Buffalo Bulls at Marshall Thundering Herd: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 7:00 PM ETCam Henderson Center · at Marshall

LineMRSH -2.5no move

Total157.5up 1 from 156.5

Season records: Buffalo and Marshall
BUF	This season	MRSH
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects MRSH 77–75 · win probability MRSH 56%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

MRSH -2.5

no move since the open

Total

157.5

model 152.4 · Under by 5

Model edge

BUF by 1

model vs market

Public on the spread

53% MRSH

56% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it

BUF 3, MRSH 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

BUFBig

Free throws

Free throw rate: BUF 39.6, MRSH 29.2. Allowed: BUF 31.4, MRSH 41.1

MRSHSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: BUF 55.4 and allows 55.1; MRSH 54.8 and allows 50.3

Context

Tempo

About 69 possessions: BUF plays 68.2 a game (219th fastest), MRSH 70.7 (86th). Faster games mean more points

BUFSmall

BUF offense vs MRSH defense

Offense 215th of 366 against a defense 277th, on the model’s ratings

BUFSmall

Turnovers

Turnover rate: BUF 16.2%, MRSH 16.6%. Forced: BUF 17.8%, MRSH 16.2%

MRSHSmall

MRSH offense vs BUF defense

Offense 198th of 366 against a defense 257th, on the model’s ratings

MRSHSmall

Home court

MRSH at home. This season: MRSH 0-0 at home, BUF 0-0 away

Even

Three-pointers

BUF hits 37.9% and allows 35.1%; MRSH hits 36.8% and allows 33.6%. Threes are 45.5% and 44.3% of their shots

Context

Schedule so far

BUF has played the 198th-hardest schedule, MRSH the 234th. A record against a soft schedule means less

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: BUF 8%, MRSH 27%. Transfers in: BUF 7, MRSH 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: BUF 27.1%, MRSH 31.9%. Defensive: BUF 68.9%, MRSH 66.2%

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of under 3	1938	56%	51%	49%
Non-conference games at this spread	1094	54%	49%	50%
Games with a total of 155 to 159.5	1555	74%	51%	49%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenMRSH -2.5

no move

NowMRSH -2.5

No change since the open

Total

Open156.5

▲ 1

Now157.5

Up 1 since the open

Moneyline

BUF +105 · MRSH -132

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened MRSH -2.5 · now MRSH -1.5 · moved 1 toward BUFmodel MRSH -1.5 matches the line

model MRSH -1.5 = line ✓

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

BUF +2.5Spread

MRSH -2.5

Bets

47%53%

Money

44%56%

Over 157.5TotalUnder 157.5

Bets

37%63%

Money

36%64%

BUFWinner

MRSH

Bets

25%75%

Money

96%

Money is 21 pts ahead of bets on MRSH

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	BUF	MRSH	Over	Under	BUF	MRSH
BetMGMMGM	-1.5-105	+1.5-115	157.5-105	157.5-115	+110	-135
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-1.5-105	+1.5-115	157-110	157-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-1.5-114	+1.5-112	156.5-115	156.5-110	+104	-132
BetUSBetUS	-1.5-105	+1.5-115	157-110	157-110	—	—
BovadaBovada	-2-110	+2-110	157-110	157-110	+105	-125
DraftKingsDK	-2.5-118	+2.5-102	157.5-105	157.5-115	+114	-135
FanDuelFD	-1.5-110	+1.5-110	156.5-115	156.5-105	+105	-126
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-1.5-101	+1.5-111	157-108	157-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 2:00 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	MRSH -2.5	MRSH -1.6	BUF +0.9
Total	157.5	152.4	Under 5.1
Projected score	—	BUF 75.4 · MRSH 77

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	MRSH -0.8	—
1H total	71.3	—
1H projected score	BUF 35.2 · MRSH 36	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
BUF WLLLW	17-13	57%	10-4	9-7
MRSH WLWLL	10-21	32%	4-12	4-17

Venue/role: BUF away, as underdog; MRSH home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
BUF OUUOU	16-14	53%	15-15
MRSH OOOOU	19-12	61%	18-13

