Stabler Arena · at Lehigh
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | LEH | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects COR 78–78 · win probability COR 52%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.0
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: LEH has more of the edges
COR 2, LEH 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Three-pointers
COR hits 38.3% and allows 37.5%; LEH hits 36.1% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 51.6% and 38.3% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: COR 30.2%, LEH 23.2%. Defensive: COR 69.4%, LEH 68.5%
Free throws
Free throw rate: COR 30.2, LEH 31.8. Allowed: COR 37.2, LEH 32.5
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: COR 53%, LEH 100%. Transfers in: COR 0, LEH 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: COR plays 72.0 a game (36th fastest), LEH 68.7 (197th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
COR has played the 144th-hardest schedule, LEH the 218th. A record against a soft schedule means less
COR offense vs LEH defense
Offense 111th of 366 against a defense 179th, on the model’s ratings
LEH offense vs COR defense
Offense 257th of 366 against a defense 319th, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: COR 58.5 and allows 55.9; LEH 52.9 and allows 50.6
Home court
LEH at home. This season: LEH 0-0 at home, COR 0-0 away
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: COR 16.1%, LEH 17.7%. Forced: COR 15.0%, LEH 16.2%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | COR -0.5 | — |
| Total | — | 156.0 | — |
| Projected score | — | COR 78.3 · LEH 77.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | COR -0.4 | — |
| 1H total | 72.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | COR 36.7 · LEH 36.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 8-2 80% | 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
COR 2–0 LEHCOR leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · COR has won the last 2 meetings · COR 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2023-24 | COR 84 @ LEH 78 | LEH +8.5 | LEH W |
| Dec 20, 2022-23 | LEH 64 @ COR 96 | COR -11.5 | COR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Cornell
26 games played
Straight up
13-13
50% wins
Against the spread
11-15
42% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg +6.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 102-110 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 164.5 | O 212 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 65-76 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 13 | @ | W 97-78 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 86-73 | -17.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 95-94 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 101-72 | -5.5 | W +23.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 81-99 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 80-93 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 90-93 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 166.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 83-75 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 97-114 | +23.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 99-104 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 170.5 | O 203 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 91-102 | -9.5 | L −20.5 | 175.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 68-102 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 174.5 | U 170 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 89-67 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-79 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 87-64 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 81-91 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 173.5 | U 172 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-67 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 171.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 89-65 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 76-82 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 169.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 54-73 | -4.5 | L −23.5 | 155.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 72-69 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-80 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 111-90 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 166.5 | O 201 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 76-88 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
KENT
L 102-110
