Tue, Dec 31, 2024, 3:00 PM ESTCheez-It Citrus Bowl · Neutral site
Weather at kickoff76°F11 mphgusts 22DryWeather watch ›
9-3 · Power #13
17
final
Final
vs
9-3 · Power #44
21
▲ winner
Closing spread
SC -9.5
✓ ILL W
Total
49.5
▼ Under · 38 pts
Model before kickoff
SC 28–18 ILL
✗ SC (76%) lost
Closing line · ESPN BET
SourceESPN BET closing line
OpenSC -10.5
CloseSC -9.5
Total47.5 → 49.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.
Loading the recap…

Market

Open → close
Spread
1 pt toward Illinois
Total
Up 2 since the open
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened SC -10.5 · closed SC -9.5 · moved 1 toward ILLmodel SC -11.5
Opened 47.5 · closed 49.5 · moved 2 upmodel 47
Openline modelKickoff
Line context
Lines that moved 1–1.5 pts toward the underdog: that team covered 49% (144 games since 2024)ⓘ
Closing line · ESPN BET
SourceESPN BET closing line
OpenSC -10.5
CloseSC -9.5
Total47.5 → 49.5
Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.

Similar games

The recent games that looked most like this one before kickoff, and how they turned out

In the 10 games most like SC as a 9.5-point neutral-site favorite against ILL, the favorite won 5, covered 2, and 3 went over the total.

Compare by
Customize filters
Only include
Show up to
games
This game: ILL won 21–17 outright; the favorite didn’t cover, as in 8 of the 10 similar games. 38 points stayed under 49.5, as in 7 of 10.
Favorite won
5 of 1050%
Normal range · usually 73%
Favorite covered
2 of 1020%
Normal range · usually 51%
Went over
3 of 1030%
Normal range · usually 52%

All three sit in the normal range for favorites of this size, so history shows no clear lean. Average result: underdog by 1.3 against an average line of 7.7; 40.1 points a game (usually 54.6). When games like this go over ›

All 10 games
MatchGameLineFinalCoveredO/U
Close
MINN vs WVU
2021 · Postseason · close · similar season form
-5.7518–6 W U44.75
Close
2023 · Postseason · close · similar season form & situation
-3.528–19 W U48.5
Close
2023 · Postseason · close
-6.57–14 L U44
Close
BYU vs UAB
2021 · Postseason · close · similar situation & season form
-628–31 L O54.25
Close
FLA vs UCF
2021 · Postseason · close · similar situation & team ratings
-717–29 L U56
Close
MINN vs SYR
2022 · Postseason · close · similar situation & team ratings
-10.528–20 L O44.75
Close
2023 · Postseason · close · similar season form & situation
-6.7510–17 L U44.25
Close
MSST vs TTU
2021 · Postseason · close · similar situation & spread
-107–34 L U58
Close
WISC vs ASU
2021 · Postseason · close
-7.7520–13 L U42.5
Close
FRES vs UTEP
2021 · Postseason · close · similar situation & season form
-1331–24 L O54.5
History, not a prediction. Every FBS game from 2021 on is compared with this one as it looked before kickoff (team strength, the betting line, season form, situation, venue and rest), and only close matches are kept. How matches are found

Signals

The data signal, and 2 trends and market moves behind it
Slight South Carolina ATS trend Miss
Slight-or-stronger ATS leans went 873-886 (50%) in our 2023–26 backtest.
Slight Over trend Miss
Slight-or-stronger total leans went 509-553 (48%) in our 2023–26 backtest.

None of these signals has beaten the market in our backtest, so this describes why the matchup is interesting — it isn’t a pick.

South Carolina ATS trend (9-3)
South Carolina have covered 75% of their games with a line this season. · Backtest 2023–26: 338-337 (50%)
Total moved up 2
47.5 → 49.5. · Backtest 2024–26: 462-498 (48%)
Loading play-by-play…

Matchup stats

Season to date before kickoff · ranks among 137 FBS teams
Power rating this season
pts vs an average team · #rank · tap a dot
SC+5.6 →+14.8▲ 9.2#14
ILL−0.5 →+4.3▲ 4.8#47
Predashed line = average team · hover or tap a dotW16

SC
Longer bar = better
ILL
#52
Offense
Even
#52
#26
Defense
◀ SC better
#74
+0.2 #53
Turnovers
ILL better ▶
+0.6 #31
69 plays #48
Pace
◀ SC faster
62 plays #118
Unit by unitEach offense against the other's defense
When SC has the ball
Advantage: SC offense
SC offILL defEdge
Points / game 31.6 #40 22.1 #35 Even
Yards / play 5.95 #58 5.47 #61 Even
PPA / play +0.17 #47 +0.12 #81 SC
Success rate 43% #62 46% #118 SC
When ILL has the ball
Advantage: SC defense
ILL offSC defEdge
Points / game 28.9 #63 17.8 #12 SC
Yards / play 5.86 #67 4.73 #12 SC
PPA / play +0.24 #20 +0.01 #18 Even
Success rate 44% #56 41% #62 Even

Points by quarter and half

Per game this season before kickoff · ranks among 134 FBS teams
SC scoring against the ILL defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
SC scored
7.3
#33
8.7
#61
16.0
#38
5.8
#69
9.8
#12
15.6
#34
ILL allowed
4.7
#54
6.5
#43
11.2
#45
4.3
#27
6.2
#56
10.4
#37
ILL scoring against the SC defense
Q1Q21HQ3Q42H
ILL scored
6.3
#60
7.8
#78
14.0
#71
5.3
#83
8.4
#37
13.8
#64
SC allowed
3.3
#16
6.6
#47
9.9
#23
3.7
#14
4.3
#11
7.9
#10

Game conditions

At kickoff
Home field
Neutral site
No home edge
Weather
76° · 11 mph
gusts 22 mph · wind lowers scoring
Rest
SC31d bye
ILL31d bye
Even
Tempo
Average 131 plays
slowavg 134fast

Schedules, links & other games

Previous and next games, standings, ESPN, and the rest of the week