Draddy Gymnasium · at Manhattan · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | MAN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SPU 73–71 · win probability SPU 55%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 143.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SPU has more of the edges
SPU 4, MAN 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: SPU 35.5, MAN 34.0. Allowed: SPU 46.4, MAN 25.7
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SPU 37.0%, MAN 28.6%. Defensive: SPU 65.3%, MAN 63.0%
MAN offense vs SPU defense
Offense 301st of 366 against a defense 182nd, on the model’s ratings
Shooting
Effective FG%: SPU 46.4 and allows 48.1; MAN 47.9 and allows 53.9
Three-pointers
SPU hits 31.0% and allows 32.1%; MAN hits 32.0% and allows 36.6%. Threes are 38.8% and 37.1% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: SPU plays 66.1 a game (308th fastest), MAN 69.0 (182nd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
MAN at home. This season: MAN 0-0 at home, SPU 0-0 away
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SPU 32%, MAN 10%. Transfers in: SPU 5, MAN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
SPU offense vs MAN defense
Offense 335th of 366 against a defense 346th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SPU 17.7%, MAN 15.6%. Forced: SPU 20.0%, MAN 16.6%
Context
Schedule so far
SPU has played the 334th-hardest schedule, MAN the 336th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | SPU -1.4 | — |
| Total | — | 143.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | SPU 72.6 · MAN 71.2 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SPU -0.9 | — |
| 1H total | 67.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | SPU 34.1 · MAN 33.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | |
| 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 10 since 2021-22
SPU 7–3 MANSPU leads · 10 games since 2021-22 · SPU has won the last 2 meetings · SPU 8-2 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2025-26 | MAN 65 @ SPU 75 | SPU -7.5 | SPU W |
| Feb 5, 2025-26 | SPU 80 @ MAN 75 | MAN +4.5 | SPU W |
| Feb 8, 2024-25 | SPU 83 @ MAN 84 | MAN -4.5 | SPU W |
| Dec 6, 2024-25 | MAN 70 @ SPU 67 | SPU -8.5 | MAN W |
| Mar 3, 2023-24 | MAN 57 @ SPU 89 | SPU -12.5 | SPU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Saint Peter's
28 games played
Straight up
16-12
57% wins
Against the spread
17-11
61% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
10-18
36% overs · avg −0.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 50-77 | +13.5 | L −13.5 | 129.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 93-83 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 61-78 | +20.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 70-81 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 68-66 | -8.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 134 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 61-87 | -3.5 | L −29.5 | 144.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 69-57 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 129.5 | U 126 |
| Dec 7 | vs | W 71-43 | -5.5 | W +22.5 | 131.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 68-76 | +20.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 70-66 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 69-59 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 133.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 9 | @ | L 65-70 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 76-63 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 133.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 74-70 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 69-58 | -10.5 | W +0.5 | 134.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 77-63 | -3.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 59-67 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 134.5 | U 126 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 66-58 | -5.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | U 124 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 78-81 | -7.5 | L −10.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 5 | @ | W 80-75 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 70-65 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 13 | @ | L 71-78 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-74 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 20 | @ | L 64-72 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 22 | @ | L 63-72 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 135.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 27 | vs | W 75-65 | -7.5 | W +2.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 63-56 | +4.5 | W +11.5 | 132.5 | U 119 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 55-74 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 137.5 | U 129 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