−1.5
9
@
ILST
L 65-76
−4.5
13
@
LAF
W 97-78
+14.5
18
vs
ARMY
W 86-73
−4.5
20
vs
COLG
W 95-94
−4.5
30
@
BUCK
W 101-72
+23.5
2
@
GMU
L 81-99
−7.5
3
@
TOW
L 80-93
−6.5
7
@
SAM
L 90-93
−0.5
21
@
UALB
W 83-75
+1.5
29
@
MSU
L 97-114
+6.5
5
vs
COLU
L 99-104
−8.5
10
vs
DART
L 91-102
−20.5
17
@
YALE
L 68-102
−24.5
19
@
BRWN
W 89-67
+19.5
24
@
HARV
W 86-79
+8.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 87-64
+15.5
31
vs
PENN
L 81-91
−17.5
7
@
COLU
W 88-67
+19.5
13
@
PRIN
W 89-65
+20.5
14
@
PENN
L 76-82
−8.5
21
vs
HARV
L 54-73
−23.5
27
vs
YALE
W 72-69
+7.5
28
vs
BRWN
W 86-80
−3.5
7
@
DART
W 111-90
+16.5
14
vs
YALE
L 76-88
−6.5
covered 11didn’t cover 15avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
KENT
L 102-110
+47.5
9
@
ILST
L 65-76
−23.5
13
@
LAF
W 97-78
+14.5
18
vs
ARMY
W 86-73
−5.5
20
vs
COLG
W 95-94
+27.5
30
@
BUCK
W 101-72
+13.5
2
@
GMU
L 81-99
+24.5
3
@
TOW
L 80-93
+18.5
7
@
SAM
L 90-93
+16.5
21
@
UALB
W 83-75
−9.5
29
@
MSU
L 97-114
+50.5
5
vs
COLU
L 99-104
+32.5
10
vs
DART
L 91-102
+17.5
17
@
YALE
L 68-102
−4.5
19
@
BRWN
W 89-67
−7.5
24
@
HARV
W 86-79
+4.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 87-64
−7.5
31
vs
PENN
L 81-91
−1.5
7
@
COLU
W 88-67
−16.5
13
@
PRIN
W 89-65
−1.5
14
@
PENN
L 76-82
−11.5
21
vs
HARV
L 54-73
−28.5
27
vs
YALE
W 72-69
−23.5
28
vs
BRWN
W 86-80
+9.5
7
@
DART
W 111-90
+34.5
14
vs
YALE
L 76-88
+0.5
over 14under 12avg +6.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Lehigh
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
19-14
58% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-15
55% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 57-75 | +36.5 | W +18.5 | 136.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 47-69 | +17.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 116 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 72-84 | +18.5 | W +6.5 | 136.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 79-62 | -10.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 67-82 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 25 | @ | L 55-78 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 132.5 | O 133 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 70-72 | +10.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 78-74 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 135.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 71-80 | -3.5 | L −12.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 82-87 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 142.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 62-76 | +9.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 78-85 | -5.5 | L −12.5 | 146.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 65-72 | +4.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 66-58 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 78-77 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 93-91 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 144.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 79-82 | +3.5 | W +0.5 | 137.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 88-81 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 64-59 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 64-67 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 147.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 77-76 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 84-89 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 67-76 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 90-82 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 140.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 78-69 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 49-72 | +9.5 | L −13.5 | 139.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 70-67 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 78-73 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 89-79 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 69-66 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 76-69 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 74-60 | +2.5 | W +16.5 | 138.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 18 | vs | L 55-67 | -3.5 | L −15.5 | 140.5 | U 122 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
HOU
L 57-75
+18.5
9
@
WVU
L 47-69
−4.5
14
@
RUTG
L 72-84
+6.5
18
vs
SFPA
W 79-62
+6.5
21
vs
COLU
L 67-82
−12.5
25
@
MRST
L 55-78
−15.5
28
vs
UCSB
L 70-72
+8.5
29
vs
TXST
W 78-74
+10.5
2
@
BING
L 71-80
−12.5
6
vs
LIU
L 82-87
−3.5
21
@
MONM
L 62-76
−4.5
31
vs
ARMY
L 78-85
−12.5
3
@
BUCK
L 65-72
−2.5
7
vs
HC
W 66-58
+5.5
10
@
COLG
