Long Beach State Beach at Utah Utes: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 9:00 PM ETJon M. Huntsman Center · at Utah

#73UTAHUtah

LineUTAH -19.5moved 1 toward LBSU

Total148.5down 1 from 149.5

Season records: Long Beach St and Utah
LBSU	This season	UTAH
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects UTAH 84–65 · win probability UTAH 96%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

UTAH -19.5

moved 1 toward LBSU

Total

148.5

model 148.8

Model edge

Even

matches the market

Public

—

No split yet for this game

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: UTAH has more of the edges

LBSU 1, UTAH 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

UTAHBig

UTAH offense vs LBSU defense

Offense 79th of 366 against a defense 300th, on the model’s ratings

UTAHBig

LBSU offense vs UTAH defense

Offense 285th of 366 against a defense 68th, on the model’s ratings

UTAHBig

Free throws

Free throw rate: LBSU 30.7, UTAH 31.7. Allowed: LBSU 42.3, UTAH 29.9

Context

Schedule so far

LBSU has played the 152nd-hardest schedule, UTAH the 53rd. A record against a soft schedule means less

Context

Tempo

About 70 possessions: LBSU plays 71.7 a game (46th fastest), UTAH 68.3 (211th). Faster games mean more points

LBSUSmall

Turnovers

Turnover rate: LBSU 18.0%, UTAH 16.7%. Forced: LBSU 17.5%, UTAH 13.3%

UTAHSmall

Three-pointers

LBSU hits 32.7% and allows 34.4%; UTAH hits 35.3% and allows 35.1%. Threes are 34.8% and 37.5% of their shots

UTAHSmall

Home court

UTAH at home. This season: UTAH 0-0 at home, LBSU 0-0 away

Even

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: LBSU 26.2%, UTAH 29.3%. Defensive: LBSU 72.2%, UTAH 68.4%

Even

Shooting

Effective FG%: LBSU 50.6 and allows 53.7; UTAH 52.0 and allows 53.9

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: LBSU 8%, UTAH 14%. Transfers in: LBSU 5, UTAH 6. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 15 to 19.5	993	94%	48%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	632	93%	49%	53%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog	4513	74%	51%	50%
Games with a total of 145 to 149.5	3547	74%	49%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenUTAH -20.5

1 → LBSU

NowUTAH -19.5

1 pt toward LBSU

Total

Open149.5

▼ 1

Now148.5

Down 1 since the open

Moneyline

LBSU +1600 · UTAH -4500

Line movement

Median of 8 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened UTAH -20.5 · now UTAH -19.5 · moved 1 toward LBSUmodel UTAH -20

model UTAH -20

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

Over 148.5TotalUnder 148.5

Bets

42%58%

Money

43%57%

LBSUWinner

UTAH

Bets

96%

Money

99%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

8 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	LBSU	UTAH	Over	Under	LBSU	UTAH
BetMGMMGM	-19.5-105	+19.5-115	148.5-115	148.5-105	+1300	-3000
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-19.5-105	+19.5-115	148.5-115	148.5-105	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-20.5-134	+20.5+105	149.5-107	149.5-120	—	—
BetUSBetUS	-19.5-105	+19.5-115	148.5-115	148.5-105	—	—
BovadaBovada	-19.5-110	+19.5-110	148.5-110	148.5-110	—	—
DraftKingsDK	-19.5-102	+19.5-118	148.5-110	148.5-110	+1700	-4500
FanDuelFD	-18.5-102	+18.5-120	148.5-115	148.5-105	+1600	-4500
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-19.5-101	+19.5-111	148.5-113	148.5-103	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated 5:30 AM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	UTAH -19.5	UTAH -19.8	UTAH +0.3
Total	148.5	148.8	Over 0.3
Projected score	—	LBSU 64.5 · UTAH 84.3

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	UTAH -11.6	—
1H total	69.6	—
1H projected score	LBSU 29 · UTAH 40.6	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
LBSU WLLLW	16-14	53%	8-8	14-9
UTAH LLLLW	15-17	47%	5-12	2-7

Venue/role: LBSU away, as underdog; UTAH home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
LBSU UOOUO	20-10	67%	8-22
UTAH UUOOO	18-14	56%	10-22

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
LBSU	2-8 20%	4-6 40%	6-4 60%
UTAH	1-9 10%	5-5 50%	3-7 30%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

