Haas Pavilion · at California · Conference game
Closing line
CLEM -4.5✓ CLEM covered by 17.5
Closing total139.5Under by 7.5
| This season | CAL | |
|---|---|---|
| 19-4 | Record | 16-6 |
| 14-9 | ATS | 12-10 |
| 9-14 | O/U | 10-12 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: CLEM 73–69 CAL · ✓ CLEM (63%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLEM | 39 | 38 | 77 |
| CAL | 20 | 35 | 55 |
1st half: CLEM 39, CAL 20 (CLEM by 19). The model had CLEM by 2.5 and a total of 66.1 (actual 59).
Team stats
| CLEM | CAL | |
|---|---|---|
| 27-49 55% | Field goals | 19-48 40% |
| 12-26 46% | 3-pointers | 4-13 31% |
| 11-19 58% | Free throws | 13-15 87% |
| 29 4 off | Rebounds | 27 4 off |
| 16 | Assists | 7 |
| 7 | Steals | 5 |
| 5 | Blocks | 0 |
| 10 | Turnovers | 14 |
| 15 | Fouls | 16 |
| 28 | Points in paint | 24 |
| 6 | Fast-break points | 7 |
Players
| CLEM | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jestin Porter G | 35 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 2-6 | 2-5 |
| Jake Wahlin F | 28 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 4-7 | 3-6 |
| RJ Godfrey F | 23 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 6-8 | 0-0 |
| Dillon Hunter G | 16 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Carter Welling F | 14 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 4-7 | 0-1 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Ace Buckner G | 23 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 3-6 | 2-4 |
| Nick Davidson F | 22 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-4 |
| Butta Johnson G | 20 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 2-4 | 2-3 |
| Chase Thompson F | 12 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-1 |
| Dallas Thomas F | 6 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 3-3 | 2-2 |
| Trent Steinour F | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Blake Davidson, Zac Foster
| CAL | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dai Dai Ames G | 33 | 12 | 0 | 1 | 5-13 | 0-1 |
| Justin Pippen G | 31 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 6-13 | 2-6 |
| John Camden F | 29 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1-7 | 0-2 |
| Chris Bell F | 29 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 5-10 | 2-3 |
| Milos Ilic C | 26 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| DeJuan Campbell G | 17 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Semetri Carr G | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0-2 | 0-1 |
| Mantas Kocanas C | 13 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2-2 | 0-0 |
| Nolan Dorsey G | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Dhiaukuei Manyiel Dut F | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Jorell Clark, Luke Butler, Lee Dort, BJ Fisher, Stephon Marbury II, Rytis Petraitis, Sammie Yeanay, Jovani Ruff
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenCLEM -3.5
1 → CLEM
CloseCLEM -4.5
1 pt toward CLEM
Total
Open137.5
▲ 2
Close139.5
Up 2 since the open
Moneyline
CLEM -198 · CAL +164
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened CLEM -3.5 · closed CLEM -4.5 · moved 1 toward CLEMmodel CLEM -4
model CLEM -4
Opened 137.5 · closed 139.5 · moved 2 upmodel 141
model 141
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | CLEM -4.5 | CLEM -3.9 | CAL +0.6 | L CLEM covered |
| Total | 139.5 | 141.1 | Over 1.6 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | CLEM 72.5 · CAL 68.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | CLEM -2.5 | CLEM -19.0 |
| 1H total | 66.1 | 59 |
| 1H projected score | CLEM 34.3 · CAL 31.8 | CLEM 39 · CAL 20 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-1 90% | 8-2 80% | 3-7 30% | |
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
CLEM 2–0 CALCLEM leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · CLEM has won the last 2 meetings · CLEM 0-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2024-25 | CAL 68 @ CLEM 80 | CLEM -14.5 | CAL W |
| Nov 26, 2022-23 | CLEM 67 vs CAL 59 | CAL +10.5 | CAL W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Clemson
23 games played
Straight up
19-4
83% wins
Against the spread
14-9
61% covers · avg +1.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-14
39% overs · avg −3.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-38 | -29.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 97-59 | -29.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 83-56 | -29.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 74-79 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 81-61 | -25.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 70-67 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 132.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-94 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 92-56 | -27.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 84-90 | +8.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 9 | vs | L 64-67 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 152.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 70-63 | -22.5 | L −15.5 | 152.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 68-61 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 68-65 | -3.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 64-61 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 73-68 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 74-70 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 76-61 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 133.5 | O 137 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 74-50 | -15.5 | W +8.5 | 136.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 69-59 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 76-80 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 77-63 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 63-52 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 66-64 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 130 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UNH
