Charles E. Smith Center · at G Washington
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | GW | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects GW 79–68 · win probability GW 82%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: GW has more of the edges
HAMP 0, GW 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: HAMP 45.7 and allows 52.0; GW 54.4 and allows 52.4
Context
Schedule so far
HAMP has played the 217th-hardest schedule, GW the 95th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: HAMP plays 66.5 a game (295th fastest), GW 70.2 (107th). Faster games mean more points
HAMP offense vs GW defense
Offense 186th of 366 against a defense 95th, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
HAMP hits 28.8% and allows 32.1%; GW hits 35.1% and allows 33.9%. Threes are 37.0% and 47.0% of their shots
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: HAMP 32.9%, GW 35.8%. Defensive: HAMP 70.0%, GW 71.3%
Home court
GW at home. This season: GW 0-0 at home, HAMP 0-0 away
Even
GW offense vs HAMP defense
Offense 112th of 366 against a defense 153rd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: HAMP 39.2, GW 34.9. Allowed: HAMP 46.5, GW 35.0
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: HAMP 17.1%, GW 18.1%. Forced: HAMP 17.2%, GW 17.8%
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: HAMP 18%, GW 13%. Transfers in: HAMP 6, GW 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | GW -10.6 | — |
| Total | — | 146.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | HAMP 68 · GW 78.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | GW -6.2 | — |
| 1H total | 68.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | HAMP 31.2 · GW 37.4 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 7-3 70% | |
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
HAMP 0–1 GWGW leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · HAMP 0-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2024-25 | HAMP 54 @ GW 82 | GW -12.5 | GW W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Hampton
30 games played
Straight up
11-19
37% wins
Against the spread
16-14
53% covers · avg −0.8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-16
47% overs · avg +0.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 86-90 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 146.5 | O 176 |
| Nov 11 | @ | L 53-91 | +24.5 | L −13.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 14 | @ | W 72-63 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 139.5 | U 135 |
| Nov 16 | vs | L 61-67 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 148.5 | U 128 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 52-63 | +12.5 | W +1.5 | 135.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 21 | @ | L 60-62 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 25 | @ | W 74-68 | -6.5 | L −0.5 | 124.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 93-71 | -6.5 | W +15.5 | 142.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 57-61 | -2.5 | L −6.5 | 142.5 | U 118 |
| Dec 18 | vs | W 84-77 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 72-81 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 62-59 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 63-62 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 136.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 45-49 | +12.5 | W +8.5 | 140.5 | U 94 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 72-86 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 70-74 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 19 | vs | W 82-61 | -6.5 | W +14.5 | 143.5 | U 143 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 65-63 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 135.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 67-75 | +4.5 | L −3.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 51-58 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 127.5 | U 109 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 50-82 | +8.5 | L −23.5 | 131.5 | O 132 |
