The Palestra · at Penn · Conference game
Closing line
PENN -1.5✓ PENN covered by 1.5
Closing total138.5Under by 13.5
| This season | PENN | |
|---|---|---|
| 15-10 | Record | 13-11 |
| 13-12 | ATS | 16-8 |
| 9-16 | O/U | 6-18 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: HARV 69–70 PENN · ✓ PENN (52%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HARV | 31 | 30 | 61 |
| PENN | 21 | 43 | 64 |
1st half: HARV 31, PENN 21 (HARV by 10). The model had PENN by 0.2 and a total of 65.1 (actual 52).
Team stats
| HARV | PENN | |
|---|---|---|
| 24-58 41% | Field goals | 26-62 42% |
| 6-25 24% | 3-pointers | 6-17 35% |
| 7-9 78% | Free throws | 6-10 60% |
| 37 8 off | Rebounds | 36 10 off |
| 11 | Assists | 9 |
| 7 | Steals | 7 |
| 3 | Blocks | 1 |
| 19 | Turnovers | 13 |
| 14 | Fouls | 13 |
| 32 | Points in paint | 36 |
| 8 | Fast-break points | 4 |
Players
| HARV | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Hinton G | 38 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 10-17 | 0-2 |
| Thomas Batties II F | 38 | 19 | 8 | 1 | 7-11 | 4-7 |
| Chandler Pigge G | 36 | 9 | 7 | 4 | 4-14 | 0-3 |
| Tey Barbour G | 35 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 2-7 | 2-6 |
| Ben Eisendrath G | 27 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 1-4 | 0-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Frankie Mannino G | 12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-2 |
| Luca Ace-Nasteski F | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Xavier Nesbitt G | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Joseph Quartey G | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
Did not play: Avner Dror, Ryan Sullivan, Alex Touomou, Dutch Dowdell, Greg Cooper, Austin Hunt, Kenan Parrish, Payton Pitts
| PENN | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TJ Power F | 38 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 3-8 | 3-6 |
| Ethan Roberts G | 32 | 21 | 4 | 3 | 9-22 | 1-6 |
| AJ Levine G | 30 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 5-13 | 0-0 |
| Michael Zanoni G | 24 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1-4 | 0-1 |
| Augustus Gerhart F | 12 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Lucas Lueth F | 24 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3-3 | 0-0 |
| Cam Thrower G | 17 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1-3 | 1-2 |
| Jay Jones G | 12 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1-4 | 0-0 |
| Niklas Polonowski G | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 2-3 | 1-2 |
| Dalton Scantlebury F | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Payton Kamin, Ryan Altman, Chris Ubochi, William Kruse, Michelangelo Oberti, Bradyn Foster, Dylan Williams, Alex Massung, Johnnie Walter
Loading the game…
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenPENN -1.5
no move
ClosePENN -1.5
No change since the open
Total
Open138.5
no move
Close138.5
No change since the open
Moneyline
HARV -102 · PENN -118
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened PENN -1.5 · unchangedmodel PENN -0.5
model PENN -0.5
Opened 138.5 · unchangedmodel 139
model 139
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | Result | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | PENN -1.5 | PENN -0.5 | HARV +1.0 | L PENN covered |
| Total | 138.5 | 139.0 | Over 0.5 | L Under |
| Projected score | — | HARV 69.3 · PENN 69.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | PENN -0.2 | HARV -10.0 |
| 1H total | 65.1 | 52 |
| 1H projected score | HARV 32.5 · PENN 32.6 | HARV 31 · PENN 21 |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 0-10 0% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 9 since 2021-22
HARV 4–5 PENNPENN leads · 9 games since 2021-22 · HARV has won the last 2 meetings · HARV 3-6 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2025-26 | PENN 63 @ HARV 64 | HARV -5.5 | PENN W |
| Feb 22, 2024-25 | HARV 79 @ PENN 78 | PENN -2.5 | HARV W |
| Jan 20, 2024-25 | PENN 82 @ HARV 67 | HARV -7.5 | PENN W |
| Feb 24, 2023-24 | PENN 70 @ HARV 74 | HARV -2.5 | HARV W |
| Jan 20, 2023-24 | HARV 70 @ PENN 61 | PENN -3.5 | HARV W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Harvard
25 games played
Straight up
15-10
60% wins
Against the spread
13-12
52% covers · avg +2.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
9-16
36% overs · avg −4.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | vs | W 86-75 | -15.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 60-77 | -5.5 | L −22.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 75-52 | -6.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 16 | @ | W 56-54 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 130.5 | U 110 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 80-84 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 74-75 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 136.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 60-73 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 138.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 56-53 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 137.5 | U 109 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 71-78 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 69-79 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 81-53 | -10.5 | W +17.5 | 136.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 59-85 | +26.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 78-69 | +3.5 | W +12.5 | 141.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 68-76 | -7.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 79-54 | +5.5 | W +30.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 87-80 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 133.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 64-63 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 79-86 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 30 | @ | W 69-59 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 132.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 67-65 | +11.5 | W +13.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 71-58 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 56-53 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 131.5 | U 109 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 75-76 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 73-54 | +4.5 | W +23.5 | 155.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | @ | W 58-56 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 130.5 | U 114 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
