Newman Arena · at Cornell
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | COR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects COR 85–76 · win probability COR 78%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 160.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: COR has more of the edges
UNCG 2, COR 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNCG 42.0, COR 30.2. Allowed: UNCG 30.6, COR 37.2
COR offense vs UNCG defense
Offense 111th of 366 against a defense 299th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UNCG has played the 256th-hardest schedule, COR the 144th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNCG 5%, COR 53%. Transfers in: UNCG 6, COR 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNCG 52.0 and allows 56.2; COR 58.5 and allows 55.9
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: UNCG plays 69.3 a game (157th fastest), COR 72.0 (36th). Faster games mean more points
UNCG offense vs COR defense
Offense 260th of 366 against a defense 319th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
COR at home. This season: COR 0-0 at home, UNCG 0-0 away
Even
Three-pointers
UNCG hits 35.6% and allows 38.0%; COR hits 38.3% and allows 37.5%. Threes are 40.2% and 51.6% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNCG 15.0%, COR 16.1%. Forced: UNCG 13.6%, COR 15.0%
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNCG 28.1%, COR 30.2%. Defensive: UNCG 71.0%, COR 69.4%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | COR -8.9 | — |
| Total | — | 160.4 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNCG 75.8 · COR 84.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | COR -5.2 | — |
| 1H total | 74.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNCG 34.9 · COR 40 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UNC Greensboro
32 games played
Straight up
13-19
41% wins
Against the spread
13-19
41% covers · avg −1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-10
69% overs · avg +8.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 64-93 | +18.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 90-92 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 64-110 | +30.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 63-69 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 94-101 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 68-62 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 60-73 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 71-82 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 82-78 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 65-71 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 77-72 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 89-82 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 85-97 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 60-86 | +11.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 69-66 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 92-102 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 85-78 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 66-89 | +4.5 | L −18.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 77-95 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 66-71 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 81-78 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 67-64 | +10.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 92-71 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 99-89 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 154.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 77-91 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 75-87 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 85-80 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 78-87 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 84-70 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 75-72 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 75-81 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
KSU
L 64-93
−10.5
8
vs
ELON
L 90-92
−6.5
12
@
NCSU
L 64-110
−15.5
15
vs
APSU
L 63-69
−7.5
20
@
QUC
L 94-101
+0.5
23
vs
YSU
W 68-62
+11.5
25
vs
DEL
L 60-73
−14.5
26
vs
M-OH
L 71-82
−0.5
2
vs
UNCA
