Reilly Center · at St Bonaventure
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SBU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SBU 82–76 · win probability SBU 69%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SBU has more of the edges
COR 1, SBU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
SBU offense vs COR defense
Offense 169th of 366 against a defense 319th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: COR plays 72.0 a game (36th fastest), SBU 68.0 (228th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: COR 30.2%, SBU 34.5%. Defensive: COR 69.4%, SBU 70.2%
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: COR 53%, SBU 18%. Transfers in: COR 0, SBU 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
SBU at home. This season: SBU 0-0 at home, COR 0-0 away
Turnovers
Turnover rate: COR 16.1%, SBU 16.8%. Forced: COR 15.0%, SBU 17.1%
Free throws
Free throw rate: COR 30.2, SBU 30.0. Allowed: COR 37.2, SBU 33.9
Context
Schedule so far
COR has played the 144th-hardest schedule, SBU the 109th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: COR 58.5 and allows 55.9; SBU 52.4 and allows 53.3
Even
Three-pointers
COR hits 38.3% and allows 37.5%; SBU hits 37.4% and allows 36.0%. Threes are 51.6% and 31.3% of their shots
Even
COR offense vs SBU defense
Offense 111th of 366 against a defense 131st, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SBU -5.7 | — |
| Total | — | 157.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | COR 76 · SBU 81.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SBU -3.3 | — |
| 1H total | 73.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | COR 35.2 · SBU 38.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Cornell
26 games played
Straight up
13-13
50% wins
Against the spread
11-15
42% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-12
54% overs · avg +6.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 102-110 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 164.5 | O 212 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 65-76 | +6.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 13 | @ | W 97-78 | -4.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 86-73 | -17.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 159 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 95-94 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 161.5 | O 189 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 101-72 | -5.5 | W +23.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 81-99 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 155.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 80-93 | +6.5 | L −6.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 90-93 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 166.5 | O 183 |
| Dec 21 | @ | W 83-75 | -6.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | U 158 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 97-114 | +23.5 | W +6.5 | 160.5 | O 211 |
| Jan 5 | vs | L 99-104 | -3.5 | L −8.5 | 170.5 | O 203 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 91-102 | -9.5 | L −20.5 | 175.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 68-102 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 174.5 | U 170 |
| Jan 19 | @ | W 89-67 | -2.5 | W +19.5 | 163.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 86-79 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 87-64 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 158.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 81-91 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 173.5 | U 172 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 88-67 | -1.5 | W +19.5 | 171.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 89-65 | -3.5 | W +20.5 | 155.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 76-82 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 169.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 54-73 | -4.5 | L −23.5 | 155.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 72-69 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-80 | -9.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 111-90 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 166.5 | O 201 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 76-88 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 163.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
KENT
L 102-110
−1.5
9
@
ILST
L 65-76
−4.5
13
@
LAF
W 97-78
+14.5
18
