McKenzie Arena · at Chattanooga
#246RADRadford
@
#227UTCChattanooga
LineNo line yet 
Total— 
Season records: Radford and Chattanooga
RADThis seasonUTC
0-0Record0-0
0-0ATS0-0
0-0O/U0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects UTC 78–75 · win probability UTC 59%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 152.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it

RAD 4, UTC 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
RADBig
Free throws
Free throw rate: RAD 42.4, UTC 29.7. Allowed: RAD 40.0, UTC 42.6
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: RAD plays 73.6 a game (13th fastest), UTC 67.6 (249th). Faster games mean more points
UTCSmall
Shooting
Effective FG%: RAD 51.4 and allows 53.0; UTC 54.2 and allows 51.7
UTCSmall
UTC offense vs RAD defense
Offense 193rd of 366 against a defense 286th, on the model’s ratings
UTCSmall
Three-pointers
RAD hits 33.5% and allows 35.5%; UTC hits 35.0% and allows 34.2%. Threes are 45.4% and 49.2% of their shots
Context
Schedule so far
RAD has played the 243rd-hardest schedule, UTC the 306th. A record against a soft schedule means less
RADSmall
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: RAD 29.8%, UTC 21.8%. Defensive: RAD 67.8%, UTC 68.3%
RADSmall
RAD offense vs UTC defense
Offense 213th of 366 against a defense 270th, on the model’s ratings
RADSmall
Turnovers
Turnover rate: RAD 17.1%, UTC 14.5%. Forced: RAD 18.5%, UTC 13.1%
UTCSmall
Home court
UTC at home. This season: UTC 0-0 at home, RAD 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: RAD 12%, UTC 32%. Transfers in: RAD 6, UTC 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Market

Open → current
Spread
Opening line not available
Total
 
Moneyline
—

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Model vs market

MarketModelModel edge
Spread—UTC -2.7—
Total—152.7—
Projected score—RAD 75 · UTC 77.7

1st-half model

ModelActual
1H spreadUTC -1.5—
1H total71.4—
1H projected scoreRAD 35 · UTC 36.4—

The starting fives are even

Position by position: Radford 1, Chattanooga 1, even 3
RadfordBetterChattanooga
G J. Robinson TR6.3 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.9 ast Score 52
Even
G T. Darner9.8 pts · 4.3 reb · 1.8 ast Score 49
G T. Gross TR3.5 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.6 ast Score 21
No call
G S. Cusano2.5 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.5 ast Not ranked
F C. Jackson TR4 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.5 ast Score 36
UTCSmall
F T. Houser TR14.4 pts · 5.4 reb · 1.8 ast Score 68
F P. Kabamba TR5.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.9 ast Score 38
RADSmall
F Y. Levy TR5 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.7 ast Score 18
F F. Erichsen4.7 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast Score 27
Even
F J. Bowman3 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.8 ast Score 22
RadfordBetterChattanooga
RAD offense213th of 366 · -6.5
RADSmall
UTC defense270th of 366 · -6.8
RAD defense286th of 366 · -7.2
UTCSmall
UTC offense193rd of 366 · -5.9
Backcourt-1.5 · 2 players
Even
Backcourt-1.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt-2.1 · 3 players
Even
Frontcourt-1.6 · 3 players
Bench-1.0 · 4 players
Even
Bench-1.1 · 1 player
Score, worst to bestRAD betterUTC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Radford
Guards
J. Robinson17 min · TRT. Gross13 min · TRW. Keel6 minM. Grujicic6 min · TRJ. Kee3 min · TRK. PruettNew
Forwards
C. Jackson17 min · TRP. Kabamba17 min · TRF. Erichsen13 minA. NokesNew
Centers
G. Ferreira5 min
Chattanooga
Guards
T. Darner29 minS. Cusano13 minH. Holland11 minL. VittersNewM. HamptonNewT. PowellNew
Forwards
T. Houser33 min · TRY. Levy21 min · TRJ. Bowman12 minA. SwiftNewC. HardawayNew
Centers
J. FleemanNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Shooting
Possessions
Defense
RADUTC
Scoring
79.9 #70Points per game74.1 #192
1.09 #168Points per possession1.10 #132
73.6 #13Pace (possessions)67.6 #249
Shooting
51.4 #181Effective FG%54.2 #60
33.5 #1993-point %35.0 #116
45.4 #593-point attempt rate49.2 #18
42.4 #25Free throw rate29.7 #319
Possessions
17.1 #210Turnover rate14.5 #40
29.8 #207Offensive rebound rate21.8 #358
12.0 #284Assists per game14.3 #127
Defense
80.8 #330Points allowed78.1 #269
1.10 #216Points allowed per possession1.15 #325
53.0 #271Opponent effective FG%51.7 #195
35.5 #279Opponent 3-point %34.2 #195
18.5 #72Turnovers forced13.1 #351
67.8 #267Defensive rebound rate68.3 #240
7.5 #79Steals per game5.0 #336
3.4 #158Blocks per game2.5 #305

Radford

13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-8 in conference · Big South Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs Presbyterian85–91
  • L@ Longwood74–90
  • Wvs SC Upstate71–59
  • L@ UNC Asheville73–74
  • Wvs Gardner-Webb82–70

A week or more of rest.

Chattanooga

10-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Southern Conference

Last five, 2025-26
  • Lvs The Citadel85–88
  • Wvs VMI86–79
  • Lvs UNC Greensboro80–85
  • W@ The Citadel93–72
  • W@ Mercer94–90

A week or more of rest.