Utah Tech Trailblazers at New Mexico Lobos: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 9:00 PM ETThe Pit · at New Mexico

LineUNM -21.5moved 1 toward UNM

Total156.5up 1 from 155.5

Season records: Utah Tech and New Mexico
UTU	This season	UNM
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects UNM 86–67 · win probability UNM 96%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

UNM -21.5

moved 1 toward UNM

Total

156.5

model 153.4 · Under by 3

Model edge

UTU by 2

model vs market

Public on the spread

98% UTU

98% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: UNM has more of the edges

UTU 0, UNM 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

UNMBig

UNM offense vs UTU defense

Offense 72nd of 366 against a defense 295th, on the model’s ratings

UNMBig

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: UTU 28.1%, UNM 30.6%. Defensive: UTU 65.5%, UNM 72.3%

UNMBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: UTU 17.8%, UNM 14.9%. Forced: UTU 16.8%, UNM 19.0%

UNMBig

UTU offense vs UNM defense

Offense 251st of 366 against a defense 103rd, on the model’s ratings

Context

Schedule so far

UTU has played the 210th-hardest schedule, UNM the 97th. A record against a soft schedule means less

UNMSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: UTU 30.6, UNM 35.8. Allowed: UTU 33.0, UNM 33.3

UNMSmall

Home court

UNM at home. This season: UNM 0-0 at home, UTU 0-0 away

Even

Shooting

Effective FG%: UTU 53.3 and allows 50.9; UNM 53.5 and allows 49.5

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: UTU 24%, UNM 42%. Transfers in: UTU 3, UNM 3. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Even

Three-pointers

UTU hits 35.0% and allows 30.7%; UNM hits 35.6% and allows 30.5%. Threes are 38.2% and 41.9% of their shots

Context

Tempo

About 70 possessions: UTU plays 69.9 a game (124th fastest), UNM 70.7 (87th). Faster games mean more points

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 20 or more	1165	99%	50%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	1090	99%	50%	52%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the favorite	6763	75%	50%	51%
Games with a total of 155 to 159.5	1555	74%	51%	49%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenUNM -20.5

1 → UNM

NowUNM -21.5

1 pt toward UNM

Total

Open155.5

▲ 1

Now156.5

Up 1 since the open

Moneyline

UTU +1600 · UNM -4750

Line movement

Median of 7 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened UNM -20.5 · now UNM -21.5 · moved 1 toward UNMmodel UNM -19.5

model UNM -19.5

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

UTU +21.5Spread

UNM -21.5

Bets

98%

Money

98%

Over 156.5TotalUnder 156.5

Bets

21%79%

Money

25%75%

UTUWinner

UNM

Bets

99%

Money

100%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

7 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	UTU	UNM	Over	Under	UTU	UNM
BetMGMMGM	-21.5-110	+21.5-110	156.5-110	156.5-110	+1500	-5000
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-21-105	+21-115	156.5-110	156.5-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-21.5-114	+21.5-112	156.5-114	156.5-112	—	—
BetUSBetUS	-21-105	+21-115	157.5-110	157.5-110	—	—
BovadaBovada	-21.5-115	+21.5-105	156.5-105	156.5-115	—	—
DraftKingsDK	-21.5-115	+21.5-105	156.5-108	156.5-112	+1700	-4500
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-21-101	+21-111	156.5-108	156.5-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	UNM -21.5	UNM -19.4	UTU +2.1
Total	156.5	153.4	Under 3.1
Projected score	—	UTU 67 · UNM 86.4

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	UNM -11.4	—
1H total	71.7	—
1H projected score	UTU 30.2 · UNM 41.6	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
UTU WLWWL	19-12	61%	9-7	12-8
UNM WWWWL	20-16	56%	11-8	14-13

Venue/role: UTU away, as underdog; UNM home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
UTU OUOOO	17-14	55%	16-15
UNM UOUUU	23-13	64%	25-11

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
UTU	6-4 60%	7-3 70%	7-3 70%
UNM	5-5 50%	6-4 60%	5-5 50%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Utah Tech

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 10	@ USU	L62–92LO
Nov 14	@ CAL	No recent meeting
Nov 19	@ WASH	L67–78WO

New Mexico

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	vs NAU	No recent meeting
Nov 10	vs LR	No recent meeting
Nov 14	@ SCU	W98–71WO

