UAB @ Temple: Lines, Model & ATS Trends (Week 11, 2026)

Sat, Nov 14, 2026, 12:00 AM ESTWeek 11 · at Temple · Conference game

UAB

4-3 · Power #107

projected

Sat 12:00 AM ET

Temple

2-5 · Power #104

projected

UAB 40%

60% TEM

Spread

—

Total

—

model 52

Model line

TEM -3.5

TEM 60% to win

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Winner

Market

Open → current

Spread

Open—

no open

Now—

Opening line not available

Total

Open—

no open

Now—

ATS

Records before kickoff

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
UAB PWLLW	3-3-1	50%	1-1-1	—
TEM WPWLL	4-2-1	67%	2-2-1	—

Venue/role: UAB away; TEM home. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

Over/under before kickoff

	O-U	Over %	SU
UAB UUUUU	1-6	14%	4-3
TEM OUUUO	3-4	43%	2-5

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Hover for the score and line.

Last 10 games

Before kickoff, this and last season

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
UAB	5-5 50%	4-5-1 44%	2-8 20%
TEM	2-8 20%	5-4-1 56%	4-6 40%

Wins-losses (pushes and ties last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

UAB

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 21	vs UTSA	L20–41LU
Nov 28	@ UNT	L24–53LO

Temple

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 19	vs RICE	No meeting since 2023
Nov 27	@ MEM	L21–45LO

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Last 1 since 2023

UAB 1–0 TEM UAB leads · 1 game since 2023 · UAB has won the last meeting

Date	Result	Line	ATS
Nov 18 2023	Temple 24 @ UAB 34	UAB -7.5	UAB W

Matchup stats

Season to date before kickoff · ranks among 138 FBS teams

Power rating this season

pts vs an average team · #rank · tap a dot

UAB−11.8 →−9.6▲ 2.2#107

TEM−7.3 →−9.4▼ 2.1#105

Predashed line = average team · hover or tap a dotW10

UAB

Longer bar = better

TEM

#106

Offense

TEM better ▶

#56

#61

Defense

◀ UAB better

#117

0.0 #72

Turnovers

Even

0.0 #74

67 plays #59

Pace

◀ UAB faster

59 plays #131

Unit by unitEach offense against the other's defense

When UAB has the ball

Even matchup

	UAB off	TEM def	Edge
Points / game	23.3 #104	28.0 #108	Even
Yards / play	5.06 #120	6.17 #118	Even
PPA / play	+0.04 #110	+0.21 #119	Even
Success rate	41% #88	46% #121	UAB

When TEM has the ball

Even matchup

	TEM off	UAB def	Edge
Points / game	25.7 #90	24.6 #75	Even
Yards / play	6.57 #27	4.95 #33	Even
PPA / play	+0.21 #42	+0.02 #40	Even
Success rate	43% #66	43% #96	TEM

Bars show league standing (dashed mark = league middle); Offense and Defense use the average rank across the four stats below. In the tables, a highlighted value and the Edge column mark the side ranked better by at least 15% of the league; defense values are what that team allows. Yards and turnovers from ESPN box scores; PPA from CollegeFootballData (garbage time excluded). Descriptive only: the model already uses these.

Points by quarter and half

Per game this season before kickoff · ranks among 138 FBS teams

UAB scoring against the TEM defense

	Q1	Q2	1H	Q3	Q4	2H
UAB scored	2.9 #119	8.0 #87	10.9 #107	2.1 #133	8.4 #43	10.6 #101
TEM allowed	6.4 #107	4.9 #26	11.3 #56	6.4 #98	9.3 #127	15.7 #125

TEM scoring against the UAB defense

	Q1	Q2	1H	Q3	Q4	2H
TEM scored	6.9 #55	7.3 #97	14.1 #82	3.9 #116	6.9 #68	10.7 #99
UAB allowed	7.0 #115	8.7 #98	15.7 #109	4.4 #58	4.4 #28	8.9 #34

Regulation only (overtime is left out). 1H = Q1 + Q2, 2H = Q3 + Q4. #1 scores the most, or allows the fewest. Season to date, not adjusted for opponents.