No games match these filters
Loosen a filter, or start over.
Conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.6
Spread edge
—
model SCST -0.6
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.2
Projected
28–36
✓ DUKE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.0
Projected
30–33
✓ URI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.8
Projected
37–37
✓ TCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
33–37
✓ ND won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
34–33
✓ CAL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
34–34
✗ COLG lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.5
Projected
33–37
✗ ETSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.9
Projected
32–41
✓ MICH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
33–36
✓ ISU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.8
Projected
31–37
✓ NEB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 81.3
Projected
43–38
✓ SJU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.6
Projected
38–42
✓ VAN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
33–36
✓ BU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.3
Projected
33–30
✗ LIU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
33–37
✓ LEM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
35–33
✓ UMBC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.7
Projected
38–31
✓ FUR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
38–32
✗ MER lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.1
Projected
31–38
✓ UNC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.0
Projected
34–35
✗ RICE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.4
Projected
32–37
✓ AMER won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.6
Projected
31–34
✓ UNCA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.5
Projected
45–31
✓ HPU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.5
Projected
36–38
✓ VT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.6
Projected
39–37
✓ SMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
37–34
✗ NDSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
33–37
✓ EMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.1
Projected
37–33
✓ KENT won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.4
Projected
30–32
✗ STO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.9
Projected
34–32
✓ MERC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
33–33
✓ CCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
29–35
✓ UVM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.8
Projected
37–41
✗ W&M lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.8
Projected
33–39
✓ CARK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
33–39
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.8
Projected
34–30
✓ LIB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.5
Projected
34–35
✓ FIU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.0
Projected
37–40
✓ RAD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
35–34
✓ VILL won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
33–40
✓ FLA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
34–37
✓ ORE won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.3
Projected
34–37
✓ LONG won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.6
Projected
36–37
✓ XAV won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.4
Projected
31–31
✗ NJIT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.7
Projected
31–39
✓ TXST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
34–38
✓ ARST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.2
Projected
32–37
✗ UTA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.3
Projected
31–35
✗ MOST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.1
Projected
35–36
✓ JKST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
