Mullins Center · at UMass
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MASS | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MASS 77–65 · win probability MASS 85%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 141.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MASS has more of the edges
ME 1, MASS 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: ME 19.7%, MASS 33.3%. Defensive: ME 65.7%, MASS 73.9%
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: ME plays 64.9 a game (348th fastest), MASS 72.7 (21st). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
ME has played the 318th-hardest schedule, MASS the 181st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Free throws
Free throw rate: ME 38.4, MASS 37.0. Allowed: ME 33.9, MASS 44.6
ME offense vs MASS defense
Offense 357th of 366 against a defense 248th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
MASS at home. This season: MASS 0-0 at home, ME 0-0 away
Three-pointers
ME hits 31.2% and allows 29.4%; MASS hits 35.2% and allows 33.0%. Threes are 37.0% and 35.4% of their shots
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: ME 19.2%, MASS 17.8%. Forced: ME 19.3%, MASS 16.9%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: ME 31%, MASS 46%. Transfers in: ME 4, MASS 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
MASS offense vs ME defense
Offense 170th of 366 against a defense 191st, on the model’s ratings
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: ME 49.6 and allows 50.6; MASS 53.1 and allows 52.9
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelMASS -12.0
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model141.8
Model edge—
Projected score
ME 64.9 · MASS 76.9
Win probability
MASS 85%
1st half
Spread
MASS -7.0
Total
66.3
Projected score
ME 29.7 · MASS 36.7
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Maine
31 games played
Straight up
7-24
23% wins
Against the spread
14-17
45% covers · avg −1.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-19
39% overs · avg −2.9 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 47-67 | +20.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 60-71 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 131.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 60-72 | +18.5 | W +6.5 | 130.5 | O 132 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 64-70 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 65-72 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 130.5 | O 137 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 53-58 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 127.5 | U 111 |
| Nov 28 | @ | L 61-74 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 133.5 | O 135 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 61-65 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 60-64 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 127.5 | U 124 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 57-79 | +12.5 | L −9.5 | 138.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 61-93 | +17.5 | L −14.5 | 139.5 | O 154 |
| Dec 10 | @ | W 69-59 | +8.5 | W +18.5 | 128.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 43-70 | -6.5 | L −33.5 | 127.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 56-74 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 129.5 | O 130 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 51-56 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 125.5 | U 107 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 62-69 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 133.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 74-70 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 130.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 62-67 | +14.5 | W +9.5 | 130.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 19 | vs | L 48-65 | -1.5 | L −18.5 | 129.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 52-49 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 131.5 | U 101 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 79-63 | -5.5 | W +10.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 77-91 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 76-70 | +8.5 | W +14.5 | 130.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 67-73 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 128.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 62-78 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 135.5 | O 140 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 58-67 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 137.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 61-58 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 70-59 | +4.5 | W +15.5 | 130.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-74 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 133.5 | O 141 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 56-67 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 139.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 58-60 | +3.5 | W +1.5 | 134.5 | U 118 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
