Schar Center · at Elon
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ELON | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ELON 79–72 · win probability ELON 71%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ELON has more of the edges
UNCG 1, ELON 3 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNCG 42.0, ELON 33.5. Allowed: UNCG 30.6, ELON 34.6
ELON offense vs UNCG defense
Offense 225th of 366 against a defense 299th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
UNCG has played the 256th-hardest schedule, ELON the 186th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Home court
ELON at home. This season: ELON 0-0 at home, UNCG 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNCG 5%, ELON 30%. Transfers in: UNCG 6, ELON 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNCG 15.0%, ELON 16.0%. Forced: UNCG 13.6%, ELON 16.4%
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNCG 28.1%, ELON 32.3%. Defensive: UNCG 71.0%, ELON 66.5%
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNCG 52.0 and allows 56.2; ELON 52.2 and allows 54.0
Even
UNCG offense vs ELON defense
Offense 260th of 366 against a defense 235th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Three-pointers
UNCG hits 35.6% and allows 38.0%; ELON hits 34.3% and allows 36.5%. Threes are 40.2% and 43.2% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: UNCG plays 69.3 a game (157th fastest), ELON 69.0 (178th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | ELON -6.4 | — |
| Total | — | 151.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNCG 72.3 · ELON 78.8 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | ELON -3.7 | — |
| 1H total | 70.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNCG 33.5 · ELON 37.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | |
| 1-9 10% | 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNCG 3–2 ELONUNCG leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · ELON has won the last 2 meetings · UNCG 1-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2025-26 | ELON 92 @ UNCG 90 | UNCG -4.5 | ELON W |
| Dec 21, 2024-25 | UNCG 69 @ ELON 73 | ELON +1.5 | ELON W |
| Dec 10, 2023-24 | ELON 73 @ UNCG 82 | UNCG -13.5 | ELON W |
| Dec 3, 2022-23 | UNCG 65 @ ELON 61 | ELON +7.5 | ELON W |
| Nov 30, 2021-22 | ELON 61 @ UNCG 74 | UNCG -4 | UNCG W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
UNC Greensboro
32 games played
Straight up
13-19
41% wins
Against the spread
13-19
41% covers · avg −1.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
22-10
69% overs · avg +8.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 64-93 | +18.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 90-92 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 64-110 | +30.5 | L −15.5 | 153.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 15 | vs | L 63-69 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 94-101 | +7.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | O 195 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 68-62 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 60-73 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 71-82 | +10.5 | L −0.5 | 150.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 82-78 | +7.5 | W +11.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 65-71 | -6.5 | L −12.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 77-72 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 89-82 | +2.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 85-97 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 153.5 | O 182 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 60-86 | +11.5 | L −14.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 69-66 | -9.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 92-102 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 194 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 85-78 | -2.5 | W +4.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 23 | vs | L 66-89 | +4.5 | L −18.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 77-95 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 158.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 66-71 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 81-78 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 155.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 8 | @ | W 67-64 | +10.5 | W +13.5 | 149.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 92-71 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 99-89 | +2.5 | W +12.5 | 154.5 | O 188 |
