Stegeman Coliseum · at Georgia
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UGA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UGA 89–66 · win probability UGA 98%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UGA has more of the edges
PRES 2, UGA 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: PRES 19.4%, UGA 14.3%. Forced: PRES 15.7%, UGA 18.4%
Context
Schedule so far
PRES has played the 272nd-hardest schedule, UGA the 52nd. A record against a soft schedule means less
PRES offense vs UGA defense
Offense 222nd of 366 against a defense 75th, on the model’s ratings
UGA offense vs PRES defense
Offense 19th of 366 against a defense 160th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: PRES plays 66.9 a game (283rd fastest), UGA 74.7 (8th). Faster games mean more points
Three-pointers
PRES hits 31.6% and allows 34.7%; UGA hits 33.8% and allows 33.6%. Threes are 28.0% and 44.3% of their shots
Shooting
Effective FG%: PRES 51.0 and allows 51.2; UGA 54.2 and allows 50.6
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: PRES 86%, UGA 46%. Transfers in: PRES 0, UGA 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Free throws
Free throw rate: PRES 39.4, UGA 36.9. Allowed: PRES 37.1, UGA 30.2
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: PRES 33.1%, UGA 34.9%. Defensive: PRES 69.3%, UGA 65.1%
Home court
UGA at home. This season: UGA 0-0 at home, PRES 0-0 away
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UGA -22.9 | — |
| Total | — | 154.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | PRES 66 · UGA 88.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UGA -13.5 | — |
| 1H total | 72.4 | — |
| 1H projected score | PRES 29.4 · UGA 42.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Presbyterian
30 games played
Straight up
12-18
40% wins
Against the spread
17-13
57% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 55-76 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 68-64 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 63-61 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 61-81 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 16 | @ | L 62-64 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 57-67 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 124.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 46-86 | +25.5 | L −14.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 69-41 | -8.5 | W +19.5 | 133.5 | U 110 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 56-63 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 80-72 | -7.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 53-74 | +4.5 | L −16.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 81-87 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 86-77 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 137.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 61-80 | +6.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 70-77 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 71-70 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 92-55 | -8.5 | W +28.5 | 145.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 87-83 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 147.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 72-82 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 81-84 | +14.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 84-93 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 68-62 | -17.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 67-84 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 58-57 | +5.5 | W +6.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 72-65 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 74-76 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 73-79 | +12.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 70-74 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 91-85 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 71-73 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
NAVY
L 55-76
−17.5
8
vs
ETSU
W 68-64
+10.5
10
@
GAST
W 63-61
+5.5
12
@
SC
L 61-81
−3.5
16
@
SAC
L 62-64
+4.5
18
@
CAL
L 57-67
+0.5
21
@
UCLA
L 46-86
−14.5
30
vs
CIT
W 69-41
+19.5
3
@
WOF
L 56-63
−2.5
6
vs
MORE
W 80-72
+0.5
17
@
ECU
L 53-74
−16.5
21
@
MAN
L 81-87
−8.5
3
vs
UPST
W 86-77
+7.5
7
@
RAD
L 61-80
−12.5
10
@
LONG
L 70-77
−3.5
14
vs
UNCA
W 71-70
+3.5
17
@
GWEB
W 92-55
+28.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 87-83
+5.5
24
vs
WIN
L 72-82
−4.5
29
@
HPU
L 81-84
+11.5
31
vs
RAD
L 84-93
−10.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 68-62
−11.5
12
@
CHSO
L 67-84
−15.5
14
@
UNCA
W 58-57
+6.5
19
vs
LONG
W 72-65
+4.5
21
@
UPST
L 74-76
