East Texas A&M Lions at Oklahoma Sooners: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 8:00 PM ETLloyd Noble Center · at Oklahoma

LineOU -31.5moved 1 toward OU

Total149.5down 1 from 150.5

Season records: East Texas A&M and Oklahoma
ETAM	This season	OU
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects OU 91–60 · win probability OU 100%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

OU -31.5

moved 1 toward OU

Total

149.5

model 151.1 · Over by 1.5

Model edge

ETAM by 0.5

model vs market

Public on the spread

89% ETAM

70% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: OU has more of the edges

ETAM 0, OU 8 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

OUBig

ETAM offense vs OU defense

Offense 344th of 366 against a defense 51st, on the model’s ratings

OUBig

OU offense vs ETAM defense

Offense 28th of 366 against a defense 317th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Schedule so far

ETAM has played the 265th-hardest schedule, OU the 32nd. A record against a soft schedule means less

OUBig

Three-pointers

ETAM hits 31.3% and allows 37.3%; OU hits 36.5% and allows 34.1%. Threes are 46.2% and 43.6% of their shots

OUBig

Shooting

Effective FG%: ETAM 49.2 and allows 52.9; OU 54.9 and allows 51.0

OUBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: ETAM 25.7%, OU 32.8%. Defensive: ETAM 67.2%, OU 67.1%

OUSmall

Turnovers

Turnover rate: ETAM 19.2%, OU 14.3%. Forced: ETAM 17.0%, OU 15.5%

OUSmall

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: ETAM 7%, OU 43%. Transfers in: ETAM 2, OU 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

OUSmall

Home court

OU at home. This season: OU 0-0 at home, ETAM 0-0 away

Even

Free throws

Free throw rate: ETAM 32.0, OU 35.5. Allowed: ETAM 34.5, OU 34.9

Context

Tempo

About 69 possessions: ETAM plays 68.5 a game (203rd fastest), OU 69.4 (154th). Faster games mean more points

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 20 or more	1165	99%	50%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	1090	99%	50%	52%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite	6763	75%	50%	51%
Games with a total of 145 to 149.5	3547	74%	49%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenOU -30.5

1 → OU

NowOU -31.5

1 pt toward OU

Total

Open150.5

▼ 1

Now149.5

Down 1 since the open

Moneyline

ETAM +5000 · OU -100000

Line movement

Median of 5 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened OU -30.5 · now OU -31.5 · moved 1 toward OUmodel OU -31

model OU -31

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

ETAM +31.5Spread

OU -31.5

Bets

89%11%

Money

70%30%

Money is 19 pts ahead of bets on OU -31.5

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

5 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	ETAM	OU	Over	Under	ETAM	OU
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-31.5-110	+31.5-110	149.5-110	149.5-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-30.5-121	+30.5-106	151.5-108	151.5-118	—	—
BovadaBovada	-31.5-110	+31.5-110	149.5-110	149.5-110	—	—
DraftKingsDK	-31.5-118	+31.5-102	149.5-110	149.5-110	+5000	-100000
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-31.5-106	+31.5-106	149.5-108	149.5-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	OU -31.5	OU -30.8	ETAM +0.7
Total	149.5	151.1	Over 1.6
Projected score	—	ETAM 60.2 · OU 90.9

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	OU -18.2	—
1H total	70.6	—
1H projected score	ETAM 26.2 · OU 44.4	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
ETAM WLLWL	14-16	47%	9-8	9-13
OU WWLWL	17-20	46%	7-9	6-10

Venue/role: ETAM away, as underdog; OU home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
ETAM UOUUO	15-15	50%	9-21
OU UUOUO	18-19	49%	21-16

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
ETAM	3-7 30%	5-5 50%	5-5 50%
OU	8-2 80%	8-2 80%	5-5 50%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

East Texas A&M

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	@ RICE	L64–71WU
Nov 11	vs FDU	W70–65WU
Nov 13	@ PORT	No recent meeting

Oklahoma

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 6	vs MVSU	W93–69LO
Nov 9	vs UNA	No recent meeting
Nov 13	vs FDU	No recent meeting

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

Recent meetings

Since 2021-22

ETAM 0–1 OUOU leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · ETAM 0-1 ATS

