Colonial Hall · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WKU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects GW 78–74 · win probability GW 63%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 151.6
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: GW has more of the edges
GW 4, WKU 2 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: GW 18.1%, WKU 14.5%. Forced: GW 17.8%, WKU 17.2%
Shooting
Effective FG%: GW 54.4 and allows 52.4; WKU 47.5 and allows 51.2
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: GW 35.8%, WKU 31.8%. Defensive: GW 71.3%, WKU 70.5%
Context
Schedule so far
GW has played the 95th-hardest schedule, WKU the 160th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Three-pointers
GW hits 35.1% and allows 33.9%; WKU hits 33.4% and allows 34.3%. Threes are 47.0% and 39.5% of their shots
GW offense vs WKU defense
Offense 112th of 366 against a defense 169th, on the model’s ratings
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: GW 13%, WKU 44%. Transfers in: GW 9, WKU 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: GW plays 70.2 a game (107th fastest), WKU 71.5 (52nd). Faster games mean more points
Even
WKU offense vs GW defense
Offense 115th of 366 against a defense 95th, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: GW 34.9, WKU 41.2. Allowed: GW 35.0, WKU 46.8
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | GW -3.7 | — |
| Total | — | 151.6 | — |
| Projected score | — | GW 77.7 · WKU 74 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | GW -2.3 | — |
| 1H total | 70.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | GW 36.6 · WKU 34.3 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
G Washington
34 games played
Straight up
18-16
53% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-18
47% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 67-47 | -20.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 99-95 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 107-67 | -17.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 96-73 | -15.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 89-52 | -22.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 86-92 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 92-79 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 95-96 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 84-70 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 99-86 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 174.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 58-70 | -21.5 | L −33.5 | 152.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 70-80 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 99-85 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 162.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 77-55 | -16.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 72-79 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 101-66 | -14.5 | W +20.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 79-84 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 64-69 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 85-69 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 76-79 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 167.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-79 | -11.5 | L −25.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 73-76 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 86-88 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 75-70 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 72-53 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 75-89 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 104-77 | -8.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 66-68 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 91-82 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 62-68 | -9.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 66-62 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 81-88 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 18 | @ | W 79-78 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 22 | @ | L 61-86 | +6.5 | L −18.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
ME
W 67-47
−0.5
8
vs
USF
W 99-95
+5.5
12
vs
AMER
W 107-67
+22.5
15
vs
ODU
W 96-73
+7.5
19
vs
UMBC
W 89-52
+14.5
23
vs
