Stetson Hatters at Clemson Tigers: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 7:00 PM ETLittlejohn Coliseum · at Clemson

LineCLEM -25.5moved 1 toward STET

Total144.5down 2 from 146.5

Season records: Stetson and Clemson
STET	This season	CLEM
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects CLEM 89–59 · win probability CLEM 99%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

CLEM -25.5

moved 1 toward STET

Total

144.5

model 147.6 · Over by 3

Model edge

CLEM by 4

model vs market

Public on the spread

73% STET

68% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: CLEM has more of the edges

STET 0, CLEM 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

CLEMBig

CLEM offense vs STET defense

Offense 51st of 366 against a defense 328th, on the model’s ratings

CLEMBig

STET offense vs CLEM defense

Offense 273rd of 366 against a defense 25th, on the model’s ratings

CLEMBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: STET 18.2%, CLEM 14.0%. Forced: STET 15.1%, CLEM 17.4%

Context

Schedule so far

STET has played the 220th-hardest schedule, CLEM the 66th. A record against a soft schedule means less

CLEMBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: STET 26.6%, CLEM 28.1%. Defensive: STET 68.2%, CLEM 73.7%

CLEMBig

Shooting

Effective FG%: STET 53.1 and allows 55.2; CLEM 52.5 and allows 48.8

Context

Tempo

About 67 possessions: STET plays 68.2 a game (221st fastest), CLEM 65.6 (326th). Faster games mean more points

CLEMSmall

Home court

CLEM at home. This season: CLEM 0-0 at home, STET 0-0 away

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: STET 51%, CLEM 37%. Transfers in: STET 3, CLEM 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

Free throws

Free throw rate: STET 32.5, CLEM 36.7. Allowed: STET 30.4, CLEM 33.9

Even

Three-pointers

STET hits 36.0% and allows 34.5%; CLEM hits 34.1% and allows 32.4%. Threes are 44.8% and 43.1% of their shots

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 20 or more	1165	99%	50%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	1090	99%	50%	52%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog	4513	74%	51%	50%
Games with a total of 140 to 144.5	3570	72%	50%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenCLEM -26.5

1 → STET

NowCLEM -25.5

1 pt toward STET

Total

Open146.5

▼ 2

Now144.5

Down 2 since the open

Moneyline

STET +3500 · CLEM -20000

Line movement

Median of 6 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened CLEM -26.5 · now CLEM -25.5 · moved 1 toward STETmodel CLEM -29.5

model CLEM -29.5

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

STET +25.5Spread

CLEM -25.5

Bets

73%27%

Money

68%32%

Over 144.5TotalUnder 144.5

Bets

24%76%

Money

24%76%

STETWinner

CLEM

Bets

95%

Money

98%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

6 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	STET	CLEM	Over	Under	STET	CLEM
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-25.5+100	+25.5-120	143.5-110	143.5-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-25.5-107	+25.5-118	144.5-112	144.5-114	—	—
BovadaBovada	-25.5+100	+25.5-120	143.5-110	143.5-110	—	—
DraftKingsDK	-25.5-105	+25.5-115	144.5-105	144.5-115	+3500	-20000
FanDuelFD	-25.5-110	+25.5-110	144.5-110	144.5-110	+3500	-20000
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-25.5+104	+25.5-116	143.5-108	143.5-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated Nov 1, 11:00 PM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	CLEM -25.5	CLEM -29.4	CLEM +3.9
Total	144.5	147.6	Over 3.1
Projected score	—	STET 59.1 · CLEM 88.5

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	CLEM -17.4	—
1H total	69.0	—
1H projected score	STET 25.8 · CLEM 43.2	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
STET WWWWW	18-13	58%	8-8	16-12
CLEM LWLLL	17-18	49%	8-8	14-14

Venue/role: STET away, as underdog; CLEM home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
STET UOUOU	14-17	45%	10-21
CLEM OUOUU	14-21	40%	24-11

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
STET	4-6 40%	7-3 70%	6-4 60%
CLEM	4-6 40%	2-8 20%	4-6 40%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Stetson

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 3	@ SC	L51–82LU
Nov 6	@ WVU	No recent meeting
Nov 12	@ HOW	W64–60WU

Clemson

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	vs AMER	No recent meeting
Nov 9	vs UND	No recent meeting
Nov 13	vs GTWN	L74–79LO