HALL
L 50-77
−13.5
8
vs
FDU
W 93-83
+3.5
12
@
VCU
L 61-78
+3.5
18
@
DEL
L 70-81
−6.5
22
vs
UML
W 68-66
−6.5
29
vs
DART
L 61-87
−29.5
5
vs
CAN
W 69-57
+2.5
7
vs
NIA
W 71-43
+22.5
13
@
GTWN
L 68-76
+12.5
29
@
FAIR
W 70-66
+6.5
2
vs
MRST
W 69-59
+12.5
9
@
MSM
L 65-70
−6.5
11
vs
MRMK
W 76-63
+11.5
14
@
QUIN
W 74-70
+10.5
17
vs
RID
W 69-58
+0.5
19
vs
IONA
W 77-63
+10.5
24
@
MRMK
L 59-67
−5.5
30
vs
MSM
W 66-58
+2.5
1
@
RID
L 78-81
−10.5
5
@
MAN
W 80-75
+0.5
7
vs
SIE
W 70-65
+6.5
13
@
SHU
L 71-78
−8.5
15
vs
FAIR
W 83-74
+5.5
20
@
IONA
L 64-72
−6.5
22
@
SIE
L 63-72
−3.5
27
vs
MAN
W 75-65
+2.5
1
@
MRST
W 63-56
+11.5
6
vs
FAIR
L 55-74
−20.5
covered 17didn’t cover 11avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
HALL
L 50-77
−2.5
8
vs
FDU
W 93-83
+38.5
12
@
VCU
L 61-78
−8.5
18
@
DEL
L 70-81
+13.5
22
vs
UML
W 68-66
−13.5
29
vs
DART
L 61-87
+3.5
5
vs
CAN
W 69-57
−3.5
7
vs
NIA
W 71-43
−17.5
13
@
GTWN
L 68-76
+3.5
29
@
FAIR
W 70-66
−4.5
2
vs
MRST
W 69-59
−5.5
9
@
MSM
L 65-70
−6.5
11
vs
MRMK
W 76-63
+5.5
14
@
QUIN
W 74-70
+3.5
17
vs
RID
W 69-58
−7.5
19
vs
IONA
W 77-63
−1.5
24
@
MRMK
L 59-67
−8.5
30
vs
MSM
W 66-58
−14.5
1
@
RID
L 78-81
+22.5
5
@
MAN
W 80-75
+10.5
7
vs
SIE
W 70-65
−0.5
13
@
SHU
L 71-78
+1.5
15
vs
FAIR
W 83-74
+15.5
20
@
IONA
L 64-72
−4.5
22
@
SIE
L 63-72
−0.5
27
vs
MAN
W 75-65
−5.5
1
@
MRST
W 63-56
−13.5
6
vs
FAIR
L 55-74
−8.5
over 10under 18avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Manhattan
31 games played
Straight up
11-20
35% wins
Against the spread
11-20
35% covers · avg −3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
13-18
42% overs · avg +2.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9 | @ | L 83-114 | +28.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 79-75 | +2.5 | W +6.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 56-86 | +15.5 | L −14.5 | 156.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 80-73 | -20.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 68-109 | +23.5 | L −17.5 | 162.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 101-103 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | O 204 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 78-81 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 70-66 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 155.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 68-80 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 53-82 | +8.5 | L −20.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 68-75 | +10.5 | W +3.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 87-81 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 138.5 | O 168 |
| Dec 29 | @ | W 74-71 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 80-79 | +7.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 159 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 66-73 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 9 | vs | L 64-70 | -7.5 | L −13.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 11 | vs | W 79-70 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 140.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 62-98 | +6.5 | L −29.5 | 158.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 59-74 | +6.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 92-98 | +13.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 190 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 57-66 | +7.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 30 | vs | W 95-90 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | O 185 |
| Feb 1 | @ | L 65-72 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 75-80 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 80-68 | +1.5 | W +13.5 | 161.5 | U 148 |
| Feb 13 | @ | W 76-69 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 136.5 | O 145 |
| Feb 15 | @ | W 69-65 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 20 | vs | L 70-84 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 27 | @ | L 65-75 | +7.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 140 |
| Mar 1 | vs | L 65-69 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 5 | vs | L 60-71 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
9
@
USC
L 83-114
−2.5
12
vs
UTU
W 79-75
+6.5
14
@
HAW
L 56-86
−14.5
15
vs
MVSU
W 80-73
−13.5
21
@
TA&M
L 68-109
−17.5
26
vs
WAG
L 101-103
−4.5
29
@
ARMY
L 78-81
