Leavey Center · at Santa Clara
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | SCU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UNM 79–78 · win probability UNM 52%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 156.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNM has more of the edges
UNM 4, SCU 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNM 35.8, SCU 25.5. Allowed: UNM 33.3, SCU 38.2
Three-pointers
UNM hits 35.6% and allows 30.5%; SCU hits 34.9% and allows 33.1%. Threes are 41.9% and 45.0% of their shots
UNM offense vs SCU defense
Offense 72nd of 366 against a defense 137th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
SCU at home. This season: SCU 0-0 at home, UNM 0-0 away
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNM 53.5 and allows 49.5; SCU 54.5 and allows 52.0
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNM 30.6%, SCU 36.4%. Defensive: UNM 72.3%, SCU 67.9%
Context
Tempo
About 70 possessions: UNM plays 70.7 a game (87th fastest), SCU 69.7 (135th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
UNM has played the 97th-hardest schedule, SCU the 86th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
SCU offense vs UNM defense
Offense 93rd of 366 against a defense 103rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNM 14.9%, SCU 15.3%. Forced: UNM 19.0%, SCU 20.1%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNM 42%, SCU 42%. Transfers in: UNM 3, SCU 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UNM -0.5 | — |
| Total | — | 156.9 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNM 78.7 · SCU 78.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNM -0.4 | — |
| 1H total | 73.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNM 36.9 · SCU 36.5 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNM 2–0 SCUUNM leads · 2 games since 2021-22 · UNM has won the last 2 meetings · UNM 2-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2025-26 | SCU 71 @ UNM 98 | UNM -1.5 | UNM W |
| Dec 9, 2023-24 | SCU 76 vs UNM 93 | UNM -9.5 | UNM W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
New Mexico
36 games played
Straight up
25-11
69% wins
Against the spread
20-16
56% covers · avg +2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
23-13
64% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | vs | W 76-54 | -22.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 74-56 | -13.5 | W +4.5 | 145.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 82-68 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 150 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 68-76 | -3.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 72-84 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 80-78 | +6.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 93-87 | -19.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 98-71 | -1.5 | W +25.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 81-78 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 75-59 | -15.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 88-65 | -16.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 53-62 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 78-58 | -7.5 | W +12.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 80-70 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 91-49 | -16.5 | W +25.5 | 138.5 | O 140 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 87-64 | -6.5 | W +16.5 | 146.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 79-83 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 83-74 | -15.5 | L −6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 80-73 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 27 | @ | W 89-61 | -3.5 | W +24.5 | 155.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 90-80 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 170 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 66-86 | -1.5 | L −21.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 90-91 | -4.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 70-64 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 148.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 98-61 | -28.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 80-78 | -9.5 | L −7.5 | 156.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 60-67 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 81-76 | -1.5 | W +3.5 | 150.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 4 | vs | L 74-82 | -8.5 | L −16.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 90-94 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 155.5 | O 184 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 93-77 | -16.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 62-64 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 18 | vs | W 107-83 | -11.5 | W +12.5 | 162.5 | O 190 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 86-61 | -6.5 | W +18.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 24 | vs | W 84-69 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | U 153 |