34–36
✓ ODU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 80.0
Projected
41–39
✓ UGA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
37–36
✓ TNST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.8
Projected
28–40
✓ HOU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.0
Projected
34–43
✓ BYU won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.5
Projected
40–36
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.5
Projected
32–34
✗ CSU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.4
Projected
37–37
✓ DUQ won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
34–37
✗ WAKE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.0
Projected
36–38
✓ NCSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
35–32
✓ UALB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.0
Projected
32–33
✓ UNCW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.6
Projected
32–32
✗ APP lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
36–36
✓ UNCO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.7
Projected
35–39
✓ JAX won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.0
Projected
38–39
✓ QUC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.8
Projected
33–33
✓ TAR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.8
Projected
30–34
✓ NORF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.0
Projected
35–38
✓ ALST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.0
Projected
37–33
✓ BCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.1
Projected
31–32
✓ AMCC won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 62.8
Projected
31–32
✗ NWST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.3
Projected
36–35
✗ NOLA lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 59.6
Projected
30–30
✓ UTM won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
36–37
✓ LIN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.0
Projected
32–31
✗ LR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.1
Projected
29–34
✓ HOW won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
36–33
✓ PUR won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.0
Projected
34–34
✓ LAF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.4
Projected
35–32
✓ LMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.5
Projected
28–38
✗ AAMU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.1
Projected
36–30
✓ GCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.9
Projected
31–38
✓ NCCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 64.7
Projected
28–37
✓ FRES won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
35–37
✓ BGSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
33–36
✓ CMU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.8
Projected
37–36
✗ WOF lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.6
Projected
36–36
✗ UTC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
33–37
✓ UCD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.2
Projected
34–36
✗ UIW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.3
Projected
33–36
✓ IDHO won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
37–38
✓ EWU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
33–34
✗ USI lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 77.4
Projected
38–39
✗ KENN lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 65.4
Projected
33–33
✗ JXST lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
34–34
✗ TXSO lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
39–37
✗ SOU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.7
Projected
34–33
✓ SFA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.2
Projected
34–39
✓ APSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.7
Projected
38–34
✓ VCU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
33–34