GW
L 47-67
+0.5
8
@
STBK
L 60-71
−7.5
10
@
RUTG
L 60-72
+6.5
16
vs
QUIN
L 64-70
−2.5
19
@
MRMK
L 65-72
−0.5
23
vs
BRWN
L 53-58
−3.5
28
@
AMER
L 61-74
−5.5
29
vs
LONG
L 61-65
+1.5
30
vs
SIE
L 60-64
+5.5
3
@
OHIO
L 57-79
−9.5
6
@
M-OH
L 61-93
−14.5
10
@
BU
W 69-59
+18.5
13
vs
CAN
L 43-70
−33.5
21
@
DREX
L 56-74
−7.5
3
vs
BRY
L 51-56
−3.5
8
@
UMBC
L 62-69
+0.5
10
@
NJIT
W 74-70
+5.5
15
@
UVM
L 62-67
+9.5
19
vs
UNH
L 48-65
−18.5
22
vs
UALB
W 52-49
+5.5
24
vs
BING
W 79-63
+10.5
31
@
UML
L 77-91
−9.5
5
vs
UVM
W 76-70
+14.5
7
@
BRY
L 67-73
−3.5
12
vs
UMBC
L 62-78
−12.5
14
vs
NJIT
L 58-67
−7.5
21
@
UNH
W 61-58
+6.5
26
@
UALB
W 70-59
+15.5
28
@
BING
L 67-74
−8.5
3
vs
UML
L 56-67
−9.5
7
@
NJIT
L 58-60
+1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 17avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
GW
L 47-67
−29.5
8
@
STBK
L 60-71
−0.5
10
@
RUTG
L 60-72
+1.5
16
vs
QUIN
L 64-70
−3.5
19
@
MRMK
L 65-72
+6.5
23
vs
BRWN
L 53-58
−16.5
28
@
AMER
L 61-74
+1.5
29
vs
LONG
L 61-65
−12.5
30
vs
SIE
L 60-64
−3.5
3
@
OHIO
L 57-79
−2.5
6
@
M-OH
L 61-93
+14.5
10
@
BU
W 69-59
−0.5
13
vs
CAN
L 43-70
−14.5
21
@
DREX
L 56-74
+0.5
3
vs
BRY
L 51-56
−18.5
8
@
UMBC
L 62-69
−2.5
10
@
NJIT
W 74-70
+13.5
15
@
UVM
L 62-67
−1.5
19
vs
UNH
L 48-65
−16.5
22
vs
UALB
W 52-49
−30.5
24
vs
BING
W 79-63
+17.5
31
@
UML
L 77-91
+31.5
5
vs
UVM
W 76-70
+15.5
7
@
BRY
L 67-73
+11.5
12
vs
UMBC
L 62-78
+4.5
14
vs
NJIT
L 58-67
−12.5
21
@
UNH
W 61-58
−16.5
26
@
UALB
W 70-59
−1.5
28
@
BING
L 67-74
+7.5
3
vs
UML
L 56-67
−16.5
7
@
NJIT
L 58-60
−16.5
over 12under 19avg −2.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
UMass
32 games played
Straight up
16-16
50% wins
Against the spread
13-19
41% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
20-12
63% overs · avg +4.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 72-78 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 83-62 | -9.5 | W +11.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 13 | vs | W 94-80 | -16.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 84-77 | -12.5 | L −5.5 | 144.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 21 | vs | L 65-69 | +3.5 | L −0.5 | 161.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 22 | vs | L 75-79 | -5.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 73-65 | +3.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 78-71 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 143.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 80-60 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 76-74 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 143.5 | O 150 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 103-95 | +12.5 | W +20.5 | 165.5 | O 198 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 59-69 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 163.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 30 | @ | L 74-80 | -2.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 100-101 | +1.5 | W +0.5 | 152.5 | O 201 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 83-86 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 79-71 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 85-82 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 68-70 | -8.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 84-82 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 164.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 68-67 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 84-86 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 70-67 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 3 | vs | W 95-89 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 91-94 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 92-99 | +12.5 | W +5.5 | 163.5 | O 191 |
| Feb 17 | vs | L 77-86 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | U 163 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 82-86 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 73-74 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 62-81 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 94-82 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 156.5 | O 176 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 87-83 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | O 170 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 67-77 | +2.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MRSH
L 72-78
−10.5
8
vs
UALB
W 83-62
+11.5
13
vs
LEM
W 94-80
−2.5
16
vs
CCSU
W 84-77
−5.5
21
vs
COFC
L 65-69
−0.5
22
vs
