VyStar Arena · at Kennesaw St
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | KENN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects KENN 80–73 · win probability KENN 71%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 153.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: APSU has more of the edges
APSU 3, KENN 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Context
Schedule so far
APSU has played the 318th-hardest schedule, KENN the 156th. A record against a soft schedule means less
KENN offense vs APSU defense
Offense 126th of 366 against a defense 240th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: APSU 15.4%, KENN 16.8%. Forced: APSU 17.9%, KENN 16.0%
Free throws
Free throw rate: APSU 37.6, KENN 45.1. Allowed: APSU 32.8, KENN 47.1
Three-pointers
APSU hits 35.3% and allows 33.2%; KENN hits 33.4% and allows 33.5%. Threes are 38.0% and 42.5% of their shots
Home court
KENN at home. This season: KENN 0-0 at home, APSU 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: APSU plays 70.1 a game (114th fastest), KENN 72.4 (27th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: APSU 53.0 and allows 52.2; KENN 50.4 and allows 48.3
Even
APSU offense vs KENN defense
Offense 174th of 366 against a defense 193rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: APSU 29.7%, KENN 35.2%. Defensive: APSU 71.1%, KENN 68.4%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: APSU 30%, KENN 32%. Transfers in: APSU 2, KENN 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | KENN -6.3 | — |
| Total | — | 153.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | APSU 73.4 · KENN 79.7 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | KENN -3.6 | — |
| 1H total | 71.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | APSU 34 · KENN 37.6 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
APSU 1–1 KENNSeries tied · 2 games since 2021-22 · APSU 1-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2023-24 | KENN 69 @ APSU 85 | APSU +1.5 | APSU W |
| Jan 26, 2022-23 | APSU 57 @ KENN 84 | KENN -10.5 | KENN W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Austin Peay
29 games played
Straight up
20-9
69% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-15
48% overs · avg +2.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 74-54 | -1.5 | W +18.5 | 136.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 65-79 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 69-63 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 65-72 | +20.5 | W +13.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 75-84 | +8.5 | L −0.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 77-59 | -6.5 | W +11.5 | 147.5 | U 136 |
| Dec 3 | @ | L 84-96 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | O 180 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 50-63 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 151.5 | U 113 |
| Dec 12 | vs | W 76-75 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 102-83 | -15.5 | W +3.5 | 162.5 | O 185 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 71-68 | -10.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 8 | @ | W 82-71 | +3.5 | W +14.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 81-69 | -9.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 74-72 | -7.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 78-82 | +2.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 83-62 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 73-65 | -16.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 28 | @ | W 90-82 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 151.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 81-78 | -7.5 | L −4.5 | 150.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 87-76 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 156.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 91-62 | -12.5 | W +16.5 | 145.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 95-87 | +2.5 | W +10.5 | 161.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 90-70 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 19 | @ | W 77-76 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 166.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 65-61 | -6.5 | L −2.5 | 142.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 88-93 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 152.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 97-111 | -5.5 | L −19.5 | 153.5 | O 208 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 69-60 | -11.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 129 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 83-90 | -2.5 | L −9.5 | 161.5 | O 173 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
