Denny Sanford Premier Center · Neutral site · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
OMA -1.5✓ OMA covered by 12.5
Closing total150.5Under by 12.5
| This season | SDAK | |
|---|---|---|
| 11-16 | Record | 13-15 |
| 13-14 | ATS | 16-12 |
| 14-13 | O/U | 12-16 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: OMA 81–80 SDAK · ✓ OMA (53%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| OMA | 34 | 42 | 76 |
| SDAK | 31 | 31 | 62 |
1st half: OMA 34, SDAK 31 (OMA by 3). The model had OMA by 0.6 and a total of 75.1 (actual 65).
Team stats
| OMA | SDAK | |
|---|---|---|
| 27-59 46% | Field goals | 20-64 31% |
| 7-26 27% | 3-pointers | 9-28 32% |
| 15-19 79% | Free throws | 13-22 59% |
| 38 8 off | Rebounds | 41 16 off |
| 8 | Assists | 7 |
| 3 | Steals | 2 |
| 4 | Blocks | 3 |
| 5 | Turnovers | 6 |
| 22 | Fouls | 16 |
| 30 | Points in paint | 22 |
| 2 | Fast-break points | 5 |
Players
| OMA | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lance Waddles G | 36 | 18 | 7 | 1 | 7-14 | 3-9 |
| Paul Djobet F | 31 | 7 | 14 | 0 | 3-4 | 0-0 |
| Grant Stubblefield G | 26 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2-6 | 0-0 |
| Tony Osburn G | 26 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0-4 | 0-4 |
| Valentino Simon F | 13 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Ja'Sean Glover G | 31 | 25 | 1 | 3 | 7-13 | 1-3 |
| Julian Margrave F | 24 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 4-11 | 3-10 |
| Kamryn Thomas F | 11 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
| Brock Scholl F | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Khamani Cooper, Isaac Ondekane, Benji Nelson, Christian Richardson, Aidan Skradis, Rob Matos, Brandon Orgilbold, Deng Mayar
| SDAK | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan Crawford G | 40 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 4-15 | 3-8 |
| Vince Buzelis G | 37 | 16 | 12 | 3 | 5-12 | 2-5 |
| Silas Bennion G | 35 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 4-8 | 3-4 |
| Cameron Fens C | 29 | 8 | 12 | 2 | 3-11 | 0-0 |
| Ethan Kizer F | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-6 | 0-6 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Jesse McIntosh G | 24 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 4-11 | 1-5 |
| Jake Brack F | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Trent Hudgens G | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Evan Anderson, Luke Bruns, Jonah Funk, Uzziah Buntyn, Porter Ihnen, Jalen Hayes, Isaac Bruns, Shey Eberwein, Josiah Dotzler, Caleb Kizer, Ashton Smith
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketOMA -1.5
ModelOMA -0.9
Model edgeSDAK +0.6
L OMA covered
Total
Market150.5
Model160.7
Model edgeOver 10.2
L Under
Projected score
OMA 80.8 · SDAK 79.9
OMA 76 · SDAK 62
Win probability
OMA 53%
1st half
Spread
OMA -0.6
OMA -3.0
Total
75.1
65 points
Projected score
OMA 37.9 · SDAK 37.2
OMA 34 · SDAK 31
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenOMA -2.5
1 → SDAK
CloseOMA -1.5
1 pt toward SDAK
Total
Open151.5
▼ 1
Close150.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
OMA -135 · SDAK +114
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened OMA -2.5 · closed OMA -1.5 · moved 1 toward SDAKmodel OMA -1
model OMA -1
Opened 151.5 · closed 150.5 · moved 1 downmodel 160.5
model 160.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
OMA 5–6 SDAKSDAK leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · SDAK has won the last 2 meetings · OMA 4-7 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2025-26 | OMA 72 @ SDAK 89 | SDAK -1.5 | SDAK W |
| Jan 21, 2025-26 | SDAK 68 @ OMA 64 | OMA -6.5 | SDAK W |
| Mar 8, 2024-25 | SDAK 75 vs OMA 100 | OMA -5.5 | OMA W |
| Feb 22, 2024-25 | SDAK 85 @ OMA 93 | OMA -4.5 | OMA W |
| Jan 29, 2024-25 | OMA 87 @ SDAK 91 | SDAK +1.5 | SDAK W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Omaha
27 games played
Straight up
11-16
41% wins
Against the spread
13-14
48% covers · avg +0 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-13
