Abessinio Court at Eleanor R. Baldwin Arena · at FAU
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FAU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FAU 85–74 · win probability FAU 83%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 158.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FAU has more of the edges
W&M 2, FAU 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
FAU offense vs W&M defense
Offense 85th of 366 against a defense 289th, on the model’s ratings
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: W&M 26.0%, FAU 31.6%. Defensive: W&M 68.5%, FAU 71.7%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: W&M 16.6%, FAU 17.6%. Forced: W&M 18.9%, FAU 15.5%
Free throws
Free throw rate: W&M 44.0, FAU 33.3. Allowed: W&M 35.5, FAU 36.2
Context
Schedule so far
W&M has played the 171st-hardest schedule, FAU the 101st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
FAU at home. This season: FAU 0-0 at home, W&M 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: W&M 1%, FAU 17%. Transfers in: W&M 7, FAU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 72 possessions: W&M plays 73.6 a game (14th fastest), FAU 71.1 (71st). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: W&M 54.3 and allows 51.9; FAU 52.2 and allows 49.5
Even
W&M offense vs FAU defense
Offense 160th of 366 against a defense 174th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
W&M hits 33.0% and allows 33.0%; FAU hits 33.3% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 42.8% and 38.2% of their shots
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FAU -10.8 | — |
| Total | — | 158.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | W&M 74 · FAU 84.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FAU -6.3 | — |
| 1H total | 74.2 | — |
| 1H projected score | W&M 33.9 · FAU 40.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
William & Mary
30 games played
Straight up
18-12
60% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-17
43% overs · avg −2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 81-78 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 86-90 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 164.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 60-93 | +28.5 | L −4.5 | 179.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 19 | @ | W 82-74 | +8.5 | W +16.5 | 167.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 74-63 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 92-58 | +1.5 | W +35.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 88-75 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 83-79 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 170.5 | U 162 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 86-99 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 174.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 96-83 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 170.5 | O 179 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 84-70 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 157.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 76-57 | -11.5 | W +7.5 | 159.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 5 | @ | L 79-88 | +2.5 | L −6.5 | 165.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 70-81 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 156.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 58-64 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 97-89 | -13.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | O 186 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 77-70 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 159.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 89-82 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 157.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 76-79 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 169.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 96-104 | -8.5 | L −16.5 | 168.5 | O 200 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 85-78 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 159.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 74-77 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 94-67 | -5.5 | W +21.5 | 167.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 78-81 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 165.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 83-84 | -1.5 | L −2.5 | 167.5 | U 167 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 84-77 | -11.5 | L −4.5 | 164.5 | U 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | W 91-88 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 94-85 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 72-62 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 163.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 61-92 | +2.5 | L −28.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