✓ UCF won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.2
Projected
33–35
✓ DART won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.3
Projected
34–33
✗ COLU lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.3
Projected
40–39
✗ COR lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
37–30
✓ MCN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.5
Projected
33–38
✓ TENN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.1
Projected
34–40
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.9
Projected
35–32
✗ YALE lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.8
Projected
34–36
✗ MISS lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.5
Projected
36–36
✗ WICH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.0
Projected
39–37
✓ UCSB won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.8
Projected
29–38
✓ CONN won
Half finalNon-conference · Neutral site
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 72.4
Projected
37–36
Half finalNon-conference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.4
Projected
32–39
✓ USU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
39–32
✓ STMN won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.7
Projected
37–33
✓ SDST won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 74.4
Projected
39–36
✗ HAW lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.1
Projected
36–36
✗ SAC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 69.2
Projected
34–35
✓ WKU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 76.1
Projected
39–37
✗ MRSH lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.0
Projected
35–44
✓ ALA won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 79.0
Projected
39–40
✓ ARK won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 71.2
Projected
37–35
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 73.1
Projected
37–36
✓ TEX won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 66.0
Projected
31–35
✓ WASH won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
34–34
✗ MONT lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
35–33
✓ CBU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 68.3
Projected
32–36
✓ SDSU won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 70.6
Projected
33–38
✓ UCI won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 67.6
Projected
30–37
✓ UCSD won
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 63.8
Projected
34–29
✗ SMC lost
Half finalConference
1H spread
—
no 1H line yet
1H total
—
model 75.0
Projected
39–36
✓ GONZ won
| Status | Matchup | Spread | Total | Model line | Spread edge | Model total | Total edge | Win prob | Model | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | — | SCST -0.6 | — | 72.6 | — | 52% SCST | › | |||
| Half final | 20-5 · #35 22-2 · #3 |
— | — | DUKE -8.0 | — | 64.2 | — | 81% DUKE | › | |
| Half final | 10-12 · #100 14-10 · #105 |
— | — | URI -3.2 | — | 63.0 | — | 64% URI | › | |
| Half final | 15-9 · #40 16-8 · #45 |
— | — | TCU -0.1 | — | 73.8 | — | 51% TCU | › | |
| Half final | 11-14 · #94 11-14 · #71 |
— | — | ND -4.4 | — | 70.1 | — | 68% ND | › | |
| Half final | 16-8 · #92 9-15 · #95 |
— | — | CAL -1.4 | — | 66.8 | — | 56% CAL | › | |
| Half final | 18-6 · #199 14-10 · #211 |
— | — | COLG -0.2 | — | 67.3 | — | 51% COLG | › | |
| Half final | 12-12 · #184 17-7 · #173 |
— | — | ETSU -4.2 | — | 69.5 | — | 68% ETSU | › | |
| Half final | 17-7 · #26 23-1 · #8 |
— | — | MICH -9.3 | — | 72.9 | — | 85% MICH | › | |
| Half final | 19-5 · #16 21-3 · #13 |
— | — | ISU -3.2 | — | 68.5 | — | 64% ISU | › | |
| Half final | 10-15 · #59 21-3 · #27 |
— | — | NEB -5.8 | — | 67.8 | — | 74% NEB | › | |
| Half final | 19-5 · #9 11-14 · #52 |
— | — | SJU -4.9 | — | 81.3 | — | 70% SJU | › | |
| Half final | 17-7 · #28 20-4 · #22 |
— | — | VAN -3.5 | — | 79.6 | — | 65% VAN | › | |
