Freedom Hall (TN) · at ETSU
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ETSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ETSU 78–70 · win probability ETSU 73%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ETSU has more of the edges
CAM 1, ETSU 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
CAM has played the 134th-hardest schedule, ETSU the 309th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: CAM 50.1 and allows 53.9; ETSU 55.3 and allows 51.0
Three-pointers
CAM hits 32.3% and allows 35.5%; ETSU hits 34.7% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 36.9% and 37.8% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: CAM 17.6%, ETSU 15.2%. Forced: CAM 17.0%, ETSU 18.4%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: CAM plays 70.0 a game (118th fastest), ETSU 67.0 (279th). Faster games mean more points
CAM offense vs ETSU defense
Offense 217th of 366 against a defense 140th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: CAM 43.5, ETSU 35.0. Allowed: CAM 37.0, ETSU 36.4
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: CAM 0%, ETSU 29%. Transfers in: CAM 2, ETSU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
ETSU at home. This season: ETSU 0-0 at home, CAM 0-0 away
ETSU offense vs CAM defense
Offense 224th of 366 against a defense 275th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: CAM 33.5%, ETSU 28.3%. Defensive: CAM 68.0%, ETSU 72.1%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ETSU -7.2 | — |
| Total | — | 147.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | CAM 70.3 · ETSU 77.5 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ETSU -4.1 | — |
| 1H total | 69.1 | — |
| 1H projected score | CAM 32.5 · ETSU 36.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Campbell
32 games played
Straight up
14-18
44% wins
Against the spread
18-14
56% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 64-96 | +20.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 65-73 | +15.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 91-82 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 85-91 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 71-67 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 51-99 | +17.5 | L −30.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 76-87 | +14.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 69-64 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 70-98 | +36.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 50-78 | +13.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 23 | vs | W 102-79 | -5.5 | W +17.5 | 145.5 | O 181 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 72-86 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 68-65 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 97-82 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 86-72 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 82-83 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 75-78 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 83-87 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 160.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 73-88 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 69-81 | -4.5 | L −16.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 104-96 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 168.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 81-60 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 79-71 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 57-62 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 159.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 84-83 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 167.5 | U 167 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 68-73 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 60-65 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-71 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 90-72 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 96-89 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 185 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 85-70 | +6.5 | W +21.5 | 149.5 | O 155 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 64-74 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
