Marriott Center · at BYU
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BYU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BYU 91–67 · win probability BYU 98%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 157.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BYU has more of the edges
UNCO 2, BYU 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
UNCO has played the 303rd-hardest schedule, BYU the 14th. A record against a soft schedule means less
BYU offense vs UNCO defense
Offense 24th of 366 against a defense 281st, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNCO 27.5, BYU 34.4. Allowed: UNCO 38.8, BYU 28.9
UNCO offense vs BYU defense
Offense 167th of 366 against a defense 33rd, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
UNCO hits 35.0% and allows 30.7%; BYU hits 34.5% and allows 35.3%. Threes are 41.5% and 39.8% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNCO 15.5%, BYU 15.2%. Forced: UNCO 12.4%, BYU 16.4%
Home court
BYU at home. This season: BYU 0-0 at home, UNCO 0-0 away
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNCO 55.7 and allows 50.1; BYU 54.4 and allows 51.2
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNCO 27.2%, BYU 34.3%. Defensive: UNCO 75.8%, BYU 70.3%
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: UNCO plays 71.3 a game (60th fastest), BYU 70.6 (90th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNCO 28%, BYU 35%. Transfers in: UNCO 4, BYU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | BYU -24.4 | — |
| Total | — | 157.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNCO 66.6 · BYU 91.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | BYU -14.4 | — |
| 1H total | 73.7 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNCO 29.6 · BYU 44 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | |
| 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
N Colorado
29 games played
Straight up
17-12
59% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg +0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +2.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15 | @ | W 88-81 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 72-73 | +4.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 86-80 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-93 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | O 190 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 71-53 | -4.5 | W +13.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 75-70 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 89-87 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 90-101 | +25.5 | W +14.5 | 152.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 79-86 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 159.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 86-81 | +15.5 | W +20.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 75-89 | +2.5 | L −11.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 79-88 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 161.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 85-72 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 71-76 | -6.5 | L −11.5 | 162.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 73-76 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 89-93 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 163.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 68-73 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 77-81 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 91-83 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 74-71 | -6.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 88-74 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 69-61 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 95-79 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 164.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 77-65 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 78-77 | -13.5 | L −12.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 72-82 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 76-67 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 2 | vs | W 85-57 | -5.5 | W +22.5 | 154.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 89-95 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
15
@
PEPP
W 88-81
+5.5
21
vs
STMN
L 72-73
+3.5
22
@
PORT
W 86-80
+2.5
23
vs
CSUF
W 97-93
−4.5
26
@
AF
W 71-53
+13.5
3
@
OMA
W 75-70
+1.5
6
vs
SDAK
W 89-87
−6.5
16
@
TTU
L 90-101
+14.5
20
vs
DEN
L 79-86
−15.5
28
@
COLO
W 86-81
+20.5
1
@
MTST
L 75-89
−11.5
3
@
MONT
L 79-88
−10.5
8
vs
IDST
W 85-72
+8.5
10
vs
WEB
L 71-76
−11.5
15
@
PRST
L 73-76
−0.5
17
@
SAC
L 89-93
−10.5
19
vs
MTST
L 68-73
−7.5
24
@
NAU
L 77-81
−10.5
29
vs
IDHO