| Feb 18 | @ | L 77-91 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 75-87 | +6.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 85-80 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 157.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 78-87 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 156.5 | O 165 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 84-70 | -7.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 154 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 75-72 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 75-81 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
KSU
L 64-93
−10.5
8
vs
ELON
L 90-92
−6.5
12
@
NCSU
L 64-110
−15.5
15
vs
APSU
L 63-69
−7.5
20
@
QUC
L 94-101
+0.5
23
vs
YSU
W 68-62
+11.5
25
vs
DEL
L 60-73
−14.5
26
vs
M-OH
L 71-82
−0.5
2
vs
UNCA
L 77-82
−0.5
6
@
ECU
W 82-78
+11.5
16
vs
NCAT
L 65-71
−12.5
1
vs
UTC
W 77-72
+7.5
3
vs
SAM
W 89-82
+9.5
7
@
WOF
L 85-97
−4.5
10
@
ETSU
L 60-86
−14.5
15
vs
CIT
W 69-66
−6.5
17
vs
MER
L 92-102
−4.5
21
@
VMI
W 85-78
+4.5
23
vs
FUR
L 66-89
−18.5
29
@
MER
L 77-95
−7.5
31
@
CIT
L 66-71
−7.5
4
vs
WCU
W 81-78
+4.5
8
@
FUR
W 67-64
+13.5
11
vs
VMI
W 92-71
+12.5
14
vs
WOF
W 99-89
+12.5
18
@
WCU
L 77-91
−8.5
21
vs
ETSU
L 75-87
−5.5
26
@
UTC
W 85-80
+9.5
28
@
SAM
L 78-87
−0.5
6
vs
VMI
W 84-70
+6.5
7
vs
WOF
W 75-72
+7.5
8
vs
FUR
L 75-81
−0.5
covered 13didn’t cover 19avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
KSU
L 64-93
+8.5
8
vs
ELON
L 90-92
+39.5
12
@
NCSU
L 64-110
+20.5
15
vs
APSU
L 63-69
−13.5
20
@
QUC
L 94-101
+44.5
23
vs
YSU
W 68-62
−22.5
25
vs
DEL
L 60-73
−9.5
26
vs
M-OH
L 71-82
+2.5
2
vs
UNCA
L 77-82
+15.5
6
@
ECU
W 82-78
+20.5
16
vs
NCAT
L 65-71
−11.5
1
vs
UTC
W 77-72
+1.5
3
vs
SAM
W 89-82
+19.5
7
@
WOF
L 85-97
+28.5
10
@
ETSU
L 60-86
−2.5
15
vs
CIT
W 69-66
−13.5
17
vs
MER
L 92-102
+38.5
21
@
VMI
W 85-78
+11.5
23
vs
FUR
L 66-89
+4.5
29
@
MER
L 77-95
+13.5
31
@
CIT
L 66-71
−10.5
4
vs
WCU
W 81-78
+3.5
8
@
FUR
W 67-64
−18.5
11
vs
VMI
W 92-71
+12.5
14
vs
WOF
W 99-89
+33.5
18
@
WCU
L 77-91
+12.5
21
vs
ETSU
L 75-87
+13.5
26
@
UTC
W 85-80
+7.5
28
@
SAM
L 78-87
+8.5
6
vs
VMI
W 84-70
−0.5
7
vs
WOF
W 75-72
−8.5
8
vs
FUR
L 75-81
+8.5
over 22under 10avg +8.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Elon
30 games played
Straight up
12-18
40% wins
Against the spread
11-19
37% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-14
53% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 92-90 | +4.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | O 182 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 89-96 | +8.5 | W +1.5 | 155.5 | O 185 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 95-84 | -13.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 72-99 | +19.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 24 | @ | W 88-53 | +5.5 | W +40.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 84-91 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 159.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 88-97 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 153.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 73-52 | +4.5 | W +25.5 | 161.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 85-79 | -11.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 73-70 | +3.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 20 | @ | L 81-82 | +12.5 | W +11.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 103-91 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 81-85 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 155.5 | O 166 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 83-82 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 161.5 | O 165 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 78-85 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 89-85 | +5.5 | W +9.5 | 149.5 | O 174 |
| Jan 22 | vs | L 59-72 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 70-80 | +3.5 | L −6.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 79-76 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 169.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 68-72 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 140 |
| Feb 5 | @ | L 79-87 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 77-82 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 54-65 | +8.5 | L −2.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 81-78 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 165.5 | U 159 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 82-102 | -7.5 | L −27.5 | 151.5 | O 184 |
| Feb 26 | @ | L 56-58 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 114 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 57-73 | +3.5 | L −12.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 3 | vs | L 57-76 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 62-72 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 163.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
UNCG
W 92-90
+6.5
12
@
MRSH
L 89-96
+1.5
15
vs