−3.5
26
vs
HPU
L 73-79
+6.5
28
@
WIN
L 70-74
+3.5
6
vs
RAD
W 91-85
+8.5
7
vs
WIN
L 71-73
+5.5
covered 17didn’t cover 13avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
NAVY
L 55-76
−10.5
8
vs
ETSU
W 68-64
−9.5
10
@
GAST
W 63-61
−17.5
12
@
SC
L 61-81
+4.5
16
@
SAC
L 62-64
−24.5
18
@
CAL
L 57-67
−0.5
21
@
UCLA
L 46-86
+0.5
30
vs
CIT
W 69-41
−23.5
3
@
WOF
L 56-63
−19.5
6
vs
MORE
W 80-72
+17.5
17
@
ECU
L 53-74
−4.5
21
@
MAN
L 81-87
+29.5
3
vs
UPST
W 86-77
+25.5
7
@
RAD
L 61-80
−6.5
10
@
LONG
L 70-77
+7.5
14
vs
UNCA
W 71-70
+2.5
17
@
GWEB
W 92-55
+1.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 87-83
+22.5
24
vs
WIN
L 72-82
+7.5
29
@
HPU
L 81-84
+15.5
31
vs
RAD
L 84-93
+25.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 68-62
−15.5
12
@
CHSO
L 67-84
+4.5
14
@
UNCA
W 58-57
−22.5
19
vs
LONG
W 72-65
−2.5
21
@
UPST
L 74-76
+8.5
26
vs
HPU
L 73-79
+0.5
28
@
WIN
L 70-74
−6.5
6
vs
RAD
W 91-85
+29.5
7
vs
WIN
L 71-73
−1.5
over 16under 14avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Georgia
33 games played
Straight up
22-11
67% wins
Against the spread
16-17
48% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Against the spread
16-1748%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 104-59 | -23.5 | W +21.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 5 | vs | W 94-29 | -33.5 | W +31.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 120-81 | -28.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 201 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 92-87 | -15.5 | L −10.5 | 155.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 87-57 | -40.5 | L −10.5 | 170.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 78-77 | -10.5 | L −9.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 94-97 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 123-81 | -34.5 | W +7.5 | 160.5 | O 204 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 107-73 | +1.5 | W +35.5 | 176.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 84-65 | -5.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | U 149 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 112-82 | -32.5 | L −2.5 | 167.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 103-74 | -36.5 | L −7.5 | 173.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 89-74 | -30.5 | L −15.5 | 179.5 | U 163 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 104-100 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 173.5 | O 204 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 77-92 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 172.5 | U 169 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 75-70 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 163.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 95-97 | -10.5 | L −12.5 | 158.5 | O 192 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 90-76 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 181.5 | U 166 |
| Jan 20 | @ | W 74-72 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 163.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 67-87 | +3.5 | L −16.5 | 168.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 85-86 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 77-92 | -4.5 | L −19.5 | 173.5 | U 169 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 83-71 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 66-86 | +8.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 78-94 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 164.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 17 | @ | W 86-78 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-80 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 162.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 80-88 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 163.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 87-68 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 98-88 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 179.5 | O 186 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 102-96 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | O 198 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 72-76 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 77-102 | -1.5 | L −26.5 | 167.5 | O 179 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BELL
W 104-59
+21.5
5
vs
UMES
W 94-29
+31.5
9
vs
MORE
W 120-81
+10.5
14
vs
GT
W 92-87
−10.5
17
vs
FAMU
W 87-57
−10.5
21
vs
XAV
W 78-77
−9.5
23
vs
CLEM
L 94-97
−1.5
29
vs
TNTC
W 123-81
+7.5
2
@
FSU
W 107-73
+35.5
13
vs
CIN
W 84-65
+13.5
18
vs
WCU
W 112-82
−2.5
22
vs
WGA
W 103-74
−7.5
29
vs
LIU
W 89-74
−15.5
3
vs
AUB
W 104-100
−2.5
6
@
FLA
L 77-92
−5.5
10
@
SC
W 75-70
+0.5