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Stetson

31 games played

Straight up

10-21

32% wins

Against the spread

18-13

58% covers · avg +2.3 pts vs the line

Over / Under

14-17

45% overs · avg +1.7 pts vs the total

Straight up

10-2132%

L L L W W L L L L L L W L W L W L L L W L L L W L L W L W W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

18-1358%

L L W W W L L L W L L W L W L W W W W W L L L W W L W W W W W

5 straight covers4 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

14-1745%

O O U U O U U U U U O U O O U O O U U U U O O U O O U O U O U

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@URI	L 62-93	+18.5	L −12.5	152.5	O 155
Nov 10	@MIA	L 61-102	+34.5	L −6.5	161.5	O 163
Nov 16	@WCU	L 65-76	+12.5	W +1.5	155.5	U 141
Nov 19	vsHOW	W 64-60	+1.5	W +5.5	149.5	U 124
Nov 22	vsVMI	W 99-80	+2.5	W +21.5	148.5	O 179
Nov 25	vsWRST	L 62-79	+9.5	L −7.5	147.5	U 141
Nov 29	vsSUU	L 68-70	+1.5	L −0.5	148.5	U 138
Nov 30	@RMU	L 62-80	+11.5	L −6.5	142.5	U 142
Dec 2	@GCU	L 45-67	+24.5	W +2.5	141.5	U 112
Dec 6	@SC	L 51-82	+22.5	L −8.5	142.5	U 133
Dec 22	@OU	L 54-107	+31.5	L −21.5	148.5	O 161
Jan 1	@UNA	W 70-67	+9.5	W +12.5	142.5	U 137
Jan 3	@CARK	L 73-93	+11.5	L −8.5	147.5	O 166
Jan 8	vsLIP	W 91-83	+11.5	W +19.5	150.5	O 174
Jan 10	vsAPSU	L 69-81	+9.5	L −2.5	150.5	U 150
Jan 15	vsWGA	W 95-86	+1.5	W +10.5	151.5	O 181
Jan 17	vsQUC	L 81-87	+10.5	W +4.5	162.5	O 168
Jan 22	@LIP	L 74-79	+15.5	W +10.5	157.5	U 153
Jan 23	@APSU	L 65-73	+16.5	W +8.5	148.5	U 138
Jan 29	@UNF	W 84-77	-1.5	W +5.5	165.5	U 161
Jan 31	vsUNA	L 66-68	-1.5	L −3.5	144.5	U 134
Feb 5	@BELL	L 71-92	+4.5	L −16.5	148.5	O 163
Feb 7	@EKU	L 88-100	+9.5	L −2.5	151.5	O 188
Feb 11	vsJAX	W 67-62	+2.5	W +7.5	138.5	U 129
Feb 14	@FGCU	L 76-78	+11.5	W +9.5	148.5	O 154
Feb 19	vsCARK	L 76-88	+9.5	L −2.5	149.5	O 164
Feb 21	vsUNF	W 76-71	-1.5	W +3.5	161.5	U 147
Feb 26	@JAX	L 85-89	+7.5	W +3.5	138.5	O 174
Feb 28	vsFGCU	W 78-63	+5.5	W +20.5	150.5	U 141
Mar 4	vsEKU	W 92-76	+5.5	W +21.5	155.5	O 168
Mar 6	vsAPSU	L 60-69	+11.5	W +2.5	153.5	U 129