−4.5
5
vs
FAIR
W 70-66
+5.5
7
@
MRST
L 68-80
−4.5
13
@
FOR
L 53-82
−20.5
18
vs
FUR
L 68-75
+3.5
21
vs
PRES
W 87-81
+8.5
29
@
RID
W 74-71
+0.5
2
vs
QUIN
W 80-79
+8.5
4
@
MRMK
L 66-73
−0.5
9
vs
CAN
L 64-70
−13.5
11
vs
NIA
W 79-70
+3.5
14
@
FAIR
L 62-98
−29.5
17
vs
SIE
L 59-74
−8.5
19
@
QUIN
L 92-98
+7.5
24
@
IONA
L 57-66
−1.5
30
vs
RID
W 95-90
−0.5
1
@
MSM
L 65-72
−0.5
5
vs
SPU
L 75-80
−0.5
7
vs
SHU
W 80-68
+13.5
13
@
NIA
W 76-69
+4.5
15
@
CAN
W 69-65
+2.5
20
vs
MRST
L 70-84
−8.5
27
@
SPU
L 65-75
−2.5
1
vs
IONA
L 65-69
−1.5
5
vs
FAIR
L 60-71
−7.5
covered 11didn’t cover 20avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
9
@
USC
L 83-114
+41.5
12
vs
UTU
W 79-75
−4.5
14
@
HAW
L 56-86
−14.5
15
vs
MVSU
W 80-73
−1.5
21
@
TA&M
L 68-109
+14.5
26
vs
WAG
L 101-103
+59.5
29
@
ARMY
L 78-81
+6.5
5
vs
FAIR
W 70-66
−19.5
7
@
MRST
L 68-80
+7.5
13
@
FOR
L 53-82
−12.5
18
vs
FUR
L 68-75
−11.5
21
vs
PRES
W 87-81
+29.5
29
@
RID
W 74-71
−2.5
2
vs
QUIN
W 80-79
−0.5
4
@
MRMK
L 66-73
−9.5
9
vs
CAN
L 64-70
−11.5
11
vs
NIA
W 79-70
+8.5
14
@
FAIR
L 62-98
+1.5
17
vs
SIE
L 59-74
−11.5
19
@
QUIN
L 92-98
+36.5
24
@
IONA
L 57-66
−30.5
30
vs
RID
W 95-90
+39.5
1
@
MSM
L 65-72
−10.5
5
vs
SPU
L 75-80
+10.5
7
vs
SHU
W 80-68
−13.5
13
@
NIA
W 76-69
+8.5
15
@
CAN
W 69-65
−8.5
20
vs
MRST
L 70-84
+11.5
27
@
SPU
L 65-75
−5.5
1
vs
IONA
L 65-69
−17.5
5
vs
FAIR
L 60-71
−17.5
over 13under 18avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Saint Peter's 0, Manhattan 0, even 5
Saint Peter'sBetterManhattan
G B. Wilson TR9.7 pts · 4.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 29
=Even
G B. Tweedy TR9 pts · 3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 29
G B. Eaton11.2 pts · 3 reb · 3.9 ast
Score 56
=Even
G J. Sabino TR7.1 pts · 4.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 53
G E. Perkins4 pts · 3 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 9
=Even
G Q. Elliott3.6 pts · 1.2 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 17
G S. Simpson3.1 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G J. Delaney0.4 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
F T. Patterson TR1.4 pts · 1.6 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F O. Stankovic TR1.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Not ranked
Saint Peter'sBetterManhattan
SPU offense335th of 366 · -11.0
=Even
MAN defense346th of 366 · -9.3
SPU defense182nd of 366 · -4.1
←SPUSmall
MAN offense301st of 366 · -9.4
Backcourt-6.2 · 4 players
→MANSmall
Backcourt-4.3 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
Bench-1.1 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-0.5 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestSPU betterMAN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Wilson28 min · TRB. Eaton28 minE. Perkins26 minS. Simpson11 minP. Glassnor6 min · TRK. WalkerNew
Forwards
T. Patterson8 min · TRB. Tshilobo2 min · TRA. WatsonNewX. ThomasNewJ. MathewsNew
Centers
J. Noudjihidi7 min · TR
Guards
B. Tweedy30 min · TRJ. Sabino21 min · TRQ. Elliott12 minJ. Delaney5 minA. Miguel4 minB. PearceNew
Forwards
O. Stankovic6 min · TRK. Kearney4 min · TRL. McChesney3 min · TRI. JohnsonNewD. EricNewN. ManojlovicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.2 #296 | Points per game | 72.4 #232 |
| 1.05 #252 | Points per possession | 1.05 #247 |
| 66.1 #308 | Pace (possessions) | 69.0 #182 |
| Shooting | ||
| 46.4 #347 | Effective FG% | 47.9 #315 |
| 31.0 #321 | 3-point % | 32.0 #280 |
| 38.8 #197 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.1 #228 |
| 35.5 #163 | Free throw rate | 34.0 #208 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.7 #251 | Turnover rate | 15.6 #112 |
| 37.0 #16 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.6 #247 |
| 12.5 #253 | Assists per game | 12.3 #268 |
| Defense | ||
| 69.1 #48 | Points allowed | 79.6 #309 |
| 1.04 #78 | Points allowed per possession | 1.15 #330 |
| 48.1 #39 | Opponent effective FG% | 53.9 #297 |
| 32.1 #68 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.6 #332 |
| 20.0 #23 | Turnovers forced | 16.6 #175 |
| 65.3 #330 | Defensive rebound rate | 63.0 #358 |
| 8.8 #13 | Steals per game | 7.8 #54 |
| 3.9 #92 | Blocks per game | 2.3 #325 |
Saint Peter's
16-12 in 2025-26 overall · 14-7 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Fairfield55–74
- W@ Marist63–56
- Wvs Manhattan75–65
- L@ Siena63–72
- L@ Iona64–72
A week or more of rest.
Manhattan
11-20 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · Metro Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Fairfield60–71
- Lvs Iona65–69
- L@ Saint Peter's65–75
- Lvs Marist70–84
- W@ Canisius69–65
A week or more of rest.