W 78-77
+12.5
14
@
BU
W 93-91
+6.5
17
vs
NAVY
L 79-82
+0.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 88-81
+3.5
24
vs
LAF
W 64-59
+2.5
28
@
ARMY
L 64-67
−4.5
31
vs
COLG
W 77-76
+4.5
4
@
L-MD
L 84-89
−2.5
7
@
HC
L 67-76
−10.5
11
vs
AMER
W 90-82
+9.5
14
@
LAF
W 78-69
+11.5
18
@
NAVY
L 49-72
−13.5
22
vs
BU
W 70-67
+5.5
25
@
AMER
W 78-73
+12.5
28
vs
BUCK
W 89-79
+4.5
5
vs
HC
W 69-66
−2.5
8
vs
COLG
W 76-69
+9.5
11
vs
BU
W 74-60
+16.5
18
vs
PV
L 55-67
−15.5
covered 19didn’t cover 14avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
HOU
L 57-75
−4.5
9
@
WVU
L 47-69
−23.5
14
@
RUTG
L 72-84
+19.5
18
vs
SFPA
W 79-62
−10.5
21
vs
COLU
L 67-82
+5.5
25
@
MRST
L 55-78
+0.5
28
vs
UCSB
L 70-72
−4.5
29
vs
TXST
W 78-74
+16.5
2
@
BING
L 71-80
+11.5
6
vs
LIU
L 82-87
+26.5
21
@
MONM
L 62-76
−5.5
31
vs
ARMY
L 78-85
+16.5
3
@
BUCK
L 65-72
−0.5
7
vs
HC
W 66-58
−13.5
10
@
COLG
W 78-77
+12.5
14
@
BU
W 93-91
+39.5
17
vs
NAVY
L 79-82
+23.5
19
vs
L-MD
W 88-81
+19.5
24
vs
LAF
W 64-59
−20.5
28
@
ARMY
L 64-67
−16.5
31
vs
COLG
W 77-76
+6.5
4
@
L-MD
L 84-89
+23.5
7
@
HC
L 67-76
+5.5
11
vs
AMER
W 90-82
+31.5
14
@
LAF
W 78-69
+6.5
18
@
NAVY
L 49-72
−18.5
22
vs
BU
W 70-67
−4.5
25
@
AMER
W 78-73
+10.5
28
vs
BUCK
W 89-79
+29.5
5
vs
HC
W 69-66
−7.5
8
vs
COLG
W 76-69
−1.5
11
vs
BU
W 74-60
−4.5
18
vs
PV
L 55-67
−18.5
over 18under 15avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Lehigh has the better starters
Position by position: Cornell 1, Lehigh 2, even 2
CornellBetterLehigh
G J. Beccles7.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 37
→LEHSmall
G J. Ingram10.7 pts · 5.1 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 54
G A. Nimani5.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 30
←CORSmall
G C. Thomas5.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 2
G M. Rafiq4.2 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Vazquez4 pts · 2.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 11
F K. Sepp4.8 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 28
=Even
F E. Benoit10.2 pts · 6 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 24
F G. Panzini2.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 9
→LEHBig
C H. Alvey15.4 pts · 7 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 86
CornellBetterLehigh
COR offense111th of 366 · -1.8
←CORSmall
LEH defense179th of 366 · -4.1
COR defense319th of 366 · -8.3
→LEHSmall
LEH offense257th of 366 · -7.9
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
←CORBig
Backcourt-6.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.3 · 2 players
→LEHBig
Frontcourt+2.3 · 2 players
Bench-1.3 · 5 players
←CORBig
Bench-7.6 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestCOR betterLEH betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Beccles24 minA. Nimani18 minM. Rafiq8 minD. Fishburn8 minR. Burbach8 minE. GriffinNew
Forwards
K. Sepp19 minG. Panzini10 minI. Imegwu5 minJ. Abalos5 minT. Iwanonkiw3 minB. LecklitnerNew
Guards
J. Ingram36 minC. Thomas23 minJ. Vazquez22 minP. Kramer19 minA. Urosevic19 minC. BurrowsNew
Forwards
E. Benoit29 minJ. Pike12 minA. Addesa8 minR. RudusansNewN. DjanoglyNew
Centers
H. Alvey31 minC. CohenNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 85.8 #13 | Points per game | 71.8 #249 |
| 1.20 #17 | Points per possession | 1.05 #257 |
| 72.0 #36 | Pace (possessions) | 68.7 #197 |
| Shooting | ||
| 58.5 #7 | Effective FG% | 52.9 #107 |
| 38.3 #14 | 3-point % | 36.1 #56 |
| 51.6 #8 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.3 #206 |
| 30.2 #304 | Free throw rate | 31.8 #258 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.1 #144 | Turnover rate | 17.7 #250 |
| 30.2 #193 | Offensive rebound rate | 23.2 #349 |
| 20.0 #1 | Assists per game | 13.9 #153 |
| Defense | ||
| 84.6 #358 | Points allowed | 74.4 #171 |
| 1.17 #343 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #175 |
| 55.9 #343 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.6 #133 |
| 37.5 #349 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.9 #109 |
| 15.0 #287 | Turnovers forced | 16.2 #212 |
| 69.4 #187 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.5 #226 |
| 5.8 #263 | Steals per game | 6.6 #163 |
| 2.8 #267 | Blocks per game | 3.1 #209 |
Cornell
13-13 in 2025-26 overall · 8-7 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Yale76–88
- W@ Dartmouth111–90
- Wvs Brown86–80
- Wvs Yale72–69
- Lvs Harvard54–73
A week or more of rest.
Lehigh
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Prairie View55–67
- Wvs Boston U74–60
- Wvs Colgate76–69
- Wvs Holy Cross69–66
- Wvs Bucknell89–79
A week or more of rest.