MCN
L 86-92
−11.5
24
vs
MTSU
W 92-79
+3.5
25
vs
MUR
L 95-96
−8.5
2
@
ARMY
W 84-70
−5.5
6
vs
W&M
W 99-86
−0.5
10
vs
DEL
L 58-70
−33.5
13
vs
FLA
L 70-80
+4.5
31
@
RICH
W 99-85
+11.5
3
vs
LAS
W 77-55
+5.5
6
@
DAY
L 72-79
−4.5
10
vs
LUC
W 101-66
+20.5
14
vs
DAV
L 79-84
−14.5
19
@
GMU
L 64-69
−3.5
24
vs
RICH
W 85-69
+5.5
27
@
SLU
L 76-79
+7.5
31
vs
FOR
L 65-79
−25.5
4
@
JOES
L 73-76
−4.5
7
@
DUQ
L 86-88
−3.5
10
vs
URI
W 75-70
−0.5
13
vs
GMU
W 72-53
+15.5
17
@
VCU
L 75-89
−7.5
24
@
LAS
W 104-77
+18.5
27
vs
DAY
L 66-68
−4.5
4
vs
SBU
W 91-82
+1.5
7
@
LUC
L 62-68
−15.5
12
vs
FOR
W 66-62
−3.5
13
vs
SLU
L 81-88
−0.5
18
@
UVU
W 79-78
+2.5
22
@
UNM
L 61-86
−18.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
ME
W 67-47
−29.5
8
vs
USF
W 99-95
+34.5
12
vs
AMER
W 107-67
+22.5
15
vs
ODU
W 96-73
+13.5
19
vs
UMBC
W 89-52
−19.5
23
vs
MCN
L 86-92
+20.5
24
vs
MTSU
W 92-79
+12.5
25
vs
MUR
L 95-96
+23.5
2
@
ARMY
W 84-70
−2.5
6
vs
W&M
W 99-86
+10.5
10
vs
DEL
L 58-70
−24.5
13
vs
FLA
L 70-80
−12.5
31
@
RICH
W 99-85
+21.5
3
vs
LAS
W 77-55
−18.5
6
@
DAY
L 72-79
−3.5
10
vs
LUC
W 101-66
+12.5
14
vs
DAV
L 79-84
+12.5
19
@
GMU
L 64-69
−20.5
24
vs
RICH
W 85-69
−5.5
27
@
SLU
L 76-79
−12.5
31
vs
FOR
L 65-79
−6.5
4
@
JOES
L 73-76
−6.5
7
@
DUQ
L 86-88
+15.5
10
vs
URI
W 75-70
−6.5
13
vs
GMU
W 72-53
−24.5
17
@
VCU
L 75-89
+2.5
24
@
LAS
W 104-77
+34.5
27
vs
DAY
L 66-68
−18.5
4
vs
SBU
W 91-82
+15.5
7
@
LUC
L 62-68
−18.5
12
vs
FOR
W 66-62
−16.5
13
vs
SLU
L 81-88
+10.5
18
@
UVU
W 79-78
+4.5
22
@
UNM
L 61-86
−14.5
over 16under 18avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Western KY
30 games played
Straight up
16-14
53% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 82-70 | -14.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 87-79 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 95-82 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 78-83 | +18.5 | W +13.5 | 168.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 91-97 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 75-70 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 80-79 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 61-77 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 159.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 81-82 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 67-78 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 102-91 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 168.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 66-61 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 64-80 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 68-56 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 87-72 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 65-81 | -7.5 | L −23.5 | 165.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 69-76 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 58-73 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 69-72 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 65-60 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 66-71 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-80 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 88-87 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 94-73 | +7.5 | W +28.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 93-70 | -4.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 97-65 | -9.5 | W +22.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 74-87 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 67-92 | -1.5 | L −26.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 87-96 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TNTC
W 82-70
−2.5
10
@
EKU
W 87-79
+6.5
16
vs
TNST
W 95-82
+0.5
26
vs
VAN
L 78-83
+13.5
27
vs
USF
L 91-97
+1.5
28
vs
WICH
W 75-70
+9.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 80-79
−10.5
10
@
MRSH
L 61-77
−14.5
19
vs
TLSA
L 81-82
+1.5
29
@
JXST
L 67-78
−13.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 102-91
+5.5
4
vs
LT
W 66-61
−4.5
8
@
NMSU
L 64-80
−13.5
10
@
UTEP
W 68-56
+8.5
14
vs
MOST
W 87-72
+8.5
17
vs
KENN
L 65-81
−23.5
21
vs
LIB
L 69-76
−5.5
24
@
SHSU
L 58-73
−9.5
28
@
KENN
L 69-72
+1.5
31
@
MTSU
W 65-60
+11.5
5
vs
JXST
L 66-71
−9.5
7
vs
FIU
W 80-70
+5.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 82-80
−1.5
18
@
DEL
W 88-87
−3.5
21
@
LIB
W 94-73
+28.5
26
vs
NMSU