GB
L 75-79
−9.5
24
vs
ORST
W 73-65
+11.5
3
vs
HARV
W 78-71
+1.5
6
vs
UML
W 80-60
+8.5
10
vs
BC
W 76-74
+3.5
13
vs
FSU
W 103-95
+20.5
20
vs
KENT
L 59-69
−8.5
30
@
EMU
L 74-80
−8.5
3
vs
BGSU
L 100-101
+0.5
6
@
OHIO
L 83-86
+1.5
10
vs
BALL
W 79-71
−2.5
13
@
WMU
W 85-82
−2.5
17
@
NIU
L 68-70
−10.5
20
vs
TOL
W 84-82
−0.5
23
@
BUF
W 68-67
+2.5
27
@
M-OH
L 84-86
+7.5
31
vs
EMU
W 70-67
−5.5
3
vs
CMU
W 95-89
−5.5
7
@
CCU
L 91-94
−5.5
13
@
AKR
L 92-99
+5.5
17
vs
M-OH
L 77-86
−5.5
21
vs
BUF
L 82-86
−11.5
24
@
BALL
L 73-74
−4.5
28
@
BGSU
L 62-81
−15.5
3
vs
OHIO
W 94-82
+10.5
12
vs
M-OH
W 87-83
+10.5
13
vs
TOL
L 67-77
−7.5
covered 13didn’t cover 19avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MRSH
L 72-78
−2.5
8
vs
UALB
W 83-62
−10.5
13
vs
LEM
W 94-80
+20.5
16
vs
CCSU
W 84-77
+16.5
21
vs
COFC
L 65-69
−27.5
22
vs
GB
L 75-79
+7.5
24
vs
ORST
W 73-65
−11.5
3
vs
HARV
W 78-71
+5.5
6
vs
UML
W 80-60
−15.5
10
vs
BC
W 76-74
+6.5
13
vs
FSU
W 103-95
+32.5
20
vs
KENT
L 59-69
−35.5
30
@
EMU
L 74-80
+5.5
3
vs
BGSU
L 100-101
+48.5
6
@
OHIO
L 83-86
+8.5
10
vs
BALL
W 79-71
+2.5
13
@
WMU
W 85-82
+9.5
17
@
NIU
L 68-70
−19.5
20
vs
TOL
W 84-82
+1.5
23
@
BUF
W 68-67
−24.5
27
@
M-OH
L 84-86
+5.5
31
vs
EMU
W 70-67
−11.5
3
vs
CMU
W 95-89
+31.5
7
@
CCU
L 91-94
+37.5
13
@
AKR
L 92-99
+27.5
17
vs
M-OH
L 77-86
−0.5
21
vs
BUF
L 82-86
+16.5
24
@
BALL
L 73-74
+3.5
28
@
BGSU
L 62-81
−7.5
3
vs
OHIO
W 94-82
+19.5
12
vs
M-OH
W 87-83
+8.5
13
vs
TOL
L 67-77
−14.5
over 20under 12avg +4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UMass has the better starters
Position by position: Maine 0, UMass 3, even 2
MaineBetterUMass
G D. Williams TR8 pts · 3.1 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 23
=Even
G D. Carbuccia6.7 pts · 1.8 reb · 6.3 ast
Score 29
G C. Crawford4.2 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 14
→MASSSmall
G J. Ndjigue6.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 34
G V. Garcia Adsten TR3.5 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 11
→MASSSmall
G J. Clayton TR3.9 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 36
F A. Flagg6.7 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 33
→MASSSmall
F J. Wang TR8.5 pts · 3 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 62
F Y. Bamba2.8 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 11
=Even
F D. Wimbley2.2 pts · 2.1 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 0
MaineBetterUMass
ME offense357th of 366 · -13.7
→MASSSmall
MASS defense248th of 366 · -6.5
ME defense191st of 366 · -4.5
=Even
MASS offense170th of 366 · -5.2
Backcourt-6.4 · 3 players
→MASSSmall
Backcourt-4.5 · 3 players
Frontcourt-2.3 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-2.5 · 2 players
Bench-0.7 · 4 players
=Even
Bench-1.3 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestME betterMASS betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Williams25 min · TRC. Crawford20 minV. Garcia Adsten18 min · TRD. LopesNewK. BedardNewH. FranzNew
Forwards
A. Flagg25 minY. Bamba12 minA. Evans8 min · TRK. Gribben3 minE. Byther2 minO. Faubert2 min · TR
Guards
D. Carbuccia28 minJ. Ndjigue27 minJ. Clayton18 min · TRR. Castineyra3 minJ. EngelNewC. HaileyNew
Forwards
J. Wang20 min · TRD. Wimbley14 minL. Damjanac10 minD. Clerc9 minA. AhmedNewC. SyllaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.2 #364 | Points per game | 79.9 #68 |
| 0.95 #356 | Points per possession | 1.10 #144 |
| 64.9 #348 | Pace (possessions) | 72.7 #21 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.6 #263 | Effective FG% | 53.1 #99 |
| 31.2 #314 | 3-point % | 35.2 #100 |
| 37.0 #231 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.4 #265 |
| 38.4 #93 | Free throw rate | 37.0 #130 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.2 #328 | Turnover rate | 17.8 #263 |
| 19.7 #364 | Offensive rebound rate | 33.3 #80 |
| 11.8 #300 | Assists per game | 16.7 #30 |
| Defense | ||
| 68.5 #39 | Points allowed | 78.8 #288 |
| 1.05 #90 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #189 |
| 50.6 #136 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.9 #262 |
| 29.4 #4 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.0 #121 |
| 19.3 #38 | Turnovers forced | 16.9 #162 |
| 65.7 #322 | Defensive rebound rate | 73.9 #20 |
| 7.7 #57 | Steals per game | 6.6 #164 |
| 3.2 #194 | Blocks per game | 2.2 #334 |
Maine
7-24 in 2025-26 overall · 6-11 in conference · America East Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ NJIT58–60
- Lvs UMass Lowell56–67
- L@ Binghamton67–74
- W@ UAlbany70–59
- W@ New Hampshire61–58
A week or more of rest.
UMass
16-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Mid-American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Toledo67–77
- Wvs Miami OH87–83
- Wvs Ohio94–82
- L@ Bowling Green62–81
- L@ Ball State73–74
A week or more of rest.