WIS
L 64-96
−11.5
6
@
WVU
L 65-73
+7.5
9
vs
WMU
W 91-82
−0.5
19
@
WEB
L 85-91
−4.5
21
vs
UTA
W 71-67
+2.5
25
@
WAKE
L 51-99
−30.5
2
@
PSU
L 76-87
+3.5
14
vs
BALL
W 69-64
−3.5
17
@
GONZ
L 70-98
+8.5
21
@
MINN
L 50-78
−14.5
23
vs
GB
W 102-79
+17.5
29
@
HOF
L 72-86
−7.5
31
@
MONM
W 68-65
+4.5
3
vs
NE
W 97-82
+11.5
8
vs
HAMP
W 86-72
+7.5
10
@
ELON
L 82-83
+3.5
17
@
UNCW
L 75-78
+3.5
22
@
COFC
L 83-87
−0.5
24
vs
MONM
L 73-88
−19.5
29
vs
STBK
L 69-81
−16.5
31
@
W&M
W 104-96
+16.5
5
vs
DREX
W 81-60
+16.5
7
@
NCAT
W 79-71
+4.5
15
vs
COFC
L 57-62
−8.5
19
vs
W&M
W 84-83
+2.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 68-73
−1.5
26
@
DREX
L 60-65
−3.5
28
@
TOW
L 67-71
+0.5
3
vs
NCAT
W 90-72
+9.5
7
vs
STBK
W 96-89
+4.5
8
vs
UNCW
W 85-70
+21.5
9
vs
MONM
L 64-74
−8.5
covered 18didn’t cover 14avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
WIS
L 64-96
+8.5
6
@
WVU
L 65-73
−0.5
9
vs
WMU
W 91-82
+20.5
19
@
WEB
L 85-91
+16.5
21
vs
UTA
W 71-67
−13.5
25
@
WAKE
L 51-99
−9.5
2
@
PSU
L 76-87
+8.5
14
vs
BALL
W 69-64
−12.5
17
@
GONZ
L 70-98
+7.5
21
@
MINN
L 50-78
−17.5
23
vs
GB
W 102-79
+35.5
29
@
HOF
L 72-86
+8.5
31
@
MONM
W 68-65
−19.5
3
vs
NE
W 97-82
+24.5
8
vs
HAMP
W 86-72
+12.5
10
@
ELON
L 82-83
+3.5
17
@
UNCW
L 75-78
+3.5
22
@
COFC
L 83-87
+9.5
24
vs
MONM
L 73-88
+12.5
29
vs
STBK
L 69-81
−2.5
31
@
W&M
W 104-96
+31.5
5
vs
DREX
W 81-60
−0.5
7
@
NCAT
W 79-71
−6.5
15
vs
COFC
L 57-62
−40.5
19
vs
W&M
W 84-83
−0.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 68-73
−9.5
26
@
DREX
L 60-65
−18.5
28
@
TOW
L 67-71
−4.5
3
vs
NCAT
W 90-72
+7.5
7
vs
STBK
W 96-89
+36.5
8
vs
UNCW
W 85-70
+5.5
9
vs
MONM
L 64-74
−13.5
over 17under 15avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
ETSU
32 games played
Straight up
21-11
66% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 64-68 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 75-63 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 78-74 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 77-62 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-55 | -19.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 80-57 | -12.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 71-88 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 91-65 | -7.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 75-76 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 58-77 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 75-81 | -9.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 74-49 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 77-71 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 81-67 | -16.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-60 | -11.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 68-72 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 76-75 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 67-66 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 84-55 | -17.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 88-90 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 86-72 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 75-71 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 87-70 | -14.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 73-61 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 72-82 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 78-69 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 87-75 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 69-72 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 76-82 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 83-76 | -14.5 | L −7.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 69-67 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 61-76 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
PRES
L 64-68
−10.5
12
vs
NKU
W 75-63
+5.5
15
@
UNA
W 78-74
+5.5
21
vs
MORE
W 77-62
+4.5
23
vs
ULM
W 97-55
+22.5
29
vs
CARK
W 80-57
+10.5
2
@
DAY
L 71-88
−5.5
5
vs
USA
W 91-65
+18.5
12
@
APSU
L 75-76
−4.5
16
@
UNC
L 58-77
−1.5
20
vs
JXST
L 75-81
−15.5
30
@
CIT
W 74-49
+12.5
3
vs
MER
W 77-71
−1.5
7
vs
VMI
W 81-67
−2.5
10
vs
UNCG
W 86-60
+14.5
14
@
WCU
L 68-72
−10.5
17
@
SAM
W 76-75
−2.5
21
@
UTC
W 67-66
−3.5
23
vs
CIT
W 84-55
+11.5
29
vs
WCU
L 88-90
−11.5
1
@
WOF
W 86-72
+12.5
4
vs
FUR
W 75-71