W 88-38
+20.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 97-59
+8.5
11
vs
MORE
W 83-56
−2.5
15
@
GTWN
L 74-79
−6.5
17
vs
UNA
W 81-61
−5.5
21
vs
WVU
W 70-67
−1.5
23
vs
UGA
W 97-94
+1.5
28
vs
AAMU
W 92-56
+8.5
3
@
ALA
L 84-90
+2.5
9
vs
BYU
L 64-67
+1.5
13
vs
MER
W 70-63
−15.5
16
vs
SC
W 68-61
−5.5
21
vs
CIN
W 68-65
−0.5
31
@
SYR
W 64-61
+1.5
3
@
PITT
W 73-68
+1.5
7
vs
SMU
W 74-70
+0.5
10
@
ND
W 76-61
+11.5
13
vs
BC
W 74-50
+8.5
17
vs
MIA
W 69-59
+5.5
20
vs
NCSU
L 76-80
−6.5
24
@
GT
W 77-63
+5.5
31
vs
PITT
W 63-52
+0.5
4
@
STAN
W 66-64
−1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 9avg +1.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UNH
W 88-38
−20.5
7
vs
GWEB
W 97-59
+10.5
11
vs
MORE
W 83-56
−12.5
15
@
GTWN
L 74-79
+10.5
17
vs
UNA
W 81-61
−2.5
21
vs
WVU
W 70-67
+4.5
23
vs
UGA
W 97-94
+38.5
28
vs
AAMU
W 92-56
+6.5
3
@
ALA
L 84-90
+8.5
9
vs
BYU
L 64-67
−21.5
13
vs
MER
W 70-63
−19.5
16
vs
SC
W 68-61
−13.5
21
vs
CIN
W 68-65
−7.5
31
@
SYR
W 64-61
−15.5
3
@
PITT
W 73-68
+5.5
7
vs
SMU
W 74-70
−5.5
10
@
ND
W 76-61
+3.5
13
vs
BC
W 74-50
−12.5
17
vs
MIA
W 69-59
−15.5
20
vs
NCSU
L 76-80
+13.5
24
@
GT
W 77-63
−2.5
31
vs
PITT
W 63-52
−20.5
4
@
STAN
W 66-64
−8.5
over 9under 14avg −3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
California
22 games played
Straight up
16-6
73% wins
Against the spread
12-10
55% covers · avg +3.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-12
45% overs · avg −0.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 87-60 | -15.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 77-67 | -14.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 10 | vs | W 93-65 | -22.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Nov 13 | @ | L 96-99 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 164.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 67-57 | -10.5 | L −0.5 | 124.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 91-67 | -21.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 80-72 | +7.5 | W +15.5 | 143.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 79-72 | -7.5 | L −0.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 67-61 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 79-70 | -19.5 | L −10.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 97-50 | -26.5 | W +20.5 | 151.5 | U 147 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 74-56 | -8.5 | W +9.5 | 153.5 | U 130 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 70-90 | +7.5 | L −12.5 | 159.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 72-71 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 60-84 | +14.5 | L −9.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 75-78 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 148.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 56-71 | +14.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 84-78 | +7.5 | W +13.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 78-66 | +4.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 61-63 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 86-85 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | O 171 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 90-85 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 175 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
CSUB
W 87-60
+11.5
6
vs
WRST
W 77-67
−4.5
10
vs
CSUF
W 93-65
+5.5
13
@
KSU
L 96-99
+3.5
18
vs
PRES
W 67-57
−0.5
21
vs
SAC
W 91-67
+2.5
25
vs
UCLA
W 80-72
+15.5
2
vs
UTAH
W 79-72
−0.5
6
vs
PAC
W 67-61
−1.5
13
vs
NWST
W 79-70
−10.5
19
vs
MORG
W 97-50
+20.5
21
vs
COLU
W 74-56
+9.5
30
vs
LOU
L 70-90
−12.5
2
vs
ND
W 72-71
−2.5
7
@
UVA
L 60-84
−9.5
10
@
VT
L 75-78
+2.5
14
vs
DUKE
L 56-71
−0.5
17
vs
UNC
W 84-78
+13.5
24
@
STAN
W 78-66
+16.5
28
@
FSU
L 61-63
+1.5
31
@
MIA
W 86-85
+12.5
4
vs
GT
W 90-85
−2.5
covered 12didn’t cover 10avg +3.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
CSUB
W 87-60
−0.5
6
vs
WRST
W 77-67
−4.5
10
vs
CSUF
W 93-65
−4.5
13
@
KSU
L 96-99
+30.5
18
vs
PRES
W 67-57
−0.5
21
vs
SAC
W 91-67
+3.5
25
vs
UCLA
W 80-72
+8.5
2
vs
UTAH
W 79-72
−1.5
6
vs
PAC
W 67-61
−16.5
13
vs
NWST
W 79-70
+3.5
19
vs
MORG
W 97-50
−4.5
21
vs
COLU
W 74-56
−23.5
30
vs
LOU
L 70-90
+0.5
2
vs
ND
W 72-71
+4.5
7
@
UVA
L 60-84
−4.5
10
@
VT
L 75-78
+4.5
14
vs
DUKE
L 56-71
−22.5
17
vs
UNC
W 84-78
+10.5
24
@
STAN
W 78-66
−2.5
28
@
FSU
L 61-63
−33.5
31
@
MIA
W 86-85
+22.5
4
vs
GT
W 90-85
+22.5
over 10under 12avg −0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Clemson
19-4 overall · 9-1 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Stanford66–64
- Wvs Pitt63–52
- W@ Georgia Tech77–63
- Lvs NC State76–80
- Wvs Miami69–59
3 days since their last game.
California
16-6 overall · 5-5 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Georgia Tech90–85
- W@ Miami86–85
- L@ Florida St61–63
- W@ Stanford78–66
- Wvs North Carolina84–78
3 days since their last game.