GWEB
W 95-84
−2.5
20
@
MIA
L 72-99
−7.5
24
@
APP
W 88-53
+40.5
29
vs
MER
L 84-91
−9.5
3
vs
FUR
L 88-97
−7.5
6
@
WOF
W 73-52
+25.5
13
vs
NIU
W 85-79
−5.5
17
vs
RICH
W 73-70
+6.5
20
@
VT
L 81-82
+11.5
29
vs
NE
W 103-91
+7.5
31
vs
COFC
L 81-85
−6.5
8
@
NCAT
W 69-64
−1.5
10
vs
CAM
W 83-82
−3.5
15
@
NE
L 78-85
−10.5
17
@
HOF
W 89-85
+9.5
22
vs
TOW
L 59-72
−14.5
24
@
COFC
L 70-80
−6.5
29
vs
W&M
W 79-76
+4.5
31
vs
STBK
L 68-72
−8.5
5
@
HAMP
L 79-87
−9.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-82
−9.5
12
@
UNCW
L 54-65
−2.5
14
@
W&M
W 81-78
+11.5
21
vs
NCAT
L 82-102
−27.5
26
@
TOW
L 56-58
+3.5
28
@
MONM
L 57-73
−12.5
3
vs
UNCW
L 57-76
−14.5
7
vs
W&M
L 62-72
−4.5
covered 11didn’t cover 19avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
UNCG
W 92-90
+39.5
12
@
MRSH
L 89-96
+29.5
15
vs
GWEB
W 95-84
+24.5
20
@
MIA
L 72-99
+6.5
24
@
APP
W 88-53
−2.5
29
vs
MER
L 84-91
+15.5
3
vs
FUR
L 88-97
+31.5
6
@
WOF
W 73-52
−36.5
13
vs
NIU
W 85-79
+7.5
17
vs
RICH
W 73-70
−18.5
20
@
VT
L 81-82
+4.5
29
vs
NE
W 103-91
+40.5
31
vs
COFC
L 81-85
+10.5
8
@
NCAT
W 69-64
−25.5
10
vs
CAM
W 83-82
+3.5
15
@
NE
L 78-85
+5.5
17
@
HOF
W 89-85
+24.5
22
vs
TOW
L 59-72
−14.5
24
@
COFC
L 70-80
−9.5
29
vs
W&M
W 79-76
−14.5
31
vs
STBK
L 68-72
−8.5
5
@
HAMP
L 79-87
+23.5
7
vs
DREX
L 77-82
+22.5
12
@
UNCW
L 54-65
−30.5
14
@
W&M
W 81-78
−6.5
21
vs
NCAT
L 82-102
+32.5
26
@
TOW
L 56-58
−30.5
28
@
MONM
L 57-73
−20.5
3
vs
UNCW
L 57-76
−12.5
7
vs
W&M
L 62-72
−29.5
over 16under 14avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UNC Greensboro has the better starters
Position by position: UNC Greensboro 2, Elon 1, even 2
UNC GreensboroBetterElon
G B. Stacker TR11.9 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 47
←UNCGSmall
G R. Pettus11 pts · 3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 28
G C. Grant TR2.2 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 9
→ELONBig
G B. Cokley12.4 pts · 3.9 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 60
F Z. Fitch TR6.1 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 31
←UNCGSmall
G I. Mbeng TR4.5 pts · 2.1 reb · 2.6 ast
Score 12
F V. Collins TR1 pts · 3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Thrower TR5.9 pts · 1.7 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 33
F A. Beljan TR2.2 pts · 0.8 reb · 0.2 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F J. Dalton TR3.4 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 38
UNC GreensboroBetterElon
UNCG offense260th of 366 · -8.0
=Even
ELON defense235th of 366 · -6.2
UNCG defense299th of 366 · -7.7
→ELONSmall
ELON offense225th of 366 · -6.9
Backcourt-2.1 · 2 players
←UNCGBig
Backcourt-5.7 · 4 players
Frontcourt-1.9 · 3 players
→ELONSmall
Frontcourt-0.5 · 1 player
Bench-0.5 · 3 players
=Even
Bench-0.7 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestUNCG betterELON betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
B. Stacker29 min · TRC. Grant11 min · TRC. Bailey6 minR. Greer6 min · TRB. MishakNewJ. ManiNew
Forwards
Z. Fitch23 min · TRV. Collins7 min · TRA. Beljan7 min · TRC. Bynum4 minC. LaFrentzNew
Guards
R. Pettus28 minB. Cokley27 minI. Mbeng23 min · TRC. Thrower17 min · TRR. Villar12 min · TRK. DixonNew
Forwards
J. Dalton13 min · TRI. Garmendia3 minA. Olander1 minM. ŠarenacNewB. SehlhorstNewC. ZhuNew
Centers
H. Harding7 min · TR
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.6 #128 | Points per game | 76.8 #123 |
| 1.11 #125 | Points per possession | 1.12 #111 |
| 69.3 #157 | Pace (possessions) | 69.0 #178 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.0 #146 | Effective FG% | 52.2 #137 |
| 35.6 #80 | 3-point % | 34.3 #154 |
| 40.2 #165 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.2 #107 |
| 42.0 #31 | Free throw rate | 33.5 #222 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.0 #63 | Turnover rate | 16.0 #136 |
| 28.1 #259 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.3 #116 |
| 12.1 #283 | Assists per game | 14.6 #108 |
| Defense | ||
| 81.9 #341 | Points allowed | 79.3 #307 |
| 1.18 #347 | Points allowed per possession | 1.14 #316 |
| 56.2 #347 | Opponent effective FG% | 54.0 #300 |
| 38.0 #357 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.5 #328 |
| 13.6 #343 | Turnovers forced | 16.4 #196 |
| 71.0 #104 | Defensive rebound rate | 66.5 #307 |
| 5.5 #301 | Steals per game | 6.6 #157 |
| 1.9 #350 | Blocks per game | 3.0 #231 |
UNC Greensboro
13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Furman75–81
- Wvs Wofford75–72
- Wvs VMI84–70
- L@ Samford78–87
- W@ Chattanooga85–80
A week or more of rest.
Elon
12-18 in 2025-26 overall · 6-13 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs William & Mary62–72
- Lvs UNC Wilmington57–76
- L@ Monmouth57–73
- L@ Towson56–58
- Lvs NC A&T82–102
A week or more of rest.