Mitchell Center · at South Alabama
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | USA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects USA 77–68 · win probability USA 79%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: USA has more of the edges
FAMU 1, USA 7 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: FAMU 37.4, USA 38.5. Allowed: FAMU 39.6, USA 25.4
Turnovers
Turnover rate: FAMU 21.5%, USA 13.1%. Forced: FAMU 19.1%, USA 18.0%
Shooting
Effective FG%: FAMU 49.2 and allows 51.2; USA 52.6 and allows 50.1
FAMU offense vs USA defense
Offense 326th of 366 against a defense 212th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
FAMU hits 32.6% and allows 34.9%; USA hits 34.5% and allows 33.1%. Threes are 37.7% and 36.5% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
FAMU has played the 323rd-hardest schedule, USA the 223rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: FAMU 30.9%, USA 25.0%. Defensive: FAMU 69.1%, USA 68.6%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: FAMU plays 70.6 a game (92nd fastest), USA 67.1 (277th). Faster games mean more points
USA offense vs FAMU defense
Offense 242nd of 366 against a defense 303rd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
USA at home. This season: USA 0-0 at home, FAMU 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: FAMU 43%, USA 21%. Transfers in: FAMU 3, USA 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | USA -9.1 | — |
| Total | — | 144.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | FAMU 67.9 · USA 77 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | USA -5.3 | — |
| 1H total | 67.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | FAMU 31.2 · USA 36.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Florida A&M
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
11-18
38% overs · avg −1.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 67-102 | +25.5 | L −9.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 72-92 | +11.5 | L −8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 60-97 | +23.5 | L −13.5 | 169.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 57-87 | +40.5 | W +10.5 | 170.5 | U 144 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 82-85 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 138.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 72-65 | +3.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 54-78 | +14.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 56-80 | +29.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 65-89 | +19.5 | L −4.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 83-87 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 67-59 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 12 | vs | W 91-84 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 71-67 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 62-48 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 66-58 | -8.5 | L −0.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 65-66 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 65-72 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 66-79 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 57-62 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 9 | vs | W 100-96 | -3.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 196 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 60-80 | -2.5 | L −22.5 | 144.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 16 | @ | W 86-78 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 61-63 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 76-63 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 82-71 | +8.5 | W +19.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 66-59 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 81-77 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 70-60 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 70-73 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
USF
L 67-102
−9.5
8
vs
KENN
L 72-92
−8.5
11
@
UCF
L 60-97
−13.5
17
@
UGA
L 57-87
+10.5
2
@
JAX
L 82-85
+7.5
17
vs
JAX
W 72-65
+10.5
19
@
TAR
L 54-78
−9.5
21
@
TCU
L 56-80
+5.5
28
@
GT
L 65-89
−4.5
3
@
BCU
L 83-87
+3.5
10
vs
SOU
W 67-59
+12.5
12
vs
GRAM
W 91-84
+8.5
17
@
UAPB
W 71-67
+6.5
19
@
MVSU
W 62-48
+2.5
24
vs
ALCN
W 66-58
−0.5
26
vs
JKST
L 65-66
−8.5
31
@
AAMU
L 65-72
−3.5
2
@
ALST
L 66-79
−9.5
7
vs
TXSO
L 57-62
−6.5
9
vs
PV
W 100-96
+0.5
14
@
JKST
L 60-80
−22.5