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

URI

L 62-93

−12.5

MIA

L 61-102

−6.5

WCU

L 65-76

+1.5

HOW

W 64-60

+5.5

VMI

W 99-80

+21.5

WRST

L 62-79

−7.5

SUU

L 68-70

−0.5

RMU

L 62-80

−6.5

GCU

L 45-67

+2.5

L 51-82

−8.5

L 54-107

−21.5

UNA

W 70-67

+12.5

CARK

L 73-93

−8.5

LIP

W 91-83

+19.5

APSU

L 69-81

−2.5

WGA

W 95-86

+10.5

QUC

L 81-87

+4.5

LIP

L 74-79

+10.5

APSU

L 65-73

+8.5

UNF

W 84-77

+5.5

UNA

L 66-68

−3.5

BELL

L 71-92

−16.5

EKU

L 88-100

−2.5

JAX

W 67-62

+7.5

FGCU

L 76-78

+9.5

CARK

L 76-88

−2.5

UNF

W 76-71

+3.5

JAX

L 85-89

+3.5

FGCU

W 78-63

+20.5

EKU

W 92-76

+21.5

APSU

L 60-69

+2.5

covered 18didn’t cover 13avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

URI

L 62-93

+2.5

MIA

L 61-102

+1.5

WCU

L 65-76

−14.5

HOW

W 64-60

−25.5

VMI

W 99-80

+30.5

WRST

L 62-79

−6.5

SUU

L 68-70

−10.5

RMU

L 62-80

−0.5

GCU

L 45-67

−29.5

L 51-82

−9.5

L 54-107

+12.5

UNA

W 70-67

−5.5

CARK

L 73-93

+18.5

LIP

W 91-83

+23.5

APSU

L 69-81

−0.5

WGA

W 95-86

+29.5

QUC

L 81-87

+5.5

LIP

L 74-79

−4.5

APSU

L 65-73

−10.5

UNF

W 84-77

−4.5

UNA

L 66-68

−10.5

BELL

L 71-92

+14.5

EKU

L 88-100

+36.5

JAX

W 67-62

−9.5

FGCU

L 76-78

+5.5

CARK

L 76-88

+14.5

UNF

W 76-71

−14.5

JAX

L 85-89

+35.5

FGCU

W 78-63

−9.5

EKU

W 92-76

+12.5

APSU

L 60-69

−24.5

over 14under 17avg +1.7 ptslonger = bigger margin

Clemson

35 games played

Straight up

24-11

69% wins

Against the spread

17-18

49% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line

Over / Under

14-21

40% overs · avg −2 pts vs the total

Straight up

24-1169%

W W W L W W W W L L W W W W W W W W W L W W W W L L L L W L W W W L L

2 straight losses2 of last 4 won

Against the spread

17-1849%

W W L L L L W W W W L L L W W W W W W L W W L W L L L L W L L W L L L

3 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

14-2140%

U O U O U O O O O U U U U U O U O U U O U U U U O U O U O U O U O U U

2 straight unders1 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsUNH	W 88-38	-29.5	W +20.5	146.5	U 126
Nov 7	vsGWEB	W 97-59	-29.5	W +8.5	145.5	O 156
Nov 11	vsMORE	W 83-56	-29.5	L −2.5	151.5	U 139
Nov 15	@GTWN	L 74-79	-1.5	L −6.5	142.5	O 153
Nov 17	vsUNA	W 81-61	-25.5	L −5.5	144.5	U 142
Nov 21	vsWVU	W 70-67	-4.5	L −1.5	132.5	O 137
Nov 23	vsUGA	W 97-94	-1.5	W +1.5	152.5	O 191
Nov 28	vsAAMU	W 92-56	-27.5	W +8.5	141.5	O 148
Dec 3	@ALA	L 84-90	+8.5	W +2.5	165.5	O 174
Dec 9	vsBYU	L 64-67	+4.5	W +1.5	152.5	U 131
Dec 13	vsMER	W 70-63	-22.5	L −15.5	152.5	U 133
Dec 16	vsSC	W 68-61	-12.5	L −5.5	142.5	U 129
Dec 21	vsCIN	W 68-65	-3.5	L −0.5	140.5	U 133
Dec 31	@SYR	W 64-61	-1.5	W +1.5	140.5	U 125
Jan 3	@PITT	W 73-68	-3.5	W +1.5	135.5	O 141
Jan 7	vsSMU	W 74-70	-3.5	W +0.5	149.5	U 144
Jan 10	@ND	W 76-61	-3.5	W +11.5	133.5	O 137
Jan 13	vsBC	W 74-50	-15.5	W +8.5	136.5	U 124
Jan 17	vsMIA	W 69-59	-4.5	W +5.5	143.5	U 128
Jan 20	vsNCSU	L 76-80	-2.5	L −6.5	142.5	O 156
Jan 24	@GT	W 77-63	-8.5	W +5.5	142.5	U 140
Jan 31	vsPITT	W 63-52	-10.5	W +0.5	135.5	U 115
Feb 4	@STAN	W 66-64	-3.5	L −1.5	138.5	U 130
Feb 7	@CAL	W 77-55	-4.5	W +17.5	139.5	U 132
Feb 11	vsVT	L 66-76	-8.5	L −18.5	138.5	O 142
Feb 14	@DUKE	L 54-67	+12.5	L −0.5	134.5	U 121
Feb 18	@WAKE	L 77-85	-4.5	L −12.5	140.5	O 162
Feb 21	vsFSU	L 65-70	-8.5	L −13.5	145.5	U 135
Feb 28	vsLOU	W 80-75	+2.5	W +7.5	146.5	O 155
Mar 3	@UNC	L 63-67	+2.5	L −1.5	141.5	U 130
Mar 7	vsGT	W 79-76	-15.5	L −12.5	145.5	O 155
Mar 11	vsWAKE	W 71-62	-5.5	W +3.5	143.5	U 133
Mar 12	vsUNC	W 80-79	-2.5	L −1.5	140.5	O 159
Mar 13	vsDUKE	L 61-73	+10.5	L −1.5	134.5	U 134
Mar 20	vsIOWA	L 61-67	+1.5	L −4.5	130.5	U 128