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Utah Tech

31 games played

Straight up

16-15

52% wins

Against the spread

19-12

61% covers · avg +1.8 pts vs the line

Over / Under

17-14

55% overs · avg +4.2 pts vs the total

Straight up

16-1552%

W L L L W L L W L W L W W L L L W L W W W W W W L W W L L W L

1 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

19-1261%

W W L L L W L W W W L W W L L L W L W W W W W W L W W L W W L

2 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

17-1455%

U U U U O U U O O O O U O O O U U U O O U O O U U O O U O O O

3 straight overs3 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	@SDAK	W 81-79	+1.5	W +3.5	164.5	U 160
Nov 7	@ARIZ	L 67-93	+33.5	W +7.5	162.5	U 160
Nov 9	@ASU	L 66-81	+12.5	L −2.5	152.5	U 147
Nov 12	vsMAN	L 75-79	-2.5	L −6.5	158.5	U 154
Nov 14	vsMVSU	W 81-75	-26.5	L −20.5	145.5	O 156
Nov 15	@HAW	L 62-68	+16.5	W +10.5	149.5	U 130
Nov 25	vsPRST	L 63-68	+1.5	L −3.5	146.5	U 131
Nov 29	vsUCR	W 77-69	-5.5	W +2.5	145.5	O 146
Dec 3	@SCU	L 80-90	+20.5	W +10.5	144.5	O 170
Dec 20	@WEB	W 82-80	+5.5	W +7.5	152.5	O 162
Dec 22	@CREI	L 69-92	+19.5	L −3.5	147.5	O 161
Dec 29	vsSUU	W 80-66	-7.5	W +6.5	148.5	U 146
Jan 1	@ACU	W 79-64	+5.5	W +20.5	139.5	O 143
Jan 8	@CBU	L 72-84	+7.5	L −4.5	144.5	O 156
Jan 10	@UVU	L 76-92	+13.5	L −2.5	149.5	O 168
Jan 15	vsUTA	L 52-56	-1.5	L −5.5	141.5	U 108
Jan 17	vsTAR	W 75-71	-3.5	W +0.5	150.5	U 146
Jan 21	@CBU	L 64-73	+8.5	L −0.5	143.5	U 137
Jan 24	vsSUU	W 102-91	-6.5	W +4.5	149.5	O 193
Jan 29	@ACU	W 76-70	+3.5	W +9.5	145.5	O 146
Jan 31	@TAR	W 65-59	+1.5	W +7.5	149.5	U 124
Feb 5	vsUTA	W 87-84	-1.5	W +1.5	139.5	O 171
Feb 12	vsUVU	W 81-77	+9.5	W +13.5	148.5	O 158
Feb 14	vsCBU	W 70-65	+2.5	W +7.5	143.5	U 135
Feb 19	@UTA	L 50-63	+4.5	L −8.5	140.5	U 113
Feb 21	@TAR	W 80-72	+1.5	W +9.5	140.5	O 152
Feb 26	vsACU	W 85-81	-2.5	W +1.5	139.5	O 166
Feb 28	@SUU	L 67-81	-1.5	L −15.5	156.5	U 148
Mar 7	vsUVU	L 101-104	+8.5	W +5.5	147.5	O 205
Mar 12	vsACU	W 80-74	-1.5	W +4.5	142.5	O 154
Mar 13	vsCBU	L 72-86	+8.5	L −5.5	144.5	O 158