L 77-82
−0.5
6
@
ECU
W 82-78
+11.5
16
vs
NCAT
L 65-71
−12.5
1
vs
UTC
W 77-72
+7.5
3
vs
SAM
W 89-82
+9.5
7
@
WOF
L 85-97
−4.5
10
@
ETSU
L 60-86
−14.5
15
vs
CIT
W 69-66
−6.5
17
vs
MER
L 92-102
−4.5
21
@
VMI
W 85-78
+4.5
23
vs
FUR
L 66-89
−18.5
29
@
MER
L 77-95
−7.5
31
@
CIT
L 66-71
−7.5
4
vs
WCU
W 81-78
+4.5
8
@
FUR
W 67-64
+13.5
11
vs
VMI
W 92-71
+12.5
14
vs
WOF
W 99-89
+12.5
18
@
WCU
L 77-91
−8.5
21
vs
ETSU
L 75-87
−5.5
26
@
UTC
W 85-80
+9.5
28
@
SAM
L 78-87
−0.5
6
vs
VMI
W 84-70
+6.5
7
vs
WOF
W 75-72
+7.5
8
vs
FUR
L 75-81
−0.5
covered 13didn’t cover 19avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
KSU
L 64-93
+8.5
8
vs
ELON
L 90-92
+39.5
12
@
NCSU
L 64-110
+20.5
15
vs
APSU
L 63-69
−13.5
20
@
QUC
L 94-101
+44.5
23
vs
YSU
W 68-62
−22.5
25
vs
DEL
L 60-73
−9.5
26
vs
M-OH
L 71-82
+2.5
2
vs
UNCA
L 77-82
+15.5
6
@
ECU
W 82-78
+20.5
16
vs
NCAT
L 65-71
−11.5
1
vs
UTC
W 77-72
+1.5
3
vs
SAM
W 89-82
+19.5
7
@
WOF
L 85-97
+28.5
10
@
ETSU
L 60-86
−2.5
15
vs
CIT
W 69-66
−13.5
17
vs
MER
L 92-102
+38.5
21
@
VMI
W 85-78
+11.5
23
vs
FUR
L 66-89
+4.5
29
@
MER
L 77-95
+13.5
31
@
CIT
L 66-71
−10.5
4
vs
WCU
W 81-78
+3.5
8
@
FUR
W 67-64
−18.5
11
vs
VMI
W 92-71
+12.5
14
vs
WOF
W 99-89
+33.5
18
@
WCU
L 77-91
+12.5
21
vs
ETSU
L 75-87
+13.5
26
@
UTC
W 85-80
+7.5
28
@
SAM
L 78-87
+8.5
6
vs
VMI
W 84-70
−0.5
7
vs
WOF
W 75-72
−8.5
8
vs
FUR
L 75-81
+8.5
over 22under 10avg +8.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Cornell
26 games played
Straight up
13-13
50% wins
Against the spread
11-15
42% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg +6.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 102-110 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 164.5 | O 212 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 65-76 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 13 | @ | W 97-78 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 86-73 | -17.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 95-94 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 101-72 | -5.5 | W +23.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 81-99 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 80-93 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 90-93 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 166.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 83-75 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 97-114 | +23.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 99-104 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 170.5 | O 203 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 91-102 | -9.5 | L −20.5 | 175.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 68-102 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 174.5 | U 170 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 89-67 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-79 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 87-64 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 81-91 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 173.5 | U 172 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-67 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 171.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 89-65 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 76-82 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 169.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 54-73 | -4.5 | L −23.5 | 155.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 72-69 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-80 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 111-90 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 166.5 | O 201 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 76-88 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
KENT
L 102-110
−1.5
9
@
ILST
L 65-76
−4.5
13
@
LAF
W 97-78
+14.5
18
vs
ARMY
W 86-73
−4.5
20
vs
COLG
W 95-94
−4.5
30
@
BUCK
W 101-72
+23.5
2
@
GMU
L 81-99
−7.5
3
@
TOW
L 80-93
−6.5
7
@
SAM
L 90-93
−0.5
21
@
UALB
W 83-75
+1.5
29
@
MSU
L 97-114
+6.5
5
vs
COLU
L 99-104
−8.5
10
vs
DART
L 91-102
−20.5
17
@
YALE
L 68-102
−24.5
19
@
BRWN
W 89-67
+19.5
24
@
HARV
W 86-79
+8.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 87-64
+15.5
31
vs
PENN