| Half final | 8-18 · #299 10-15 · #261 |
— | — | BU -3.1 | — | 68.5 | — | 63% BU | › | |
| Half final | 17-8 · #324 7-15 · #355 |
— | — | LIU -3.0 | — | 62.3 | — | 63% LIU | › | |
| Half final | 5-20 · #362 12-13 · #332 |
— | — | LEM -4.2 | — | 69.3 | — | 68% LEM | › | |
| Half final | 13-8 · #264 6-15 · #286 |
— | — | UMBC -2.3 | — | 68.3 | — | 60% UMBC | › | |
| Half final | 13-10 · #152 3-20 · #320 |
— | — | FUR -6.8 | — | 68.7 | — | 77% FUR | › | |
| Half final | 13-10 · #242 6-17 · #339 |
— | — | MER -6.2 | — | 70.5 | — | 75% MER | › | |
| Half final | 9-16 · #74 19-5 · #44 |
— | — | UNC -7.1 | — | 68.1 | — | 78% UNC | › | |
| Half final | 7-16 · #145 9-14 · #177 |
— | — | RICE -1.8 | — | 69.0 | — | 58% RICE | › | |
| Half final | 8-16 · #288 11-13 · #153 |
— | — | AMER -5.0 | — | 69.4 | — | 71% AMER | › | |
| Half final | 9-14 · #183 9-13 · #271 |
— | — | UNCA -2.7 | — | 64.6 | — | 62% UNCA | › | |
| Half final | 20-4 · #90 1-22 · #348 |
— | — | HPU -14.1 | — | 75.5 | — | 94% HPU | › | |
| Half final | 11-13 · #81 17-8 · #68 |
— | — | VT -2.4 | — | 74.5 | — | 60% VT | › | |
| Half final | 17-7 · #55 14-11 · #63 |
— | — | SMU -1.9 | — | 75.6 | — | 58% SMU | › | |
| Half final | 17-6 · #213 12-13 · #336 |
— | — | NDSU -3.5 | — | 71.3 | — | 65% NDSU | › | |
| Half final | 7-15 · #187 8-16 · #188 |
— | — | EMU -4.0 | — | 69.2 | — | 67% EMU | › | |
| Half final | 16-7 · #151 6-16 · #181 |
— | — | KENT -4.1 | — | 69.1 | — | 67% KENT | › | |
| Half final | 5-15 · #354 7-17 · #349 |
— | — | STO -1.6 | — | 62.4 | — | 57% STO | › | |
| Half final | 10-14 · #331 4-19 · #88 |
— | — | MERC -2.6 | — | 65.9 | — | 61% MERC | › | |
| Half final | 12-10 · #337 7-16 · #356 |
— | — | CCSU -0.0 | — | 66.1 | — | 50% FDU | › | |
| Half final | 6-17 · #290 14-10 · #186 |
— | — | UVM -6.1 | — | 64.7 | — | 75% UVM | › | |
| Half final | 11-13 · #232 14-9 · #217 |
— | — | W&M -3.7 | — | 77.8 | — | 66% W&M | › | |
| Half final | 10-13 · #298 14-10 · #240 |
— | — | CARK -5.7 | — | 71.8 | — | 73% CARK | › | |
| Half final | 7-17 · #303 9-15 · #266 |
— | — | FGCU -6.2 | — | 71.2 | — | 75% FGCU | › | |
| Half final | 18-3 · #160 7-15 · #190 |
— | — | LIB -3.9 | — | 64.8 | — | 66% LIB | › | |
| Half final | 11-10 · #244 8-13 · #178 |
— | — | FIU -1.4 | — | 68.5 | — | 56% FIU | › | |
| Half final | 9-14 · #326 10-13 · #246 |
— | — | RAD -2.4 | — | 77.0 | — | 60% RAD | › | |
| Half final | 19-5 · #32 13-12 · #37 |
— | — | VILL -1.2 | — | 68.2 | — | 55% VILL | › | |
| Half final | 17-7 · #19 18-6 · #1 |
— | — | FLA -6.8 | — | 73.0 | — | 77% FLA | › | |
| Half final | 11-14 · #78 8-16 · #57 |
— | — | ORE -3.0 | — | 70.3 | — | 63% ORE | › | |
| Half final | 8-15 · #325 10-14 · #218 |
— | — | LONG -3.0 | — | 70.3 | — | 63% LONG | › | |
| Half final | 9-16 · #42 12-12 · #49 |
— | — | XAV -0.8 | — | 73.6 | — | 54% XAV | › | |
| Half final | 13-12 · #316 5-20 · #323 |
— | — | NJIT -0.2 | — | 62.4 | — | 51% NJIT | › | |
| Half final | 2-22 · #358 14-11 · #103 |
— | — | TXST -7.9 | — | 70.7 | — | 80% TXST | › | |
| Half final | 16-7 · #228 14-10 · #171 |
— | — | ARST -3.9 | — | 71.6 | — | 66% ARST | › | |
| Half final | 5-17 · #267 12-10 · #257 |
— | — | UTA -5.0 | — | 68.2 | — | 71% UTA | › | |
| Half final | 8-15 · #206 10-11 · #250 |
— | — | MOST -4.2 | — | 65.3 | — | 68% MOST | › | |
| Half final | 7-13 · #327 7-17 · #280 |
— | — | JKST -0.8 | — | 70.1 | — | 53% JKST | › | |
| Half final | 7-17 · #208 7-18 · #234 |
— | — | ODU -2.3 | — | 69.7 | — | 60% ODU | › | |
| Half final | 17-7 · #34 12-12 · #31 |
— | — | UGA -2.3 | — | 80.0 | — | 60% UGA | › | |
| Half final | 14-8 · #245 11-12 · #350 |
— | — | TNST -1.0 | — | 72.4 | — | 54% TNST | › | |
| Half final | 10-14 · #83 22-2 · #2 |
— | — | HOU -12.1 | — | 68.8 | — | 91% HOU | › | |