Long Beach St

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 7	@ MTST	L72–78LO
Nov 11	vs PAC	L66–69WU
Nov 16	@ UCLA	L69–93LO

Utah

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	vs TOW	No recent meeting
Nov 10	vs WEB	W92–89LO
Nov 14	vs WASH	L65–74WU

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

Long Beach St

30 games played

Straight up

8-22

27% wins

Against the spread

16-14

53% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line

Over / Under

20-10

67% overs · avg +4.6 pts vs the total

Straight up

8-2227%

L L L L L L W L L L W L W L W W W L L L L L L L L L L W L W

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

16-1453%

L L W W L L W W W W L W W W L W W L W L W W L L L W L L L W

1 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

20-1067%

U O U O O O O O O O O O U U O O O U O U O O O U U U O O U O

3 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 4	@SDSU	L 45-77	+25.5	L −6.5	135.5	U 122
Nov 8	@FRES	L 62-82	+6.5	L −13.5	142.5	O 144
Nov 12	@PAC	L 66-69	+12.5	W +9.5	141.5	U 135
Nov 16	vsILST	L 80-82	+8.5	W +6.5	141.5	O 162
Nov 21	vsMTST	L 72-78	+3.5	L −2.5	140.5	O 150
Nov 26	@PORT	L 73-93	+5.5	L −14.5	148.5	O 166
Nov 30	vsUSD	W 76-72	+2.5	W +6.5	147.5	O 148
Dec 4	@UCSB	L 77-84	+13.5	W +6.5	141.5	O 161
Dec 6	vsUCSD	L 74-80	+8.5	W +2.5	145.5	O 154
Dec 9	@SJSU	L 83-89	+7.5	W +1.5	141.5	O 172
Dec 18	vsPEPP	W 81-78	-4.5	L −1.5	141.5	O 159
Dec 21	@ISU	L 60-91	+37.5	W +6.5	149.5	O 151
Jan 3	vsCP	W 74-66	-2.5	W +5.5	162.5	U 140
Jan 8	@UCI	L 64-74	+10.5	W +0.5	142.5	U 138
Jan 10	vsCSUB	W 81-75	-6.5	L −0.5	142.5	O 156
Jan 15	vsUCR	W 88-73	-5.5	W +9.5	141.5	O 161
Jan 17	@CSUN	W 87-80	+7.5	W +14.5	158.5	O 167
Jan 22	@CSUF	L 61-71	+3.5	L −6.5	160.5	U 132
Jan 24	vsUCSB	L 71-74	+4.5	W +1.5	144.5	O 145
Jan 29	@UCR	L 61-71	-1.5	L −11.5	144.5	U 132
Jan 31	vsHAW	L 82-89	+8.5	W +1.5	144.5	O 171
Feb 5	@UCSD	L 74-77	+10.5	W +7.5	144.5	O 151
Feb 12	vsCSUF	L 82-86	-2.5	L −6.5	156.5	O 168
Feb 14	@UCD	L 54-71	+4.5	L −12.5	149.5	U 125
Feb 19	vsUCI	L 58-69	+5.5	L −5.5	144.5	U 127
Feb 21	vsCSUN	L 76-78	+2.5	W +0.5	157.5	U 154
Feb 26	@CP	L 92-102	+5.5	L −4.5	162.5	O 194
Feb 28	@CSUB	W 88-87	-3.5	L −2.5	152.5	O 175
Mar 5	vsUCD	L 70-76	+1.5	L −4.5	149.5	U 146
Mar 7	@HAW	W 84-75	+14.5	W +23.5	150.5	O 159