L 81-91
−17.5
7
@
COLU
W 88-67
+19.5
13
@
PRIN
W 89-65
+20.5
14
@
PENN
L 76-82
−8.5
21
vs
HARV
L 54-73
−23.5
27
vs
YALE
W 72-69
+7.5
28
vs
BRWN
W 86-80
−3.5
7
@
DART
W 111-90
+16.5
14
vs
YALE
L 76-88
−6.5
covered 11didn’t cover 15avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
KENT
L 102-110
+47.5
9
@
ILST
L 65-76
−23.5
13
@
LAF
W 97-78
+14.5
18
vs
ARMY
W 86-73
−5.5
20
vs
COLG
W 95-94
+27.5
30
@
BUCK
W 101-72
+13.5
2
@
GMU
L 81-99
+24.5
3
@
TOW
L 80-93
+18.5
7
@
SAM
L 90-93
+16.5
21
@
UALB
W 83-75
−9.5
29
@
MSU
L 97-114
+50.5
5
vs
COLU
L 99-104
+32.5
10
vs
DART
L 91-102
+17.5
17
@
YALE
L 68-102
−4.5
19
@
BRWN
W 89-67
−7.5
24
@
HARV
W 86-79
+4.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 87-64
−7.5
31
vs
PENN
L 81-91
−1.5
7
@
COLU
W 88-67
−16.5
13
@
PRIN
W 89-65
−1.5
14
@
PENN
L 76-82
−11.5
21
vs
HARV
L 54-73
−28.5
27
vs
YALE
W 72-69
−23.5
28
vs
BRWN
W 86-80
+9.5
7
@
DART
W 111-90
+34.5
14
vs
YALE
L 76-88
+0.5
over 14under 12avg +6.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Cornell has the better starters
Position by position: UNC Greensboro 0, Cornell 1, even 4
UNC GreensboroBetterCornell
G B. Stacker TR11.9 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 47
=Even
G J. Beccles7.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 37
G C. Grant TR2.2 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 9
→CORSmall
G A. Nimani5.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 30
F Z. Fitch TR6.1 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 31
=No call
G M. Rafiq4.2 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Not ranked
F V. Collins TR1 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F K. Sepp4.8 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 28
F A. Beljan TR2.2 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F G. Panzini2.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 9
UNC GreensboroBetterCornell
UNCG offense260th of 366 · -8.0
←UNCGSmall
COR defense319th of 366 · -8.3
UNCG defense299th of 366 · -7.7
→CORBig
COR offense111th of 366 · -1.8
Backcourt-2.1 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.9 · 3 players
=Even
Frontcourt-2.3 · 2 players
Bench-0.5 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-1.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUNCG betterCOR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Stacker29 min · TRC. Grant11 min · TRC. Bailey6 minR. Greer6 min · TRB. MishakNewJ. ManiNew
Forwards
Z. Fitch23 min · TRV. Collins7 min · TRA. Beljan7 min · TRC. Bynum4 minC. LaFrentzNew
Guards
J. Beccles24 minA. Nimani18 minM. Rafiq8 minD. Fishburn8 minR. Burbach8 minE. GriffinNew
Forwards
K. Sepp19 minG. Panzini10 minI. Imegwu5 minJ. Abalos5 minT. Iwanonkiw3 minB. LecklitnerNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.6 #128 | Points per game | 85.8 #13 |
| 1.11 #125 | Points per possession | 1.20 #17 |
| 69.3 #157 | Pace (possessions) | 72.0 #36 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.0 #146 | Effective FG% | 58.5 #7 |
| 35.6 #80 | 3-point % | 38.3 #14 |
| 40.2 #165 | 3-point attempt rate | 51.6 #8 |
| 42.0 #31 | Free throw rate | 30.2 #304 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #63 | Turnover rate | 16.1 #144 |
| 28.1 #259 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.2 #193 |
| 12.1 #283 | Assists per game | 20.0 #1 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.9 #341 | Points allowed | 84.6 #358 |
| 1.18 #347 | Points allowed per possession | 1.17 #343 |
| 56.2 #347 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.9 #343 |
| 38.0 #357 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.5 #349 |
| 13.6 #343 | Turnovers forced | 15.0 #287 |
| 71.0 #104 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.4 #187 |
| 5.5 #301 | Steals per game | 5.8 #263 |
| 1.9 #350 | Blocks per game | 2.8 #267 |
UNC Greensboro
13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Furman75–81
- Wvs Wofford75–72
- Wvs VMI84–70
- L@ Samford78–87
- W@ Chattanooga85–80
A week or more of rest.
Cornell
13-13 in 2025-26 overall · 8-7 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Yale76–88
- W@ Dartmouth111–90
- Wvs Brown86–80
- Wvs Yale72–69
- Lvs Harvard54–73
A week or more of rest.