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

SDAK

W 81-79

+3.5

ARIZ

L 67-93

+7.5

ASU

L 66-81

−2.5

MAN

L 75-79

−6.5

MVSU

W 81-75

−20.5

HAW

L 62-68

+10.5

PRST

L 63-68

−3.5

UCR

W 77-69

+2.5

SCU

L 80-90

+10.5

WEB

W 82-80

+7.5

CREI

L 69-92

−3.5

SUU

W 80-66

+6.5

ACU

W 79-64

+20.5

CBU

L 72-84

−4.5

UVU

L 76-92

−2.5

UTA

L 52-56

−5.5

TAR

W 75-71

+0.5

CBU

L 64-73

−0.5

SUU

W 102-91

+4.5

ACU

W 76-70

+9.5

TAR

W 65-59

+7.5

UTA

W 87-84

+1.5

UVU

W 81-77

+13.5

CBU

W 70-65

+7.5

UTA

L 50-63

−8.5

TAR

W 80-72

+9.5

ACU

W 85-81

+1.5

SUU

L 67-81

−15.5

UVU

L 101-104

+5.5

ACU

W 80-74

+4.5

CBU

L 72-86

−5.5

covered 19didn’t cover 12avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

SDAK

W 81-79

−4.5

ARIZ

L 67-93

−2.5

ASU

L 66-81

−5.5

MAN

L 75-79

−4.5

MVSU

W 81-75

+10.5

HAW

L 62-68

−19.5

PRST

L 63-68

−15.5

UCR

W 77-69

+0.5

SCU

L 80-90

+25.5

WEB

W 82-80

+9.5

CREI

L 69-92

+13.5

SUU

W 80-66

−2.5

ACU

W 79-64

+3.5

CBU

L 72-84

+11.5

UVU

L 76-92

+18.5

UTA

L 52-56

−33.5

TAR

W 75-71

−4.5

CBU

L 64-73

−6.5

SUU

W 102-91

+43.5

ACU

W 76-70

+0.5

TAR

W 65-59

−25.5

UTA

W 87-84

+31.5

UVU

W 81-77

+9.5

CBU

W 70-65

−8.5

UTA

L 50-63

−27.5

TAR

W 80-72

+11.5

ACU

W 85-81

+26.5

SUU

L 67-81

−8.5

UVU

L 101-104

+57.5

ACU

W 80-74

+11.5

CBU

L 72-86

+13.5

over 17under 14avg +4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

New Mexico

36 games played

Straight up

25-11

69% wins

Against the spread

20-16

56% covers · avg +2.5 pts vs the line

Over / Under

23-13

64% overs · avg +1.3 pts vs the total

Straight up

25-1169%

W W W L L W W W W W W L W W W W L W W W W L L W W W L W L L W L W W W L

3 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

20-1656%

L W L L L W L W W W W L W W W W W L L W L L L W W L L W L W L W W W W L

3 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

23-1364%

U U O O O O O O O U O U U O O O O O O U O U O U O O U O O O O U O U U U

3 straight unders1 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 5	vsETAM	W 76-54	-22.5	L −0.5	143.5	U 130
Nov 8	vsUTA	W 74-56	-13.5	W +4.5	145.5	U 130
Nov 11	vsUCR	W 82-68	-19.5	L −5.5	141.5	O 150
Nov 15	@NMSU	L 68-76	-3.5	L −11.5	139.5	O 144
Nov 20	vsNEB	L 72-84	+8.5	L −3.5	151.5	O 156
Nov 21	vsMSST	W 80-78	+6.5	W +8.5	151.5	O 158
Nov 26	vsALST	W 93-87	-19.5	L −13.5	148.5	O 180
Dec 6	vsSCU	W 98-71	-1.5	W +25.5	153.5	O 169
Dec 10	@VCU	W 81-78	+8.5	W +11.5	157.5	O 159
Dec 14	vsFGCU	W 75-59	-15.5	W +0.5	159.5	U 134
Dec 20	vsSJSU	W 88-65	-16.5	W +6.5	152.5	O 153
Dec 30	@BOIS	L 53-62	+5.5	L −3.5	146.5	U 115
Jan 3	vsWYO	W 78-58	-7.5	W +12.5	151.5	U 136
Jan 6	@CSU	W 80-70	-1.5	W +8.5	143.5	O 150
Jan 10	@AF	W 91-49	-16.5	W +25.5	138.5	O 140
Jan 13	vsGCU	W 87-64	-6.5	W +16.5	146.5	O 151
Jan 17	@SDSU	L 79-83	+5.5	W +1.5	148.5	O 162
Jan 21	vsFRES	W 83-74	-15.5	L −6.5	151.5	O 157
Jan 24	vsNEV	W 80-73	-8.5	L −1.5	150.5	O 153
Jan 27	@UNLV	W 89-61	-3.5	W +24.5	155.5	U 150
Jan 31	@SJSU	W 90-80	-15.5	L −5.5	148.5	O 170
Feb 4	vsUSU	L 66-86	-1.5	L −21.5	156.5	U 152
Feb 7	vsBOIS	L 90-91	-4.5	L −5.5	152.5	O 181
Feb 11	@GCU	W 70-64	+1.5	W +7.5	148.5	U 134
Feb 17	vsAF	W 98-61	-28.5	W +8.5	148.5	O 159
Feb 21	@FRES	W 80-78	-9.5	L −7.5	156.5	O 158
Feb 24	@NEV	L 60-67	+1.5	L −5.5	148.5	U 127
Feb 28	vsSDSU	W 81-76	-1.5	W +3.5	150.5	O 157
Mar 4	vsCSU	L 74-82	-8.5	L −16.5	150.5	O 156
Mar 7	@USU	L 90-94	+7.5	W +3.5	155.5	O 184
Mar 12	vsSJSU	W 93-77	-16.5	L −0.5	154.5	O 170
Mar 13	vsSDSU	L 62-64	+2.5	W +0.5	150.5	U 126
Mar 18	vsSHSU	W 107-83	-11.5	W +12.5	162.5	O 190
Mar 22	vsGW	W 86-61	-6.5	W +18.5	161.5	U 147
Mar 24	vsJOES	W 84-69	-10.5	W +4.5	155.5	U 153
Apr 2	vsTLSA	L 69-74	-2.5	L −7.5	161.5	U 143