52% overs · avg +0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 77-85 | +5.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 6 | @ | L 71-73 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 74-97 | +14.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 90-85 | -8.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 73-99 | +20.5 | L −5.5 | 163.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 77-88 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 61-74 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 157.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 70-75 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 60-55 | +12.5 | W +17.5 | 144.5 | U 115 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 85-82 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 141.5 | O 167 |
| Dec 28 | @ | L 57-80 | +21.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 69-84 | +9.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 66-73 | -8.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | vs | W 90-79 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 146.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 76-78 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 73-62 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 64-68 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 160.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 77-60 | -4.5 | W +12.5 | 148.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 80-71 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 150.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 84-82 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 73-76 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 84-92 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 12 | vs | W 98-94 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | O 192 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-76 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 80-71 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 72-89 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 53-68 | +11.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | U 121 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
MUR
L 77-85
−2.5
6
@
ACU
L 71-73
+2.5
9
@
CSU
L 74-97
−8.5
15
vs
SUU
W 90-85
−3.5
21
@
LSU
L 73-99
−5.5
25
vs
JMU
L 77-88
−9.5
26
@
FIU
L 61-74
−8.5
3
vs
UNCO
L 70-75
−1.5
6
@
PRST
W 60-55
+17.5
20
@
LAM
W 85-82
+8.5
28
@
ORE
L 57-80
−1.5
1
@
SDST
L 69-84
−5.5
3
vs
KC
L 66-73
−15.5
8
vs
UND
W 90-79
+5.5
10
vs
NDSU
L 76-78
+3.5
17
@
ORU
W 73-62
+12.5
21
vs
SDAK
L 64-68
−10.5
24
@
KC
W 77-60
+12.5
28
vs
SDST
W 80-71
+10.5
31
@
DEN
W 84-82
+3.5
5
@
UND
L 73-76
−1.5
7
@
NDSU
L 84-92
+1.5
12
vs
STMN
W 98-94
+8.5
15
vs
DEN
W 83-76
+4.5
18
vs
ORU
W 80-71
+2.5
25
@
SDAK
L 72-89
−15.5
28
@
STMN
L 53-68
−3.5
covered 13didn’t cover 14avg +0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
MUR
L 77-85
+8.5
6
@
ACU
L 71-73
−6.5
9
@
CSU
L 74-97
+17.5
15
vs
SUU
W 90-85
+21.5
21
@
LSU
L 73-99
+8.5
25
vs
JMU
L 77-88
+12.5
26
@
FIU
L 61-74
−22.5
3
vs
UNCO
L 70-75
−12.5
6
@
PRST
W 60-55
−29.5
20
@
LAM
W 85-82
+25.5
28
@
ORE
L 57-80
−14.5
1
@
SDST
L 69-84
+0.5
3
vs
KC
L 66-73
−9.5
8
vs
UND
W 90-79
+22.5
10
vs
NDSU
L 76-78
+6.5
17
@
ORU
W 73-62
−14.5
21
vs
SDAK
L 64-68
−28.5
24
@
KC
W 77-60
−11.5
28
vs
SDST
W 80-71
+0.5
31
@
DEN
W 84-82
+7.5
5
@
UND
L 73-76
−1.5
7
@
NDSU
L 84-92
+29.5
12
vs
STMN
W 98-94
+35.5
15
vs
DEN
W 83-76
−1.5
18
vs
ORU
W 80-71
−0.5
25
@
SDAK
L 72-89
+8.5
28
@
STMN
L 53-68
−37.5
over 14under 13avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
South Dakota
28 games played
Straight up
13-15
46% wins
Against the spread
16-12
57% covers · avg +1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
12-16
43% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 79-81 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 164.5 | U 160 |