Date	Result	Line	Covered
Nov 21, 2024-25	ETAM 56 @ OU 84	OU -24.5	OU W

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

East Texas A&M

30 games played

Straight up

9-21

30% wins

Against the spread

14-16

47% covers · avg −1.6 pts vs the line

Over / Under

15-15

50% overs · avg −1.3 pts vs the total

Straight up

9-2130%

L L L W W L W L W L L L L L W L L W L L L W W L L W L L L L

4 straight losses0 of last 4 won

Against the spread

14-1647%

W L W W W W W L W L L L L L W L L W L L L W W W L W L L W L

1 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

15-1550%

U O U U O O U O O O U U U O O U O U O U O U U O O U O U U O

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 5	@UNM	L 54-76	+22.5	W +0.5	143.5	U 130
Nov 10	@HAW	L 74-100	+18.5	L −7.5	145.5	O 174
Nov 14	@RICE	L 64-71	+10.5	W +3.5	146.5	U 135
Nov 24	@FDU	W 70-65	-3.5	W +1.5	149.5	U 135
Nov 25	vsARMY	W 84-67	-2.5	W +14.5	143.5	O 151
Dec 5	@CONN	L 59-83	+36.5	W +12.5	141.5	O 142
Dec 7	vsCARK	W 75-68	-2.5	W +4.5	145.5	U 143
Dec 12	@MCN	L 66-102	+20.5	L −15.5	142.5	O 168
Dec 15	@SELA	W 70-69	+4.5	W +5.5	137.5	O 139
Dec 21	@TA&M	L 77-118	+28.5	L −12.5	166.5	O 195
Dec 29	vsSFA	L 48-75	+4.5	L −22.5	146.5	U 123
Dec 31	vsLAM	L 62-69	+5.5	L −1.5	143.5	U 131
Jan 3	@NICH	L 58-80	+6.5	L −15.5	146.5	U 138
Jan 5	@NOLA	L 73-83	+6.5	L −3.5	150.5	O 156
Jan 10	vsRGV	W 77-69	+3.5	W +11.5	145.5	O 146
Jan 12	vsAMCC	L 50-61	+3.5	L −7.5	142.5	U 111
Jan 17	@HCU	L 70-81	+2.5	L −8.5	139.5	O 151
Jan 19	@UIW	W 80-58	+6.5	W +28.5	142.5	U 138
Jan 27	@LAM	L 61-82	+6.5	L −14.5	140.5	O 143
Jan 31	vsNICH	L 68-72	-1.5	L −5.5	146.5	U 140
Feb 2	vsNOLA	L 85-94	+1.5	L −7.5	151.5	O 179
Feb 4	@NWST	W 74-68	+3.5	W +9.5	143.5	U 142
Feb 7	vsNWST	W 52-48	-1.5	W +2.5	140.5	U 100
Feb 9	@SFA	L 70-74	+16.5	W +12.5	143.5	O 144
Feb 14	vsMCN	L 54-97	+13.5	L −29.5	142.5	O 151
Feb 16	vsSELA	W 70-53	-2.5	W +14.5	136.5	U 123
Feb 21	vsUIW	L 73-82	-3.5	L −12.5	145.5	O 155
Feb 23	vsHCU	L 68-69	-2.5	L −3.5	138.5	U 137
Feb 28	@RGV	L 55-63	+10.5	W +2.5	146.5	U 118
Mar 2	@AMCC	L 71-84	+7.5	L −5.5	136.5	O 155

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

UNM

L 54-76

+0.5

HAW

L 74-100

−7.5

RICE

L 64-71

+3.5

FDU

W 70-65

+1.5

ARMY

W 84-67

+14.5

CONN

L 59-83

+12.5

CARK

W 75-68

+4.5

MCN

L 66-102

−15.5

SELA

W 70-69

+5.5

TA&M

L 77-118

−12.5

SFA

L 48-75

−22.5

LAM

L 62-69

−1.5

NICH

L 58-80

−15.5

NOLA

L 73-83

−3.5

RGV

W 77-69

+11.5

AMCC

L 50-61

−7.5

HCU

L 70-81

−8.5

UIW

W 80-58

+28.5

LAM

L 61-82

−14.5

NICH

L 68-72

−5.5

NOLA

L 85-94

−7.5

NWST

W 74-68

+9.5

NWST

W 52-48

+2.5

SFA

L 70-74

+12.5

MCN

L 54-97

−29.5

SELA

W 70-53

+14.5

UIW

L 73-82

−12.5

HCU

L 68-69

−3.5

RGV

L 55-63

+2.5

AMCC

L 71-84

−5.5

covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −1.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