vs
ARMY
W 86-73
−4.5
20
vs
COLG
W 95-94
−4.5
30
@
BUCK
W 101-72
+23.5
2
@
GMU
L 81-99
−7.5
3
@
TOW
L 80-93
−6.5
7
@
SAM
L 90-93
−0.5
21
@
UALB
W 83-75
+1.5
29
@
MSU
L 97-114
+6.5
5
vs
COLU
L 99-104
−8.5
10
vs
DART
L 91-102
−20.5
17
@
YALE
L 68-102
−24.5
19
@
BRWN
W 89-67
+19.5
24
@
HARV
W 86-79
+8.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 87-64
+15.5
31
vs
PENN
L 81-91
−17.5
7
@
COLU
W 88-67
+19.5
13
@
PRIN
W 89-65
+20.5
14
@
PENN
L 76-82
−8.5
21
vs
HARV
L 54-73
−23.5
27
vs
YALE
W 72-69
+7.5
28
vs
BRWN
W 86-80
−3.5
7
@
DART
W 111-90
+16.5
14
vs
YALE
L 76-88
−6.5
covered 11didn’t cover 15avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
KENT
L 102-110
+47.5
9
@
ILST
L 65-76
−23.5
13
@
LAF
W 97-78
+14.5
18
vs
ARMY
W 86-73
−5.5
20
vs
COLG
W 95-94
+27.5
30
@
BUCK
W 101-72
+13.5
2
@
GMU
L 81-99
+24.5
3
@
TOW
L 80-93
+18.5
7
@
SAM
L 90-93
+16.5
21
@
UALB
W 83-75
−9.5
29
@
MSU
L 97-114
+50.5
5
vs
COLU
L 99-104
+32.5
10
vs
DART
L 91-102
+17.5
17
@
YALE
L 68-102
−4.5
19
@
BRWN
W 89-67
−7.5
24
@
HARV
W 86-79
+4.5
30
vs
PRIN
W 87-64
−7.5
31
vs
PENN
L 81-91
−1.5
7
@
COLU
W 88-67
−16.5
13
@
PRIN
W 89-65
−1.5
14
@
PENN
L 76-82
−11.5
21
vs
HARV
L 54-73
−28.5
27
vs
YALE
W 72-69
−23.5
28
vs
BRWN
W 86-80
+9.5
7
@
DART
W 111-90
+34.5
14
vs
YALE
L 76-88
+0.5
over 14under 12avg +6.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
St Bonaventure
33 games played
Straight up
16-17
48% wins
Against the spread
13-20
39% covers · avg −2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-14
58% overs · avg +4.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 69-63 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 89-70 | -21.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 75-66 | -9.5 | L −0.5 | 140.5 | O 141 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 84-80 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | O 164 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 75-61 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 70-85 | +10.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 67-58 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 30 | @ | W 70-65 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 77-69 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 146 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 85-77 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 83-88 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 92-81 | -21.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 82-89 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 80-89 | -6.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 77-81 | -8.5 | L −12.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 64-68 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 74-78 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 84-70 | -10.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 62-97 | +8.5 | L −26.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 87-79 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 73-77 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 70-72 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 70-67 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 73-78 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 65-71 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 94-99 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 94-76 | -2.5 | W +15.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 58-71 | +3.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 4 | @ | L 82-91 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 63-68 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 99-80 | -7.5 | W +11.5 | 146.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 63-57 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 120 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 63-68 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BRAD
W 69-63
+4.5
8
vs
CAN
W 89-70
−2.5
12
vs
SIE
W 75-66
−0.5
15
vs
YSU
W 84-80
−5.5
20
vs
RMU
W 75-61
+2.5
25
vs
UNC
L 70-85
−4.5
27
vs
ECU
W 67-58
−1.5
30
@
FAU
W 70-65
+6.5
6
@
BUF
W 77-69
+2.5
10
vs
COLG
W 85-77
−1.5
13
vs
OHIO
L 83-88
−11.5
20
vs
LEM
W 92-81
−10.5
31
@
VCU
L 82-89
+2.5
7
vs
RICH
L 80-89
−15.5
10
vs
FOR
L 77-81
−12.5
14
@
JOES
L 64-68
−5.5
17
@
LAS
L 74-78
−9.5
20
vs
LUC
W 84-70
+3.5
23
vs
SLU
L 62-97
−26.5
28
@
DUQ
W 87-79
+11.5
31
vs
GMU
L 73-77
−2.5
3
@
DAY
L 70-72
+5.5
7
@
FOR
W 70-67
+1.5
14
vs
DUQ
L 73-78
−6.5
18
vs
JOES
L 65-71
−11.5
21