W 91-83
+5.5
31
vs
EWU
W 74-71
−3.5
5
@
WEB
W 88-74
+12.5
7
@
IDST
W 69-61
+5.5
12
vs
SAC
W 95-79
+4.5
14
vs
PRST
W 77-65
+8.5
21
vs
NAU
W 78-77
−12.5
26
@
EWU
L 72-82
−11.5
28
@
IDHO
W 76-67
+11.5
2
vs
MONT
W 85-57
+22.5
9
vs
MONT
L 89-95
−10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
15
@
PEPP
W 88-81
+15.5
21
vs
STMN
L 72-73
−12.5
22
@
PORT
W 86-80
+8.5
23
vs
CSUF
W 97-93
+25.5
26
@
AF
W 71-53
−22.5
3
@
OMA
W 75-70
−12.5
6
vs
SDAK
W 89-87
+13.5
16
@
TTU
L 90-101
+38.5
20
vs
DEN
L 79-86
+5.5
28
@
COLO
W 86-81
+8.5
1
@
MTST
L 75-89
+9.5
3
@
MONT
L 79-88
+5.5
8
vs
IDST
W 85-72
+1.5
10
vs
WEB
L 71-76
−15.5
15
@
PRST
L 73-76
−6.5
17
@
SAC
L 89-93
+18.5
19
vs
MTST
L 68-73
−12.5
24
@
NAU
L 77-81
+7.5
29
vs
IDHO
W 91-83
+18.5
31
vs
EWU
W 74-71
−11.5
5
@
WEB
W 88-74
−0.5
7
@
IDST
W 69-61
−20.5
12
vs
SAC
W 95-79
+9.5
14
vs
PRST
W 77-65
−7.5
21
vs
NAU
W 78-77
+3.5
26
@
EWU
L 72-82
−3.5
28
@
IDHO
W 76-67
−13.5
2
vs
MONT
W 85-57
−12.5
9
vs
MONT
L 89-95
+31.5
over 16under 13avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
BYU
35 games played
Straight up
23-12
66% wins
Against the spread
16-19
46% covers · avg −1.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
18-17
51% overs · avg −0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 71-66 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 98-53 | -38.5 | W +6.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 85-68 | -35.5 | L −18.5 | 164.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 84-86 | +6.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 98-70 | -4.5 | W +23.5 | 165.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 72-62 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 83-79 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 91-60 | -18.5 | W +12.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 67-64 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 100-53 | -33.5 | W +13.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Dec 16 | vs | W 93-57 | -23.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 19 | vs | W 85-67 | -33.5 | L −15.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 109-81 | -34.5 | L −6.5 | 168.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 83-73 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 174.5 | U 156 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 104-76 | -17.5 | W +10.5 | 168.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 89-84 | -14.5 | L −9.5 | 168.5 | O 173 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 76-70 | -13.5 | L −7.5 | 162.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 71-84 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 165.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 91-78 | -19.5 | L −6.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 26 | vs | L 83-86 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 166.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 82-90 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 159.5 | O 172 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 92-99 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 66-77 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 10 | @ | W 99-94 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 193 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 90-86 | -15.5 | L −11.5 | 161.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 68-75 | +11.5 | W +4.5 | 165.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 79-69 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 154.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 24 | vs | L 84-97 | -14.5 | L −27.5 | 162.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 71-79 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 68-90 | +1.5 | L −20.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 82-76 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Mar 10 | vs | W 105-91 | -11.5 | W +2.5 | 168.5 | O 196 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 68-48 | -3.5 | W +16.5 | 141.5 | U 116 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 66-73 | +9.5 | W +2.5 | 146.5 | U 139 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 71-79 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 156.5 | U 150 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
VILL
W 71-66
−4.5
8
vs
HC
W 98-53
+6.5
11
vs
DEL
W 85-68
−18.5
15
vs
CONN
L 84-86
+4.5
21
vs
WIS
W 98-70
+23.5
27
vs
MIA
W 72-62
+2.5
28
vs
DAY
W 83-79
−5.5
3
vs
CBU
W 91-60
+12.5
9
vs
CLEM
W 67-64
−1.5
13
vs
UCR
W 100-53
+13.5
16
vs
PAC
W 93-57
+12.5
19
vs
ACU
W 85-67
−15.5
22
vs
EWU
W 109-81
−6.5
3
@
KSU
W 83-73
+2.5
7
vs
ASU
W 104-76
+10.5
10
@
UTAH
W 89-84
−9.5
14
vs
TCU
W 76-70
−7.5
17
@
TTU
L 71-84
−10.5
24