| Half final | 14-11 · #65 18-6 · #24 |
— | — | BYU -8.2 | — | 77.0 | — | 81% BYU | › | |
| Half final | 18-6 · #14 12-11 · #29 |
— | — | LOU -4.4 | — | 76.5 | — | 68% LOU | › | |
| Half final | 12-11 · #122 13-10 · #87 |
— | — | CSU -1.8 | — | 66.5 | — | 58% CSU | › | |
| Half final | 12-10 · #107 13-10 · #142 |
— | — | DUQ -0.0 | — | 73.4 | — | 50% SBU | › | |
| Half final | 16-9 · #85 12-12 · #89 |
— | — | WAKE -2.6 | — | 71.4 | — | 61% WAKE | › | |
| Half final | 19-5 · #25 18-7 · #48 |
— | — | NCSU -2.2 | — | 74.0 | — | 60% NCSU | › | |
| Half final | 5-17 · #301 2-21 · #272 |
— | — | UALB -2.6 | — | 67.2 | — | 61% UALB | › | |
| Half final | 15-9 · #166 19-4 · #120 |
— | — | UNCW -1.2 | — | 65.0 | — | 55% UNCW | › | |
| Half final | 16-9 · #259 12-13 · #158 |
— | — | APP -0.3 | — | 63.6 | — | 51% APP | › | |
| Half final | 14-6 · #274 13-10 · #219 |
— | — | UNCO -0.4 | — | 71.3 | — | 52% UNCO | › | |
| Half final | 4-20 · #333 7-17 · #223 |
— | — | JAX -4.5 | — | 73.7 | — | 69% JAX | › | |
| Half final | 14-10 · #214 13-12 · #175 |
— | — | QUC -1.1 | — | 77.0 | — | 55% QUC | › | |
| Half final | 8-12 · #185 8-13 · #253 |
— | — | TAR -0.2 | — | 65.8 | — | 51% TAR | › | |
| Half final | 3-16 · #351 7-14 · #319 |
— | — | NORF -4.9 | — | 63.8 | — | 70% NORF | › | |
| Half final | 9-13 · #363 6-17 · #302 |
— | — | ALST -2.4 | — | 73.0 | — | 60% ALST | › | |
| Half final | 12-11 · #202 5-18 · #360 |
— | — | BCU -4.6 | — | 70.0 | — | 69% BCU | › | |
| Half final | 10-13 · #293 9-12 · #238 |
— | — | AMCC -1.1 | — | 63.1 | — | 55% AMCC | › | |
| Half final | 7-17 · #252 5-18 · #318 |
— | — | NWST -0.2 | — | 62.8 | — | 51% NWST | › | |
| Half final | 11-14 · #276 6-17 · #300 |
— | — | NOLA -0.6 | — | 71.3 | — | 53% NOLA | › | |
| Half final | 16-7 · #341 14-9 · #256 |
— | — | UTM -0.2 | — | 59.6 | — | 51% UTM | › | |
| Half final | 12-11 · #306 13-10 · #258 |
— | — | LIN -0.9 | — | 72.4 | — | 54% LIN | › | |
| Half final | 8-16 · #222 7-16 · #361 |
— | — | LR -0.2 | — | 63.0 | — | 51% LR | › | |
| Half final | 6-17 · #364 11-10 · #197 |
— | — | HOW -5.3 | — | 63.1 | — | 72% HOW | › | |
| Half final | 20-4 · #23 18-6 · #43 |
— | — | PUR -2.7 | — | 68.3 | — | 62% PUR | › | |
| Half final | 9-15 · #216 7-18 · #310 |
— | — | LAF -0.7 | — | 68.0 | — | 53% LAF | › | |
| Half final | 12-14 · #121 4-20 · #172 |
— | — | LMU -3.0 | — | 67.4 | — | 63% LMU | › | |
| Half final | 0-23 · #366 10-11 · #328 |
— | — | AAMU -9.6 | — | 65.5 | — | 85% AAMU | › | |
| Half final | 15-9 · #80 5-18 · #143 |
— | — | GCU -6.0 | — | 66.1 | — | 74% GCU | › | |
| Half final | 3-21 · #352 5-13 · #357 |
— | — | NCCU -6.3 | — | 68.9 | — | 75% NCCU | › | |
| Half final | 3-21 · #220 10-13 · #174 |
— | — | FRES -8.9 | — | 64.7 | — | 83% FRES | › | |
| Half final | 11-12 · #157 12-10 · #200 |
— | — | BGSU -1.9 | — | 71.4 | — | 58% BGSU | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #334 5-17 · #270 |
— | — | CMU -2.8 | — | 68.3 | — | 62% CMU | › | |
| Half final | 15-9 · #248 9-15 · #284 |
— | — | WOF -1.6 | — | 72.8 | — | 57% WOF | › | |
| Half final | 7-15 · #215 7-16 · #227 |
— | — | UTC -0.4 | — | 71.6 | — | 52% UTC | › | |
| Half final | 6-17 · #297 13-10 · #182 |
— | — | UCD -3.3 | — | 70.2 | — | 64% UCD | › | |
| Half final | 9-15 · #285 7-15 · #289 |
— | — | UIW -1.6 | — | 70.2 | — | 57% UIW | › | |
| Half final | 7-16 · #344 10-12 · #247 |
— | — | IDHO -3.1 | — | 69.3 | — | 63% IDHO | › | |
| Half final | 11-13 · #313 7-17 · #254 |
— | — | EWU -1.0 | — | 75.0 | — | 54% EWU | › | |
| Half final | 7-16 · #282 3-20 · #304 |
— | — | USI -0.3 | — | 66.9 | — | 51% USI | › | |
| Half final | 13-8 · #189 11-10 · #148 |
— | — | KENN -0.9 | — | 77.4 | — | 54% KENN | › | |
| Half final | 8-13 · #133 10-11 · #198 |
— | — | JXST -0.5 | — | 65.4 | — | 52% JXST | › | |
