Timmons Arena · at Furman
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | FUR | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FUR 70–70 · win probability FUR 50%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 140.1
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FUR has more of the edges
UNI 3, FUR 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Turnovers
Turnover rate: UNI 14.5%, FUR 17.8%. Forced: UNI 18.0%, FUR 13.7%
Context
Schedule so far
UNI has played the 133rd-hardest schedule, FUR the 224th. A record against a soft schedule means less
FUR offense vs UNI defense
Offense 166th of 366 against a defense 92nd, on the model’s ratings
Three-pointers
UNI hits 34.7% and allows 29.1%; FUR hits 33.4% and allows 32.3%. Threes are 39.1% and 46.5% of their shots
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: UNI 10%, FUR 46%. Transfers in: UNI 5, FUR 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: UNI 21.8%, FUR 30.5%. Defensive: UNI 73.5%, FUR 71.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: UNI 25.6, FUR 32.7. Allowed: UNI 29.6, FUR 28.9
UNI offense vs FUR defense
Offense 204th of 366 against a defense 146th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
FUR at home. This season: FUR 0-0 at home, UNI 0-0 away
Context
Tempo
About 66 possessions: UNI plays 63.9 a game (361st fastest), FUR 67.2 (273rd). Faster games mean more points
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: UNI 53.8 and allows 47.5; FUR 54.8 and allows 50.2
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | FUR -0.0 | — |
| Total | — | 140.1 | — |
| Projected score | — | UNI 70 · FUR 70.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UNI -0.1 | — |
| 1H total | 65.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | UNI 32.8 · FUR 32.7 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | |
| 6-4 60% | 7-3 70% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
UNI 1–0 FURUNI leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · UNI 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2025-26 | FUR 54 @ UNI 70 | UNI -9.5 | UNI W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Northern Iowa
35 games played
Straight up
22-13
63% wins
Against the spread
19-16
54% covers · avg +2.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-21
40% overs · avg −4.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | vs | W 86-57 | -9.5 | W +19.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Nov 9 | vs | W 65-58 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 150.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 14 | vs | W 70-54 | -9.5 | W +6.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 70-57 | -19.5 | L −6.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Nov 22 | @ | W 70-69 | +2.5 | W +3.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 72-51 | -8.5 | W +12.5 | 134.5 | U 123 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 60-63 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 137.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 6 | vs | L 69-74 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 135.5 | O 143 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 75-63 | -8.5 | W +3.5 | 149.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 17 | @ | W 60-54 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 22 | @ | L 58-63 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 132.5 | U 121 |
| Dec 29 | vs | W 58-48 | -8.5 | W +1.5 | 131.5 | U 106 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 75-66 | -10.5 | L −1.5 | 135.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 62-48 | -4.5 | W +9.5 | 131.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 65-78 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 137.5 | O 143 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 69-75 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 131.5 | O 144 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 61-69 | -6.5 | L −14.5 | 128.5 | O 130 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 44-54 | -1.5 | L −11.5 | 130.5 | U 98 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 54-59 | +6.5 | W +1.5 | 132.5 | U 113 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 81-76 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 145.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 50-65 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 130.5 | U 115 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 71-55 | -11.5 | W +4.5 | 128.5 | U 126 |