14
vs
MISS
L 95-97
−12.5
17
vs
ARK
W 90-76
+11.5
20
@
MIZ
W 74-72
+3.5
24
@
TEX
L 67-87
−16.5
28
vs
TENN
L 85-86
+0.5
31
vs
TA&M
L 77-92
−19.5
7
@
LSU
W 83-71
+10.5
11
vs
FLA
L 66-86
−11.5
14
@
OU
L 78-94
−14.5
17
@
UK
W 86-78
+14.5
21
vs
TEX
W 91-80
+8.5
25
@
VAN
L 80-88
−0.5
28
vs
SC
W 87-68
+6.5
3
vs
ALA
W 98-88
+11.5
7
@
MSST
W 102-96
+0.5
12
vs
MISS
L 72-76
−9.5
19
vs
SLU
L 77-102
−26.5
covered 16didn’t cover 17avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BELL
W 104-59
+12.5
5
vs
UMES
W 94-29
−19.5
9
vs
MORE
W 120-81
+50.5
14
vs
GT
W 92-87
+23.5
17
vs
FAMU
W 87-57
−26.5
21
vs
XAV
W 78-77
−10.5
23
vs
CLEM
L 94-97
+38.5
29
vs
TNTC
W 123-81
+43.5
2
@
FSU
W 107-73
+3.5
13
vs
CIN
W 84-65
−8.5
18
vs
WCU
W 112-82
+26.5
22
vs
WGA
W 103-74
+3.5
29
vs
LIU
W 89-74
−16.5
3
vs
AUB
W 104-100
+30.5
6
@
FLA
L 77-92
−3.5
10
@
SC
W 75-70
−18.5
14
vs
MISS
L 95-97
+33.5
17
vs
ARK
W 90-76
−15.5
20
@
MIZ
W 74-72
−17.5
24
@
TEX
L 67-87
−14.5
28
vs
TENN
L 85-86
+13.5
31
vs
TA&M
L 77-92
−4.5
7
@
LSU
W 83-71
−7.5
11
vs
FLA
L 66-86
−12.5
14
@
OU
L 78-94
+7.5
17
@
UK
W 86-78
+2.5
21
vs
TEX
W 91-80
+8.5
25
@
VAN
L 80-88
+4.5
28
vs
SC
W 87-68
−3.5
3
vs
ALA
W 98-88
+6.5
7
@
MSST
W 102-96
+30.5
12
vs
MISS
L 72-76
−8.5
19
vs
SLU
L 77-102
+11.5
over 18under 15avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Georgia has the better starters
Position by position: Presbyterian 0, Georgia 3, even 2
PresbyterianBetterGeorgia
G C. Parrish14.7 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 56
→UGABig
G B. Cain13.1 pts · 5.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 95
G T. Wilson11.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 52
→UGABig
G F. Dilione V TR14 pts · 3.2 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 93
G E. Taylor5.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 3.6 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Millender12 pts · 2.8 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 89
G I. King3.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 2
→UGABig
F K. Catchings11.6 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 78
F J. Peterson11 pts · 7.2 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 71
=Even
F J. Scott TR3.9 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 78
PresbyterianBetterGeorgia
PRES offense222nd of 366 · -6.8
→UGABig
UGA defense75th of 366 · +0.7
PRES defense160th of 366 · -3.5
→UGABig
UGA offense19th of 366 · +7.8
Backcourt-4.4 · 4 players
→UGABig
Backcourt+8.6 · 3 players
Frontcourt+1.1 · 1 player
→UGASmall
Frontcourt+2.4 · 2 players
Bench-1.6 · 5 players
→UGASmall
Bench+0.4 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestPRES betterUGA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
C. Parrish35 minT. Wilson32 minE. Taylor21 minI. King19 minK. Hudson11 minJ. Bowden8 min
Forwards
J. Peterson30 minC. Chiakwelu11 minA. AyelyineNewL. HackworthNew
Guards
B. Cain28 minF. Dilione V28 min · TRM. Millender26 minB. Klatsky2 minM. Jennings1 minK. MillenderNew
Forwards
K. Catchings23 minJ. Scott18 min · TRB. Dunlap17 min · TRK. Stagg13 minA. Osasuyi12 min · TRM. KuanyNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.0 #286 | Points per game | 89.4 #3 |
| 1.05 #249 | Points per possession | 1.19 #18 |
| 66.9 #283 | Pace (possessions) | 74.7 #8 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.0 #196 | Effective FG% | 54.2 #61 |
| 31.6 #302 | 3-point % | 33.8 #185 |
| 28.0 #360 | 3-point attempt rate | 44.3 #83 |
| 39.4 #71 | Free throw rate | 36.9 #131 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.4 #335 | Turnover rate | 14.3 #31 |
| 33.1 #86 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.9 #49 |
| 12.4 #260 | Assists per game | 14.8 #102 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.1 #133 | Points allowed | 79.8 #314 |
| 1.09 #192 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #135 |
| 51.2 #170 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.6 #134 |
| 34.7 #235 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.6 #165 |
| 15.7 #237 | Turnovers forced | 18.4 #82 |
| 69.3 #188 | Defensive rebound rate | 65.1 #336 |
| 5.5 #303 | Steals per game | 8.4 #21 |
| 4.5 #35 | Blocks per game | 6.0 #3 |
Presbyterian
12-18 in 2025-26 overall · 8-10 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Winthrop71–73
- Wvs Radford91–85
- L@ Winthrop70–74
- Lvs High Point73–79
- L@ SC Upstate74–76
A week or more of rest.
Georgia
22-11 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Southeastern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Saint Louis77–102
- Lvs Ole Miss72–76
- W@ Mississippi St102–96
- Wvs Alabama98–88
- Wvs South Carolina87–68
A week or more of rest.