| Nov 5 | @ | L 76-92 | +29.5 | W +13.5 | 169.5 | U 168 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 89-74 | -7.5 | W +7.5 | 164.5 | U 163 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 83-78 | -3.5 | W +1.5 | 172.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 68-102 | +24.5 | L −9.5 | 171.5 | U 170 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 82-81 | -15.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | O 163 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 80-63 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 147.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 71-77 | +2.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 87-89 | +8.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 9 | @ | L 79-106 | +14.5 | L −12.5 | 161.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 97-85 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 168.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 76-106 | +21.5 | L −8.5 | 176.5 | O 182 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 61-84 | +11.5 | L −11.5 | 164.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 86-99 | +14.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 82-72 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 169.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 99-83 | -7.5 | W +8.5 | 156.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 80-96 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 68-64 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 160.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 78-90 | +10.5 | L −1.5 | 161.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 77-69 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 84-89 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | O 173 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 82-75 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 156.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 68-67 | +11.5 | W +12.5 | 159.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 71-72 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 156.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 70-90 | +5.5 | L −14.5 | 163.5 | U 160 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 62-67 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 151.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 89-72 | -1.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 75-70 | +3.5 | W +8.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
UTU
L 79-81
−3.5
5
@
CREI
L 76-92
+13.5
12
vs
USI
W 89-74
+7.5
16
vs
WMU
W 83-78
+1.5
20
@
MIZ
L 68-102
−9.5
23
vs
SCST
W 82-81
−14.5
29
vs
AF
W 80-63
+13.5
3
vs
PRST
L 71-77
−3.5
6
@
UNCO
L 87-89
+6.5
9
@
WYO
L 79-106
−12.5
13
vs
PV
W 97-85
+5.5
20
@
KSU
L 76-106
−8.5
31
@
NDSU
L 61-84
−11.5
7
@
STMN
L 86-99
+1.5
10
vs
DEN
W 82-72
+11.5
15
vs
KC
W 99-83
+8.5
17
@
UND
L 80-96
−14.5
21
@
OMA
W 68-64
+10.5
24
vs
STMN
L 78-90
−1.5
29
vs
ORU
W 77-69
+4.5
31
vs
NDSU
L 84-89
+3.5
4
@
KC
W 82-75
+4.5
7
@
SDST
W 68-67
+12.5
11
vs
UND
L 71-72
−3.5
19
@
DEN
L 70-90
−14.5
21
@
ORU
L 62-67
−3.5
25
vs
OMA
W 89-72
+15.5
28
vs
SDST
W 75-70
+8.5
covered 16didn’t cover 12avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
UTU
L 79-81
−4.5
5
@
CREI
L 76-92
−1.5
12
vs
USI
W 89-74
−1.5
16
vs
WMU
W 83-78
−11.5
20
@
MIZ
L 68-102
−1.5
23
vs
SCST
W 82-81
+2.5
29
vs
AF
W 80-63
−4.5
3
vs
PRST
L 71-77
−10.5
6
@
UNCO
L 87-89
+13.5
9
@
WYO
L 79-106
+23.5
13
vs
PV
W 97-85
+13.5
20
@
KSU
L 76-106
+5.5
31
@
NDSU
L 61-84
−19.5
7
@
STMN
L 86-99
+22.5
10
vs
DEN
W 82-72
−15.5
15
vs
KC
W 99-83
+25.5
17
@
UND
L 80-96
+15.5
21
@
OMA
W 68-64
−28.5
24
vs
STMN
L 78-90
+6.5
29
vs
ORU
W 77-69
−8.5
31
vs
NDSU
L 84-89
+18.5
4
@
KC
W 82-75
+0.5
7
@
SDST
W 68-67
−24.5
11
vs
UND
L 71-72
−13.5
19
@
DEN
L 70-90
−3.5
21
@
ORU
L 62-67
−22.5
25
vs
OMA
W 89-72
+8.5
28
vs
SDST
W 75-70
−6.5
over 12under 16avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Omaha
11-16 overall · 8-8 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ St Thomas53–68
- L@ South Dakota72–89
- Wvs Oral Roberts80–71
- Wvs Denver83–76
- Wvs St Thomas98–94
6 days since their last game.
South Dakota
13-15 overall · 8-8 in conference · Summit League
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs S Dakota St75–70
- Wvs Omaha89–72
- L@ Oral Roberts62–67
- L@ Denver70–90
- Lvs North Dakota71–72
6 days since their last game.