16
@
ALCN
W 86-78
+5.5
19
vs
AAMU
L 61-63
−3.5
21
vs
ALST
W 76-63
+14.5
26
@
SOU
W 82-71
+19.5
28
@
GRAM
W 66-59
+11.5
5
vs
BCU
W 81-77
+6.5
11
vs
JKST
W 70-60
+3.5
13
vs
SOU
L 70-73
−1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
USF
L 67-102
+15.5
8
vs
KENN
L 72-92
−2.5
11
@
UCF
L 60-97
−12.5
17
@
UGA
L 57-87
−26.5
2
@
JAX
L 82-85
+28.5
17
vs
JAX
W 72-65
−2.5
19
@
TAR
L 54-78
−13.5
21
@
TCU
L 56-80
−6.5
28
@
GT
L 65-89
+7.5
3
@
BCU
L 83-87
+24.5
10
vs
SOU
W 67-59
−27.5
12
vs
GRAM
W 91-84
+33.5
17
@
UAPB
W 71-67
−11.5
19
@
MVSU
W 62-48
−29.5
24
vs
ALCN
W 66-58
−17.5
26
vs
JKST
L 65-66
−19.5
31
@
AAMU
L 65-72
−1.5
2
@
ALST
L 66-79
+5.5
7
vs
TXSO
L 57-62
−27.5
9
vs
PV
W 100-96
+46.5
14
@
JKST
L 60-80
−4.5
16
@
ALCN
W 86-78
+26.5
19
vs
AAMU
L 61-63
−15.5
21
vs
ALST
W 76-63
−5.5
26
@
SOU
W 82-71
+5.5
28
@
GRAM
W 66-59
−15.5
5
vs
BCU
W 81-77
+12.5
11
vs
JKST
W 70-60
−11.5
13
vs
SOU
L 70-73
+1.5
over 11under 18avg −1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
South Alabama
31 games played
Straight up
19-12
61% wins
Against the spread
17-14
55% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg +2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | W 76-74 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 6 | vs | W 76-70 | -18.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 66-64 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 72-62 | -18.5 | L −8.5 | 133.5 | O 134 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 71-65 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 135.5 | O 136 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 72-80 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 82-58 | -1.5 | W +22.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 77-75 | +2.5 | W +4.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 5 | @ | L 65-91 | +7.5 | L −18.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 14 | vs | L 57-58 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 96-92 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 188 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 65-67 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 63-58 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 127.5 | U 121 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 49-59 | +9.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 108 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 87-71 | -2.5 | W +13.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 91-87 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 154.5 | O 178 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 56-59 | -9.5 | L −12.5 | 129.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 22 | @ | W 90-83 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 53-48 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | U 101 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 69-67 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 57-65 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 131.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 81-69 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 84-78 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 135.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 92-88 | +8.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 80-84 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 19 | vs | L 82-90 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 137.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 65-54 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 142.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 89-54 | -14.5 | W +20.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 55-68 | -4.5 | L −17.5 | 141.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 85-94 | -4.5 | L −13.5 | 149.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 17 | @ | L 67-78 | +18.5 | W +7.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
TOL
W 76-74
+4.5
6
vs
ALCN
W 76-70
−12.5
13
vs
CMU
W 66-64
−3.5
15
vs
COPP
W 72-62
−8.5
19
@
JXST
W 71-65
+8.5
21
@
UAB
L 72-80
−0.5
30
@
UTSA
W 82-58
+22.5
2
vs
NMSU
W 77-75
+4.5
5
@
ETSU
L 65-91
−18.5
14
vs
UNT
L 57-58
−2.5
17
@
ULM
W 96-92
−5.5
20
@
TXST
L 65-67
+1.5
31
@
UL
W 63-58
+1.5
3
@
TROY
L 49-59
−0.5
10
vs
GASO
W 87-71
+13.5
15
vs
ARST
W 91-87
+8.5
17
vs
UL
L 56-59
−12.5
22
@
JMU
W 90-83
+11.5
29
vs
CCU
W 53-48
+1.5
31
vs
GAST
W 69-67
−3.5
4
@
APP
L 57-65
−2.5
7
vs
BUF
W 81-69
+8.5
12
@
USM
W 84-78