| Feb 6 | vs | W 61-49 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | U 110 |
| Feb 9 | @ | W 89-60 | +4.5 | W +33.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 86-91 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 138.5 | O 177 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 86-62 | -8.5 | W +15.5 | 138.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 81-60 | -5.5 | W +15.5 | 136.5 | O 141 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 57-59 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 134.5 | U 116 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 69-71 | -4.5 | L −6.5 | 132.5 | O 140 |
| Mar 1 | @ | W 75-53 | -4.5 | W +17.5 | 137.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 5 | vs | W 68-59 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 127.5 | U 127 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 74-52 | -1.5 | W +20.5 | 130.5 | U 126 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 73-69 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 127.5 | O 142 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 84-69 | -2.5 | W +12.5 | 125.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 53-79 | +10.5 | L −15.5 | 133.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
vs
CSUN
W 86-57
+19.5
9
vs
SDST
W 65-58
−3.5
14
vs
FUR
W 70-54
+6.5
18
vs
NIU
W 70-57
−6.5
22
@
UCI
W 70-69
+3.5
25
vs
LUC
W 72-51
+12.5
26
vs
TLSA
L 60-63
−5.5
6
vs
WICH
L 69-74
−6.5
13
vs
OAK
W 75-63
+3.5
17
@
UIC
W 60-54
+0.5
22
@
SMC
L 58-63
+6.5
29
vs
VAL
W 58-48
+1.5
1
vs
INST
W 75-66
−1.5
4
@
EVAN
W 62-48
+9.5
7
vs
BEL
L 65-78
−15.5
10
@
BRAD
L 69-75
−1.5
13
vs
UIC
L 61-69
−14.5
17
@
VAL
L 44-54
−11.5
21
@
ILST
L 54-59
+1.5
24
vs
MUR
W 81-76
+6.5
28
@
SIU
L 50-65
−16.5
31
vs
EVAN
W 71-55
+4.5
6
vs
BRAD
W 61-49
+8.5
9
@
MUR
W 89-60
+33.5
12
@
BEL
L 86-91
−0.5
15
vs
DRKE
W 86-62
+15.5
18
@
INST
W 81-60
+15.5
21
vs
SIU
L 57-59
−8.5
25
vs
ILST
L 69-71
−6.5
1
@
DRKE
W 75-53
+17.5
5
vs
EVAN
W 68-59
−4.5
6
vs
ILST
W 74-52
+20.5
7
vs
BRAD
W 73-69
−0.5
8
vs
UIC
W 84-69
+12.5
20
vs
SJU
L 53-79
−15.5
covered 19didn’t cover 16avg +2.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
vs
CSUN
W 86-57
−10.5
9
vs
SDST
W 65-58
−27.5
14
vs
FUR
W 70-54
−17.5
18
vs
NIU
W 70-57
−19.5
22
@
UCI
W 70-69
+0.5
25
vs
LUC
W 72-51
−11.5
26
vs
TLSA
L 60-63
−14.5
6
vs
WICH
L 69-74
+7.5
13
vs
OAK
W 75-63
−11.5
17
@
UIC
W 60-54
−19.5
22
@
SMC
L 58-63
−11.5
29
vs
VAL
W 58-48
−25.5
1
vs
INST
W 75-66
+5.5
4
@
EVAN
W 62-48
−21.5
7
vs
BEL
L 65-78
+5.5
10
@
BRAD
L 69-75
+12.5
13
vs
UIC
L 61-69
+1.5
17
@
VAL
L 44-54
−32.5
21
@
ILST
L 54-59
−19.5
24
vs
MUR
W 81-76
+11.5
28
@
SIU
L 50-65
−15.5
31
vs
EVAN
W 71-55
−2.5
6
vs
BRAD
W 61-49
−24.5
9
@
MUR
W 89-60
+3.5
12
@
BEL
L 86-91
+38.5
15
vs
DRKE
W 86-62
+9.5
18
@
INST
W 81-60
+4.5
21
vs
SIU
L 57-59
−18.5
25
vs
ILST
L 69-71
+7.5
1
@
DRKE
W 75-53
−9.5
5
vs
EVAN
W 68-59
−0.5
6
vs
ILST
W 74-52
−4.5
7
vs
BRAD
W 73-69
+14.5
8
vs
UIC
W 84-69
+27.5
20
vs
SJU
L 53-79
−1.5
over 14under 21avg −4.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Furman
32 games played
Straight up
19-13
59% wins
Against the spread
16-16
50% covers · avg −0.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | L 71-97 | +3.5 | L −22.5 | 153.5 | O 168 |
| Nov 7 | vs | L 61-64 | -2.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 125 |