AF
W 74-54
+18.5
11
@
WYO
L 65-79
−8.5
15
@
UNCG
W 69-63
+7.5
18
@
MISS
L 65-72
+13.5
21
@
TLSA
L 75-84
−0.5
25
vs
NIU
W 77-59
+11.5
3
@
KENT
L 84-96
−3.5
7
@
RGV
L 50-63
−10.5
12
vs
ETSU
W 76-75
+4.5
1
vs
UNF
W 102-83
+3.5
3
vs
JAX
W 71-68
−7.5
8
@
FGCU
W 82-71
+14.5
10
@
STET
W 81-69
+2.5
15
vs
EKU
W 74-72
−5.5
17
@
LIP
L 78-82
−1.5
22
vs
FGCU
W 83-62
+14.5
23
vs
STET
W 73-65
−8.5
28
@
EKU
W 90-82
+5.5
31
@
WGA
W 81-78
−4.5
4
vs
LIP
W 87-76
+6.5
7
vs
UNA
W 91-62
+16.5
11
@
QUC
W 95-87
+10.5
14
vs
BELL
W 90-70
+10.5
19
@
UNF
W 77-76
−10.5
21
@
JAX
W 65-61
−2.5
25
vs
CARK
L 88-93
−9.5
28
@
BELL
L 97-111
−19.5
6
vs
STET
W 69-60
−2.5
7
vs
QUC
L 83-90
−9.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
AF
W 74-54
−8.5
11
@
WYO
L 65-79
−9.5
15
@
UNCG
W 69-63
−13.5
18
@
MISS
L 65-72
−8.5
21
@
TLSA
L 75-84
+10.5
25
vs
NIU
W 77-59
−11.5
3
@
KENT
L 84-96
+26.5
7
@
RGV
L 50-63
−38.5
12
vs
ETSU
W 76-75
+7.5
1
vs
UNF
W 102-83
+22.5
3
vs
JAX
W 71-68
−1.5
8
@
FGCU
W 82-71
−0.5
10
@
STET
W 81-69
−0.5
15
vs
EKU
W 74-72
−7.5
17
@
LIP
L 78-82
+4.5
22
vs
FGCU
W 83-62
−10.5
23
vs
STET
W 73-65
−10.5
28
@
EKU
W 90-82
+20.5
31
@
WGA
W 81-78
+8.5
4
vs
LIP
W 87-76
+6.5
7
vs
UNA
W 91-62
+7.5
11
@
QUC
W 95-87
+20.5
14
vs
BELL
W 90-70
+6.5
19
@
UNF
W 77-76
−13.5
21
@
JAX
W 65-61
−16.5
25
vs
CARK
L 88-93
+28.5
28
@
BELL
L 97-111
+54.5
6
vs
STET
W 69-60
−24.5
7
vs
QUC
L 83-90
+11.5
over 14under 15avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Kennesaw St
32 games played
Straight up
18-14
56% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-17
47% overs · avg +0.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | W 92-72 | -11.5 | W +8.5 | 166.5 | U 164 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 89-108 | +7.5 | L −11.5 | 177.5 | O 197 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 89-84 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 159.5 | O 173 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 83-91 | -8.5 | L −16.5 | 166.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 26 | @ | W 102-100 | +1.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | O 202 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 88-73 | -15.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 92-69 | -14.5 | W +8.5 | 158.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 67-68 | +3.5 | W +2.5 | 160.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 81-92 | +20.5 | W +9.5 | 182.5 | U 173 |
| Jan 2 | @ | L 73-81 | +7.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 52-67 | -8.5 | L −23.5 | 148.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 90-80 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 88-82 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 149.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 89-86 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 175.5 | U 175 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 81-65 | +7.5 | W +23.5 | 165.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 87-93 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 167.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 23 | @ | L 76-82 | -1.5 | L −7.5 | 144.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 72-69 | -4.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 76-53 | -3.5 | W +19.5 | 159.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 58-77 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 149.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 87-90 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 148.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 79-83 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 162.5 | U 162 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 91-87 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 58-55 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 147.5 | U 113 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 74-65 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 90-82 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | O 172 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 71-78 | -3.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | O 149 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 76-79 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 96-87 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 79-73 | +2.5 | W +8.5 | 159.5 | U 152 |
| Mar 14 | vs | W 71-60 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 131 |
| Mar 19 | vs | L 64-73 | +20.5 | W +11.5 | 152.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
FAMU
W 92-72
+8.5
16
vs
USF
L 89-108
−11.5
24
vs
RICE
W 89-84
+0.5
25
vs
ORU
L 83-91
−16.5
26
@
FGCU
W 102-100
+3.5
2
vs
JKST
W 88-73
−0.5
6
vs
GAST
W 92-69
+8.5
17
@
MTSU
L 67-68