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

SDSU

L 45-77

−6.5

FRES

L 62-82

−13.5

PAC

L 66-69

+9.5

ILST

L 80-82

+6.5

MTST

L 72-78

−2.5

PORT

L 73-93

−14.5

USD

W 76-72

+6.5

UCSB

L 77-84

+6.5

UCSD

L 74-80

+2.5

SJSU

L 83-89

+1.5

PEPP

W 81-78

−1.5

ISU

L 60-91

+6.5

W 74-66

+5.5

UCI

L 64-74

+0.5

CSUB

W 81-75

−0.5

UCR

W 88-73

+9.5

CSUN

W 87-80

+14.5

CSUF

L 61-71

−6.5

UCSB

L 71-74

+1.5

UCR

L 61-71

−11.5

HAW

L 82-89

+1.5

UCSD

L 74-77

+7.5

CSUF

L 82-86

−6.5

UCD

L 54-71

−12.5

UCI

L 58-69

−5.5

CSUN

L 76-78

+0.5

L 92-102

−4.5

CSUB

W 88-87

−2.5

UCD

L 70-76

−4.5

HAW

W 84-75

+23.5

covered 16didn’t cover 14avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

SDSU

L 45-77

−13.5

FRES

L 62-82

+1.5

PAC

L 66-69

−6.5

ILST

L 80-82

+20.5

MTST

L 72-78

+9.5

PORT

L 73-93

+17.5

USD

W 76-72

+0.5

UCSB

L 77-84

+19.5

UCSD

L 74-80

+8.5

SJSU

L 83-89

+30.5

PEPP

W 81-78

+17.5

ISU

L 60-91

+1.5

W 74-66

−22.5

UCI

L 64-74

−4.5

CSUB

W 81-75

+13.5

UCR

W 88-73

+19.5

CSUN

W 87-80

+8.5

CSUF

L 61-71

−28.5

UCSB

L 71-74

+0.5

UCR

L 61-71

−12.5

HAW

L 82-89

+26.5

UCSD

L 74-77

+6.5

CSUF

L 82-86

+11.5

UCD

L 54-71

−24.5

UCI

L 58-69

−17.5

CSUN

L 76-78

−3.5

L 92-102

+31.5

CSUB

W 88-87

+22.5

UCD

L 70-76

−3.5

HAW

W 84-75

+8.5

over 20under 10avg +4.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Utah

32 games played

Straight up

10-22

31% wins

Against the spread

15-17

47% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line

Over / Under

18-14

56% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total

Straight up

10-2231%

W W W W W L L W L W L W L L L L L W L L L L L L L W L L L L L L

6 straight losses0 of last 4 won

Against the spread

15-1747%

L L L L L L L W W W L W W L L W W W W W L L W W W W L L L L L W

1 of last 4 coveredno streak

Over / Under

18-1456%

O O O O O O U O U O O O U O U O O O U O U U U U U U U U U O O O

3 straight overs3 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsSJSU	W 84-75	-11.5	L −2.5	146.5	O 159
Nov 8	vsWEB	W 92-89	-15.5	L −12.5	148.5	O 181
Nov 10	vsHC	W 87-69	-21.5	L −3.5	155.5	O 156
Nov 15	vsSHSU	W 85-79	-12.5	L −6.5	159.5	O 164
Nov 18	vsPFW	W 85-77	-13.5	L −5.5	161.5	O 162
Nov 20	vsCP	L 85-92	-14.5	L −21.5	167.5	O 177
Nov 25	vsGCU	L 58-68	+5.5	L −4.5	153.5	U 126
Nov 26	vsMISS	W 75-74	+10.5	W +11.5	144.5	O 149
Dec 2	@CAL	L 72-79	+7.5	W +0.5	152.5	U 151
Dec 6	vsCBU	W 91-85	-5.5	W +0.5	145.5	O 176
Dec 13	vsMSST	L 74-82	+1.5	L −6.5	153.5	O 156
Dec 20	vsEWU	W 101-77	-10.5	W +13.5	160.5	O 178
Dec 29	@WASH	L 65-74	+12.5	W +3.5	157.5	U 139
Jan 3	vsARIZ	L 78-97	+17.5	L −1.5	162.5	O 175
Jan 7	@COLO	L 73-85	+9.5	L −2.5	162.5	U 158
Jan 10	vsBYU	L 84-89	+14.5	W +9.5	168.5	O 173
Jan 14	@TTU	L 74-88	+17.5	W +3.5	159.5	O 162
Jan 17	vsTCU	W 82-79	+4.5	W +7.5	154.5	O 161
Jan 20	@KSU	L 78-81	+10.5	W +7.5	168.5	U 159
Jan 24	@BYU	L 78-91	+19.5	W +6.5	168.5	O 169
Jan 31	vsOKST	L 69-81	+1.5	L −10.5	166.5	U 150
Feb 4	vsASU	L 63-71	-1.5	L −9.5	161.5	U 134
Feb 7	@KU	L 59-71	+18.5	W +6.5	150.5	U 130
Feb 10	vsHOU	L 52-66	+16.5	W +2.5	142.5	U 118
Feb 15	@CIN	L 65-69	+12.5	W +8.5	139.5	U 134
Feb 18	@WVU	W 61-56	+10.5	W +15.5	133.5	U 117
Feb 21	vsUCF	L 71-73	+1.5	L −0.5	154.5	U 144
Feb 24	vsISU	L 59-75	+14.5	L −1.5	144.5	U 134
Feb 28	@ASU	L 60-73	+6.5	L −6.5	150.5	U 133
Mar 3	vsCOLO	L 78-92	+1.5	L −12.5	148.5	O 170
Mar 7	@BAY	L 75-101	+13.5	L −12.5	148.5	O 176
Mar 10	vsCIN	L 66-73	+12.5	W +5.5	138.5	O 139