| Feb 5 | vs | W 87-79 | +1.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | O 166 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 77-74 | +5.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | U 151 |
| Feb 13 | vs | L 70-71 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 137.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 43-79 | +11.5 | L −24.5 | 133.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 72-79 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 26 | vs | L 71-85 | +5.5 | L −8.5 | 139.5 | O 156 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 76-65 | -3.5 | W +7.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Mar 3 | @ | L 85-94 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 163.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 68-74 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | O 142 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
MILW
L 86-90
+1.5
11
@
UVA
L 53-91
−13.5
14
@
BRWN
W 72-63
+10.5
16
vs
HC
L 61-67
−10.5
18
@
BC
L 52-63
+1.5
21
@
NORF
L 60-62
+0.5
25
@
UMES
W 74-68
−0.5
3
vs
L-MD
W 93-71
+15.5
13
vs
HOW
L 57-61
−6.5
18
vs
JKST
W 84-77
−1.5
19
vs
GRAM
L 72-81
−10.5
29
vs
STBK
W 62-59
+0.5
31
vs
TOW
W 63-62
+7.5
3
@
UNCW
L 45-49
+8.5
8
@
CAM
L 72-86
−7.5
10
@
COFC
L 70-74
+5.5
19
vs
NCAT
W 82-61
+14.5
22
vs
MONM
W 65-63
+0.5
24
vs
UNCW
L 67-75
−3.5
29
@
DREX
L 51-58
−4.5
31
@
TOW
L 50-82
−23.5
5
vs
ELON
W 87-79
+9.5
7
vs
W&M
W 77-74
+8.5
13
vs
NCAT
L 70-71
−4.5
19
@
HOF
L 43-79
−24.5
21
@
STBK
L 72-79
−1.5
26
vs
COFC
L 71-85
−8.5
28
vs
NE
W 76-65
+7.5
3
@
W&M
L 85-94
+2.5
7
vs
TOW
L 68-74
+1.5
covered 16didn’t cover 14avg −0.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
MILW
L 86-90
+29.5
11
@
UVA
L 53-91
−4.5
14
@
BRWN
W 72-63
−4.5
16
vs
HC
L 61-67
−20.5
18
@
BC
L 52-63
−20.5
21
@
NORF
L 60-62
−11.5
25
@
UMES
W 74-68
+17.5
3
vs
L-MD
W 93-71
+21.5
13
vs
HOW
L 57-61
−24.5
18
vs
JKST
W 84-77
+25.5
19
vs
GRAM
L 72-81
+15.5
29
vs
STBK
W 62-59
−19.5
31
vs
TOW
W 63-62
−11.5
3
@
UNCW
L 45-49
−46.5
8
@
CAM
L 72-86
+12.5
10
@
COFC
L 70-74
−1.5
19
vs
NCAT
W 82-61
−0.5
22
vs
MONM
W 65-63
−7.5
24
vs
UNCW
L 67-75
+5.5
29
@
DREX
L 51-58
−18.5
31
@
TOW
L 50-82
+0.5
5
vs
ELON
W 87-79
+23.5
7
vs
W&M
W 77-74
−1.5
13
vs
NCAT
L 70-71
+3.5
19
@
HOF
L 43-79
−11.5
21
@
STBK
L 72-79
+15.5
26
vs
COFC
L 71-85
+16.5
28
vs
NE
W 76-65
−4.5
3
@
W&M
L 85-94
+15.5
7
vs
TOW
L 68-74
+9.5
over 14under 16avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
G Washington
34 games played
Straight up
18-16
53% wins
Against the spread
15-19
44% covers · avg −0.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-18
47% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 67-47 | -20.5 | L −0.5 | 143.5 | U 114 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 99-95 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | O 194 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 107-67 | -17.5 | W +22.5 | 151.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 96-73 | -15.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 89-52 | -22.5 | W +14.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 86-92 | -5.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | O 178 |
| Nov 24 | vs | W 92-79 | -9.5 | W +3.5 | 158.5 | O 171 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 95-96 | -7.5 | L −8.5 | 167.5 | O 191 |
