Abessinio Court at Eleanor R. Baldwin Arena · at FAU
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FAU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FAU 76–73 · win probability FAU 62%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 149.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: DAV has more of the edges
DAV 3, FAU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: DAV plays 65.0 a game (347th fastest), FAU 71.1 (71st). Faster games mean more points
Turnovers
Turnover rate: DAV 15.8%, FAU 17.6%. Forced: DAV 17.5%, FAU 15.5%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: DAV 28.1%, FAU 31.6%. Defensive: DAV 70.0%, FAU 71.7%
Three-pointers
DAV hits 35.4% and allows 32.6%; FAU hits 33.3% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 44.5% and 38.2% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: DAV 49%, FAU 17%. Transfers in: DAV 2, FAU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
FAU at home. This season: FAU 0-0 at home, DAV 0-0 away
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: DAV 31.0, FAU 33.3. Allowed: DAV 37.1, FAU 36.2
Even
DAV offense vs FAU defense
Offense 149th of 366 against a defense 174th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: DAV 52.6 and allows 50.6; FAU 52.2 and allows 49.5
Context
Schedule so far
DAV has played the 91st-hardest schedule, FAU the 101st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
FAU offense vs DAV defense
Offense 85th of 366 against a defense 84th, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FAU -3.4 | — |
| Total | — | 149.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | DAV 73 · FAU 76.4 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | FAU -1.9 | — |
| 1H total | 69.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | DAV 34 · FAU 35.9 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | |
| 4-6 40% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Davidson
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 85-69 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 11 | @ | W 62-55 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 91-87 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 59-49 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 108 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 60-94 | +9.5 | L −24.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 90-74 | -13.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 4 | vs | W 79-63 | -18.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 7 | vs | L 61-70 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 137.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 80-47 | -11.5 | W +21.5 | 132.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 63-68 | -5.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 61-90 | +14.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 30 | vs | L 83-89 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 62-56 | -1.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | U 118 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 79-64 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 136.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 45-70 | -2.5 | L −27.5 | 134.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 84-79 | +9.5 | W +14.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 68-63 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 69-75 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 52-60 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 134.5 | U 112 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 79-54 | +1.5 | W +26.5 | 140.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 3 | vs | L 82-91 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 84-64 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 59-70 | +5.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 65-63 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 59-63 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 131.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 67-56 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 71-64 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 67-70 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 136.5 | O 137 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 68-63 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 64-59 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 132.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 58-70 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 17 | @ | L 80-84 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
WSU
W 85-69
+11.5
11
@
CLT
W 62-55
+8.5
15
vs
BGSU