W 93-70
+18.5
28
vs
UTEP
W 97-65
+22.5
5
@
MOST
L 74-87
−14.5
7
@
FIU
L 67-92
−26.5
12
vs
KENN
L 87-96
−10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TNTC
W 82-70
−1.5
10
@
EKU
W 87-79
+3.5
16
vs
TNST
W 95-82
+9.5
26
vs
VAN
L 78-83
−7.5
27
vs
USF
L 91-97
+20.5
28
vs
WICH
W 75-70
−10.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 80-79
+11.5
10
@
MRSH
L 61-77
−21.5
19
vs
TLSA
L 81-82
+4.5
29
@
JXST
L 67-78
+2.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 102-91
+24.5
4
vs
LT
W 66-61
−18.5
8
@
NMSU
L 64-80
−10.5
10
@
UTEP
W 68-56
−20.5
14
vs
MOST
W 87-72
+10.5
17
vs
KENN
L 65-81
−19.5
21
vs
LIB
L 69-76
−3.5
24
@
SHSU
L 58-73
−25.5
28
@
KENN
L 69-72
−19.5
31
@
MTSU
W 65-60
−15.5
5
vs
JXST
L 66-71
−3.5
7
vs
FIU
W 80-70
−9.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 82-80
+16.5
18
@
DEL
W 88-87
+35.5
21
@
LIB
W 94-73
+19.5
26
vs
NMSU
W 93-70
+11.5
28
vs
UTEP
W 97-65
+16.5
5
@
MOST
L 74-87
+8.5
7
@
FIU
L 67-92
−1.5
12
vs
KENN
L 87-96
+23.5
over 15under 15avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Western KY has the better starters
Position by position: G Washington 1, Western KY 3, even 1
G WashingtonBetterWestern KY
G A. Phillips TR13.8 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 50
→WKUBig
G T. Moore19.2 pts · 5.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 99
G O. Witherspoon TR7.5 pts · 3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 34
←GWSmall
G N. Norgaard TR7.8 pts · 2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 11
G J. Aranguren8.1 pts · 4.1 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 70
=Even
G A. Boone10.6 pts · 6.1 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 61
G F. Kossaras TR4.6 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 37
→WKUSmall
G L. Hackman8.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 64
F A. Shaw TR4.5 pts · 6.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 48
→WKUSmall
F E. Erkins-Ford TR8.6 pts · 3.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 71
G WashingtonBetterWestern KY
GW offense112th of 366 · -1.9
←GWSmall
WKU defense169th of 366 · -3.9
GW defense95th of 366 · -0.5
=Even
WKU offense115th of 366 · -2.4
Backcourt-2.8 · 4 players
→WKUBig
Backcourt+3.0 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
→WKUSmall
Frontcourt+0.8 · 1 player
Bench-0.5 · 5 players
←GWBig
Bench-3.8 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestGW betterWKU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Phillips34 min · TRO. Witherspoon28 min · TRJ. Aranguren24 minF. Kossaras16 min · TRT. Arceneaux16 min · TRA. Arrington1 min
Forwards
A. Shaw26 min · TRA. Vukovic15 min · TRD. James15 min · TRM. Arrington14 min · TRR. Frost7 min · TRL. UrbihaNew
Guards
T. Moore30 minN. Norgaard25 min · TRA. Boone25 minL. Hackman22 minS. Young19 min · TRK. Unseld11 min
Forwards
E. Erkins-Ford22 min · TRE. Walker16 min · TRM. KonareNewG. WeisNewJ. AdebayoNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 80.9 #46 | Points per game | 77.9 #95 |
| 1.15 #63 | Points per possession | 1.09 #163 |
| 70.2 #107 | Pace (possessions) | 71.5 #52 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.4 #55 | Effective FG% | 47.5 #327 |
| 35.1 #106 | 3-point % | 33.4 #205 |
| 47.0 #33 | 3-point attempt rate | 39.5 #184 |
| 34.9 #184 | Free throw rate | 41.2 #42 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.1 #276 | Turnover rate | 14.5 #42 |
| 35.8 #26 | Offensive rebound rate | 31.8 #134 |
| 15.4 #69 | Assists per game | 12.9 #215 |
| Defense | ||
| 75.2 #195 | Points allowed | 77.0 #241 |
| 1.08 #149 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #155 |
| 52.4 #234 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.2 #169 |
| 33.9 #175 | Opponent 3-point % | 34.3 #205 |
| 17.8 #110 | Turnovers forced | 17.2 #134 |
| 71.3 #91 | Defensive rebound rate | 70.5 #135 |
| 7.2 #103 | Steals per game | 7.4 #90 |
| 3.5 #142 | Blocks per game | 2.3 #327 |
G Washington
18-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ New Mexico61–86
- W@ Utah Valley79–78
- Lvs Saint Louis81–88
- Wvs Fordham66–62
- L@ Loyola Chicago62–68
A week or more of rest.
Western KY
16-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kennesaw St87–96
- L@ FIU67–92
- L@ Missouri St74–87
- Wvs UTEP97–65
- Wvs New Mexico St93–70
A week or more of rest.