| Dec 2 | @ | W 84-70 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 99-86 | -13.5 | L −0.5 | 174.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 58-70 | -21.5 | L −33.5 | 152.5 | U 128 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 70-80 | +14.5 | W +4.5 | 162.5 | U 150 |
| Dec 31 | @ | W 99-85 | -2.5 | W +11.5 | 162.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 77-55 | -16.5 | W +5.5 | 150.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 6 | @ | L 72-79 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 151 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 101-66 | -14.5 | W +20.5 | 154.5 | O 167 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 79-84 | -9.5 | L −14.5 | 150.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 19 | @ | L 64-69 | +1.5 | L −3.5 | 153.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 85-69 | -10.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 76-79 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 167.5 | U 155 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 65-79 | -11.5 | L −25.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 73-76 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 149 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 86-88 | -1.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 10 | vs | W 75-70 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 13 | vs | W 72-53 | -3.5 | W +15.5 | 149.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 17 | @ | L 75-89 | +6.5 | L −7.5 | 161.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 24 | @ | W 104-77 | -8.5 | W +18.5 | 146.5 | O 181 |
| Feb 27 | vs | L 66-68 | -2.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 134 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 91-82 | -7.5 | W +1.5 | 157.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 62-68 | -9.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 130 |
| Mar 12 | vs | W 66-62 | -7.5 | L −3.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 13 | vs | L 81-88 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 169 |
| Mar 18 | @ | W 79-78 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | O 157 |
| Mar 22 | @ | L 61-86 | +6.5 | L −18.5 | 161.5 | U 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
ME
W 67-47
−0.5
8
vs
USF
W 99-95
+5.5
12
vs
AMER
W 107-67
+22.5
15
vs
ODU
W 96-73
+7.5
19
vs
UMBC
W 89-52
+14.5
23
vs
MCN
L 86-92
−11.5
24
vs
MTSU
W 92-79
+3.5
25
vs
MUR
L 95-96
−8.5
2
@
ARMY
W 84-70
−5.5
6
vs
W&M
W 99-86
−0.5
10
vs
DEL
L 58-70
−33.5
13
vs
FLA
L 70-80
+4.5
31
@
RICH
W 99-85
+11.5
3
vs
LAS
W 77-55
+5.5
6
@
DAY
L 72-79
−4.5
10
vs
LUC
W 101-66
+20.5
14
vs
DAV
L 79-84
−14.5
19
@
GMU
L 64-69
−3.5
24
vs
RICH
W 85-69
+5.5
27
@
SLU
L 76-79
+7.5
31
vs
FOR
L 65-79
−25.5
4
@
JOES
L 73-76
−4.5
7
@
DUQ
L 86-88
−3.5
10
vs
URI
W 75-70
−0.5
13
vs
GMU
W 72-53
+15.5
17
@
VCU
L 75-89
−7.5
24
@
LAS
W 104-77
+18.5
27
vs
DAY
L 66-68
−4.5
4
vs
SBU
W 91-82
+1.5
7
@
LUC
L 62-68
−15.5
12
vs
FOR
W 66-62
−3.5
13
vs
SLU
L 81-88
−0.5
18
@
UVU
W 79-78
+2.5
22
@
UNM
L 61-86
−18.5
covered 15didn’t cover 19avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
ME
W 67-47
−29.5
8
vs
USF
W 99-95
+34.5
12
vs
AMER
W 107-67
+22.5
15
vs
ODU
W 96-73
+13.5
19
vs
UMBC
W 89-52
−19.5
23
vs
MCN
L 86-92
+20.5
24
vs
MTSU
W 92-79
+12.5
25
vs
MUR
L 95-96
+23.5
2
@
ARMY
W 84-70
−2.5
6
vs
W&M
W 99-86
+10.5
10
vs
DEL
L 58-70
−24.5
13
vs
FLA
L 70-80
−12.5
31
@
RICH
W 99-85
+21.5
3
vs
LAS
W 77-55
−18.5
6
@
DAY
L 72-79
−3.5
10
vs
LUC
W 101-66
+12.5
14
vs
DAV
L 79-84
+12.5
19
@
GMU
L 64-69
−20.5
24
vs
RICH
W 85-69
−5.5
27
@
SLU
L 76-79
−12.5
31
vs
FOR
L 65-79
−6.5
4
@
JOES
L 73-76
−6.5
7
@
DUQ
L 86-88
+15.5
10
vs
URI
W 75-70
−6.5
13
vs
GMU
W 72-53
−24.5
17
@
VCU
L 75-89
+2.5