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

ETAM

W 76-54

−0.5

UTA

W 74-56

+4.5

UCR

W 82-68

−5.5

NMSU

L 68-76

−11.5

NEB

L 72-84

−3.5

MSST

W 80-78

+8.5

ALST

W 93-87

−13.5

SCU

W 98-71

+25.5

VCU

W 81-78

+11.5

FGCU

W 75-59

+0.5

SJSU

W 88-65

+6.5

BOIS

L 53-62

−3.5

WYO

W 78-58

+12.5

CSU

W 80-70

+8.5

W 91-49

+25.5

GCU

W 87-64

+16.5

SDSU

L 79-83

+1.5

FRES

W 83-74

−6.5

NEV

W 80-73

−1.5

UNLV

W 89-61

+24.5

SJSU

W 90-80

−5.5

USU

L 66-86

−21.5

BOIS

L 90-91

−5.5

GCU

W 70-64

+7.5

W 98-61

+8.5

FRES

W 80-78

−7.5

NEV

L 60-67

−5.5

SDSU

W 81-76

+3.5

CSU

L 74-82

−16.5

USU

L 90-94

+3.5

SJSU

W 93-77

−0.5

SDSU

L 62-64

+0.5

SHSU

W 107-83

+12.5

W 86-61

+18.5

JOES

W 84-69

+4.5

TLSA

L 69-74

−7.5

covered 20didn’t cover 16avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

ETAM

W 76-54

−13.5

UTA

W 74-56

−15.5

UCR

W 82-68

+8.5

NMSU

L 68-76

+4.5

NEB

L 72-84

+4.5

MSST

W 80-78

+6.5

ALST

W 93-87

+31.5

SCU

W 98-71

+15.5

VCU

W 81-78

+1.5

FGCU

W 75-59

−25.5

SJSU

W 88-65

+0.5

BOIS

L 53-62

−31.5

WYO

W 78-58

−15.5

CSU

W 80-70

+6.5

W 91-49

+1.5

GCU

W 87-64

+4.5

SDSU

L 79-83

+13.5

FRES

W 83-74

+5.5

NEV

W 80-73

+2.5

UNLV

W 89-61

−5.5

SJSU

W 90-80

+21.5

USU

L 66-86

−4.5

BOIS

L 90-91

+28.5

GCU

W 70-64

−14.5

W 98-61

+10.5

FRES

W 80-78

+1.5

NEV

L 60-67

−21.5

SDSU

W 81-76

+6.5

CSU

L 74-82

+5.5

USU

L 90-94

+28.5

SJSU

W 93-77

+15.5

SDSU

L 62-64

−24.5

SHSU

W 107-83

+27.5

W 86-61

−14.5

JOES

W 84-69

−2.5

TLSA

L 69-74

−18.5

over 23under 13avg +1.3 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

New Mexico has the better starters

Position by position: Utah Tech 0, New Mexico 4, even 1

Utah TechBetterNew Mexico

G R. Sunderland TR4.8 pts · 3.5 reb · 3.2 ast Score 4

UNMBig

G J. Hall16.2 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.6 ast Score 90

G A. Dupre TR3 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.6 ast Score 1

UNMBig

G U. Tenette10.6 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.9 ast Score 73

G M. Brown TR3 pts · 1.1 reb · 1.2 ast Score 6

UNMBig

G C. Howell6 pts · 3 reb · 3.5 ast Score 54

F E. Potter17.1 pts · 7.9 reb · 2 ast Score 94

Even

G H. Mayes TR11.1 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.7 ast Score 93

