
L 74-103
−5.5
3
@
ARST
W 78-74
+14.5
7
vs
MRSH
L 64-66
−3.5
10
vs
ODU
W 70-69
−5.5
15
@
APP
L 65-80
−12.5
17
@
MRSH
L 72-77
+1.5
22
vs
USA
L 83-90
−11.5
24
vs
TXST
W 82-57
+19.5
29
@
TROY
W 73-64
+18.5
31
@
USM
L 65-73
−6.5
4
vs
UL
L 61-64
−12.5
7
vs
TOL
W 73-71
+3.5
12
vs
GAST
W 81-79
−3.5
14
vs
APP
W 69-58
+12.5
18
@
CCU
W 67-65
+0.5
21
@
GAST
W 80-65
+12.5
25
vs
GASO
W 82-66
+10.5
27
vs
CCU
L 68-69
−7.5
4
vs
UL
W 87-72
+8.5
5
vs
USM
L 80-86
−8.5
covered 13didn’t cover 19avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
AKR
L 71-85
+2.5
9
vs
COPP
W 84-70
+12.5
12
@
LONG
L 72-82
+4.5
15
@
LIU
L 79-88
+19.5
18
vs
TOW
W 81-75
+15.5
24
@
FIU
W 80-72
−3.5
25
vs
OMA
W 88-77
+12.5
29
@
GMU
L 66-82
+6.5
3
vs
NCCU
W 67-62
−14.5
6
vs
NORF
W 68-67
−3.5
17
@
ODU
L 68-77
−3.5
20
@
GASO
L 92-96
+34.5
29
@
ARK
L 74-103
+17.5
3
@
ARST
W 78-74
−6.5
7
vs
MRSH
L 64-66
−22.5
10
vs
ODU
W 70-69
−8.5
15
@
APP
L 65-80
+11.5
17
@
MRSH
L 72-77
−0.5
22
vs
USA
L 83-90
+34.5
24
vs
TXST
W 82-57
−4.5
29
@
TROY
W 73-64
−10.5
31
@
USM
L 65-73
−5.5
4
vs
UL
L 61-64
−7.5
7
vs
TOL
W 73-71
−9.5
12
vs
GAST
W 81-79
+15.5
14
vs
APP
W 69-58
−7.5
18
@
CCU
W 67-65
−8.5
21
@
GAST
W 80-65
+2.5
25
vs
GASO
W 82-66
−5.5
27
vs
CCU
L 68-69
−4.5
4
vs
UL
W 87-72
+24.5
5
vs
USM
L 80-86
+22.5
over 15under 17avg +3.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Delaware
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 70-78 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 68-85 | +35.5 | W +18.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 81-70 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 59-79 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 73-60 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 1 | vs | L 66-89 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-75 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 129.5 | O 147 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 70-58 | +21.5 | W +33.5 | 152.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 66-88 | -1.5 | L −23.5 | 144.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 65-57 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 129.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 43-61 | +1.5 | L −16.5 | 131.5 | U 104 |
| Jan 2 | vs | L 64-67 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 126.5 | O 131 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 67-52 | +8.5 | W +23.5 | 148.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 60-72 | +11.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 68-70 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 123.5 | O 138 |
| Jan 15 | vs | L 69-70 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 125.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-97 | +4.5 | L −24.5 | 134.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 51-67 | +15.5 | L −0.5 | 134.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 73-64 | +13.5 | W +22.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 55-70 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 128.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 69-75 | +10.5 | W +4.5 | 132.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 89-88 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 133.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 68-66 | +8.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 76-67 | +9.5 | W +18.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 87-88 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 66-78 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 70-80 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 133.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 82-90 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 83-80 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 38-81 | +2.5 | L −40.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
BUCK
L 70-78
−5.5
11
@
BYU
L 68-85
+18.5
18
vs
SPU
W 81-70
+6.5
23
vs
SIU
L 59-79
−11.5
25
vs
UNCG
W 73-60
+14.5
1
vs
IONA
L 66-89
−21.5
6
@
DSU
L 72-75
−10.5
10
@
GW
W 70-58
+33.5
13
vs
CSUN
L 66-88
−23.5
16
vs
RID
W 65-57
−0.5
29
vs
MOST
L 43-61
−16.5
2
vs
JXST
L 64-67
+1.5
4
vs
KENN
W 67-52
+23.5
8
@
SHSU
L 60-72
−0.5
10
@
LT
L 68-70
+4.5
15
vs
UTEP
L 69-70
−2.5
17
vs
NMSU
L 68-97
−24.5
24
@
LIB
L 51-67
−0.5
28
@
NMSU
W 73-64
+22.5
31
@
UTEP
L 55-70
−8.5
4
vs
LIB
L 69-75
+4.5
7
vs
MTSU
W 89-88
+6.5
12
@
FIU