vs
UNH
W 86-75
−4.5
11
vs
NE
L 60-77
−22.5
15
@
ARMY
W 75-52
+16.5
16
@
MRST
W 56-54
+8.5
19
@
PSU
L 80-84
+8.5
22
vs
BU
L 74-75
−5.5
26
@
BC
L 60-73
−5.5
29
vs
BRY
W 56-53
−4.5
3
@
MASS
L 71-78
−1.5
6
@
FUR
L 69-79
−5.5
20
vs
HC
W 81-53
+17.5
23
@
SJU
L 59-85
+0.5
28
@
COLG
W 78-69
+12.5
5
vs
DART
L 68-76
−15.5
10
@
COLU
W 79-54
+30.5
17
vs
PRIN
W 87-80
+2.5
19
vs
PENN
W 64-63
−4.5
24
vs
COR
L 79-86
−8.5
30
@
BRWN
W 69-59
+8.5
31
@
YALE
W 67-65
+13.5
7
@
DART
W 71-58
+11.5
13
vs
BRWN
W 56-53
−4.5
14
vs
YALE
L 75-76
+3.5
21
@
COR
W 73-54
+23.5
27
@
PRIN
W 58-56
−1.5
covered 13didn’t cover 12avg +2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
vs
UNH
W 86-75
+13.5
11
vs
NE
L 60-77
−7.5
15
@
ARMY
W 75-52
−19.5
16
@
MRST
W 56-54
−20.5
19
@
PSU
L 80-84
+21.5
22
vs
BU
L 74-75
+12.5
26
@
BC
L 60-73
−5.5
29
vs
BRY
W 56-53
−28.5
3
@
MASS
L 71-78
+5.5
6
@
FUR
L 69-79
+6.5
20
vs
HC
W 81-53
−2.5
23
@
SJU
L 59-85
−1.5
28
@
COLG
W 78-69
+5.5
5
vs
DART
L 68-76
−4.5
10
@
COLU
W 79-54
−12.5
17
vs
PRIN
W 87-80
+33.5
19
vs
PENN
W 64-63
−23.5
24
vs
COR
L 79-86
+4.5
30
@
BRWN
W 69-59
−4.5
31
@
YALE
W 67-65
−9.5
7
@
DART
W 71-58
−11.5
13
vs
BRWN
W 56-53
−22.5
14
vs
YALE
L 75-76
+12.5
21
@
COR
W 73-54
−28.5
27
@
PRIN
W 58-56
−16.5
over 9under 16avg −4.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Penn
24 games played
Straight up
13-11
54% wins
Against the spread
16-8
67% covers · avg +3.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
6-18
25% overs · avg −5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | @ | L 78-84 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 81-106 | +19.5 | L −5.5 | 172.5 | O 187 |
| Nov 17 | vs | W 83-74 | +5.5 | W +14.5 | 163.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 21 | @ | W 84-68 | +4.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 77-65 | -2.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 73-71 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 60-77 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 149.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-90 | +18.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 8 | vs | W 74-72 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 69-70 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 79-83 | +16.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 80-61 | -14.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 76-78 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 81-73 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 84-74 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 163.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 63-64 | +5.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 60-77 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 30 | @ | L 67-72 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 91-81 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 173.5 | U 172 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 61-60 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 144.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 76-67 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-76 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 169.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 70-74 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 80-71 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
@
AMER
L 78-84
−7.5
11
@
PROV
L 81-106
−5.5
17
vs
JOES
W 83-74
+14.5
21
@
DREX
W 84-68
+20.5
28
vs
MRMK
W 77-65
+9.5
29
vs
LAS
W 73-71
+0.5
30
vs
HOF
L 60-77
−15.5
6
@
VILL
L 63-90
−8.5
8
vs
LAF
W 74-72
−5.5
20
@
RUTG
L 69-70
+10.5
28
@
GMU
L 79-83
+12.5
31
vs
NJIT
W 80-61
+4.5
5
@
PRIN
L 76-78
+1.5
10
vs
BRWN
W 81-73
+2.5
17
@
DART
W 84-74
+12.5
19
@
HARV
L 63-64
+4.5
24
vs
YALE
L 60-77
−10.5
30
@
COLU
L 67-72
−0.5
31
@
COR
W 91-81
+17.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 61-60
−2.5
13
vs
COLU
W 76-67
+7.5
14
vs
COR
W 82-76
+8.5
21
@
YALE
L 70-74
+5.5
27
vs
DART
W 80-71
+2.5
covered 16didn’t cover 8avg +3.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
@
AMER
L 78-84
+7.5
11
@
PROV
L 81-106
+14.5
17
vs
JOES
W 83-74
−6.5
21
@
DREX
W 84-68
−0.5
28
vs
MRMK
W 77-65
−10.5
29
vs
LAS
W 73-71
−5.5
30
vs
HOF
L 60-77
−12.5
6
@
VILL
L 63-90
+2.5
8
vs
LAF
W 74-72
−4.5
20
@
RUTG
L 69-70
−11.5
28
@
GMU
L 79-83
+15.5
31
vs
NJIT
W 80-61
−10.5
5
@
PRIN
L 76-78
+8.5
10
vs
BRWN
W 81-73
+8.5
17
@
DART
W 84-74
−5.5
19
@
HARV
L 63-64
−23.5
24
vs
YALE
L 60-77
−20.5
30
@
COLU
L 67-72
−14.5
31
@
COR
W 91-81
−1.5
7
vs
PRIN
W 61-60
−23.5
13
vs
COLU
W 76-67
−5.5
14
vs
COR
W 82-76
−11.5
21
@
YALE
L 70-74
−6.5
27
vs
DART
W 80-71
−3.5
over 6under 18avg −5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Harvard
15-10 overall · 9-3 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- W@ Princeton58–56
- W@ Cornell73–54
- Lvs Yale75–76
- Wvs Brown56–53
- W@ Dartmouth71–58
1 day since their last game.
Penn
13-11 overall · 7-5 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Dartmouth80–71
- L@ Yale70–74
- Wvs Cornell82–76
- Wvs Columbia76–67
- Wvs Princeton61–60
1 day since their last game.