+7.5
14
@
ARST
W 92-88
+12.5
16
@
MRSH
L 80-84
+2.5
19
vs
TXST
L 82-90
−11.5
21
vs
TROY
W 65-54
+13.5
25
vs
ULM
W 89-54
+20.5
27
vs
USM
L 55-68
−17.5
6
vs
GASO
L 85-94
−13.5
17
@
AUB
L 67-78
+7.5
covered 17didn’t cover 14avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
TOL
W 76-74
−0.5
6
vs
ALCN
W 76-70
+4.5
13
vs
CMU
W 66-64
−12.5
15
vs
COPP
W 72-62
+0.5
19
@
JXST
W 71-65
+0.5
21
@
UAB
L 72-80
+2.5
30
@
UTSA
W 82-58
−1.5
2
vs
NMSU
W 77-75
+16.5
5
@
ETSU
L 65-91
+12.5
14
vs
UNT
L 57-58
−20.5
17
@
ULM
W 96-92
+39.5
20
@
TXST
L 65-67
−4.5
31
@
UL
W 63-58
−6.5
3
@
TROY
L 49-59
−40.5
10
vs
GASO
W 87-71
+9.5
15
vs
ARST
W 91-87
+23.5
17
vs
UL
L 56-59
−14.5
22
@
JMU
W 90-83
+34.5
29
vs
CCU
W 53-48
−38.5
31
vs
GAST
W 69-67
−4.5
4
@
APP
L 57-65
−9.5
7
vs
BUF
W 81-69
+4.5
12
@
USM
W 84-78
+26.5
14
@
ARST
W 92-88
+30.5
16
@
MRSH
L 80-84
+13.5
19
vs
TXST
L 82-90
+34.5
21
vs
TROY
W 65-54
−23.5
25
vs
ULM
W 89-54
−10.5
27
vs
USM
L 55-68
−18.5
6
vs
GASO
L 85-94
+29.5
17
@
AUB
L 67-78
−6.5
over 16under 15avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
South Alabama has the better starters
Position by position: Florida A&M 0, South Alabama 1, even 4
Florida A&MBetterSouth Alabama
G J. Kempson TR10.7 pts · 4.4 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 33
=No call
G A. Goldstein NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
G J. Sanders12 pts · 3.2 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 42
=No call
G A. Lewis NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
G A. Baker9.6 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 35
=No call
G J. Langsy NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
G R. Martino6.5 pts · 2.2 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 44
→USABig
F P. Law13.1 pts · 5.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 86
F D. Williford TR2.2 pts · 0.8 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F S. Williams6 pts · 4.2 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 84
Florida A&MBetterSouth Alabama
FAMU offense326th of 366 · -10.6
→USASmall
USA defense212th of 366 · -5.4
FAMU defense303rd of 366 · -7.8
→USASmall
USA offense242nd of 366 · -7.3
Backcourt-5.5 · 4 players
=No call
BackcourtNo numbers yet
Frontcourt-0.3 · 1 player
→USABig
Frontcourt+3.5 · 2 players
Bench-0.2 · 2 players
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestFAMU betterUSA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Kempson32 min · TRJ. Sanders32 minA. Baker27 minR. Martino22 minC. DavisNewA. WilliamsNew
Forwards
D. Williford6 min · TRT. Onuoha5 minM. StijovicNewJ. LomickaNewB. NdourNew
Centers
A. Mbaye1 min · TRJ. MokwezaNew
Guards
A. GoldsteinNewA. LewisNewJ. LangsyNewS. ShoptawNewD. WilliamsNewD. RomanNew
Forwards
P. Law26 minS. Williams15 minL. KunzewitschNewO. KenneyNewR. WilliamsNewD. HueittNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 70.0 #285 | Points per game | 73.2 #218 |
| 0.99 #334 | Points per possession | 1.10 #139 |
| 70.6 #92 | Pace (possessions) | 67.1 #277 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.2 #283 | Effective FG% | 52.6 #120 |
| 32.6 #249 | 3-point % | 34.5 #146 |
| 37.7 #219 | 3-point attempt rate | 36.5 #237 |
| 37.4 #116 | Free throw rate | 38.5 #89 |
| Possessions | ||
| 21.5 #359 | Turnover rate | 13.1 #8 |
| 30.9 #168 | Offensive rebound rate | 25.0 #341 |
| 12.7 #236 | Assists per game | 11.9 #287 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.1 #192 | Points allowed | 71.3 #85 |
| 1.06 #114 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #100 |
| 51.2 #171 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.1 #105 |
| 34.9 #243 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.1 #133 |
| 19.1 #43 | Turnovers forced | 18.0 #96 |
| 69.1 #198 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.6 #222 |
| 8.1 #35 | Steals per game | 7.9 #46 |
| 3.0 #220 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #330 |
Florida A&M
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Southwestern Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Southern70–73
- Wvs Jackson St70–60
- Wvs Bethune81–77
- W@ Grambling66–59
- W@ Southern82–71
A week or more of rest.
South Alabama
19-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-8 in conference · Sun Belt Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Auburn67–78
- Lvs GA Southern85–94
- Lvs Southern Miss55–68
- Wvs UL Monroe89–54
- Wvs Troy65–54
A week or more of rest.