F S. Ariyibi2.4 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.5 ast Score 11

UNMBig

F T. Vahlberg Fasasi TR12.3 pts · 4.2 reb · 2.4 ast Score 72

Utah TechBetterNew Mexico

UTU offense251st of 366 · -7.6

UNMBig

UNM defense103rd of 366 · -0.9

UTU defense295th of 366 · -7.4

UNMBig

UNM offense72nd of 366 · +1.6

Backcourt-8.4 · 3 players

UNMBig

Backcourt+5.6 · 4 players

Frontcourt+3.6 · 2 players

UTUSmall

Frontcourt+1.0 · 1 player

Bench-0.3 · 3 players

UNMSmall

Bench+0.9 · 1 player

Score, worst to bestUTU betterUNM betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Utah Tech

Guards

R. Sunderland27 min · TRA. Dupre16 min · TRM. Brown14 min · TRB. Harker3 minP. Vandermyde1 minP. RagkosNew

Forwards

E. Potter32 minS. Ariyibi10 minD. Grant2 minJ. ClarkNew

Centers

K. LemkeNew

New Mexico

Guards

J. Hall31 minU. Tenette28 minC. Howell25 minH. Mayes24 min · TRD. HallNew

Forwards

T. Vahlberg Fasasi27 min · TRR. Petraitis17 min · TRF. GraniNewI. SuljanovicNewN. MuriithiNewB. SchuchNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

UTU74.7 #171

UNM80.8 #52

Points per possession

UTU1.08 #193

UNM1.14 #70

Pace (possessions)

UTU69.9 #124

UNM70.7 #87

Shooting

Effective FG%

UTU53.3 #90

UNM53.5 #82

3-point %

UTU35.0 #113

UNM35.6 #83

3-point attempt rate

UTU38.2 #207

UNM41.9 #136

Free throw rate

UTU30.6 #290

UNM35.8 #160

Possessions

Turnover rate

UTU17.8 #256

UNM14.9 #59

Offensive rebound rate

UTU28.1 #261

UNM30.6 #176

Assists per game

UTU14.4 #121

UNM14.8 #104

Defense

Points allowed

UTU77.0 #243

UNM71.6 #96

Points allowed per possession

UTU1.09 #211

UNM1.01 #36

Opponent effective FG%

UTU50.9 #151

UNM49.5 #84

Opponent 3-point %

UTU30.7 #29

UNM30.5 #20

Turnovers forced

UTU16.8 #166

UNM19.0 #50

Defensive rebound rate

UTU65.5 #326

UNM72.3 #57

Steals per game

UTU6.9 #135

UNM7.9 #43

Blocks per game

UTU3.0 #216

UNM2.7 #274

UTU		UNM
Scoring
74.7 #171	Points per game	80.8 #52
1.08 #193	Points per possession	1.14 #70
69.9 #124	Pace (possessions)	70.7 #87
Shooting
53.3 #90	Effective FG%	53.5 #82
35.0 #113	3-point %	35.6 #83
38.2 #207	3-point attempt rate	41.9 #136
30.6 #290	Free throw rate	35.8 #160
Possessions
17.8 #256	Turnover rate	14.9 #59
28.1 #261	Offensive rebound rate	30.6 #176
14.4 #121	Assists per game	14.8 #104
Defense
77.0 #243	Points allowed	71.6 #96
1.09 #211	Points allowed per possession	1.01 #36
50.9 #151	Opponent effective FG%	49.5 #84
30.7 #29	Opponent 3-point %	30.5 #20
16.8 #166	Turnovers forced	19.0 #50
65.5 #326	Defensive rebound rate	72.3 #57
6.9 #135	Steals per game	7.9 #43
3.0 #216	Blocks per game	2.7 #274

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Utah Tech

16-15 in 2025-26 overall · 12-8 in conference · Big Sky Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs CA Baptist72–86
Wvs Abilene Chrstn80–74
Lvs Utah Valley101–104
L@ Southern Utah67–81
Wvs Abilene Chrstn85–81

A week or more of rest.

New Mexico

25-11 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Mountain West Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Tulsa69–74
Wvs Saint Joseph's84–69
Wvs G Washington86–61
Wvs Sam Houston107–83
Lvs San Diego St62–64

A week or more of rest.