| Half final | 9-12 · #338 5-15 · #322 |
— | — | TXSO -0.2 | — | 67.3 | — | 51% TXSO | › | |
| Half final | 8-13 · #309 5-15 · #343 |
— | — | SOU -2.0 | — | 76.0 | — | 59% SOU | › | |
| Half final | 20-3 · #193 12-11 · #287 |
— | — | SFA -1.0 | — | 66.7 | — | 54% SFA | › | |
| Half final | 9-14 · #295 16-6 · #210 |
— | — | APSU -4.8 | — | 72.2 | — | 70% APSU | › | |
| Half final | 19-6 · #61 13-11 · #104 |
— | — | VCU -4.0 | — | 72.7 | — | 67% VCU | › | |
| Half final | 15-9 · #47 17-6 · #39 |
— | — | UCF -1.1 | — | 67.6 | — | 55% UCF | › | |
| Half final | 5-15 · #156 8-12 · #251 |
— | — | DART -1.8 | — | 67.2 | — | 58% DART | › | |
| Half final | 12-9 · #170 7-16 · #135 |
— | — | COLU -0.6 | — | 67.3 | — | 52% COLU | › | |
| Half final | 10-10 · #179 11-10 · #137 |
— | — | COR -0.6 | — | 79.3 | — | 53% COR | › | |
| Half final | 18-5 · #127 8-16 · #342 |
— | — | MCN -7.8 | — | 66.9 | — | 80% MCN | › | |
| Half final | 14-10 · #51 17-7 · #7 |
— | — | TENN -5.3 | — | 70.5 | — | 72% TENN | › | |
| Half final | 18-6 · #12 23-1 · #5 |
— | — | ARIZ -5.8 | — | 73.1 | — | 73% ARIZ | › | |
| Half final | 17-4 · #126 13-9 · #136 |
— | — | YALE -3.1 | — | 66.9 | — | 63% YALE | › | |
| Half final | 11-13 · #53 11-13 · #46 |
— | — | MISS -2.0 | — | 69.8 | — | 59% MISS | › | |
| Half final | 18-5 · #108 14-10 · #77 |
— | — | WICH -0.3 | — | 71.5 | — | 51% WICH | › | |
| Half final | 15-8 · #134 8-16 · #164 |
— | — | UCSB -2.4 | — | 76.0 | — | 60% UCSB | › | |
| Half final | 13-11 · #64 23-2 · #6 |
— | — | CONN -9.6 | — | 66.8 | — | 85% CONN | › | |
| Half final | 21-3 · #20 16-8 · #33 |
— | — | UVA -0.5 | — | 72.4 | — | 52% UVA | › | |
| Half final | 12-12 · #76 20-3 · #58 |
— | — | USU -6.5 | — | 71.4 | — | 76% USU | › | |
| Half final | 17-7 · #212 1-21 · #335 |
— | — | STMN -7.4 | — | 71.2 | — | 79% STMN | › | |
| Half final | 8-15 · #201 3-20 · #305 |
— | — | SDST -3.6 | — | 69.7 | — | 65% SDST | › | |
| Half final | 16-5 · #140 13-10 · #194 |
— | — | HAW -2.8 | — | 74.4 | — | 62% HAW | › | |
| Half final | 6-15 · #196 6-17 · #321 |
— | — | SAC -0.1 | — | 71.1 | — | 50% NAU | › | |
| Half final | 9-12 · #154 11-11 · #129 |
— | — | WKU -1.4 | — | 69.2 | — | 56% WKU | › | |
| Half final | 15-9 · #231 12-12 · #296 |
— | — | MRSH -1.5 | — | 76.1 | — | 56% MRSH | › | |
| Half final | 11-13 · #79 17-7 · #15 |
— | — | ALA -9.7 | — | 79.0 | — | 85% ALA | › | |
| Half final | 14-10 · #21 18-6 · #18 |
— | — | ARK -1.6 | — | 79.0 | — | 57% ARK | › | |
| Half final | 15-9 · #147 11-14 · #224 |
— | — | TROY -2.3 | — | 71.2 | — | 60% TROY | › | |
| Half final | 14-9 · #11 17-7 · #54 |
— | — | TEX -0.5 | — | 73.1 | — | 52% TEX | › | |
| Half final | 11-13 · #70 12-13 · #56 |
— | — | WASH -3.7 | — | 66.0 | — | 66% WASH | › | |
| Half final | 11-11 · #162 11-10 · #273 |
— | — | MONT -0.6 | — | 68.3 | — | 53% MONT | › | |
| Half final | 19-6 · #203 12-11 · #268 |
— | — | CBU -1.8 | — | 68.3 | — | 58% CBU | › | |
| Half final | 17-7 · #96 16-6 · #75 |
— | — | SDSU -3.5 | — | 68.3 | — | 65% SDSU | › | |
| Half final | 11-13 · #312 14-9 · #149 |
— | — | UCI -5.2 | — | 70.6 | — | 72% UCI | › | |
| Half final | 6-18 · #281 15-9 · #123 |
— | — | UCSD -7.2 | — | 67.6 | — | 78% UCSD | › | |
| Half final | 21-4 · #97 15-10 · #163 |
— | — | SMC -4.9 | — | 63.8 | — | 70% SMC | › | |
| Half final | 24-2 · #17 21-5 · #106 |
— | — | GONZ -3.8 | — | 75.0 | — | 66% GONZ | › |
The model’s 1st half is fitted from its full-game numbers and past halves; ESPN posts no 1st-half lines for college games. The # beside a record is the team’s power rank today, from the Rankings; AP is the poll. Spread is the market line (the favorite shows the minus). Model line and Model edge are from the model, never the market. Lines are pre-tip-off: after tip-off a tile shows the closing line. Model record