+2.5
21
vs
ALA
L 81-92
+9.5
2
@
LIB
L 73-81
−0.5
4
@
DEL
L 52-67
−23.5
7
vs
MOST
W 90-80
+3.5
10
vs
JXST
W 88-82
+0.5
14
vs
FIU
W 89-86
−2.5
17
@
WKU
W 81-65
+23.5
21
@
SHSU
L 87-93
−0.5
23
@
LT
L 76-82
−7.5
28
vs
WKU
W 72-69
−1.5
31
vs
NMSU
W 76-53
+19.5
7
@
JXST
L 58-77
−20.5
12
vs
MTSU
L 87-90
−6.5
14
vs
SHSU
L 79-83
−5.5
18
@
MOST
W 91-87
+5.5
21
vs
LT
W 58-55
−2.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-65
+10.5
28
vs
DEL
W 90-82
−3.5
5
@
UTEP
L 71-78
−10.5
7
@
NMSU
L 76-79
−1.5
12
vs
WKU
W 96-87
+10.5
13
vs
SHSU
W 79-73
+8.5
14
vs
LT
W 71-60
+9.5
19
vs
GONZ
L 64-73
+11.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
FAMU
W 92-72
−2.5
16
vs
USF
L 89-108
+19.5
24
vs
RICE
W 89-84
+13.5
25
vs
ORU
L 83-91
+7.5
26
@
FGCU
W 102-100
+41.5
2
vs
JKST
W 88-73
+3.5
6
vs
GAST
W 92-69
+2.5
17
@
MTSU
L 67-68
−25.5
21
vs
ALA
L 81-92
−9.5
2
@
LIB
L 73-81
−4.5
4
@
DEL
L 52-67
−29.5
7
vs
MOST
W 90-80
+17.5
10
vs
JXST
W 88-82
+20.5
14
vs
FIU
W 89-86
−0.5
17
@
WKU
W 81-65
−19.5
21
@
SHSU
L 87-93
+12.5
23
@
LT
L 76-82
+13.5
28
vs
WKU
W 72-69
−19.5
31
vs
NMSU
W 76-53
−30.5
7
@
JXST
L 58-77
−14.5
12
vs
MTSU
L 87-90
+28.5
14
vs
SHSU
L 79-83
−0.5
18
@
MOST
W 91-87
+25.5
21
vs
LT
W 58-55
−34.5
26
vs
LIB
W 74-65
−13.5
28
vs
DEL
W 90-82
+28.5
5
@
UTEP
L 71-78
+0.5
7
@
NMSU
L 76-79
−2.5
12
vs
WKU
W 96-87
+23.5
13
vs
SHSU
W 79-73
−7.5
14
vs
LT
W 71-60
−11.5
19
vs
GONZ
L 64-73
−15.5
over 15under 17avg +0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Austin Peay has the better starters
Position by position: Austin Peay 2, Kennesaw St 0, even 3
Austin PeayBetterKennesaw St
G Z. Collins13.7 pts · 3.2 reb · 4.2 ast
Score 60
=Even
G J. Hill TR10.1 pts · 3.8 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 53
G C. Love TR7.2 pts · 2.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 44
←APSUSmall
G K. Rickard5.5 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 21
G S. Hugie TR4.4 pts · 2.4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 32
=Even
F T. Simpson8 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 38
G C. Ryans NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F A. Thomas TR8.3 pts · 6.9 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 61
F R. Marshall16.3 pts · 7 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 92
←APSUBig
F A. Enoh TR4.9 pts · 5.1 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 19
Austin PeayBetterKennesaw St
APSU offense174th of 366 · -5.4
=Even
KENN defense193rd of 366 · -4.6
APSU defense240th of 366 · -6.3
→KENNSmall
KENN offense126th of 366 · -3.4
Backcourt-1.7 · 4 players
=Even
Backcourt-2.3 · 2 players
Frontcourt+3.8 · 1 player
←APSUBig
Frontcourt-2.5 · 3 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-0.4 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestAPSU betterKENN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
Z. Collins30 minC. Love25 min · TRS. Hugie12 min · TRC. RyansNewP. SingletonNewT. ToddNew
Forwards
R. Marshall30 minD. BoldenNewA. DavisNew
Guards
J. Hill31 min · TRK. Rickard20 minC. Beaumont9 min · TRK. Parker6 min · TRB. TousignautNewA. DanielsNew
Forwards
T. Simpson26 minA. Thomas25 min · TRA. Enoh23 min · TRA. Taylor17 minD. Onyirimba2 minK. BerryNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 79.0 #79 | Points per game | 80.0 #66 |
| 1.13 #91 | Points per possession | 1.11 #122 |
| 70.1 #114 | Pace (possessions) | 72.4 #27 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.0 #105 | Effective FG% | 50.4 #224 |
| 35.3 #99 | 3-point % | 33.4 #203 |
| 38.0 #215 | 3-point attempt rate | 42.5 #127 |
| 37.6 #110 | Free throw rate | 45.1 #5 |
| Possessions | ||
| 15.4 #94 | Turnover rate | 16.8 #183 |
| 29.7 #214 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.2 #44 |
| 15.3 #76 | Assists per game | 13.3 #189 |
| Defense | ||
| 74.6 #179 | Points allowed | 78.3 #272 |
| 1.06 #119 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #159 |
| 52.2 #227 | Opponent effective FG% | 48.3 #43 |
| 33.2 #137 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.5 #154 |
| 17.9 #103 | Turnovers forced | 16.0 #223 |
| 71.1 #100 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #234 |
| 8.4 #22 | Steals per game | 6.8 #146 |
| 2.2 #329 | Blocks per game | 5.3 #10 |
Austin Peay
20-9 in 2025-26 overall · 16-4 in conference · United Athletic Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Queens University Royals83–90
- Wvs Stetson69–60
- L@ Bellarmine97–111
- Lvs C Arkansas88–93
- W@ Jacksonville65–61
A week or more of rest.
Kennesaw St
18-14 in 2025-26 overall · 13-10 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Gonzaga64–73
- Wvs Louisiana Tech71–60
- Wvs Sam Houston79–73
- Wvs Western KY96–87
- L@ New Mexico St76–79
A week or more of rest.