W 91-87
−0.5
21
vs
BC
W 59-49
+11.5
23
vs
USU
L 60-94
−24.5
28
vs
NCAT
W 90-74
+2.5
4
vs
CIT
W 79-63
−2.5
7
vs
SMC
L 61-70
−0.5
13
vs
MERC
W 80-47
+21.5
18
vs
TEM
L 63-68
−10.5
22
@
KU
L 61-90
−14.5
30
vs
DUQ
L 83-89
−8.5
3
@
JOES
W 62-56
+4.5
7
@
LUC
W 79-64
+13.5
10
vs
URI
L 45-70
−27.5
14
@
GW
W 84-79
+14.5
21
vs
FOR
W 68-63
+0.5
24
vs
VCU
L 69-75
−0.5
28
@
GMU
L 52-60
−1.5
31
@
RICH
W 79-54
+26.5
3
vs
SLU
L 82-91
−0.5
6
vs
LUC
W 84-64
+10.5
15
@
DAY
L 59-70
−5.5
18
vs
RICH
W 65-63
−3.5
21
@
FOR
L 59-63
−5.5
25
@
DUQ
W 67-56
+14.5
1
vs
LAS
W 71-64
−3.5
4
vs
JOES
L 67-70
−4.5
7
@
SBU
W 68-63
+9.5
12
vs
LUC
W 64-59
−0.5
13
vs
JOES
L 58-70
−9.5
17
@
OKST
L 80-84
+2.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
WSU
W 85-69
+0.5
11
@
CLT
W 62-55
−26.5
15
vs
BGSU
W 91-87
+33.5
21
vs
BC
W 59-49
−32.5
23
vs
USU
L 60-94
+6.5
28
vs
NCAT
W 90-74
+18.5
4
vs
CIT
W 79-63
+4.5
7
vs
SMC
L 61-70
−6.5
13
vs
MERC
W 80-47
−5.5
18
vs
TEM
L 63-68
−10.5
22
@
KU
L 61-90
+11.5
30
vs
DUQ
L 83-89
+21.5
3
@
JOES
W 62-56
−21.5
7
@
LUC
W 79-64
+6.5
10
vs
URI
L 45-70
−19.5
14
@
GW
W 84-79
+12.5
21
vs
FOR
W 68-63
−4.5
24
vs
VCU
L 69-75
−4.5
28
@
GMU
L 52-60
−22.5
31
@
RICH
W 79-54
−7.5
3
vs
SLU
L 82-91
+21.5
6
vs
LUC
W 84-64
+7.5
15
@
DAY
L 59-70
−11.5
18
vs
RICH
W 65-63
−13.5
21
@
FOR
L 59-63
−9.5
25
@
DUQ
W 67-56
−19.5
1
vs
LAS
W 71-64
+1.5
4
vs
JOES
L 67-70
+0.5
7
@
SBU
W 68-63
−10.5
12
vs
LUC
W 64-59
−9.5
13
vs
JOES
L 58-70
−5.5
17
@
OKST
L 80-84
+9.5
over 14under 18avg −2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
FAU
31 games played
Straight up
16-15
52% wins
Against the spread
17-14
55% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-14
55% overs · avg +0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 83-78 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 94-77 | -5.5 | W +11.5 | 156.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 68-88 | +7.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 20 | vs | W 82-59 | -7.5 | W +15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 76-65 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 144.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 65-74 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 65-70 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 7 | @ | W 81-76 | -2.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 105-79 | -18.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 19 | @ | L 75-88 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 23 | @ | L 80-85 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 110-70 | -16.5 | W +23.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 66-69 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 158.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 76-71 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 162.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 89-78 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 85-67 | -3.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 79-73 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 79-74 | -10.5 | L −5.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 25 | @ | L 75-89 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 65-92 | +3.5 | L −23.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 75-76 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 76-78 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 73-81 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 15 | vs | L 81-83 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 165.5 | U 164 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 60-52 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 157.5 | U 112 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 72-73 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 140.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 77-73 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Mar 1 | vs | W 77-76 | -6.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 70-88 | +8.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 11 | vs | W 63-59 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | U 122 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 70-74 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 136.5 | O 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BC
W 83-78
+3.5
8
vs
COFC
W 94-77
+11.5
9
@
LIB
L 68-88
−12.5
20
vs
PAC
W 82-59
+15.5
24
vs
LMU
W 76-65
+7.5
25
vs
GMU
L 65-74
−4.5
30
vs
SBU
L 65-70
−6.5
7
@
FGCU
W 81-76
+2.5
13
vs
UALB
W 105-79
+7.5
19
@
SMC
L 75-88
+0.5
23
@
UCF
L 80-85
+3.5
31
vs
UTSA
W 110-70
+23.5
4
@
TULN
L 66-69
−6.5
7
@
UAB
W 76-71
+8.5
11
vs
MEM
W 89-78
+9.5
15
vs
WICH
W 85-67
