Kirby Sports Center · at Lafayette · Conference game · Conference tournament
Closing line
LAF -4.5✓ HC covered by 9.5
Closing total141.5Over by 17.5
| This season | LAF | |
|---|---|---|
| 8-21 | Record | 10-20 |
| 14-15 | ATS | 13-16 |
| 14-15 | O/U | 16-13 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: HC 68–72 LAF · ✗ LAF (65%) lost
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HC | 34 | 48 | 82 |
| LAF | 39 | 38 | 77 |
1st half: HC 34, LAF 39 (LAF by 5). The model had LAF by 2.5 and a total of 65.4 (actual 73).
Team stats
| HC | LAF | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-60 47% | Field goals | 26-53 49% |
| 8-24 33% | 3-pointers | 10-21 48% |
| 18-18 100% | Free throws | 15-18 83% |
| 33 8 off | Rebounds | 26 2 off |
| 22 | Assists | 18 |
| 5 | Steals | 2 |
| 2 | Blocks | 4 |
| 7 | Turnovers | 8 |
| 18 | Fouls | 13 |
| 32 | Points in paint | 32 |
| 6 | Fast-break points | 18 |
Players
| HC | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gabe Warren G | 40 | 23 | 9 | 1 | 7-16 | 2-4 |
| Tyler Boston G | 35 | 17 | 9 | 14 | 4-8 | 1-3 |
| DeAndre Williams G | 34 | 14 | 5 | 1 | 5-13 | 3-7 |
| Aiden Disu F | 30 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 7-11 | 0-2 |
| Aidan Richard F | 24 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2-7 | 2-7 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Declan Ryan F | 20 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3-4 | 0-1 |
| John St. Germain III G | 15 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Chuck Hare F | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Jude Haigh, Joe Nugent, Austin Mejia, Ethan Clark, Tim Finau, Jaden Kirkwood, Will Aljancic, Ben Capron
| LAF | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Butler G | 38 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 6-11 | 0-0 |
| Caleb Williams G | 32 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 5-9 | 3-5 |
| Andrew Phillips G | 32 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 2-8 | 1-5 |
| Shareef Jackson F | 24 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 4-9 | 0-0 |
| Christian Humphrey-Rembert F | 21 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 1-2 | 1-2 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Ryan Pettit G | 28 | 12 | 4 | 2 | 4-8 | 2-4 |
| Misha Bednostin C | 16 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
| KaiMani Murdock F | 9 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3-5 | 3-5 |
Did not play: TJ Berger, Beckett Currie, Ashton Wallace, Luke Azzinaro, Justin Vander Baan, Luke Bevilacqua, Folabomi Fayemi, Malik Rasul, Chris Rubayo, Luka Savicevic, Joshua Wyche
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketLAF -4.5
ModelLAF -4.3
Model edgeHC +0.2
W HC covered
Total
Market141.5
Model139.7
Model edgeUnder 1.8
L Over
Projected score
HC 67.7 · LAF 72
HC 82 · LAF 77
Win probability
LAF 65%
1st half
Spread
LAF -2.5
LAF -5.0
Total
65.4
73 points
Projected score
HC 31.5 · LAF 33.9
HC 34 · LAF 39
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenLAF -3.5
1 → LAF
CloseLAF -4.5
1 pt toward LAF
Total
Open142.5
▼ 1
Close141.5
Down 1 since the open
Moneyline
HC +164 · LAF -198
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened LAF -3.5 · closed LAF -4.5 · moved 1 toward LAFmodel LAF -4.5 matches the line
model LAF -4.5 = line ✓
Opened 142.5 · closed 141.5 · moved 1 downmodel 139.5
model 139.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 11 since 2021-22
HC 2–9 LAFLAF leads · 11 games since 2021-22 · LAF has won the last 3 meetings · HC 3-8 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2025-26 | LAF 86 @ HC 83 | HC -1.5 | LAF W |
| Jan 17, 2025-26 | HC 55 @ LAF 74 | LAF -2.5 | LAF W |
| Mar 4, 2024-25 | HC 68 @ LAF 69 | LAF -7.5 | HC W |
| Feb 19, 2024-25 | LAF 69 @ HC 74 | HC +2.5 | HC W |
| Jan 11, 2024-25 | HC 65 @ LAF 82 | LAF -5.5 | LAF W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Holy Cross
29 games played
Straight up
8-21
28% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg −0.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 79-89 | +23.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 53-98 | +38.5 | L −6.5 | 165.5 | U 151 |
| Nov 10 | @ | L 69-87 | +21.5 | W +3.5 | 155.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 67-61 | +4.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 49-68 | +2.5 | L −16.5 | 141.5 | U 117 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 66-79 | +7.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 69-73 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 76-59 | +8.5 | W +25.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 70-69 | +10.5 | W +11.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 64-89 | +1.5 | L −23.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 53-81 | +10.5 | L −17.5 | 136.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 65-58 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 133.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 58-65 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 137.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 58-66 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 84-73 | +8.5 | W +19.5 | 137.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 82-75 | -4.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 55-74 | +2.5 | L −16.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 68-85 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 67-76 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 74-79 | +10.5 | W +5.5 | 144.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 68-69 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 2 | vs | L 64-72 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 76-67 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 70-74 | +8.5 | W +4.5 | 142.5 | O 144 |
| Feb 15 | @ | L 73-83 | +4.5 | L −5.5 | 146.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 83-86 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 72-63 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 142.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 63-78 | +8.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 62-76 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 138 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
PROV
L 79-89
+13.5
8
@
BYU
L 53-98
−6.5
10
@
UTAH
L 69-87
+3.5
16
vs
HAMP
W 67-61
+10.5
18
@
BRWN
L 49-68
−16.5
21
@
SHU
L 66-79
−5.5
24
vs
SIE
L 69-73
+5.5
3
vs
NE
W 76-59
+25.5
6
@
FOR
W 70-69
+11.5
16
vs
DART
L 64-89
−23.5
20
@
HARV
L 53-81
−17.5
31
vs
BUCK
W 65-58
+8.5
3
vs
NAVY
L 58-65
−1.5
7
@
LEH
L 58-66
−5.5
10
@
AMER
W 84-73
+19.5
14
vs
ARMY
W 82-75
+2.5
17
@
LAF
L 55-74
−16.5
21
@
NAVY
L 68-85
−5.5
24
vs
AMER
L 67-76
−4.5
28
@
COLG
L 74-79
+5.5
31
@
ARMY
L 68-69
+1.5
2
vs
BU
L 64-72
−5.5
7
vs
LEH
W 76-67
+10.5
11
vs
COLG
L 70-74
+4.5
15
@
L-MD
L 73-83
−5.5
18
vs
LAF
L 83-86
−4.5
22
@
BUCK
W 72-63
+11.5
25
@
BU
L 63-78
−6.5
28
vs
L-MD
L 62-76
−15.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
PROV
L 79-89
+15.5
8
@
BYU
L 53-98
−14.5
10
@
UTAH
L 69-87
+0.5
16
vs
HAMP
W 67-61
−20.5
18
@
BRWN
L 49-68
−24.5
21
@
SHU
L 66-79
−7.5
24
vs
SIE
L 69-73
+4.5
3
vs
NE
W 76-59
−10.5
6
@
FOR
W 70-69
+0.5
16
vs
DART
L 64-89
+5.5
20
@
HARV
L 53-81
−2.5
31
vs
BUCK
W 65-58
−10.5
3
vs
NAVY
L 58-65
−14.5
7
@
LEH
L 58-66
−13.5
10
@
AMER
W 84-73
+19.5
14
vs
ARMY
W 82-75
+14.5
17
@
LAF
L 55-74
−9.5
21
@
NAVY
L 68-85
+18.5
24
vs
AMER
L 67-76
+3.5
28
@
COLG
L 74-79
+8.5
31
@
ARMY
L 68-69
−7.5
2
vs
BU
L 64-72
−3.5
7
vs
LEH
W 76-67
+5.5
11
vs
COLG
L 70-74
+1.5
15
@
L-MD
L 73-83
+9.5
18
vs
LAF
L 83-86
+29.5
22
@
BUCK
W 72-63
−7.5
25
@
BU
L 63-78
−0.5
28
vs
L-MD
L 62-76
−13.5
over 14under 15avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Lafayette
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg −0 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 76-85 | +13.5 | W +4.5 | 138.5 | O 161 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 60-97 | +25.5 | L −11.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 13 | vs | L 78-97 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 59-81 | +24.5 | W +2.5 | 135.5 | O 140 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 70-74 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 141.5 | O 144 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 63-76 | -4.5 | L −17.5 | 151.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 55-37 | +1.5 | W +19.5 | 140.5 | U 92 |