vs
UTAH
W 91-78
−6.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 83-86
−1.5
31
@
KU
L 82-90
−5.5
4
@
OKST
L 92-99
−15.5
7
vs
HOU
L 66-77
−9.5
10
@
BAY
W 99-94
+1.5
14
vs
COLO
W 90-86
−11.5
18
@
ARIZ
L 68-75
+4.5
21
vs
ISU
W 79-69
+12.5
24
vs
UCF
L 84-97
−27.5
28
@
WVU
L 71-79
−10.5
3
@
CIN
L 68-90
−20.5
7
vs
TTU
W 82-76
+3.5
10
vs
KSU
W 105-91
+2.5
11
vs
WVU
W 68-48
+16.5
12
vs
HOU
L 66-73
+2.5
19
vs
TEX
L 71-79
−10.5
covered 16didn’t cover 19avg −1.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
VILL
W 71-66
−16.5
8
vs
HC
W 98-53
−14.5
11
vs
DEL
W 85-68
−11.5
15
vs
CONN
L 84-86
+13.5
21
vs
WIS
W 98-70
+2.5
27
vs
MIA
W 72-62
−31.5
28
vs
DAY
W 83-79
+11.5
3
vs
CBU
W 91-60
−2.5
9
vs
CLEM
W 67-64
−21.5
13
vs
UCR
W 100-53
−2.5
16
vs
PAC
W 93-57
+0.5
19
vs
ACU
W 85-67
+5.5
22
vs
EWU
W 109-81
+21.5
3
@
KSU
W 83-73
−18.5
7
vs
ASU
W 104-76
+11.5
10
@
UTAH
W 89-84
+4.5
14
vs
TCU
W 76-70
−16.5
17
@
TTU
L 71-84
−10.5
24
vs
UTAH
W 91-78
+0.5
26
vs
ARIZ
L 83-86
+2.5
31
@
KU
L 82-90
+12.5
4
@
OKST
L 92-99
+23.5
7
vs
HOU
L 66-77
−8.5
10
@
BAY
W 99-94
+34.5
14
vs
COLO
W 90-86
+14.5
18
@
ARIZ
L 68-75
−22.5
21
vs
ISU
W 79-69
−6.5
24
vs
UCF
L 84-97
+18.5
28
@
WVU
L 71-79
+8.5
3
@
CIN
L 68-90
+6.5
7
vs
TTU
W 82-76
−1.5
10
vs
KSU
W 105-91
+27.5
11
vs
WVU
W 68-48
−25.5
12
vs
HOU
L 66-73
−7.5
19
vs
TEX
L 71-79
−6.5
over 18under 17avg −0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
BYU has the better starters
Position by position: N Colorado 0, BYU 3, even 2
N ColoradoBetterBYU
G L. Reynolds TR11.6 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 79
→BYUSmall
G R. Wright18.1 pts · 3.5 reb · 4.6 ast
Score 97
G V. Delano6.4 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 11
→BYUBig
G C. Chandler TR9.7 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 84
G C. Tramble TR3.6 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 16
→BYUBig
F J. Kohler TR12.5 pts · 8.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 96
F K. Rayfield TR6.3 pts · 4.3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 40
=Even
F J. Wahlin TR5.3 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 44
C E. Shields6.4 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 41
=No call
F D. Baker7.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
N ColoradoBetterBYU
UNCO offense167th of 366 · -5.1
→BYUBig
BYU defense33rd of 366 · +3.5
UNCO defense281st of 366 · -7.0
→BYUBig
BYU offense24th of 366 · +7.2
Backcourt-2.2 · 3 players
→BYUBig
Backcourt+6.9 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.0 · 2 players
→BYUBig
Frontcourt+4.5 · 3 players
Bench-1.5 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-0.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestUNCO betterBYU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Reynolds33 min · TRV. Delano20 minC. Tramble12 min · TRA. Mawien8 minT. Braketa5 minC. BloggNew
Forwards
K. Rayfield20 min · TRA. Crawford5 min · TRM. ShareefNewD. PaineNew
Centers
E. Shields18 minH. Caldwell4 min
Guards
R. Wright35 minC. Chandler27 min · TRN. PickensNew
Forwards
J. Kohler28 min · TRJ. Wahlin21 min · TRD. Baker20 minT. Betsey18 min · TRK. Mboup16 minB. KozlowskiNew
Centers
A. Stewart1 min · TRP. OstojicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.8 #51 | Points per game | 83.5 #22 |
| 1.14 #75 | Points per possession | 1.18 #32 |
| 71.3 #60 | Pace (possessions) | 70.6 #90 |
| Shooting | ||
| 55.7 #24 | Effective FG% | 54.4 #54 |
| 35.0 #121 | 3-point % | 34.5 #145 |
| 41.5 #140 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.8 #177 |
| 27.5 #348 | Free throw rate | 34.4 #198 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.5 #103 | Turnover rate | 15.2 #78 |
| 27.2 #288 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.3 #61 |
| 15.8 #54 | Assists per game | 13.3 #192 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.1 #270 | Points allowed | 75.4 #202 |
| 1.09 #209 | Points allowed per possession | 1.07 #133 |
| 50.1 #106 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.2 #174 |
| 30.7 #28 | Opponent 3-point % | 35.3 #269 |
| 12.4 #363 | Turnovers forced | 16.4 #194 |
| 75.8 #6 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.3 #145 |
| 4.0 #364 | Steals per game | 7.2 #109 |
| 2.7 #273 | Blocks per game | 4.4 #40 |
N Colorado
17-12 in 2025-26 overall · 10-9 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Montana89–95
- Wvs Montana85–57
- W@ Idaho76–67
- L@ E Washington72–82
- Wvs N Arizona78–77
A week or more of rest.
BYU
23-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Big 12 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Texas71–79
- Lvs Houston66–73
- Wvs West Virginia68–48
- Wvs Kansas St105–91
- Wvs Texas Tech82–76
A week or more of rest.