Chartway Arena · at Old Dominion
Line
WMU -1.5moved 3 toward WMU
Total157.5no move
| This season | ODU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WMU 77–75 · win probability WMU 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Spread
Total
Winner
Line
WMU -1.5
moved 3 toward WMU
Total
157.5
model 151.8 · Under by 6
Model edge
Even
matches the market
Public on the spread
67% ODU
82% of the money
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ODU has more of the edges
WMU 2, ODU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
WMU hits 35.3% and allows 36.1%; ODU hits 36.0% and allows 32.0%. Threes are 36.1% and 36.2% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WMU 30.5%, ODU 26.0%. Defensive: WMU 70.9%, ODU 69.7%
Shooting
Effective FG%: WMU 49.9 and allows 54.4; ODU 50.6 and allows 50.8
WMU offense vs ODU defense
Offense 137th of 366 against a defense 222nd, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WMU 0%, ODU 34%. Transfers in: WMU 9, ODU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WMU 16.8%, ODU 15.4%. Forced: WMU 13.4%, ODU 14.5%
Home court
ODU at home. This season: ODU 0-0 at home, WMU 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: WMU plays 69.3 a game (160th fastest), ODU 70.8 (81st). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
WMU has played the 175th-hardest schedule, ODU the 188th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
ODU offense vs WMU defense
Offense 240th of 366 against a defense 253rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: WMU 32.8, ODU 34.7. Allowed: WMU 37.5, ODU 42.0
How games like this went
Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines
| Situation | Games | Favorite won | Favorite covered | Went over |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Road favorites of under 3 | 1412 | 54% | 50% | 50% |
| Non-conference games at this spread | 1094 | 54% | 49% | 50% |
| Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite | 6763 | 75% | 50% | 51% |
| Games with a total of 155 to 159.5 | 1555 | 74% | 51% | 49% |
Market
Open → current
Spread
OpenODU -1.5
3 → WMU
NowWMU -1.5
3 pts toward WMU
Total
Open157.5
no move
Now157.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
WMU -120 · ODU -104
Line movement
Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot
Opened ODU -1.5 · now WMU -1.5 · moved 3 toward WMUmodel WMU -1.5 matches the line
model WMU -1.5 = line ✓
Opened 157.5 · unchangedmodel 152
model 152
Openline modelNow
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Public betting
Share of bets and of money
Bets
Money
Money is 15 pts ahead of bets on ODU +1.5
Over 157.5TotalUnder 157.5
Bets
Money
Bets
Money
Money is 33 pts ahead of bets on ODU
Books
8 sportsbooks · current prices
| Book | Spread | Total | Moneyline | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WMU | ODU | Over | Under | WMU | ODU | |
| BetMGMMGM | +1.5-105 | -1.5-115 | 157.5-110 | 157.5-110 | -120 | +100 |
| BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag | +1-110 | -1-110 | 157.5-110 | 157.5-110 | — | — |
| BetRiversBetRivers | +0.5-122 | -0.5-104 | 157.5-112 | 157.5-114 | -122 | -104 |
| BetUSBetUS | +1-110 | -1-110 | 157.5-110 | 157.5-110 | — | — |
| BovadaBovada | +1.5-110 | -1.5-110 | 157-110 | 157-110 | -115 | -105 |
| DraftKingsDK | +1.5-108 | -1.5-112 | 157.5-108 | 157.5-112 | -125 | +105 |
| FanDuelFD | +1.5-102 | -1.5-120 | 157.5-105 | 157.5-115 | -114 | -105 |
| LowVig.agLowVig.ag | +1-106 | -1-106 | 157.5-108 | 157.5-108 | — | — |
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | WMU -1.5 | WMU -1.4 | ODU +0.1 |
| Total | 157.5 | 151.8 | Under 5.8 |
| Projected score | — | WMU 76.6 · ODU 75.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WMU -1.0 | — |
| 1H total | 70.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | WMU 36 · ODU 35 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 8-2 80% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
W Michigan
29 games played
Straight up
9-20
31% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-11
62% overs · avg +1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 76-71 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 82-91 | +9.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 83-71 | +3.5 | W +15.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 78-83 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 172.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 58-91 | +26.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 83-60 | -1.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 55-84 | +4.5 | L −24.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 88-74 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 83-73 | +5.5 | W +15.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 14 | @ | L 51-91 | +25.5 | L −14.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 71-88 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 79-84 | +10.5 | W +5.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 76-87 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-62 | +1.5 | W +18.