+14.5
18
@
TEM
W 79-73
+3.5
21
vs
TULN
W 79-74
−5.5
25
@
USF
L 75-89
−8.5
29
@
MEM
L 65-92
−23.5
1
vs
ECU
L 75-76
−11.5
4
vs
TLSA
L 76-78
+1.5
11
@
RICE
L 73-81
−11.5
15
vs
USF
L 81-83
+2.5
18
@
UTSA
W 60-52
−3.5
22
@
UNT
L 72-73
+1.5
26
vs
TEM
W 77-73
−0.5
1
vs
CLT
W 77-76
−5.5
7
@
WICH
L 70-88
−9.5
11
vs
TEM
W 63-59
+5.5
12
vs
UNT
L 70-74
−2.5
covered 17didn’t cover 14avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BC
W 83-78
+12.5
8
vs
COFC
W 94-77
+14.5
9
@
LIB
L 68-88
+3.5
20
vs
PAC
W 82-59
−13.5
24
vs
LMU
W 76-65
−3.5
25
vs
GMU
L 65-74
−4.5
30
vs
SBU
L 65-70
−11.5
7
@
FGCU
W 81-76
+6.5
13
vs
UALB
W 105-79
+36.5
19
@
SMC
L 75-88
+17.5
23
@
UCF
L 80-85
+2.5
31
vs
UTSA
W 110-70
+21.5
4
@
TULN
L 66-69
−23.5
7
@
UAB
W 76-71
−15.5
11
vs
MEM
W 89-78
+14.5
15
vs
WICH
W 85-67
−3.5
18
@
TEM
W 79-73
+3.5
21
vs
TULN
W 79-74
−2.5
25
@
USF
L 75-89
−2.5
29
@
MEM
L 65-92
+4.5
1
vs
ECU
L 75-76
−2.5
4
vs
TLSA
L 76-78
−8.5
11
@
RICE
L 73-81
+2.5
15
vs
USF
L 81-83
−1.5
18
@
UTSA
W 60-52
−45.5
22
@
UNT
L 72-73
+4.5
26
vs
TEM
W 77-73
+4.5
1
vs
CLT
W 77-76
+5.5
7
@
WICH
L 70-88
+7.5
11
vs
TEM
W 63-59
−22.5
12
vs
UNT
L 70-74
+7.5
over 17under 14avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
FAU has the better starters
Position by position: Davidson 1, FAU 2, even 2
DavidsonBetterFAU
G N. Janowski TR16.7 pts · 5 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 81
=Even
G B. Speed TR15.8 pts · 4.4 reb · 3.7 ast
Score 82
G S. Brown7.9 pts · 2 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 33
→FAUBig
G J. Hamilton TR17.8 pts · 4.5 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 93
G N. Coval6.2 pts · 1.5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 49
→FAUSmall
G K. Carlyle14.5 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 73
F J. Scovens11.1 pts · 4.2 reb · 2 ast
Score 88
←DAVBig
G M. Charles TR10.5 pts · 4 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 32
C I. Platteeuw3.9 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 43
=Even
F M. Porter-Brown TR7.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 42
DavidsonBetterFAU
DAV offense149th of 366 · -4.5
=Even
FAU defense174th of 366 · -3.9
DAV defense84th of 366 · +0.0
=Even
FAU offense85th of 366 · +0.4
Backcourt-0.2 · 3 players
→FAUBig
Backcourt+4.0 · 4 players
Frontcourt+2.2 · 2 players
←DAVSmall
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
Bench-0.9 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-0.2 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestDAV betterFAU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
N. Janowski32 min · TRS. Brown24 minN. Coval19 minP. Kavu1 minJ. CarterNewE. HeinonenNew
Forwards
J. Scovens25 minJ. Roberts12 minJ. Keith9 min · TRJ. Nowland1 minQ. BashiruNewT. StoiberNew
Centers
I. Platteeuw15 min
Guards
B. Speed34 min · TRJ. Hamilton32 min · TRK. Carlyle31 minM. Charles30 min · TRL. Dayco-Green2 minL. Smith1 min
Forwards
M. Porter-Brown20 min · TRJ. HarrisNewM. PuodziukaitisNewD. MusisNew
Centers
K. Mullen6 min · TRT. IfaolaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.9 #289 | Points per game | 77.2 #111 |
| 1.08 #189 | Points per possession | 1.09 #170 |
| 65.0 #347 | Pace (possessions) | 71.1 #71 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.6 #121 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #135 |
| 35.4 #92 | 3-point % | 33.3 #210 |
| 44.5 #79 | 3-point attempt rate | 38.2 #208 |
| 31.0 #283 | Free throw rate | 33.3 #231 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.8 #124 | Turnover rate | 17.6 #246 |
| 28.1 #265 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.6 #140 |
| 13.4 #184 | Assists per game | 13.0 #210 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.5 #40 | Points allowed | 75.3 #198 |
| 1.05 #94 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #108 |
| 50.6 #132 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.5 #81 |
| 32.6 #92 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #169 |
| 17.5 #121 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #252 |
| 70.0 #157 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.7 #78 |
| 6.4 #189 | Steals per game | 5.7 #272 |
| 4.1 #66 | Blocks per game | 5.3 #11 |
Davidson
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Oklahoma St80–84
- Lvs Saint Joseph's58–70
- Wvs Loyola Chicago64–59
- W@ St Bonaventure68–63
- Lvs Saint Joseph's67–70
A week or more of rest.
FAU
16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 10-10 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs North Texas70–74
- Wvs Temple63–59
- L@ Wichita St70–88
- Wvs Charlotte77–76
- Wvs Temple77–73
A week or more of rest.