NORF
W 81-78
+0.5
11
@
RICH
L 86-90
+5.5
15
@
SJU
L 60-93
−4.5
19
@
BGSU
W 82-74
+16.5
24
vs
UTEP
W 74-63
+8.5
25
vs
ACU
W 92-58
+35.5
30
vs
ODU
W 88-75
+4.5
2
@
DUQ
W 83-79
+9.5
6
@
GW
L 86-99
+0.5
18
vs
RAD
W 96-83
+4.5
29
vs
TOW
W 84-70
+12.5
31
vs
STBK
W 76-57
+7.5
5
@
COFC
L 79-88
−6.5
8
@
MONM
L 70-81
−13.5
10
@
DREX
L 58-64
−9.5
15
vs
NCAT
W 97-89
−5.5
22
vs
UNCW
W 77-70
+4.5
24
vs
HOF
W 89-82
+3.5
29
@
ELON
L 76-79
−4.5
31
vs
CAM
L 96-104
−16.5
5
@
UNCW
W 85-78
+11.5
7
@
HAMP
L 74-77
−8.5
12
@
NE
W 94-67
+21.5
14
vs
ELON
L 78-81
−11.5
19
@
CAM
L 83-84
−2.5
26
vs
NE
W 84-77
−4.5
28
@
NCAT
W 91-88
−5.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 94-85
−2.5
7
vs
ELON
W 72-62
+4.5
8
vs
HOF
L 61-92
−28.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
NORF
W 81-78
+0.5
11
@
RICH
L 86-90
+11.5
15
@
SJU
L 60-93
−26.5
19
@
BGSU
W 82-74
−11.5
24
vs
UTEP
W 74-63
−22.5
25
vs
ACU
W 92-58
+2.5
30
vs
ODU
W 88-75
−0.5
2
@
DUQ
W 83-79
−8.5
6
@
GW
L 86-99
+10.5
18
vs
RAD
W 96-83
+8.5
29
vs
TOW
W 84-70
−3.5
31
vs
STBK
W 76-57
−26.5
5
@
COFC
L 79-88
+1.5
8
@
MONM
L 70-81
−5.5
10
@
DREX
L 58-64
−28.5
15
vs
NCAT
W 97-89
+23.5
22
vs
UNCW
W 77-70
−12.5
24
vs
HOF
W 89-82
+13.5
29
@
ELON
L 76-79
−14.5
31
vs
CAM
L 96-104
+31.5
5
@
UNCW
W 85-78
+3.5
7
@
HAMP
L 74-77
−1.5
12
@
NE
W 94-67
−6.5
14
vs
ELON
L 78-81
−6.5
19
@
CAM
L 83-84
−0.5
26
vs
NE
W 84-77
−3.5
28
@
NCAT
W 91-88
+15.5
3
vs
HAMP
W 94-85
+15.5
7
vs
ELON
W 72-62
−29.5
8
vs
HOF
L 61-92
+0.5
over 13under 17avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
FAU
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
17-14
55% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-78 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 94-77 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 68-88 | +7.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 82-59 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 76-65 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 65-74 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 65-70 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 81-76 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 105-79 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 75-88 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 80-85 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 110-70 | -16.5 | W +23.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 66-69 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 158.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 76-71 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 162.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 89-78 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 85-67 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 79-73 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 79-74 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 75-89 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 65-92 | +3.5 | L −23.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 75-76 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 76-78 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 73-81 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 81-83 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 60-52 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 72-73 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 77-73 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 77-76 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 70-88 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 63-59 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 70-74 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BC
W 83-78
+3.5
8
vs
COFC
W 94-77
+11.5
9
@
LIB
L 68-88
−12.5
20
vs
PAC
W 82-59
+15.5
24
vs
LMU
W 76-65
+7.5
25
vs
GMU
L 65-74
−4.5
30
vs
SBU
L 65-70
−6.5
7
@
FGCU
W 81-76
+2.5
13
vs
UALB
W 105-79
+7.5
19
@
SMC
L 75-88
+0.5
23
@
UCF
L 80-85
+3.5
31
vs
UTSA
W 110-70
+23.5
4
@
TULN
L 66-69
−6.5
7
@
UAB
W 76-71
+8.5
11
vs
MEM
W 89-78
+9.5
15
vs
WICH
W 85-67
+14.5
18
@
TEM
W 79-73
+3.5
21
vs
TULN
W 79-74
−5.5
25
@
USF
L 75-89
−8.5
29
@
MEM
L 65-92