@
RICH
L 94-99
−3.5
26
vs
URI
W 94-76
+15.5
28
@
GMU
L 58-71
−9.5
4
@
GW
L 82-91
−1.5
7
vs
DAV
L 63-68
−9.5
11
vs
LAS
W 99-80
+11.5
12
vs
GMU
W 63-57
+8.5
13
vs
DAY
L 63-68
+0.5
covered 13didn’t cover 20avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BRAD
W 69-63
−7.5
8
vs
CAN
W 89-70
+22.5
12
vs
SIE
W 75-66
+0.5
15
vs
YSU
W 84-80
+17.5
20
vs
RMU
W 75-61
−10.5
25
vs
UNC
L 70-85
+2.5
27
vs
ECU
W 67-58
−19.5
30
@
FAU
W 70-65
−11.5
6
@
BUF
W 77-69
+1.5
10
vs
COLG
W 85-77
+19.5
13
vs
OHIO
L 83-88
+20.5
20
vs
LEM
W 92-81
+21.5
31
@
VCU
L 82-89
+13.5
7
vs
RICH
L 80-89
+15.5
10
vs
FOR
L 77-81
+15.5
14
@
JOES
L 64-68
−15.5
17
@
LAS
L 74-78
+10.5
20
vs
LUC
W 84-70
+6.5
23
vs
SLU
L 62-97
−0.5
28
@
DUQ
W 87-79
+15.5
31
vs
GMU
L 73-77
+7.5
3
@
DAY
L 70-72
−2.5
7
@
FOR
W 70-67
−4.5
14
vs
DUQ
L 73-78
−1.5
18
vs
JOES
L 65-71
−11.5
21
@
RICH
L 94-99
+45.5
26
vs
URI
W 94-76
+25.5
28
@
GMU
L 58-71
−17.5
4
@
GW
L 82-91
+15.5
7
vs
DAV
L 63-68
−10.5
11
vs
LAS
W 99-80
+32.5
12
vs
GMU
W 63-57
−23.5
13
vs
DAY
L 63-68
−10.5
over 19under 14avg +4.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
St Bonaventure has the better starters
Position by position: Cornell 0, St Bonaventure 1, even 4
CornellBetterSt Bonaventure
G J. Beccles7.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 37
→SBUSmall
G A. Fulton TR10.7 pts · 6.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 62
G A. Nimani5.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 30
=No call
G I. Ermakov2.6 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Not ranked
G M. Rafiq4.2 pts · 0.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F R. Kalambay TR4.4 pts · 5.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 40
F K. Sepp4.8 pts · 5.4 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 28
=Even
F J. Grahovac4.2 pts · 2.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 33
F G. Panzini2.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 9
=Even
F M. Blackwood TR2.6 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.2 ast
Score 22
CornellBetterSt Bonaventure
COR offense111th of 366 · -1.8
=Even
SBU defense131st of 366 · -2.4
COR defense319th of 366 · -8.3
→SBUBig
SBU offense169th of 366 · -5.2
Backcourt-2.1 · 3 players
→SBUSmall
Backcourt-0.4 · 2 players
Frontcourt-2.3 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-2.4 · 3 players
Bench-1.3 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-0.6 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestCOR betterSBU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Beccles24 minA. Nimani18 minM. Rafiq8 minD. Fishburn8 minR. Burbach8 minE. GriffinNew
Forwards
K. Sepp19 minG. Panzini10 minI. Imegwu5 minJ. Abalos5 minT. Iwanonkiw3 minB. LecklitnerNew
Guards
A. Fulton29 min · TRI. Ermakov10 minA. Lonati8 minJ. DeRose1 minR. HeathNewZ. PhilipkoskiNew
Forwards
R. Kalambay21 min · TRJ. Grahovac18 minM. Blackwood12 min · TRJ. IkpotokinNewC. BlankenbergNew
Centers
B. BillNewC. DialloNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 85.8 #13 | Points per game | 76.2 #138 |
| 1.20 #17 | Points per possession | 1.12 #104 |
| 72.0 #36 | Pace (possessions) | 68.0 #228 |
| Shooting | ||
| 58.5 #7 | Effective FG% | 52.4 #129 |
| 38.3 #14 | 3-point % | 37.4 #22 |
| 51.6 #8 | 3-point attempt rate | 31.3 #335 |
| 30.2 #304 | Free throw rate | 30.0 #310 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.1 #144 | Turnover rate | 16.8 #189 |
| 30.2 #193 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.5 #60 |
| 20.0 #1 | Assists per game | 15.4 #73 |
| Defense | ||
| 84.6 #358 | Points allowed | 75.4 #201 |
| 1.17 #343 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #245 |
| 55.9 #343 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.3 #278 |
| 37.5 #349 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.0 #299 |
| 15.0 #287 | Turnovers forced | 17.1 #144 |
| 69.4 #187 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.2 #150 |
| 5.8 #263 | Steals per game | 7.5 #80 |
| 2.8 #267 | Blocks per game | 4.4 #41 |
Cornell
13-13 in 2025-26 overall · 8-7 in conference · Ivy League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Yale76–88
- W@ Dartmouth111–90
- Wvs Brown86–80
- Wvs Yale72–69
- Lvs Harvard54–73
A week or more of rest.
St Bonaventure
16-17 in 2025-26 overall · 6-15 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Dayton63–68
- Wvs George Mason63–57
- Wvs La Salle99–80
- Lvs Davidson63–68
- L@ G Washington82–91
A week or more of rest.