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
BUF	3-7 30%	5-5 50%	4-6 40%
MRSH	5-5 50%	2-8 20%	9-1 90%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Buffalo

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	@ PITT	No recent meeting
Nov 15	vs CAN	W71–53WU
Nov 19	@ SBU	L69–77LO

Marshall

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	vs TOL	W85–73WU
Nov 9	@ OSU	No recent meeting
Nov 14	@ YSU	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Buffalo

30 games played

Straight up

15-15

50% wins

Against the spread

17-13

57% covers · avg +1.8 pts vs the line

Over / Under

16-14

53% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total

Straight up

15-1550%

W W W W W W W L W L W W W L L L L L W L L L W L W L L W L L

2 straight losses1 of last 4 won

Against the spread

17-1357%

W W W W W L W L W L W W W L L W L L W L W L W L W W L L L W

1 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

16-1453%

O O U O U U U O O U O U O O O O U U O O U O U U O O U U O U

1 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsUSM	W 85-79	-3.5	W +2.5	153.5	O 164
Nov 7	vsGB	W 83-76	-3.5	W +3.5	147.5	O 159
Nov 11	@DEP	W 66-53	+18.5	W +31.5	153.5	U 119
Nov 18	vsUVM	W 94-90	+1.5	W +5.5	141.5	O 184
Nov 24	vsVMI	W 78-70	-5.5	W +2.5	150.5	U 148
Nov 26	vsBUCK	W 73-71	-4.5	L −2.5	146.5	U 144
Nov 29	@CAN	W 71-53	-9.5	W +8.5	139.5	U 124
Dec 6	vsSBU	L 69-77	+5.5	L −2.5	144.5	O 146
Dec 9	@UMBC	W 83-79	-3.5	W +0.5	145.5	O 162
Dec 14	@ECU	L 70-73	+1.5	L −1.5	146.5	U 143
Dec 20	@WMU	W 88-71	-2.5	W +14.5	150.5	O 159
Dec 31	@NIU	W 81-67	-6.5	W +7.5	152.5	U 148
Jan 3	vsBALL	W 85-72	-6.5	W +6.5	145.5	O 157
Jan 10	@OHIO	L 80-91	+4.5	L −6.5	156.5	O 171
Jan 13	vsKENT	L 81-87	+2.5	L −3.5	165.5	O 168
Jan 17	@M-OH	L 102-105	+10.5	W +7.5	162.5	O 207
Jan 20	vsAKR	L 63-82	+8.5	L −10.5	166.5	U 145
Jan 23	vsMASS	L 67-68	-1.5	L −2.5	159.5	U 135
Jan 27	@BGSU	W 89-78	+7.5	W +18.5	150.5	O 167
Jan 31	vsOHIO	L 83-95	-2.5	L −14.5	156.5	O 178
Feb 3	vsM-OH	L 71-73	+4.5	W +2.5	165.5	U 144
Feb 7	@USA	L 69-81	+3.5	L −8.5	145.5	O 150
Feb 11	@BALL	W 63-53	+1.5	W +11.5	141.5	U 116
Feb 17	vsNIU	L 70-72	-9.5	L −11.5	145.5	U 142
Feb 21	@MASS	W 86-82	+7.5	W +11.5	151.5	O 168
Feb 24	@AKR	L 85-99	+15.5	W +1.5	160.5	O 184
Feb 28	vsCMU	L 70-75	-5.5	L −10.5	151.5	U 145
Mar 3	vsEMU	W 72-67	-5.5	L −0.5	143.5	U 139
Mar 6	@TOL	L 78-99	+5.5	L −15.5	155.5	O 177
Mar 12	vsAKR	L 70-73	+12.5	W +9.5	158.5	U 143