−23.5
1
vs
ECU
L 75-76
−11.5
4
vs
TLSA
L 76-78
+1.5
11
@
RICE
L 73-81
−11.5
15
vs
USF
L 81-83
+2.5
18
@
UTSA
W 60-52
−3.5
22
@
UNT
L 72-73
+1.5
26
vs
TEM
W 77-73
−0.5
1
vs
CLT
W 77-76
−5.5
7
@
WICH
L 70-88
−9.5
11
vs
TEM
W 63-59
+5.5
12
vs
UNT
L 70-74
−2.5
covered 17didn’t cover 14avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BC
W 83-78
+12.5
8
vs
COFC
W 94-77
+14.5
9
@
LIB
L 68-88
+3.5
20
vs
PAC
W 82-59
−13.5
24
vs
LMU
W 76-65
−3.5
25
vs
GMU
L 65-74
−4.5
30
vs
SBU
L 65-70
−11.5
7
@
FGCU
W 81-76
+6.5
13
vs
UALB
W 105-79
+36.5
19
@
SMC
L 75-88
+17.5
23
@
UCF
L 80-85
+2.5
31
vs
UTSA
W 110-70
+21.5
4
@
TULN
L 66-69
−23.5
7
@
UAB
W 76-71
−15.5
11
vs
MEM
W 89-78
+14.5
15
vs
WICH
W 85-67
−3.5
18
@
TEM
W 79-73
+3.5
21
vs
TULN
W 79-74
−2.5
25
@
USF
L 75-89
−2.5
29
@
MEM
L 65-92
+4.5
1
vs
ECU
L 75-76
−2.5
4
vs
TLSA
L 76-78
−8.5
11
@
RICE
L 73-81
+2.5
15
vs
USF
L 81-83
−1.5
18
@
UTSA
W 60-52
−45.5
22
@
UNT
L 72-73
+4.5
26
vs
TEM
W 77-73
+4.5
1
vs
CLT
W 77-76
+5.5
7
@
WICH
L 70-88
+7.5
11
vs
TEM
W 63-59
−22.5
12
vs
UNT
L 70-74
+7.5
over 17under 14avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
FAU has the better starters
Position by position: William & Mary 0, FAU 4, even 1
William & MaryBetterFAU
G J. Baldwin TR7.7 pts · 4.2 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 63
→FAUSmall
G B. Speed TR15.8 pts · 4.4 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 82
G J. McIntosh TR6.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 48
→FAUBig
G J. Hamilton TR17.8 pts · 4.5 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 93
G T. Blassingame TR3.7 pts · 2.6 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 18
→FAUBig
G K. Carlyle14.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 73
G N. Daniels TR2 pts · 1.1 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Charles TR10.5 pts · 4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 32
F S. Sivka TR2 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 15
→FAUSmall
F M. Porter-Brown TR7.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 42
William & MaryBetterFAU
W&M offense160th of 366 · -4.8
=Even
FAU defense174th of 366 · -3.9
W&M defense289th of 366 · -7.2
→FAUBig
FAU offense85th of 366 · +0.4
Backcourt-2.6 · 4 players
→FAUBig
Backcourt+4.0 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.0 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
Bench-0.4 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-0.2 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestW&M betterFAU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Baldwin20 min · TRJ. McIntosh17 min · TRT. Blassingame17 min · TRN. Daniels10 min · TRZ. Clark9 min · TRJ. Forsythe4 min · TR
Forwards
S. Sivka11 min · TRB. CarterNewJ. RolandNew
Guards
B. Speed34 min · TRJ. Hamilton32 min · TRK. Carlyle31 minM. Charles30 min · TRL. Dayco-Green2 minL. Smith1 min
Forwards
M. Porter-Brown20 min · TRJ. HarrisNewM. PuodziukaitisNewD. MusisNew
Centers
K. Mullen6 min · TRT. IfaolaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 81.5 #38 | Points per game | 77.2 #111 |
| 1.11 #116 | Points per possession | 1.09 #170 |
| 73.6 #14 | Pace (possessions) | 71.1 #71 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.3 #58 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #135 |
| 33.0 #233 | 3-point % | 33.3 #210 |
| 42.8 #120 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.2 #208 |
| 44.0 #9 | Free throw rate | 33.3 #231 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.6 #171 | Turnover rate | 17.6 #246 |
| 26.0 #324 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.6 #140 |
| 17.4 #17 | Assists per game | 13.0 #210 |
| Defense | ||
| 78.9 #294 | Points allowed | 75.3 #198 |
| 1.07 #126 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #108 |
| 51.9 #205 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.5 #81 |
| 33.0 #126 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #169 |
| 18.9 #52 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #252 |
| 68.5 #229 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.7 #78 |
| 7.9 #47 | Steals per game | 5.7 #272 |
| 3.8 #95 | Blocks per game | 5.3 #11 |
William & Mary
18-12 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Hofstra61–92
- Wvs Elon72–62
- Wvs Hampton94–85
- W@ NC A&T91–88
- Wvs Northeastern84–77
A week or more of rest.
FAU
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs North Texas70–74
- Wvs Temple63–59
- L@ Wichita St70–88
- Wvs Charlotte77–76
- Wvs Temple77–73
A week or more of rest.