Williams Arena at Minges Coliseum · at East Carolina
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ECU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ECU 80–72 · win probability ECU 77%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ECU has more of the edges
RAD 3, ECU 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
ECU offense vs RAD defense
Offense 142nd of 366 against a defense 286th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
RAD has played the 243rd-hardest schedule, ECU the 123rd. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: RAD 42.4, ECU 39.2. Allowed: RAD 40.0, ECU 32.2
Turnovers
Turnover rate: RAD 17.1%, ECU 17.1%. Forced: RAD 18.5%, ECU 16.3%
Shooting
Effective FG%: RAD 51.4 and allows 53.0; ECU 46.4 and allows 52.3
Three-pointers
RAD hits 33.5% and allows 35.5%; ECU hits 29.3% and allows 34.9%. Threes are 45.4% and 31.1% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: RAD 29.8%, ECU 33.4%. Defensive: RAD 67.8%, ECU 67.5%
RAD offense vs ECU defense
Offense 213th of 366 against a defense 158th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: RAD plays 73.6 a game (13th fastest), ECU 70.0 (116th). Faster games mean more points
Home court
ECU at home. This season: ECU 0-0 at home, RAD 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: RAD 12%, ECU 16%. Transfers in: RAD 6, ECU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ECU -8.5 | — |
| Total | — | 151.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | RAD 71.6 · ECU 80.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ECU -4.9 | — |
| 1H total | 70.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | RAD 33 · ECU 37.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Radford
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg −2.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-12
59% overs · avg +3.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 80-75 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 155 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 74-89 | +20.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 59-92 | -6.5 | L −39.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 82-87 | -8.5 | L −13.5 | 162.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 58-87 | +10.5 | L −18.5 | 153.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 73-81 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 24 | @ | L 72-89 | +23.5 | W +6.5 | 165.5 | U 161 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 75-82 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 89-56 | -13.5 | W +19.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 107-77 | -20.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 83-96 | +8.5 | L −4.5 | 170.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 97-90 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 158.5 | O 187 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 76-69 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 158.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 80-61 | -6.5 | W +12.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 72-91 | -4.5 | L −23.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 89-80 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 165.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 85-83 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 75-76 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 83-93 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 165.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 84-75 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 93-84 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 151.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 78-80 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 161.5 | U 158 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 77-86 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 162.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 90-80 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 161.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 82-70 | -18.5 | L −6.5 | 162.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 73-74 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 71-59 | -7.5 | W +4.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 74-90 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 85-91 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
WIU
W 80-75
−11.5
11
@
UNC
L 74-89
+5.5
15
vs
WRST
L 59-92
−39.5
16
vs
CLE
L 82-87
−13.5
18
@
SC
L 58-87