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

USM

W 85-79

+2.5

W 83-76

+3.5

DEP

W 66-53

+31.5

UVM

W 94-90

+5.5

VMI

W 78-70

+2.5

BUCK

W 73-71

−2.5

CAN

W 71-53

+8.5

SBU

L 69-77

−2.5

UMBC

W 83-79

+0.5

ECU

L 70-73

−1.5

WMU

W 88-71

+14.5

NIU

W 81-67

+7.5

BALL

W 85-72

+6.5

OHIO

L 80-91

−6.5

KENT

L 81-87

−3.5

M-OH

L 102-105

+7.5

AKR

L 63-82

−10.5

MASS

L 67-68

−2.5

BGSU

W 89-78

+18.5

OHIO

L 83-95

−14.5

M-OH

L 71-73

+2.5

USA

L 69-81

−8.5

BALL

W 63-53

+11.5

NIU

L 70-72

−11.5

MASS

W 86-82

+11.5

AKR

L 85-99

+1.5

CMU

L 70-75

−10.5

EMU

W 72-67

−0.5

TOL

L 78-99

−15.5

AKR

L 70-73

+9.5

covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

USM

W 85-79

+10.5

W 83-76

+11.5

DEP

W 66-53

−34.5

UVM

W 94-90

+42.5

VMI

W 78-70

−2.5

BUCK

W 73-71

−2.5

CAN

W 71-53

−15.5

SBU

L 69-77

+1.5

UMBC

W 83-79

+16.5

ECU

L 70-73

−3.5

WMU

W 88-71

+8.5

NIU

W 81-67

−4.5

BALL

W 85-72

+11.5

OHIO

L 80-91

+14.5

KENT

L 81-87

+2.5

M-OH

L 102-105

+44.5

AKR

L 63-82

−21.5

MASS

L 67-68

−24.5

BGSU

W 89-78

+16.5

OHIO

L 83-95

+21.5

M-OH

L 71-73

−21.5

USA

L 69-81

+4.5

BALL

W 63-53

−25.5

NIU

L 70-72

−3.5

MASS

W 86-82

+16.5

AKR

L 85-99

+23.5

CMU

L 70-75

−6.5

EMU

W 72-67

−4.5

TOL

L 78-99

+21.5

AKR

L 70-73

−15.5

over 16under 14avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin

Marshall

31 games played

Straight up

18-13

58% wins

Against the spread

10-21

32% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line

Over / Under

19-12

61% overs · avg +4.1 pts vs the total

Straight up

18-1358%

W W W L W W L L L W W L W W W L L W W L W W L W L W W L W L L

2 straight losses1 of last 4 won

Against the spread

10-2132%

W W L L W L L W L W L L L L W L L L W L W L L L L L W L W L L

2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

19-1261%

U U O O O U U U O U O U O O U O O U O U U O O O O O O O O O U

3 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@MASS	W 78-72	+4.5	W +10.5	152.5	U 150
Nov 8	@TOL	W 85-73	+2.5	W +14.5	160.5	U 158
Nov 12	vsELON	W 96-89	-8.5	L −1.5	155.5	O 185
Nov 15	@UVA	L 78-104	+20.5	L −5.5	155.5	O 182
Nov 20	vsUAPB	W 98-70	-20.5	W +7.5	164.5	O 168
Nov 23	vsMERC	W 69-60	-11.5	L −2.5	147.5	U 129
Nov 26	vsLIP	L 67-90	-7.5	L −30.5	157.5	U 157
Dec 3	@UNCW	L 69-70	+8.5	W +7.5	150.5	U 139
Dec 6	@OHIO	L 81-88	+3.5	L −3.5	157.5	O 169
Dec 10	vsWKU	W 77-61	-1.5	W +14.5	159.5	U 138
Dec 13	vsWRST	W 76-74	-3.5	L −1.5	149.5	O 150
Dec 20	@TROY	L 63-70	+4.5	L −2.5	155.5	U 133
Dec 31	vsGAST	W 84-80	-13.5	L −9.5	151.5	O 164
Jan 3	vsAPP	W 88-81	-7.5	L −0.5	141.5	O 169
Jan 7	@JMU	W 66-64	+1.5	W +3.5	152.5	U 130
Jan 10	@GAST	L 73-81	-4.5	L −12.5	153.5	O 154
Jan 14	vsCCU	L 83-85	-9.5	L −11.5	151.5	O 168
Jan 17	vsJMU	W 77-72	-6.5	L −1.5	149.5	U 149
Jan 22	vsULM	W 115-60	-18.5	W +36.5	160.5	O 175
Jan 28	@TXST	L 68-72	-3.5	L −7.5	147.5	U 140
Jan 31	@ARST	W 70-61	+3.5	W +12.5	165.5	U 131
Feb 4	vsUSM	W 81-77	-10.5	L −6.5	148.5	O 158
Feb 7	vsM-OH	L 74-90	+1.5	L −14.5	162.5	O 164
Feb 11	@ODU	W 81-79	-3.5	L −1.5	155.5	O 160
Feb 14	@GASO	L 87-101	-2.5	L −16.5	162.5	O 188
Feb 16	vsUSA	W 84-80	-6.5	L −2.5	150.5	O 164
Feb 19	@APP	W 94-93	+3.5	W +4.5	143.5	O 187
Feb 21	@CCU	L 75-79	-2.5	L −6.5	153.5	O 154
Feb 24	vsODU	W 97-88	-7.5	W +1.5	159.5	O 185
Feb 27	vsGASO	L 82-99	-7.5	L −24.5	168.5	O 181
Mar 8	vsGASO	L 78-82	-2.5	L −6.5	166.5	U 160