| Nov 30 | vs | L 74-88 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 141.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 79-71 | — | — | — | — |
| Dec 8 | @ | L 72-74 | +7.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 67-81 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 137.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 81-95 | +16.5 | W +2.5 | 147.5 | O 176 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 77-85 | +6.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 79-64 | -1.5 | W +13.5 | 152.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 67-83 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 50-76 | +8.5 | L −17.5 | 141.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 69-76 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 137.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 74-55 | -2.5 | W +16.5 | 138.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 73-77 | +4.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 59-64 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 143.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 81-79 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 67-65 | +5.5 | W +7.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 4 | vs | L 50-65 | +3.5 | L −11.5 | 139.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 63-60 | -1.5 | W +1.5 | 142.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 54-68 | -3.5 | L −17.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 69-78 | -2.5 | L −11.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 86-83 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 139.5 | O 169 |
| Feb 22 | vs | L 61-75 | +3.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 70-69 | +8.5 | W +9.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 83-77 | -3.5 | W +2.5 | 144.5 | O 160 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
JOES
L 76-85
+4.5
8
@
TEX
L 60-97
−11.5
13
vs
COR
L 78-97
−14.5
17
@
WVU
L 59-81
+2.5
21
@
STO
L 70-74
−5.5
28
vs
LEM
L 63-76
−17.5
29
vs
BALL
W 55-37
+19.5
30
vs
MONM
L 74-88
−12.5
8
@
PENN
L 72-74
+5.5
18
@
CLT
L 67-81
−2.5
20
@
GT
L 81-95
+2.5
31
vs
COLG
L 77-85
−1.5
3
@
L-MD
W 79-64
+13.5
7
vs
BU
L 67-83
−14.5
10
@
NAVY
L 50-76
−17.5
14
@
BUCK
L 69-76
−4.5
17
vs
HC
W 74-55
+16.5
21
@
BU
L 73-77
+0.5
24
@
LEH
L 59-64
−2.5
28
vs
BUCK
W 81-79
−2.5
31
@
AMER
W 67-65
+7.5
4
vs
NAVY
L 50-65
−11.5
7
@
ARMY
W 63-60
+1.5
11
vs
L-MD
L 54-68
−17.5
14
vs
LEH
L 69-78
−11.5
18
@
HC
W 86-83
+4.5
22
vs
AMER
L 61-75
−10.5
25
@
COLG
W 70-69
+9.5
28
vs
ARMY
W 83-77
+2.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
JOES
L 76-85
+22.5
8
@
TEX
L 60-97
+3.5
13
vs
COR
L 78-97
+14.5
17
@
WVU
L 59-81
+4.5
21
@
STO
L 70-74
+2.5
28
vs
LEM
L 63-76
−12.5
29
vs
BALL
W 55-37
−48.5
30
vs
MONM
L 74-88
+20.5
8
@
PENN
L 72-74
−4.5
18
@
CLT
L 67-81
+10.5
20
@
GT
L 81-95
+28.5
31
vs
COLG
L 77-85
+15.5
3
@
L-MD
W 79-64
−9.5
7
vs
BU
L 67-83
+7.5
10
@
NAVY
L 50-76
−15.5
14
@
BUCK
L 69-76
+7.5
17
vs
HC
W 74-55
−9.5
21
@
BU
L 73-77
+4.5
24
@
LEH
L 59-64
−20.5
28
vs
BUCK
W 81-79
+21.5
31
@
AMER
W 67-65
−10.5
4
vs
NAVY
L 50-65
−24.5
7
@
ARMY
W 63-60
−19.5
11
vs
L-MD
L 54-68
−25.5
14
vs
LEH
L 69-78
+6.5
18
@
HC
W 86-83
+29.5
22
vs
AMER
L 61-75
−5.5
25
@
COLG
W 70-69
−9.5
28
vs
ARMY
W 83-77
+15.5
over 16under 13avg −0 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Holy Cross
8-21 overall · 5-13 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Loyola MD62–76
- L@ Boston U63–78
- W@ Bucknell72–63
- Lvs Lafayette83–86
- L@ Loyola MD73–83
3 days since their last game.
Lafayette
10-20 overall · 8-10 in conference · Patriot League
Last five, 2025-26
- Wvs Army83–77
- W@ Colgate70–69
- Lvs American61–75
- W@ Holy Cross86–83
- Lvs Lehigh69–78
3 days since their last game.