1. NCAAB
  2. Sun, Nov 8
  3. CAM @ WMU
NCAAB · Sun, Nov 8

Campbell Fighting Camels at Western Michigan Broncos

University Arena (MI) · at W Michigan
#243CAMCampbell
@
#187WMUW Michigan
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
CAMThis seasonWMU
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects WMU 81–74 · win probability WMU 71%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: WMU has more of the edges

CAM 2, WMU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
WMUBig
WMU offense vs CAM defense
Offense 137th of 366 against a defense 275th, on the model’s ratings
CAMBig
Free throws
Free throw rate: CAM 43.5, WMU 32.8. Allowed: CAM 37.0, WMU 37.5
CAMSmall
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CAM 17.6%, WMU 16.8%. Forced: CAM 17.0%, WMU 13.4%
WMUSmall
Three-pointers
CAM hits 32.3% and allows 35.5%; WMU hits 35.3% and allows 36.1%. Threes are 36.9% and 36.1% of their shots
WMUSmall
Home court
WMU at home. This season: WMU 0-0 at home, CAM 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
CAM has played the 134th-hardest schedule, WMU the 175th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
CAM offense vs WMU defense
Offense 217th of 366 against a defense 253rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CAM 33.5%, WMU 30.5%. Defensive: CAM 68.0%, WMU 70.9%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: CAM plays 70.0 a game (118th fastest), WMU 69.3 (160th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: CAM 50.1 and allows 53.9; WMU 49.9 and allows 54.4
Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—WMU -6.5—
Total—154.7—
Projected score—CAM 74.1 · WMU 80.6

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›
ModelActual
1H spreadWMU -3.7—
1H total72.3—
1H projected scoreCAM 34.3 · WMU 38—
The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

The starting fives are even

Position by position: Campbell 0, W Michigan 0, even 5
CampbellBetterW Michigan
G L. Waddles TR11.7 pts · 4.7 reb · 2 ast Score 48
Even
G T. Hayhurst TR10 pts · 3.3 reb · 1.4 ast Score 41
G E. Butkus NEWNo Division I numbers yet Not ranked
No call
G M. Bendinger TR14.4 pts · 3.6 reb · 1.1 ast Score 37
G A. Wright NEWNo Division I numbers yet Not ranked
No call
G R. Lee TR15.9 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.9 ast Score 79
G J. Browder NEWNo Division I numbers yet Not ranked
No call
G J. Washington TR10 pts · 2.3 reb · 4 ast Score 73
F N. Kapic TR3.9 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast Score 55
Even
F I. Finlinson TR9.4 pts · 3.8 reb · 0.8 ast Score 56
CampbellBetterW Michigan
CAM offense217th of 366 · -6.7
Even
WMU defense253rd of 366 · -6.6
CAM defense275th of 366 · -6.9
WMUBig
WMU offense137th of 366 · -4.0
Backcourt-0.7 · 4 players
Even
Backcourt-1.0 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.0 · 1 player
Even
Frontcourt0.0 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
No call
Bench-1.7 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestCAM betterWMU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Campbell
Guards
L. Waddles29 min · TRE. ButkusNewA. WrightNewJ. BrowderNewB. RitgerNewC. McAbeeNew
Forwards
N. Kapic11 min · TRK. RogersNewS. MooreNewB. ThetNew
W Michigan
Guards
T. Hayhurst31 min · TRM. Bendinger31 min · TRR. Lee29 min · TRJ. Washington27 min · TRJ. Gomez23 min · TRA. Harakow19 min · TR
Forwards
I. Finlinson23 min · TRJ. Eli15 min · TRA. Kiudulas14 min · TRD. WatkinsNew
Centers
J. JünemannNew
In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
CAMWMU
Scoring
76.1 #140Points per game73.9 #203
1.08 #175Points per possession1.06 #225
70.0 #118Pace (possessions)69.3 #160
Shooting
50.1 #230Effective FG%49.9 #241
32.3 #2673-point %35.3 #95
36.9 #2323-point attempt rate36.1 #248
43.5 #16Free throw rate32.8 #241
Possessions
17.6 #240Turnover rate16.8 #191
33.5 #77Offensive rebound rate30.5 #177
11.4 #315Assists per game12.4 #256
Defense
78.8 #289Points allowed80.1 #320
1.13 #282Points allowed per possession1.16 #336
53.9 #295Opponent effective FG%54.4 #310
35.5 #277Opponent 3-point %36.1 #307
17.0 #153Turnovers forced13.4 #346
68.0 #254Defensive rebound rate70.9 #110
6.5 #179Steals per game4.1 #362
1.5 #361Blocks per game2.5 #301
From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Campbell

14-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Monmouth64–74
  • Wvs UNC Wilmington85–70
  • Wvs Stony Brook96–89
  • Wvs NC A&T90–72
  • L@ Towson67–71

A week or more of rest.

W Michigan

9-20 in 2025-26 overall · 4-14 in conference · Mid-American Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • L@ Kent State78–86
  • Lvs Ball State71–74
  • Lvs Miami OH67–69
  • W@ Bowling Green88–79
  • L@ C Michigan70–83

A week or more of rest.