−1.5
7
@
VMI
W 87-70
+2.5
11
vs
UTC
W 73-61
+1.5
14
vs
SAM
L 72-82
−17.5
18
@
FUR
W 78-69
+10.5
21
@
UNCG
W 87-75
+5.5
25
vs
WOF
L 69-72
−9.5
28
@
MER
L 76-82
−4.5
7
vs
CIT
W 83-76
−7.5
8
vs
WCU
W 69-67
−0.5
9
vs
FUR
L 61-76
−16.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
PRES
L 64-68
−9.5
12
vs
NKU
W 75-63
−4.5
15
@
UNA
W 78-74
+6.5
21
vs
MORE
W 77-62
−5.5
23
vs
ULM
W 97-55
+5.5
29
vs
CARK
W 80-57
−7.5
2
@
DAY
L 71-88
+18.5
5
vs
USA
W 91-65
+12.5
12
@
APSU
L 75-76
+7.5
16
@
UNC
L 58-77
−15.5
20
vs
JXST
L 75-81
+21.5
30
@
CIT
W 74-49
−17.5
3
vs
MER
W 77-71
−0.5
7
vs
VMI
W 81-67
+1.5
10
vs
UNCG
W 86-60
−2.5
14
@
WCU
L 68-72
−7.5
17
@
SAM
W 76-75
+2.5
21
@
UTC
W 67-66
−10.5
23
vs
CIT
W 84-55
−2.5
29
vs
WCU
L 88-90
+32.5
1
@
WOF
W 86-72
+11.5
4
vs
FUR
W 75-71
+4.5
7
@
VMI
W 87-70
+13.5
11
vs
UTC
W 73-61
−11.5
14
vs
SAM
L 72-82
+8.5
18
@
FUR
W 78-69
+6.5
21
@
UNCG
W 87-75
+13.5
25
vs
WOF
L 69-72
−8.5
28
@
MER
L 76-82
+8.5
7
vs
CIT
W 83-76
+19.5
8
vs
WCU
W 69-67
−9.5
9
vs
FUR
L 61-76
−2.5
over 17under 15avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Campbell has the better starters
Position by position: Campbell 1, ETSU 0, even 4
CampbellBetterETSU
G L. Waddles TR11.7 pts · 4.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 48
←CAMSmall
G B. Ward TR11.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 29
G E. Butkus NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Cooper TR11.2 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 34
G A. Wright NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G T. Hennig TR9.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 24
G J. Browder NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Johnson5.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 28
F N. Kapic TR3.9 pts · 2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 55
=Even
F J. McCullum7.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 49
CampbellBetterETSU
CAM offense217th of 366 · -6.7
→ETSUSmall
ETSU defense140th of 366 · -2.9
CAM defense275th of 366 · -6.9
=Even
ETSU offense224th of 366 · -6.9
Backcourt-0.7 · 4 players
←CAMBig
Backcourt-7.6 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.0 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.3 · 1 player
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestCAM betterETSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Waddles29 min · TRE. ButkusNewA. WrightNewJ. BrowderNewB. RitgerNewC. McAbeeNew
Forwards
N. Kapic11 min · TRK. RogersNewS. MooreNewB. ThetNew
Guards
B. Ward31 min · TRJ. Cooper31 min · TRT. Hennig25 min · TRM. Johnson22 minT. Mason17 min · TRD. PayneNew
Forwards
J. McCullum22 minB. Crump15 minM. Marion12 min · TRK. CampbellNewE. SmithNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.1 #140 | Points per game | 76.8 #121 |
| 1.08 #175 | Points per possession | 1.15 #59 |
| 70.0 #118 | Pace (possessions) | 67.0 #279 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.1 #230 | Effective FG% | 55.3 #33 |
| 32.3 #267 | 3-point % | 34.7 #132 |
| 36.9 #232 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.8 #216 |
| 43.5 #16 | Free throw rate | 35.0 #180 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.6 #240 | Turnover rate | 15.2 #79 |
| 33.5 #77 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #252 |
| 11.4 #315 | Assists per game | 13.9 #154 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.8 #289 | Points allowed | 70.1 #61 |
| 1.13 #282 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #77 |
| 53.9 #295 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #161 |
| 35.5 #277 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.9 #110 |
| 17.0 #153 | Turnovers forced | 18.4 #79 |
| 68.0 #254 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.1 #64 |
| 6.5 #179 | Steals per game | 8.6 #16 |
| 1.5 #361 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #180 |
Campbell
14-18 in 2025-26 overall · 10-11 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Monmouth64–74
- Wvs UNC Wilmington85–70
- Wvs Stony Brook96–89
- Wvs NC A&T90–72
- L@ Towson67–71
A week or more of rest.
ETSU
21-11 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Furman61–76
- Wvs W Carolina69–67
- Wvs The Citadel83–76
- L@ Mercer76–82
- Lvs Wofford69–72
A week or more of rest.