−18.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 73-81
−3.5
24
@
SMU
L 72-89
+6.5
3
vs
USM
L 75-82
−10.5
7
vs
SFPA
W 89-56
+19.5
14
vs
COPP
W 107-77
+9.5
18
@
W&M
L 83-96
−4.5
21
vs
VMI
W 97-90
−4.5
31
@
UPST
W 76-69
+8.5
7
vs
PRES
W 80-61
+12.5
10
vs
UNCA
L 72-91
−23.5
14
@
GWEB
W 89-80
−4.5
17
vs
LONG
W 85-83
−2.5
21
@
WIN
L 75-76
+8.5
23
vs
HPU
L 83-93
−2.5
29
@
CHSO
W 84-75
+7.5
31
@
PRES
W 93-84
+10.5
4
vs
WIN
L 78-80
+2.5
7
@
HPU
L 77-86
+5.5
14
vs
CHSO
W 90-80
+5.5
19
vs
GWEB
W 82-70
−6.5
21
@
UNCA
L 73-74
+1.5
26
vs
UPST
W 71-59
+4.5
28
@
LONG
L 74-90
−14.5
6
vs
PRES
L 85-91
−8.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg −2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
WIU
W 80-75
+3.5
11
@
UNC
L 74-89
+0.5
15
vs
WRST
L 59-92
−5.5
16
vs
CLE
L 82-87
+6.5
18
@
SC
L 58-87
−8.5
21
vs
UNCW
L 73-81
+2.5
24
@
SMU
L 72-89
−4.5
3
vs
USM
L 75-82
+4.5
7
vs
SFPA
W 89-56
−9.5
14
vs
COPP
W 107-77
+29.5
18
@
W&M
L 83-96
+8.5
21
vs
VMI
W 97-90
+28.5
31
@
UPST
W 76-69
−13.5
7
vs
PRES
W 80-61
−6.5
10
vs
UNCA
L 72-91
+11.5
14
@
GWEB
W 89-80
+3.5
17
vs
LONG
W 85-83
+10.5
21
@
WIN
L 75-76
−14.5
23
vs
HPU
L 83-93
+10.5
29
@
CHSO
W 84-75
−3.5
31
@
PRES
W 93-84
+25.5
4
vs
WIN
L 78-80
−3.5
7
@
HPU
L 77-86
+0.5
14
vs
CHSO
W 90-80
+8.5
19
vs
GWEB
W 82-70
−10.5
21
@
UNCA
L 73-74
−2.5
26
vs
UPST
W 71-59
−22.5
28
@
LONG
L 74-90
+9.5
6
vs
PRES
L 85-91
+29.5
over 17under 12avg +3.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
East Carolina
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
12-18
40% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +3.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs | W 92-89 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 151.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 72-87 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 60-85 | +6.5 | L −18.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 65-77 | -13.5 | L −25.5 | 157.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 56-89 | +19.5 | L −13.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 58-67 | +10.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 68-56 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 78-82 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 11 | vs | L 54-67 | -4.5 | L −17.5 | 130.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 73-70 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 74-53 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 131.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 51-99 | +25.5 | L −22.5 | 144.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 70-79 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 67-75 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 142 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 85-87 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 71-82 | +18.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 18 | vs | L 70-73 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 60-77 | +12.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 63-59 | +10.5 | W +14.5 | 134.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 28 | vs | L 77-83 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 140.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 76-75 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 73-81 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 88-72 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 85-75 | +4.5 | W +14.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 89-92 | +7.5 | W +4.5 | 149.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 56-68 | +4.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 82-81 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 163 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 84-68 | +4.5 | W +20.5 | 152.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 66-93 | +8.5 | L −18.5 | 156.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 8 | @ | L 83-90 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vs
GASO
W 92-89
−2.5
8
@
RICH
L 72-87
−9.5
18
@
UNCW
L 60-85
−18.5
21
vs
CHSO
L 65-77
−25.5
25
vs
MSU
L 56-89
−13.5
27
vs
SBU
L 58-67
+1.5
2
vs
UMES
W 68-56
−0.5
6
vs
UNCG
L 78-82
−11.5
11
vs
APP
L 54-67
−17.5
14
vs
BUF
W 73-70
+1.5
17
vs
PRES
W 74-53
+16.5
22
@
UNC
L 51-99
−22.5
31
vs
TULN
L 70-79
−7.5
7
@
TEM
L 67-75
−0.5
11
vs
UAB
L 85-87
+5.5
14
@
USF
L 71-82
+7.5
18
vs
CLT
L 70-73
−4.5
21
@
WICH
L 60-77
−4.5
23
@
UNT
W 63-59
+14.5
28
vs
RICE
L 77-83
−8.5
1
@
FAU
W 76-75
+11.5
7
vs
TEM
L 73-81
−5.5