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

SJSU

W 84-75

−2.5

WEB

W 92-89

−12.5

W 87-69

−3.5

SHSU

W 85-79

−6.5

PFW

W 85-77

−5.5

L 85-92

−21.5

GCU

L 58-68

−4.5

MISS

W 75-74

+11.5

CAL

L 72-79

+0.5

CBU

W 91-85

+0.5

MSST

L 74-82

−6.5

EWU

W 101-77

+13.5

WASH

L 65-74

+3.5

ARIZ

L 78-97

−1.5

COLO

L 73-85

−2.5

BYU

L 84-89

+9.5

TTU

L 74-88

+3.5

TCU

W 82-79

+7.5

KSU

L 78-81

+7.5

BYU

L 78-91

+6.5

OKST

L 69-81

−10.5

ASU

L 63-71

−9.5

L 59-71

+6.5

HOU

L 52-66

+2.5

CIN

L 65-69

+8.5

WVU

W 61-56

+15.5

UCF

L 71-73

−0.5

ISU

L 59-75

−1.5

ASU

L 60-73

−6.5

COLO

L 78-92

−12.5

BAY

L 75-101

−12.5

CIN

L 66-73

+5.5

covered 15didn’t cover 17avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

SJSU

W 84-75

+12.5

WEB

W 92-89

+32.5

W 87-69

+0.5

SHSU

W 85-79

+4.5

PFW

W 85-77

+0.5

L 85-92

+9.5

GCU

L 58-68

−27.5

MISS

W 75-74

+4.5

CAL

L 72-79

−1.5

CBU

W 91-85

+30.5

MSST

L 74-82

+2.5

EWU

W 101-77

+17.5

WASH

L 65-74

−18.5

ARIZ

L 78-97

+12.5

COLO

L 73-85

−4.5

BYU

L 84-89

+4.5

TTU

L 74-88

+2.5

TCU

W 82-79

+6.5

KSU

L 78-81

−9.5

BYU

L 78-91

+0.5

OKST

L 69-81

−16.5

ASU

L 63-71

−27.5

L 59-71

−20.5

HOU

L 52-66

−24.5

CIN

L 65-69

−5.5

WVU

W 61-56

−16.5

UCF

L 71-73

−10.5

ISU

L 59-75

−10.5

ASU

L 60-73

−17.5

COLO

L 78-92

+21.5

BAY

L 75-101

+27.5

CIN

L 66-73

+0.5

over 18under 14avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

The starting fives are even

Position by position: Long Beach St 2, Utah 2, even 1

Long Beach StBetterUtah

G J. Payne TR6.9 pts · 3.7 reb · 1.2 ast Score 40

UTAHBig

G T. Campbell TR13.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 3.9 ast Score 85

G Y. Sissoko TR2.7 pts · 1.8 reb · 1 ast Score 32

UTAHBig

G J. Holcombe TR15.9 pts · 6.5 reb · 3.6 ast Score 97

G C. Jones3.1 pts · 1.4 reb · 0.4 ast Not ranked

No call

G T. Burch TR12.8 pts · 2.5 reb · 3.4 ast Score 88

F G. Brcic TR4.3 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.4 ast Score 39

LBSUSmall

G O. Abbey2.5 pts · 1.6 reb · 2.2 ast Score 12

C N. Amenhauser TR5.1 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.4 ast Score 57