W 68-66
+10.5
14
@
MOST
W 76-67
+18.5
18
vs
WKU
L 87-88
+3.5
21
@
MTSU
L 66-78
−1.5
26
@
JXST
L 70-80
−2.5
28
@
KENN
L 82-90
+3.5
5
vs
SHSU
W 83-80
+10.5
7
vs
LT
L 38-81
−40.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
BUCK
L 70-78
−1.5
11
@
BYU
L 68-85
−11.5
18
vs
SPU
W 81-70
+13.5
23
vs
SIU
L 59-79
−15.5
25
vs
UNCG
W 73-60
−9.5
1
vs
IONA
L 66-89
+5.5
6
@
DSU
L 72-75
+17.5
10
@
GW
W 70-58
−24.5
13
vs
CSUN
L 66-88
+9.5
16
vs
RID
W 65-57
−7.5
29
vs
MOST
L 43-61
−27.5
2
vs
JXST
L 64-67
+4.5
4
vs
KENN
W 67-52
−29.5
8
@
SHSU
L 60-72
−12.5
10
@
LT
L 68-70
+14.5
15
vs
UTEP
L 69-70
+13.5
17
vs
NMSU
L 68-97
+30.5
24
@
LIB
L 51-67
−16.5
28
@
NMSU
W 73-64
−0.5
31
@
UTEP
L 55-70
−3.5
4
vs
LIB
L 69-75
+11.5
7
vs
MTSU
W 89-88
+43.5
12
@
FIU
W 68-66
−13.5
14
@
MOST
W 76-67
+7.5
18
vs
WKU
L 87-88
+35.5
21
@
MTSU
L 66-78
+6.5
26
@
JXST
L 70-80
+16.5
28
@
KENN
L 82-90
+28.5
5
vs
SHSU
W 83-80
+15.5
7
vs
LT
L 38-81
−13.5
over 16under 14avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
James Madison has the better starters
Position by position: James Madison 2, Delaware 1, even 2
James MadisonBetterDelaware
G G. Lattimore TR15.5 pts · 4.4 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 48
←JMUSmall
G D. Dinkins TR11.9 pts · 1.6 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 21
G A. Myers TR11.1 pts · 4.9 reb · 1 ast
Score 73
←JMUBig
G A. Kazanecki5 pts · 2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 5
G C. Reilly TR3 pts · 1 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Brown12 pts · 3 reb · 1 ast
Not ranked
F J. Hogarth TR10.2 pts · 6.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 61
=No call
G M. Ellison3.8 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.8 ast
Not ranked
F P. Fowler6.3 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 25
→DELSmall
F K. Nzeh TR11.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 44
James MadisonBetterDelaware
JMU offense181st of 366 · -5.7
=Even
DEL defense187th of 366 · -4.3
JMU defense154th of 366 · -3.4
←JMUSmall
DEL offense237th of 366 · -7.3
Backcourt-2.0 · 3 players
←JMUBig
Backcourt-9.1 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.3 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
Bench-3.8 · 5 players
→DELSmall
Bench-2.8 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestJMU betterDEL betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
G. Lattimore37 min · TRA. Myers29 min · TRC. Reilly23 min · TRK. Windham13 min · TRP. Jones11 minB. Lee5 min · TR
Forwards
J. Hogarth25 min · TRP. Fowler23 minG. Sundra18 min · TRM. Curtis16 min · TRJ. BrownNewA. EvansNew
Guards
D. Dinkins34 min · TRA. Kazanecki29 minJ. Brown23 minM. Ellison20 minC. Bailey18 min · TRD. Harris-Smith17 min · TR
Forwards
K. Nzeh29 min · TRE. Alvin20 min · TRJ. Taylor16 minF. EgbunaNew
Centers
S. Solano4 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.7 #172 | Points per game | 67.9 #316 |
| 1.10 #128 | Points per possession | 1.04 #269 |
| 67.5 #253 | Pace (possessions) | 65.3 #337 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.1 #97 | Effective FG% | 53.3 #89 |
| 35.4 #94 | 3-point % | 36.8 #31 |
| 42.5 #128 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.2 #44 |
| 35.9 #153 | Free throw rate | 30.6 #291 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.3 #225 | Turnover rate | 18.3 #287 |
| 30.6 #175 | Offensive rebound rate | 20.8 #362 |
| 12.5 #252 | Assists per game | 12.2 #271 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.4 #170 | Points allowed | 74.1 #156 |
| 1.10 #226 | Points allowed per possession | 1.13 #298 |
| 49.0 #66 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.5 #185 |
| 32.7 #101 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.1 #255 |
| 12.8 #359 | Turnovers forced | 14.0 #334 |
| 70.5 #134 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.9 #206 |
| 5.1 #327 | Steals per game | 5.7 #273 |
| 4.1 #68 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #219 |
James Madison
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern Miss80–86
- Wvs Louisiana87–72
- Lvs Coastal68–69
- Wvs GA Southern82–66
- W@ Georgia St80–65
A week or more of rest.
Delaware
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 6-14 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Louisiana Tech38–81
- Wvs Sam Houston83–80
- L@ Kennesaw St82–90
- L@ Jax State70–80
- L@ MTSU66–78
A week or more of rest.