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

MASS

W 78-72

+10.5

TOL

W 85-73

+14.5

ELON

W 96-89

−1.5

UVA

L 78-104

−5.5

UAPB

W 98-70

+7.5

MERC

W 69-60

−2.5

LIP

L 67-90

−30.5

UNCW

L 69-70

+7.5

OHIO

L 81-88

−3.5

WKU

W 77-61

+14.5

WRST

W 76-74

−1.5

TROY

L 63-70

−2.5

GAST

W 84-80

−9.5

APP

W 88-81

−0.5

JMU

W 66-64

+3.5

GAST

L 73-81

−12.5

CCU

L 83-85

−11.5

JMU

W 77-72

−1.5

ULM

W 115-60

+36.5

TXST

L 68-72

−7.5

ARST

W 70-61

+12.5

USM

W 81-77

−6.5

M-OH

L 74-90

−14.5

ODU

W 81-79

−1.5

GASO

L 87-101

−16.5

USA

W 84-80

−2.5

APP

W 94-93

+4.5

CCU

L 75-79

−6.5

ODU

W 97-88

+1.5

GASO

L 82-99

−24.5

GASO

L 78-82

−6.5

covered 10didn’t cover 21avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

MASS

W 78-72

−2.5

TOL

W 85-73

−2.5

ELON

W 96-89

+29.5

UVA

L 78-104

+26.5

UAPB

W 98-70

+3.5

MERC

W 69-60

−18.5

LIP

L 67-90

−0.5

UNCW

L 69-70

−11.5

OHIO

L 81-88

+11.5

WKU

W 77-61

−21.5

WRST

W 76-74

+0.5

TROY

L 63-70

−22.5

GAST

W 84-80

+12.5

APP

W 88-81

+27.5

JMU

W 66-64

−22.5

GAST

L 73-81

+0.5

CCU

L 83-85

+16.5

JMU

W 77-72

−0.5

ULM

W 115-60

+14.5

TXST

L 68-72

−7.5

ARST

W 70-61

−34.5

USM

W 81-77

+9.5

M-OH

L 74-90

+1.5

ODU

W 81-79

+4.5

GASO

L 87-101

+25.5

USA

W 84-80

+13.5

APP

W 94-93

+43.5

CCU

L 75-79

+0.5

ODU

W 97-88

+25.5

GASO

L 82-99

+12.5

GASO

L 78-82

−6.5

over 19under 12avg +4.1 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Buffalo has the better starters

Position by position: Buffalo 2, Marshall 1, even 2

BuffaloBetterMarshall

G D. Steffe TR9.9 pts · 3 reb · 2.5 ast Score 39

Even

G N. Otshudi14.5 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.5 ast Score 45

G D. Ducommun TR10.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 3.3 ast Score 15

MRSHSmall

G F. Oshodi TR8.6 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.5 ast Score 47

G J. Starling TR10.9 pts · 2.7 reb · 2.4 ast Score 55

BUFBig

G L. Rasmussen TR2.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.6 ast Score 15

F J. Pitre TR5.9 pts · 6.4 reb · 0.9 ast Score 30

Even

G D. Johnson TR2.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.2 ast Score 17