11
vs
UTSA
W 88-72
+5.5
14
@
RICE
W 85-75
+14.5
18
vs
WICH
L 89-92
+4.5
21
@
CLT
L 56-68
−7.5
25
@
UTSA
W 82-81
−3.5
1
vs
MEM
W 84-68
+20.5
5
vs
TLSA
L 66-93
−18.5
8
@
UAB
L 83-90
+3.5
covered 12didn’t cover 18avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vs
GASO
W 92-89
+29.5
8
@
RICH
L 72-87
+15.5
18
@
UNCW
L 60-85
−0.5
21
vs
CHSO
L 65-77
−15.5
25
vs
MSU
L 56-89
+4.5
27
vs
SBU
L 58-67
−19.5
2
vs
UMES
W 68-56
−3.5
6
vs
UNCG
L 78-82
+20.5
11
vs
APP
L 54-67
−9.5
14
vs
BUF
W 73-70
−3.5
17
vs
PRES
W 74-53
−4.5
22
@
UNC
L 51-99
+5.5
31
vs
TULN
L 70-79
+3.5
7
@
TEM
L 67-75
−1.5
11
vs
UAB
L 85-87
+21.5
14
@
USF
L 71-82
−5.5
18
vs
CLT
L 70-73
+3.5
21
@
WICH
L 60-77
−7.5
23
@
UNT
W 63-59
−12.5
28
vs
RICE
L 77-83
+19.5
1
@
FAU
W 76-75
−2.5
7
vs
TEM
L 73-81
+13.5
11
vs
UTSA
W 88-72
+9.5
14
@
RICE
W 85-75
+13.5
18
vs
WICH
L 89-92
+31.5
21
@
CLT
L 56-68
−21.5
25
@
UTSA
W 82-81
+9.5
1
vs
MEM
W 84-68
−0.5
5
vs
TLSA
L 66-93
+2.5
8
@
UAB
L 83-90
+21.5
over 16under 14avg +3.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
East Carolina has the better starters
Position by position: Radford 1, East Carolina 2, even 2
RadfordBetterEast Carolina
G J. Robinson TR6.3 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 52
←RADSmall
G C. Medley TR10.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 6.2 ast
Score 32
G T. Gross TR3.5 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 21
→ECUBig
G B. Blaine TR17.7 pts · 7.1 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 82
F C. Jackson TR4 pts · 3.9 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 36
=Even
F K. Watson TR12.5 pts · 4.8 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 50
F P. Kabamba TR5.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 38
→ECUBig
F K. Cooper TR8.5 pts · 7.5 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 76
F F. Erichsen4.7 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 27
=No call
F J. Woodard3.3 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.7 ast
Not ranked
RadfordBetterEast Carolina
RAD offense213th of 366 · -6.5
→ECUSmall
ECU defense158th of 366 · -3.4
RAD defense286th of 366 · -7.2
→ECUBig
ECU offense142nd of 366 · -4.3
Backcourt-1.5 · 2 players
=Even
Backcourt-0.7 · 2 players
Frontcourt-2.1 · 3 players
→ECUSmall
Frontcourt+0.4 · 3 players
Bench-1.0 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-1.8 · 2 players
Score, worst to bestRAD betterECU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Robinson17 min · TRT. Gross13 min · TRW. Keel6 minM. Grujicic6 min · TRJ. Kee3 min · TRK. PruettNew
Forwards
C. Jackson17 min · TRP. Kabamba17 min · TRF. Erichsen13 minA. NokesNew
Centers
G. Ferreira5 min
Guards
C. Medley34 min · TRB. Blaine29 min · TRT. Best6 min · TRA. McCulloughNewM. PandovNew
Forwards
K. Watson32 min · TRK. Cooper26 min · TRJ. Woodard17 minJ. BuchananNewD. QuinnNewD. Creasy-QuirindoongoNew
Centers
E. DeLaurier15 minM. KlitschkoNewM. HintonNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.9 #70 | Points per game | 71.5 #259 |
| 1.09 #168 | Points per possession | 1.02 #305 |
| 73.6 #13 | Pace (possessions) | 70.0 #116 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.4 #181 | Effective FG% | 46.4 #346 |
| 33.5 #199 | 3-point % | 29.3 #350 |
| 45.4 #59 | 3-point attempt rate | 31.1 #337 |
| 42.4 #25 | Free throw rate | 39.2 #75 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #210 | Turnover rate | 17.1 #208 |
| 29.8 #207 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.4 #79 |
| 12.0 #284 | Assists per game | 11.8 #301 |
| Defense | ||
| 80.8 #330 | Points allowed | 77.7 #262 |
| 1.10 #216 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #246 |
| 53.0 #271 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.3 #229 |
| 35.5 #279 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.9 #245 |
| 18.5 #72 | Turnovers forced | 16.3 #205 |
| 67.8 #267 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.5 #282 |
| 7.5 #79 | Steals per game | 6.5 #177 |
| 3.4 #158 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #74 |
Radford
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-8 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Presbyterian85–91
- L@ Longwood74–90
- Wvs SC Upstate71–59
- L@ UNC Asheville73–74
- Wvs Gardner-Webb82–70
A week or more of rest.
East Carolina
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 6-12 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UAB83–90
- Lvs Tulsa66–93
- Wvs Memphis84–68
- W@ UTSA82–81
- L@ Charlotte56–68
A week or more of rest.