UNM

L 54-76

−13.5

HAW

L 74-100

+28.5

RICE

L 64-71

−11.5

FDU

W 70-65

−14.5

ARMY

W 84-67

+7.5

CONN

L 59-83

+0.5

CARK

W 75-68

−2.5

MCN

L 66-102

+25.5

SELA

W 70-69

+1.5

TA&M

L 77-118

+28.5

SFA

L 48-75

−23.5

LAM

L 62-69

−12.5

NICH

L 58-80

−8.5

NOLA

L 73-83

+5.5

RGV

W 77-69

+0.5

AMCC

L 50-61

−31.5

HCU

L 70-81

+11.5

UIW

W 80-58

−4.5

LAM

L 61-82

+2.5

NICH

L 68-72

−6.5

NOLA

L 85-94

+27.5

NWST

W 74-68

−1.5

NWST

W 52-48

−40.5

SFA

L 70-74

+0.5

MCN

L 54-97

+8.5

SELA

W 70-53

−13.5

UIW

L 73-82

+9.5

HCU

L 68-69

−1.5

RGV

L 55-63

−28.5

AMCC

L 71-84

+18.5

over 15under 15avg −1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Oklahoma

37 games played

Straight up

21-16

57% wins

Against the spread

17-20

46% covers · avg +0.9 pts vs the line

Over / Under

18-19

49% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total

Straight up

21-1657%

W L W L W W W W L W W W W W L L L L L L L L L W W L L W W W W W W L W W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

17-2046%

W L L L L L L W L W L W L W L L L W L W L L L W W L L W W W W W W W L W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

18-1949%

O U U O U U U U U U O O O O U U O U O O U U O O O O U O U U O O U U O U O

2 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsSFPA	W 102-66	-31.5	W +4.5	149.5	O 168
Nov 8	@GONZ	L 68-83	+10.5	L −4.5	166.5	U 151
Nov 11	vsUAPB	W 95-69	-36.5	L −10.5	168.5	U 164
Nov 15	vsNEB	L 99-105	+1.5	L −4.5	163.5	O 204
Nov 20	vsORU	W 95-71	-24.5	L −0.5	166.5	U 166
Nov 23	vsALCN	W 72-53	-31.5	L −12.5	160.5	U 125
Nov 28	vsMARQ	W 75-74	-1.5	L −0.5	162.5	U 149
Dec 2	@WAKE	W 86-68	+4.5	W +22.5	159.5	U 154
Dec 6	vsASU	L 70-86	-5.5	L −21.5	157.5	U 156
Dec 13	vsOKST	W 85-76	-2.5	W +6.5	169.5	U 161
Dec 16	vsKC	W 89-67	-30.5	L −8.5	153.5	O 156
Dec 22	vsSTET	W 107-54	-31.5	W +21.5	148.5	O 161
Dec 29	vsMVSU	W 93-69	-44.5	L −20.5	153.5	O 162
Jan 3	vsMISS	W 86-70	-6.5	W +9.5	146.5	O 156
Jan 7	@MSST	L 53-72	+1.5	L −17.5	158.5	U 125
Jan 10	@TA&M	L 76-83	+4.5	L −2.5	165.5	U 159
Jan 13	vsFLA	L 79-96	+7.5	L −9.5	157.5	O 175
Jan 17	vsALA	L 81-83	+5.5	W +3.5	177.5	U 164
Jan 20	@SC	L 76-85	-2.5	L −11.5	150.5	O 161
Jan 24	@MIZ	L 87-88	+4.5	W +3.5	151.5	O 175
Jan 27	vsARK	L 79-83	+3.5	L −0.5	167.5	U 162
Jan 31	vsTEX	L 69-79	+1.5	L −8.5	155.5	U 148
Feb 4	@UK	L 78-94	+8.5	L −7.5	152.5	O 172
Feb 7	@VAN	W 92-91	+11.5	W +12.5	159.5	O 183
Feb 14	vsUGA	W 94-78	-1.5	W +14.5	164.5	O 172
Feb 18	@TENN	L 66-89	+11.5	L −11.5	149.5	O 155
Feb 21	vsTA&M	L 71-75	+1.5	L −2.5	165.5	U 146
Feb 24	vsAUB	W 91-79	+3.5	W +15.5	157.5	O 170
Feb 28	@LSU	W 83-67	+1.5	W +17.5	155.5	U 150
Mar 3	vsMIZ	W 80-64	+1.5	W +17.5	153.5	U 144
Mar 7	@TEX	W 88-85	+6.5	W +9.5	154.5	O 173
Mar 11	vsSC	W 86-74	-7.5	W +4.5	149.5	O 160
Mar 12	vsTA&M	W 83-63	+2.5	W +22.5	162.5	U 146
Mar 13	vsARK	L 79-82	+6.5	W +3.5	166.5	U 161
Apr 1	vsCOLO	W 90-86	-9.5	L −5.5	162.5	O 176
Apr 4	vsBAY	W 82-69	+1.5	W +14.5	159.5	U 151
Apr 5	vsWVU	L 82-89	-3.5	L −10.5	141.5	O 171