F A. Lorick TR10.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 1.1 ast Score 75

BUFBig

F E. Harding3.8 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.5 ast Score 11

BuffaloBetterMarshall

BUF offense215th of 366 · -6.6

BUFSmall

MRSH defense277th of 366 · -7.0

BUF defense257th of 366 · -6.7

MRSHSmall

MRSH offense198th of 366 · -6.1

Backcourt-5.1 · 3 players

Even

Backcourt-4.7 · 4 players

Frontcourt-0.2 · 2 players

BUFSmall

Frontcourt-1.5 · 1 player

Bench-3.9 · 4 players

MRSHSmall

Bench-1.4 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestBUF betterMRSH betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Buffalo

Guards

D. Steffe31 min · TRD. Ducommun31 min · TRJ. Starling29 min · TRM. Tyne19 min · TRK. Jones10 minH. Reede9 min · TR

Forwards

J. Pitre25 min · TRA. Lorick22 min · TRM. Buteliauskas6 minB. JohnNewT. KuskaNew

Marshall

Guards

N. Otshudi32 minF. Oshodi20 min · TRL. Rasmussen15 min · TRD. Johnson15 min · TRB. Slay8 minE. Manyuon2 min · TR

Forwards

E. Harding14 minC. Langdon3 min · TRV. Kuridza2 min · TRB. DjigoNew

Centers

K. Maker6 min · TR

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

BUF77.5 #106

MRSH80.5 #56

Points per possession

BUF1.14 #73

MRSH1.14 #71

Pace (possessions)

BUF68.2 #219

MRSH70.7 #86

Shooting

Effective FG%

BUF55.4 #30

MRSH54.8 #42

3-point %

BUF37.9 #20

MRSH36.8 #34

3-point attempt rate

BUF45.5 #57

MRSH44.3 #82

Free throw rate

BUF39.6 #65

MRSH29.2 #328

Possessions

Turnover rate

BUF16.2 #152

MRSH16.6 #172

Offensive rebound rate

BUF27.1 #291

MRSH31.9 #127

Assists per game

BUF14.1 #138

MRSH16.2 #43

Defense

Points allowed

BUF77.0 #244

MRSH78.9 #292

Points allowed per possession

BUF1.13 #279

MRSH1.11 #253

Opponent effective FG%

BUF55.1 #333

MRSH50.3 #118

Opponent 3-point %

BUF35.1 #252

MRSH33.6 #162

Turnovers forced

BUF17.8 #105

MRSH16.2 #206

Defensive rebound rate

BUF68.9 #209

MRSH66.2 #316

Steals per game

BUF7.6 #72

MRSH6.1 #225

Blocks per game

BUF2.8 #262

MRSH4.8 #23

BUF		MRSH
Scoring
77.5 #106	Points per game	80.5 #56
1.14 #73	Points per possession	1.14 #71
68.2 #219	Pace (possessions)	70.7 #86
Shooting
55.4 #30	Effective FG%	54.8 #42
37.9 #20	3-point %	36.8 #34
45.5 #57	3-point attempt rate	44.3 #82
39.6 #65	Free throw rate	29.2 #328
Possessions
16.2 #152	Turnover rate	16.6 #172
27.1 #291	Offensive rebound rate	31.9 #127
14.1 #138	Assists per game	16.2 #43
Defense
77.0 #244	Points allowed	78.9 #292
1.13 #279	Points allowed per possession	1.11 #253
55.1 #333	Opponent effective FG%	50.3 #118
35.1 #252	Opponent 3-point %	33.6 #162
17.8 #105	Turnovers forced	16.2 #206
68.9 #209	Defensive rebound rate	66.2 #316
7.6 #72	Steals per game	6.1 #225
2.8 #262	Blocks per game	4.8 #23

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Buffalo

15-15 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Mid-American Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Akron70–73
L@ Toledo78–99
Wvs E Michigan72–67
Lvs C Michigan70–75
L@ Akron85–99

A week or more of rest.

Marshall

18-13 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Sun Belt Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs GA Southern78–82
Lvs GA Southern82–99
Wvs Old Dominion97–88
L@ Coastal75–79
W@ App State94–93

A week or more of rest.