| Apr 2 | vs | L 69-74 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
5
vs
ETAM
W 76-54
−0.5
8
vs
UTA
W 74-56
+4.5
11
vs
UCR
W 82-68
−5.5
15
@
NMSU
L 68-76
−11.5
20
vs
NEB
L 72-84
−3.5
21
vs
MSST
W 80-78
+8.5
26
vs
ALST
W 93-87
−13.5
6
vs
SCU
W 98-71
+25.5
10
@
VCU
W 81-78
+11.5
14
vs
FGCU
W 75-59
+0.5
20
vs
SJSU
W 88-65
+6.5
30
@
BOIS
L 53-62
−3.5
3
vs
WYO
W 78-58
+12.5
6
@
CSU
W 80-70
+8.5
10
@
AF
W 91-49
+25.5
13
vs
GCU
W 87-64
+16.5
17
@
SDSU
L 79-83
+1.5
21
vs
FRES
W 83-74
−6.5
24
vs
NEV
W 80-73
−1.5
27
@
UNLV
W 89-61
+24.5
31
@
SJSU
W 90-80
−5.5
4
vs
USU
L 66-86
−21.5
7
vs
BOIS
L 90-91
−5.5
11
@
GCU
W 70-64
+7.5
17
vs
AF
W 98-61
+8.5
21
@
FRES
W 80-78
−7.5
24
@
NEV
L 60-67
−5.5
28
vs
SDSU
W 81-76
+3.5
4
vs
CSU
L 74-82
−16.5
7
@
USU
L 90-94
+3.5
12
vs
SJSU
W 93-77
−0.5
13
vs
SDSU
L 62-64
+0.5
18
vs
SHSU
W 107-83
+12.5
22
vs
GW
W 86-61
+18.5
24
vs
JOES
W 84-69
+4.5
2
vs
TLSA
L 69-74
−7.5
covered 20didn’t cover 16avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
5
vs
ETAM
W 76-54
−13.5
8
vs
UTA
W 74-56
−15.5
11
vs
UCR
W 82-68
+8.5
15
@
NMSU
L 68-76
+4.5
20
vs
NEB
L 72-84
+4.5
21
vs
MSST
W 80-78
+6.5
26
vs
ALST
W 93-87
+31.5
6
vs
SCU
W 98-71
+15.5
10
@
VCU
W 81-78
+1.5
14
vs
FGCU
W 75-59
−25.5
20
vs
SJSU
W 88-65
+0.5
30
@
BOIS
L 53-62
−31.5
3
vs
WYO
W 78-58
−15.5
6
@
CSU
W 80-70
+6.5
10
@
AF
W 91-49
+1.5
13
vs
GCU
W 87-64
+4.5
17
@
SDSU
L 79-83
+13.5
21
vs
FRES
W 83-74
+5.5
24
vs
NEV
W 80-73
+2.5
27
@
UNLV
W 89-61
−5.5
31
@
SJSU
W 90-80
+21.5
4
vs
USU
L 66-86
−4.5
7
vs
BOIS
L 90-91
+28.5
11
@
GCU
W 70-64
−14.5
17
vs
AF
W 98-61
+10.5
21
@
FRES
W 80-78
+1.5
24
@
NEV
L 60-67
−21.5
28
vs
SDSU
W 81-76
+6.5
4
vs
CSU
L 74-82
+5.5
7
@
USU
L 90-94
+28.5
12
vs
SJSU
W 93-77
+15.5
13
vs
SDSU
L 62-64
−24.5
18
vs
SHSU
W 107-83
+27.5
22
vs
GW
W 86-61
−14.5
24
vs
JOES
W 84-69
−2.5
2
vs
TLSA
L 69-74
−18.5
over 23under 13avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Santa Clara
34 games played
Straight up
25-9
74% wins
Against the spread
18-16
53% covers · avg +2.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
19-15
56% overs · avg +4 pts vs the total
Against the spread
18-1653%
2 straight misses ATS1 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 79-67 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 87-68 | +3.5 | W +22.5 | 155.5 | U 155 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 98-83 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | O 181 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 64-55 | -14.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 80-43 | -19.5 | W +17.5 | 140.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 70-71 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 86-75 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 90-80 | -20.5 | L −10.5 | 144.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 71-98 | +1.5 | L −25.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 79-82 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 63-60 | -12.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 78-80 | -15.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 28 | @ | W 102-64 | -7.5 | W +30.5 | 150.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 92-85 | -13.5 | L −6.5 | 157.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 82-63 | -20.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 98-70 | -17.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 77-89 | +17.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 103-72 | -11.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 85-69 | -12.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 62-54 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | U 116 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-73 | -13.5 | L −1.5 | 162.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 88-73 | -9.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 104-73 | -8.5 | W +22.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 71-56 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 127 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 96-92 | -8.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 84-72 | -12.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 86-94 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 180 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 94-73 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 158.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 67-86 | +5.5 | L −13.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 93-72 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 76-68 | -9.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 76-71 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 150.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 10 | vs | L 68-79 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 84-89 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | O 173 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
MCN
W 79-67
+5.5
10
@
XAV
W 87-68
+22.5