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 82-85 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 89-104 | +21.5 | W +6.5 | 163.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 54-72 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 77-65 | -5.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 65-85 | +1.5 | L −18.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 71-91 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 155.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 61-77 | +6.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 79-90 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 76-62 | +6.5 | W +20.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 73-90 | +14.5 | L −2.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 70-83 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 88-79 | +11.5 | W +20.5 | 149.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 67-69 | +12.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 71-74 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 138.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 6 | @ | L 78-86 | +13.5 | W +5.5 | 157.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CCU
W 76-71
+2.5
9
@
CAM
L 82-91
+0.5
12
vs
PFW
W 83-71
+15.5
16
@
SDAK
L 78-83
−1.5
20
@
OSU
L 58-91
−6.5
23
vs
MSM
W 83-60
+21.5
29
@
VAL
L 55-84
−24.5
3
vs
USI
W 88-74
+8.5
6
@
SIUE
W 83-73
+15.5
14
@
IOWA
L 51-91
−14.5
20
vs
BUF
L 71-88
−14.5
30
@
TOL
L 79-84
+5.5
6
@
M-OH
L 76-87
+3.5
10
vs
EMU
W 79-62
+18.5
13
vs
MASS
L 82-85
+2.5
17
@
AKR
L 89-104
+6.5
20
vs
BGSU
L 54-72
−11.5
24
vs
CMU
W 77-65
+6.5
27
@
NIU
L 65-85
−18.5
3
@
OHIO
L 71-91
−9.5
7
@
TXST
L 61-77
−9.5
11
vs
TOL
L 79-90
−4.5
14
@
EMU
W 76-62
+20.5
17
vs
AKR
L 73-90
−2.5
21
@
CMU
L 70-83
−9.5
24
@
BGSU
W 88-79
+20.5
27
vs
M-OH
L 67-69
+10.5
3
vs
BALL
L 71-74
−4.5
6
@
KENT
L 78-86
+5.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CCU
W 76-71
+0.5
9
@
CAM
L 82-91
+20.5
12
vs
PFW
W 83-71
−7.5
16
@
SDAK
L 78-83
−11.5
20
@
OSU
L 58-91
−10.5
23
vs
MSM
W 83-60
−7.5
29
@
VAL
L 55-84
−7.5
3
vs
USI
W 88-74
+11.5
6
@
SIUE
W 83-73
+16.5
14
@
IOWA
L 51-91
+4.5
20
vs
BUF
L 71-88
+8.5
30
@
TOL
L 79-84
+2.5
6
@
M-OH
L 76-87
+2.5
10
vs
EMU
W 79-62
−4.5
13
vs
MASS
L 82-85
+9.5
17
@
AKR
L 89-104
+29.5
20
vs
BGSU
L 54-72
−26.5
24
vs
CMU
W 77-65
−6.5
27
@
NIU
L 65-85
+3.5
3
@
OHIO
L 71-91
+6.5
7
@
TXST
L 61-77
−8.5
11
vs
TOL
L 79-90
+14.5
14
@
EMU
W 76-62
−5.5
17
vs
AKR
L 73-90
+2.5
21
@
CMU
L 70-83
+2.5
24
@
BGSU
W 88-79
+17.5
27
vs
M-OH
L 67-69
−25.5
3
vs
BALL
L 71-74
+6.5
6
@
KENT
L 78-86
+6.5
over 18under 11avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Old Dominion
32 games played
Straight up
11-21
34% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
21-11
66% overs · avg +2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 72-87 | +16.5 | W +1.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 60-57 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 73-96 | +15.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 69-99 | +10.5 | L −19.5 | 150.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 88-56 | -11.5 | W +20.5 | 156.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 71-75 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 142.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 75-89 | +22.5 | W +8.5 | 147.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 75-88 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 77-86 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 61-73 | +16.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 77-68 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 74-76 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 58-73 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 73-81 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 86-93 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 70-66 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-70 | +6.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 84-87 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 75-73 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 77-83 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 75-71 | +9.5 | W +13.5 | 159.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 64-81 | +2.5 | L −14.5 | 143.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 79-85 | -14.5 | L −20.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 78-72 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 79-81 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 78-55 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 16 | vs | W 83-72 | -6.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 81-86 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 88-97 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 159.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 81-73 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 87-80 | -9.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 84-88 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 172 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