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

SFPA

W 102-66

+4.5

GONZ

L 68-83

−4.5

UAPB

W 95-69

−10.5

NEB

L 99-105

−4.5

ORU

W 95-71

−0.5

ALCN

W 72-53

−12.5

MARQ

W 75-74

−0.5

WAKE

W 86-68

+22.5

ASU

L 70-86

−21.5

OKST

W 85-76

+6.5

W 89-67

−8.5

STET

W 107-54

+21.5

MVSU

W 93-69

−20.5

MISS

W 86-70

+9.5

MSST

L 53-72

−17.5

TA&M

L 76-83

−2.5

FLA

L 79-96

−9.5

ALA

L 81-83

+3.5

L 76-85

−11.5

MIZ

L 87-88

+3.5

ARK

L 79-83

−0.5

TEX

L 69-79

−8.5

L 78-94

−7.5

VAN

W 92-91

+12.5

UGA

W 94-78

+14.5

TENN

L 66-89

−11.5

TA&M

L 71-75

−2.5

AUB

W 91-79

+15.5

LSU

W 83-67

+17.5

MIZ

W 80-64

+17.5

TEX

W 88-85

+9.5

W 86-74

+4.5

TA&M

W 83-63

+22.5

ARK

L 79-82

+3.5

COLO

W 90-86

−5.5

BAY

W 82-69

+14.5

WVU

L 82-89

−10.5

covered 17didn’t cover 20avg +0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

SFPA

W 102-66

+18.5

GONZ

L 68-83

−15.5

UAPB

W 95-69

−4.5

NEB

L 99-105

+40.5

ORU

W 95-71

−0.5

ALCN

W 72-53

−35.5

MARQ

W 75-74

−13.5

WAKE

W 86-68

−5.5

ASU

L 70-86

−1.5

OKST

W 85-76

−8.5

W 89-67

+2.5

STET

W 107-54

+12.5

MVSU

W 93-69

+8.5

MISS

W 86-70

+9.5

MSST

L 53-72

−33.5

TA&M

L 76-83

−6.5

FLA

L 79-96

+17.5

ALA

L 81-83

−13.5

L 76-85

+10.5

MIZ

L 87-88

+23.5

ARK

L 79-83

−5.5

TEX

L 69-79

−7.5

L 78-94

+19.5

VAN

W 92-91

+23.5

UGA

W 94-78

+7.5

TENN

L 66-89

+5.5

TA&M

L 71-75

−19.5

AUB

W 91-79

+12.5

LSU

W 83-67

−5.5

MIZ

W 80-64

−9.5

TEX

W 88-85

+18.5

W 86-74

+10.5

TA&M

W 83-63

−16.5

ARK

L 79-82

−5.5

COLO

W 90-86

+13.5

BAY

W 82-69

−8.5

WVU

L 82-89

+29.5

over 18under 19avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Oklahoma has the better starters

Position by position: East Texas A&M 0, Oklahoma 1, even 4

East Texas A&MBetterOklahoma

G A. Dodd TR14.3 pts · 5.3 reb · 4.1 ast Score 82

Even

G B. Edwards TR12.7 pts · 5.9 reb · 4.9 ast Score 93

G E. Phelps1.3 pts · 0.7 reb · 1 ast Score 0

OUBig

G X. Brown15.4 pts · 3.2 reb · 3.3 ast Score 92

G K. Tolbert NEWNo Division I numbers yet Not ranked

No call

G T. Hendricks TR11.1 pts · 4.1 reb · 1.9 ast Score 60

F J. Ford TR3.1 pts · 2.5 reb · 0.5 ast Not ranked

No call

F D. Brennan TR12.4 pts · 10.3 reb · 2 ast Score 95

F B. Aldridge NEWNo Division I numbers yet Not ranked

No call

F D. Reid11.7 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.1 ast Score 84