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

UNH

W 88-38

+20.5

GWEB

W 97-59

+8.5

W 83-56

−2.5

GTWN

L 74-79

−6.5

UNA

W 81-61

−5.5

WVU

W 70-67

−1.5

UGA

W 97-94

+1.5

AAMU

W 92-56

+8.5

ALA

L 84-90

+2.5

BYU

L 64-67

+1.5

MER

W 70-63

−15.5

W 68-61

−5.5

CIN

W 68-65

−0.5

SYR

W 64-61

+1.5

PITT

W 73-68

+1.5

SMU

W 74-70

+0.5

W 76-61

+11.5

W 74-50

+8.5

MIA

W 69-59

+5.5

NCSU

L 76-80

−6.5

W 77-63

+5.5

PITT

W 63-52

+0.5

STAN

W 66-64

−1.5

CAL

W 77-55

+17.5

L 66-76

−18.5

DUKE

L 54-67

−0.5

WAKE

L 77-85

−12.5

FSU

L 65-70

−13.5

LOU

W 80-75

+7.5

UNC

L 63-67

−1.5

W 79-76

−12.5

WAKE

W 71-62

+3.5

UNC

W 80-79

−1.5

DUKE

L 61-73

−1.5

IOWA

L 61-67

−4.5

covered 17didn’t cover 18avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

UNH

W 88-38

−20.5

GWEB

W 97-59

+10.5

W 83-56

−12.5

GTWN

L 74-79

+10.5

UNA

W 81-61

−2.5

WVU

W 70-67

+4.5

UGA

W 97-94

+38.5

AAMU

W 92-56

+6.5

ALA

L 84-90

+8.5

BYU

L 64-67

−21.5

MER

W 70-63

−19.5

W 68-61

−13.5

CIN

W 68-65

−7.5

SYR

W 64-61

−15.5

PITT

W 73-68

+5.5

SMU

W 74-70

−5.5

W 76-61

+3.5

W 74-50

−12.5

MIA

W 69-59

−15.5

NCSU

L 76-80

+13.5

W 77-63

−2.5

PITT

W 63-52

−20.5

STAN

W 66-64

−8.5

CAL

W 77-55

−7.5

L 66-76

+3.5

DUKE

L 54-67

−13.5

WAKE

L 77-85

+21.5

FSU

L 65-70

−10.5

LOU

W 80-75

+8.5

UNC

L 63-67

−11.5

W 79-76

+9.5

WAKE

W 71-62

−10.5

UNC

W 80-79

+18.5

DUKE

L 61-73

−0.5

IOWA

L 61-67

−2.5

over 14under 21avg −2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Clemson has the better starters

Position by position: Stetson 0, Clemson 3, even 2

StetsonBetterClemson

G D. Macgregor4.8 pts · 2 reb · 3.8 ast Score 26

CLEMBig

G C. Certa TR12.8 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.8 ast Score 83

F C. Kuhl13.2 pts · 6 reb · 0.6 ast Score 87

Even

F D. Faulkner TR17.3 pts · 8.6 reb · 1.8 ast Score 99

F F. Sheridan7.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.4 ast Score 21