24
@
LAS
W 104-77
+34.5
27
vs
DAY
L 66-68
−18.5
4
vs
SBU
W 91-82
+15.5
7
@
LUC
L 62-68
−18.5
12
vs
FOR
W 66-62
−16.5
13
vs
SLU
L 81-88
+10.5
18
@
UVU
W 79-78
+4.5
22
@
UNM
L 61-86
−14.5
over 16under 18avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Hampton has the better starters
Position by position: Hampton 2, G Washington 1, even 2
HamptonBetterG Washington
G J. Mitchell TR14.5 pts · 4.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 56
=Even
G A. Phillips TR13.8 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 50
G S. Hubbard TR16.5 pts · 2.9 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 70
←HAMPBig
G O. Witherspoon TR7.5 pts · 3 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 34
G A. Davis TR9.3 pts · 3.5 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 59
=Even
G J. Aranguren8.1 pts · 4.1 reb · 3.2 ast
Score 70
F M. Frazier TR12 pts · 7.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 77
←HAMPBig
G F. Kossaras TR4.6 pts · 1.5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 37
F C. Robinson TR8.2 pts · 4 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 25
→GWSmall
F A. Shaw TR4.5 pts · 6.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 48
HamptonBetterG Washington
HAMP offense186th of 366 · -5.7
→GWSmall
GW defense95th of 366 · -0.5
HAMP defense153rd of 366 · -3.4
=Even
GW offense112th of 366 · -1.9
Backcourt+0.1 · 3 players
←HAMPSmall
Backcourt-2.8 · 4 players
Frontcourt-0.1 · 2 players
=Even
Frontcourt-0.4 · 1 player
Bench-2.1 · 5 players
→GWSmall
Bench-0.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestHAMP betterGW betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Mitchell33 min · TRS. Hubbard31 min · TRA. Davis24 min · TRE. Strothers19 minT. Jackson17 min · TRA. Haskins10 min
Forwards
M. Frazier29 min · TRC. Robinson26 min · TRP. Da CruzNewW. PrestonNewZ. IbekweNewS. TabeNew
Guards
A. Phillips34 min · TRO. Witherspoon28 min · TRJ. Aranguren24 minF. Kossaras16 min · TRT. Arceneaux16 min · TRA. Arrington1 min
Forwards
A. Shaw26 min · TRA. Vukovic15 min · TRD. James15 min · TRM. Arrington14 min · TRR. Frost7 min · TRL. UrbihaNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.0 #312 | Points per game | 80.9 #46 |
| 1.02 #301 | Points per possession | 1.15 #63 |
| 66.5 #295 | Pace (possessions) | 70.2 #107 |
| Shooting | ||
| 45.7 #356 | Effective FG% | 54.4 #55 |
| 28.8 #357 | 3-point % | 35.1 #106 |
| 37.0 #229 | 3-point attempt rate | 47.0 #33 |
| 39.2 #73 | Free throw rate | 34.9 #184 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #205 | Turnover rate | 18.1 #276 |
| 32.9 #90 | Offensive rebound rate | 35.8 #26 |
| 11.2 #329 | Assists per game | 15.4 #69 |
| Defense | ||
| 72.1 #108 | Points allowed | 75.2 #195 |
| 1.08 #176 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #149 |
| 52.0 #212 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.4 #234 |
| 32.1 #65 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.9 #175 |
| 17.2 #137 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #110 |
| 70.0 #165 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.3 #91 |
| 6.3 #207 | Steals per game | 7.2 #103 |
| 3.0 #232 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #142 |
Hampton
11-19 in 2025-26 overall · 7-12 in conference · Coastal Athletic Association
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Towson68–74
- L@ William & Mary85–94
- Wvs Northeastern76–65
- Lvs Charleston71–85
- L@ Stony Brook72–79
A week or more of rest.
G Washington
18-16 in 2025-26 overall · 9-11 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ New Mexico61–86
- W@ Utah Valley79–78
- Lvs Saint Louis81–88
- Wvs Fordham66–62
- L@ Loyola Chicago62–68
A week or more of rest.