East Texas A&MBetterOklahoma

ETAM offense344th of 366 · -11.8

OUBig

OU defense51st of 366 · +1.9

ETAM defense317th of 366 · -8.2

OUBig

OU offense28th of 366 · +6.6

Backcourt-1.7 · 3 players

OUBig

Backcourt+6.7 · 3 players

Frontcourt-1.0 · 2 players

OUBig

Frontcourt+6.9 · 2 players

BenchNo numbers yet

No call

Bench+2.0 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestETAM betterOU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

East Texas A&M

Guards

A. Dodd32 min · TRE. Phelps15 minK. TolbertNewC. AdlamNewK. RobinsonNewG. SkorjancNew

Forwards

J. Ford10 min · TRB. AldridgeNewY. VidalNewM. DiakiteNewC. DinuNewM. CarrioNew

Oklahoma

Guards

B. Edwards33 min · TRX. Brown32 minT. Hendricks31 min · TRP. Isaacs22 min · TRD. Forsythe17 minB. MoserNew

Forwards

D. Brennan31 min · TRD. Reid28 minK. Rooths16 min · TRK. Rogers8 minF. KeeffeNewG. MayfieldNew

Centers

Y. Yaak15 min · TR

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

ETAM67.1 #331

OU82.9 #29

Points per possession

ETAM0.98 #342

OU1.19 #23

Pace (possessions)

ETAM68.5 #203

OU69.4 #154

Shooting

Effective FG%

ETAM49.2 #282

OU54.9 #40

3-point %

ETAM31.3 #313

OU36.5 #41

3-point attempt rate

ETAM46.2 #43

OU43.6 #97

Free throw rate

ETAM32.0 #257

OU35.5 #161

Possessions

Turnover rate

ETAM19.2 #330

OU14.3 #33

Offensive rebound rate

ETAM25.7 #328

OU32.8 #92

Assists per game

ETAM14.6 #109

OU14.5 #116

Defense

Points allowed

ETAM76.0 #218

OU77.4 #248

Points allowed per possession

ETAM1.11 #240

OU1.12 #271

Opponent effective FG%

ETAM52.9 #261

OU51.0 #162

Opponent 3-point %

ETAM37.3 #347

OU34.1 #189

Turnovers forced

ETAM17.0 #156

OU15.5 #247

Defensive rebound rate

ETAM67.2 #288

OU67.1 #296

Steals per game

ETAM6.7 #150

OU6.3 #193

Blocks per game

ETAM3.1 #196

OU3.9 #89

ETAM		OU
Scoring
67.1 #331	Points per game	82.9 #29
0.98 #342	Points per possession	1.19 #23
68.5 #203	Pace (possessions)	69.4 #154
Shooting
49.2 #282	Effective FG%	54.9 #40
31.3 #313	3-point %	36.5 #41
46.2 #43	3-point attempt rate	43.6 #97
32.0 #257	Free throw rate	35.5 #161
Possessions
19.2 #330	Turnover rate	14.3 #33
25.7 #328	Offensive rebound rate	32.8 #92
14.6 #109	Assists per game	14.5 #116
Defense
76.0 #218	Points allowed	77.4 #248
1.11 #240	Points allowed per possession	1.12 #271
52.9 #261	Opponent effective FG%	51.0 #162
37.3 #347	Opponent 3-point %	34.1 #189
17.0 #156	Turnovers forced	15.5 #247
67.2 #288	Defensive rebound rate	67.1 #296
6.7 #150	Steals per game	6.3 #193
3.1 #196	Blocks per game	3.9 #89

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

East Texas A&M

9-21 in 2025-26 overall · 6-16 in conference · Southland Conference

Last five, 2025-26

L@ Texas A&M-CC71–84
L@ UT Rio Grande55–63
Lvs Hou Christian68–69
Lvs Incarnate Word73–82
Wvs SE Louisiana70–53

A week or more of rest.

Oklahoma

21-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-12 in conference · Southeastern Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs West Virginia82–89
Wvs Baylor82–69
Wvs Colorado90–86
Lvs Arkansas79–82
Wvs Texas A&M83–63

A week or more of rest.