CLEMBig

F D. Fuchs TR13 pts · 7.8 reb · 1.5 ast Score 95

F M. Myles TR7.7 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.5 ast Score 66

Even

F L. Lelevicius TR8 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.7 ast Score 72

F A. Doyle5.1 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.9 ast Score 9

CLEMBig

F C. Welling10.2 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.1 ast Score 97

StetsonBetterClemson

STET offense273rd of 366 · -8.3

CLEMBig

CLEM defense25th of 366 · +4.8

STET defense328th of 366 · -8.5

CLEMBig

CLEM offense51st of 366 · +3.6

Backcourt-1.4 · 1 player

CLEMSmall

Backcourt+1.5 · 1 player

Frontcourt-0.9 · 4 players

CLEMBig

Frontcourt+14.4 · 4 players

Bench-5.1 · 5 players

CLEMBig

Bench+2.5 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestSTET betterCLEM betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Stetson

Guards

D. Macgregor19 minS. Morgan14 minT. Sucatzky13 min · TRM. McGowan2 minI. Jones2 minB. Gladieux2 min

Forwards

C. Kuhl24 minF. Sheridan23 minM. Myles21 min · TRA. Doyle17 minM. Entenmann12 min · TRJ. Boyomo KeediNew

Clemson

Guards

C. Certa27 min · TRA. Buckner20 minZ. Foster19 minH. ReynoldsNewA. JamesNew

Forwards

D. Faulkner27 min · TRD. Fuchs24 min · TRL. Lelevicius24 min · TRC. Welling21 minC. Thompson9 minD. Thomas4 min

Centers

W. StevensNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

STET71.9 #246

CLEM73.8 #209

Points per possession

STET1.06 #231

CLEM1.12 #95

Pace (possessions)

STET68.2 #221

CLEM65.6 #326

Shooting

Effective FG%

STET53.1 #96

CLEM52.5 #126

3-point %

STET36.0 #59

CLEM34.1 #165

3-point attempt rate

STET44.8 #75

CLEM43.1 #115

Free throw rate

STET32.5 #250

CLEM36.7 #136

Possessions

Turnover rate

STET18.2 #284

CLEM14.0 #24

Offensive rebound rate

STET26.6 #308

CLEM28.1 #264

Assists per game

STET14.7 #105

CLEM12.7 #233

Defense

Points allowed

STET79.9 #315

CLEM66.7 #21

Points allowed per possession

STET1.17 #339

CLEM1.02 #41

Opponent effective FG%

STET55.2 #338

CLEM48.8 #59

Opponent 3-point %

STET34.5 #223

CLEM32.4 #88

Turnovers forced

STET15.1 #278

CLEM17.4 #124

Defensive rebound rate

STET68.2 #250

CLEM73.7 #21

Steals per game

STET6.2 #213

CLEM6.3 #209

Blocks per game

STET2.0 #344

CLEM2.8 #260

STET		CLEM
Scoring
71.9 #246	Points per game	73.8 #209
1.06 #231	Points per possession	1.12 #95
68.2 #221	Pace (possessions)	65.6 #326
Shooting
53.1 #96	Effective FG%	52.5 #126
36.0 #59	3-point %	34.1 #165
44.8 #75	3-point attempt rate	43.1 #115
32.5 #250	Free throw rate	36.7 #136
Possessions
18.2 #284	Turnover rate	14.0 #24
26.6 #308	Offensive rebound rate	28.1 #264
14.7 #105	Assists per game	12.7 #233
Defense
79.9 #315	Points allowed	66.7 #21
1.17 #339	Points allowed per possession	1.02 #41
55.2 #338	Opponent effective FG%	48.8 #59
34.5 #223	Opponent 3-point %	32.4 #88
15.1 #278	Turnovers forced	17.4 #124
68.2 #250	Defensive rebound rate	73.7 #21
6.2 #213	Steals per game	6.3 #209
2.0 #344	Blocks per game	2.8 #260

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Stetson

10-21 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Atlantic Sun Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Austin Peay60–69
Wvs E Kentucky92–76
Wvs FGCU78–63
L@ Jacksonville85–89
Wvs North Florida76–71

A week or more of rest.

Clemson

24-11 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Iowa61–67
Lvs Duke61–73
Wvs North Carolina80–79
Wvs Wake Forest71–62
Wvs Georgia Tech79–76

A week or more of rest.