M-OH
L 72-87
+1.5
11
vs
NORF
W 60-57
−5.5
15
@
GW
L 73-96
−7.5
18
@
XAV
L 69-99
−19.5
21
vs
MORG
W 88-56
+20.5
23
@
DREX
L 71-75
−0.5
25
@
VILL
L 75-89
+8.5
30
@
W&M
L 75-88
−4.5
6
@
RICH
L 77-86
+3.5
13
@
GMU
L 61-73
+4.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-68
+11.5
20
vs
CCU
L 74-76
−5.5
28
@
MD
L 58-73
−0.5
31
vs
APP
L 73-81
−9.5
3
vs
GASO
L 86-93
−5.5
8
@
CCU
W 70-66
+8.5
10
@
JMU
L 69-70
+5.5
15
@
GASO
L 84-87
+2.5
17
@
APP
W 75-73
+9.5
21
vs
TROY
L 77-83
−0.5
28
@
ARST
W 75-71
+13.5
31
@
TXST
L 64-81
−14.5
4
vs
ULM
L 79-85
−20.5
7
vs
OHIO
W 78-72
+9.5
11
vs
MRSH
L 79-81
+1.5
14
vs
GAST
W 78-55
+19.5
16
vs
UL
W 83-72
+4.5
21
@
USM
L 81-86
−0.5
24
@
MRSH
L 88-97
−1.5
27
@
GAST
W 81-73
+6.5
3
vs
ULM
W 87-80
−2.5
4
vs
GASO
L 84-88
−1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
M-OH
L 72-87
+5.5
11
vs
NORF
W 60-57
−32.5
15
@
GW
L 73-96
+13.5
18
@
XAV
L 69-99
+17.5
21
vs
MORG
W 88-56
−12.5
23
@
DREX
L 71-75
+3.5
25
@
VILL
L 75-89
+16.5
30
@
W&M
L 75-88
−0.5
6
@
RICH
L 77-86
+9.5
13
@
GMU
L 61-73
−10.5
17
vs
JMU
W 77-68
−3.5
20
vs
CCU
L 74-76
+2.5
28
@
MD
L 58-73
−23.5
31
vs
APP
L 73-81
+17.5
3
vs
GASO
L 86-93
+17.5
8
@
CCU
W 70-66
−15.5
10
@
JMU
L 69-70
−8.5
15
@
GASO
L 84-87
+8.5
17
@
APP
W 75-73
+7.5
21
vs
TROY
L 77-83
+7.5
28
@
ARST
W 75-71
−13.5
31
@
TXST
L 64-81
+1.5
4
vs
ULM
L 79-85
+9.5
7
vs
OHIO
W 78-72
−6.5
11
vs
MRSH
L 79-81
+4.5
14
vs
GAST
W 78-55
−14.5
16
vs
UL
W 83-72
+19.5
21
@
USM
L 81-86
+19.5
24
@
MRSH
L 88-97
+25.5
27
@
GAST
W 81-73
+4.5
3
vs
ULM
W 87-80
+9.5
4
vs
GASO
L 84-88
+14.5
over 21under 11avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
W Michigan has the better starters
Position by position: W Michigan 3, Old Dominion 0, even 2
W MichiganBetterOld Dominion
G T. Hayhurst TR10 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 41
=Even
G B. Benjamin TR5.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 32
G M. Bendinger TR14.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 37
=Even
G Z. Wiggins6 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 46
G R. Lee TR15.9 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 79
←WMUBig
G S. Hubbard3.2 pts · 2.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 10
G J. Washington TR10 pts · 2.3 reb · 4 ast
Score 73
←WMUBig
F Z. Weluche-Ume TR11.1 pts · 7.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 29
F I. Finlinson TR9.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 56
←WMUSmall
F J. Turner6.2 pts · 3.7 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 30
W MichiganBetterOld Dominion
WMU offense137th of 366 · -4.0
←WMUSmall
ODU defense222nd of 366 · -5.8
WMU defense253rd of 366 · -6.6
=Even
ODU offense240th of 366 · -7.3
Backcourt-1.0 · 4 players
←WMUSmall
Backcourt-3.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt0.0 · 1 player
←WMUSmall
Frontcourt-2.9 · 2 players
Bench-1.7 · 4 players
←WMUSmall
Bench-3.2 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestWMU betterODU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Hayhurst31 min · TRM. Bendinger31 min · TRR. Lee29 min · TRJ. Washington27 min · TRJ. Gomez23 min · TRA. Harakow19 min · TR
Forwards
I. Finlinson23 min · TRJ. Eli15 min · TRA. Kiudulas14 min · TRD. WatkinsNew
Centers
J. JünemannNew
Guards
B. Benjamin20 min · TRZ. Wiggins18 minS. Hubbard16 minK. Thurmon11 min · TRC. Parker3 minR. Hellams2 min
Forwards
Z. Weluche-Ume31 min · TRJ. Turner21 minK. Howze10 min · TRB. Nacey8 minJ. NwekeNewL. MartiniNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.9 #203 | Points per game | 75.7 #150 |
| 1.06 #225 | Points per possession | 1.06 #217 |
| 69.3 #160 | Pace (possessions) | 70.8 #81 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.9 #241 | Effective FG% | 50.6 #203 |
| 35.3 #95 | 3-point % | 36.0 #60 |
| 36.1 #248 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.2 #245 |
| 32.8 #241 | Free throw rate | 34.7 #189 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.8 #191 | Turnover rate | 15.4 #95 |
| 30.5 #177 | Offensive rebound rate | 26.0 #323 |
| 12.4 #256 | Assists per game | 12.9 #218 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.1 #320 | Points allowed | 78.7 #283 |
| 1.16 #336 | Points allowed per possession | 1.12 #263 |
| 54.4 #310 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.8 #145 |
| 36.1 #307 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.0 #62 |
| 13.4 #346 | Turnovers forced | 14.5 #321 |
| 70.9 #110 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.7 #176 |
| 4.1 #362 | Steals per game | 5.7 #275 |
| 2.5 #301 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #208 |
W Michigan
9-20 in 2025-26 overall · 4-14 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Kent State78–86
- Lvs Ball State71–74
- Lvs Miami OH67–69
- W@ Bowling Green88–79
- L@ C Michigan70–83
A week or more of rest.
Old Dominion
11-21 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs GA Southern84–88
- Wvs UL Monroe87–80
- W@ Georgia St81–73
- L@ Marshall88–97
- L@ Southern Miss81–86
A week or more of rest.