LBSUSmall

C M. Gomma TR8 pts · 6.8 reb · 1.4 ast Score 28

Long Beach StBetterUtah

LBSU offense285th of 366 · -8.8

UTAHBig

UTAH defense68th of 366 · +0.9

LBSU defense300th of 366 · -7.7

UTAHBig

UTAH offense79th of 366 · +0.7

Backcourt-2.0 · 3 players

UTAHBig

Backcourt+6.8 · 4 players

Frontcourt-0.3 · 2 players

LBSUSmall

Frontcourt-1.4 · 1 player

Bench-1.9 · 2 players

UTAHSmall

Bench-0.7 · 3 players

Score, worst to bestLBSU betterUTAH betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

Long Beach St

Guards

J. Payne22 min · TRY. Sissoko11 min · TRC. Jones10 minJ. TenganNewJ. GrayNewM. AdamsNew

Forwards

G. Brcic17 min · TRK. Smith8 min · TRJ. Chaikovsky6 minB. WrightNewH. LauNewM. VanlaninghamNew

Centers

N. Amenhauser12 min · TR

Utah

Guards

T. Campbell34 min · TRJ. Holcombe31 min · TRT. Burch25 min · TRO. Abbey15 minT. Chatman13 min · TRL. Langarita12 min

Forwards

G. Gaddis1 min · TRB. FayeNewZ. LoubakiNewJ. JohnsonNewA. AnigbataNew

Centers

M. Gomma26 min · TRF. SchottNewL. McCannaNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

LBSU73.2 #219

UTAH74.3 #185

Points per possession

LBSU1.02 #303

UTAH1.08 #173

Pace (possessions)

LBSU71.7 #46

UTAH68.3 #211

Shooting

Effective FG%

LBSU50.6 #207

UTAH52.0 #142

3-point %

LBSU32.7 #245

UTAH35.3 #98

3-point attempt rate

LBSU34.8 #280

UTAH37.5 #222

Free throw rate

LBSU30.7 #287

UTAH31.7 #262

Possessions

Turnover rate

LBSU18.0 #271

UTAH16.7 #175

Offensive rebound rate

LBSU26.2 #315

UTAH29.3 #224

Assists per game

LBSU12.3 #264

UTAH13.7 #169

Defense

Points allowed

LBSU79.0 #297

UTAH79.1 #302

Points allowed per possession

LBSU1.10 #220

UTAH1.16 #337

Opponent effective FG%

LBSU53.7 #290

UTAH53.9 #298

Opponent 3-point %

LBSU34.4 #212

UTAH35.1 #254

Turnovers forced

LBSU17.5 #119

UTAH13.3 #348

Defensive rebound rate

LBSU72.2 #60

UTAH68.4 #233

Steals per game

LBSU6.5 #173

UTAH5.3 #315

Blocks per game

LBSU2.9 #250

UTAH3.4 #160

LBSU		UTAH
Scoring
73.2 #219	Points per game	74.3 #185
1.02 #303	Points per possession	1.08 #173
71.7 #46	Pace (possessions)	68.3 #211
Shooting
50.6 #207	Effective FG%	52.0 #142
32.7 #245	3-point %	35.3 #98
34.8 #280	3-point attempt rate	37.5 #222
30.7 #287	Free throw rate	31.7 #262
Possessions
18.0 #271	Turnover rate	16.7 #175
26.2 #315	Offensive rebound rate	29.3 #224
12.3 #264	Assists per game	13.7 #169
Defense
79.0 #297	Points allowed	79.1 #302
1.10 #220	Points allowed per possession	1.16 #337
53.7 #290	Opponent effective FG%	53.9 #298
34.4 #212	Opponent 3-point %	35.1 #254
17.5 #119	Turnovers forced	13.3 #348
72.2 #60	Defensive rebound rate	68.4 #233
6.5 #173	Steals per game	5.3 #315
2.9 #250	Blocks per game	3.4 #160

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

Long Beach St

8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 6-14 in conference · Big West Conference

Last five, 2025-26

W@ Hawai'i84–75
Lvs UC Davis70–76
W@ Bakersfield88–87
L@ Cal Poly92–102
Lvs CSU Northridge76–78

A week or more of rest.

Utah

10-22 in 2025-26 overall · 2-17 in conference · Big 12 Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Cincinnati66–73
L@ Baylor75–101
Lvs Colorado78–92
L@ Arizona St60–73
Lvs Iowa State59–75

A week or more of rest.