15
vs
NEV
W 98-83
+8.5
18
vs
IDST
W 64-55
−5.5
21
vs
UL
W 80-43
+17.5
27
vs
SLU
L 70-71
+0.5
28
vs
MINN
W 86-75
+5.5
3
vs
UTU
W 90-80
−10.5
6
@
UNM
L 71-98
−25.5
13
vs
ASU
L 79-82
−4.5
17
vs
UNT
W 63-60
−9.5
20
vs
LUC
L 78-80
−17.5
28
@
ORST
W 102-64
+30.5
30
@
PORT
W 92-85
−6.5
2
vs
PEPP
W 82-63
−1.5
4
vs
USD
W 98-70
+10.5
8
@
GONZ
L 77-89
+5.5
10
vs
LMU
W 103-72
+19.5
14
vs
PAC
W 85-69
+3.5
17
vs
SMC
W 62-54
+6.5
24
@
USD
W 85-73
−1.5
28
vs
SF
W 88-73
+5.5
31
@
LMU
W 104-73
+22.5
4
@
PAC
W 71-56
+8.5
7
@
WSU
W 96-92
−4.5
11
vs
SEA
W 84-72
−0.5
14
vs
GONZ
L 86-94
−3.5
21
@
SF
W 94-73
+14.5
25
@
SMC
L 67-86
−13.5
28
vs
ORST
W 93-72
+5.5
8
vs
PAC
W 76-68
−1.5
9
vs
SMC
W 76-71
+9.5
10
vs
GONZ
L 68-79
−2.5
20
vs
UK
L 84-89
−1.5
covered 18didn’t cover 16avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
MCN
W 79-67
−5.5
10
@
XAV
W 87-68
−0.5
15
vs
NEV
W 98-83
+36.5
18
vs
IDST
W 64-55
−22.5
21
vs
UL
W 80-43
−17.5
27
vs
SLU
L 70-71
−17.5
28
vs
MINN
W 86-75
+22.5
3
vs
UTU
W 90-80
+25.5
6
@
UNM
L 71-98
+15.5
13
vs
ASU
L 79-82
+6.5
17
vs
UNT
W 63-60
−16.5
20
vs
LUC
L 78-80
+6.5
28
@
ORST
W 102-64
+15.5
30
@
PORT
W 92-85
+19.5
2
vs
PEPP
W 82-63
−5.5
4
vs
USD
W 98-70
+6.5
8
@
GONZ
L 77-89
+2.5
10
vs
LMU
W 103-72
+21.5
14
vs
PAC
W 85-69
−0.5
17
vs
SMC
W 62-54
−36.5
24
@
USD
W 85-73
−4.5
28
vs
SF
W 88-73
+10.5
31
@
LMU
W 104-73
+23.5
4
@
PAC
W 71-56
−24.5
7
@
WSU
W 96-92
+27.5
11
vs
SEA
W 84-72
+8.5
14
vs
GONZ
L 86-94
+21.5
21
@
SF
W 94-73
+8.5
25
@
SMC
L 67-86
−0.5
28
vs
ORST
W 93-72
+11.5
8
vs
PAC
W 76-68
−4.5
9
vs
SMC
W 76-71
−3.5
10
vs
GONZ
L 68-79
−10.5
20
vs
UK
L 84-89
+15.5
over 19under 15avg +4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
New Mexico has the better starters
Position by position: New Mexico 4, Santa Clara 0, even 1
New MexicoBetterSanta Clara
G J. Hall16.2 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 90
←UNMBig
G J. Ensminger6.4 pts · 5.5 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 53
G U. Tenette10.6 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 73
←UNMSmall
G D. Castillo TR10.3 pts · 1.9 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 41
G C. Howell6 pts · 3 reb · 3.5 ast
Score 54
=Even
G S. Gavalyugov9 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.7 ast
Score 61
G H. Mayes TR11.1 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 93
←UNMBig
G T. Darlan5.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 35
F T. Vahlberg Fasasi TR12.3 pts · 4.2 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 72
←UNMSmall
G F. Zugic TR5.2 pts · 2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 56
New MexicoBetterSanta Clara
UNM offense72nd of 366 · +1.6
←UNMSmall
SCU defense137th of 366 · -2.8
UNM defense103rd of 366 · -0.9
=Even
SCU offense93rd of 366 · -0.4
Backcourt+5.6 · 4 players
←UNMBig
Backcourt-2.9 · 5 players
Frontcourt+1.0 · 1 player
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench+0.9 · 1 player
←UNMSmall
Bench-0.2 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestUNM betterSCU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Hall31 minU. Tenette28 minC. Howell25 minH. Mayes24 min · TRD. HallNew
Forwards
T. Vahlberg Fasasi27 min · TRR. Petraitis17 min · TRF. GraniNewI. SuljanovicNewN. MuriithiNewB. SchuchNew
Guards
J. Ensminger29 minD. Castillo28 min · TRS. Gavalyugov20 minT. Darlan18 minF. Zugic16 min · TRK. Cochran12 min
Forwards
C. TadjoNewN. BadibangaNew
Centers
F. Chukwudebelu6 minS. Gueye4 min · TRA. EnsorNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.8 #52 | Points per game | 82.9 #30 |
| 1.14 #70 | Points per possession | 1.18 #37 |
| 70.7 #87 | Pace (possessions) | 69.7 #135 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.5 #82 | Effective FG% | 54.5 #53 |
| 35.6 #83 | 3-point % | 34.9 #125 |
| 41.9 #136 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.0 #67 |
| 35.8 #160 | Free throw rate | 25.5 #363 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.9 #59 | Turnover rate | 15.3 #86 |
| 30.6 #176 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.4 #20 |
| 14.8 #104 | Assists per game | 16.6 #33 |
| Defense | ||
| 71.6 #96 | Points allowed | 73.5 #141 |
| 1.01 #36 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #117 |
| 49.5 #84 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #213 |
| 30.5 #20 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.1 #127 |
| 19.0 #50 | Turnovers forced | 20.1 #20 |
| 72.3 #57 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.9 #262 |
| 7.9 #43 | Steals per game | 8.7 #14 |
| 2.7 #274 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #125 |
New Mexico
25-11 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Tulsa69–74
- Wvs Saint Joseph's84–69
- Wvs G Washington86–61
- Wvs Sam Houston107–83
- Lvs San Diego St62–64
A week or more of rest.
Santa Clara
25-9 in 2025-26 overall · 17-4 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kentucky84–89
- Lvs Gonzaga68–79
- Wvs Saint Mary's76–71
- Wvs Pacific76–68
- Wvs Oregon St93–72
A week or more of rest.