| Nov 14 | @ | L 54-70 | +9.5 | L −6.5 | 141.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 90-79 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 27 | vs | W 73-72 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 147.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 65-72 | +3.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 97-88 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 79-69 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Dec 18 | @ | W 75-68 | -10.5 | L −3.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 21 | vs | W 84-76 | -10.5 | L −2.5 | 155.5 | O 160 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 74-72 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 77-80 | -8.5 | L −11.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 7 | @ | W 78-67 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 69-48 | -12.5 | W +8.5 | 149.5 | U 117 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 77-73 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 149.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 70-74 | -4.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 75-77 | -11.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 23 | @ | W 89-66 | -4.5 | W +18.5 | 150.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 78-73 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 151 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 75-70 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 71-75 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 8 | vs | L 64-67 | -10.5 | L −13.5 | 149.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 11 | @ | L 64-69 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 133 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 90-72 | -11.5 | W +6.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | vs | L 69-78 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 76-67 | -1.5 | W +7.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 72-51 | -15.5 | W +5.5 | 143.5 | U 123 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 67-86 | -1.5 | L −20.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 86-81 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 81-75 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 9 | vs | W 76-61 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Mar 20 | vs | L 71-82 | +20.5 | W +9.5 | 133.5 | O 153 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
HPU
L 71-97
−22.5
7
vs
TROY
L 61-64
−5.5
14
@
UNI
L 54-70
−6.5
23
vs
QUC
W 90-79
+2.5
27
vs
RICH
W 73-72
+4.5
28
vs
ILST
L 65-72
−3.5
3
@
ELON
W 97-88
+7.5
6
vs
HARV
W 79-69
+5.5
18
@
MAN
W 75-68
−3.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 84-76
−2.5
31
vs
MER
W 74-72
−0.5
3
vs
WCU
L 77-80
−11.5
7
@
UTC
W 78-67
+8.5
10
vs
VMI
W 69-48
+8.5
14
@
SAM
W 77-73
+2.5
17
vs
WOF
L 70-74
−8.5
21
@
CIT
L 75-77
−13.5
23
@
UNCG
W 89-66
+18.5
29
vs
SAM
W 78-73
−0.5
1
vs
UTC
W 75-70
−2.5
4
@
ETSU
L 71-75
+1.5
8
vs
UNCG
L 64-67
−13.5
11
@
MER
L 64-69
−1.5
14
@
VMI
W 90-72
+6.5
18
vs
ETSU
L 69-78
−10.5
21
@
WOF
W 76-67
+7.5
25
vs
CIT
W 72-51
+5.5
28
@
WCU
L 67-86
−20.5
7
vs
SAM
W 86-81
+6.5
8
vs
UNCG
W 81-75
+0.5
9
vs
ETSU
W 76-61
+16.5
20
vs
CONN
L 71-82
+9.5
covered 16didn’t cover 16avg −0.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
HPU
L 71-97
+14.5
7
vs
TROY
L 61-64
−27.5
14
@
UNI
L 54-70
−17.5
23
vs
QUC
W 90-79
+15.5
27
vs
RICH
W 73-72
−2.5
28
vs
ILST
L 65-72
−8.5
3
@
ELON
W 97-88
+31.5
6
vs
HARV
W 79-69
+6.5
18
@
MAN
W 75-68
−11.5
21
vs
CHSO
W 84-76
+4.5
31
vs
MER
W 74-72
−8.5
3
vs
WCU
L 77-80
−0.5
7
@
UTC
W 78-67
−1.5
10
vs
VMI
W 69-48
−32.5
14
@
SAM
W 77-73
+0.5
17
vs
WOF
L 70-74
−5.5
21
@
CIT
L 75-77
+9.5
23
@
UNCG
W 89-66
+4.5
29
vs
SAM
W 78-73
+1.5
1
vs
UTC
W 75-70
−1.5
4
@
ETSU
L 71-75
+4.5
8
vs
UNCG
L 64-67
−18.5
11
@
MER
L 64-69
−18.5
14
@
VMI
W 90-72
+13.5
18
vs
ETSU
L 69-78
+6.5
21
@
WOF
W 76-67
−10.5
25
vs
CIT
W 72-51
−20.5
28
@
WCU
L 67-86
+5.5
7
vs
SAM
W 86-81
+19.5
8
vs
UNCG
W 81-75
+8.5
9
vs
ETSU
W 76-61
−2.5
20
vs
CONN
L 71-82
+19.5
over 16under 16avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Furman has the better starters
Position by position: Northern Iowa 1, Furman 2, even 2
Northern IowaBetterFurman
G T. McCubbin TR9.5 pts · 4.7 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 21
→FURBig
G J. Bell TR12.3 pts · 5 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 76
G G. Uelmen TR17.4 pts · 2.8 reb · 2.3 ast
Score 90
←UNIBig
G C. Bowser5.2 pts · 5.3 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 31
G C. Vis TR5.8 pts · 2.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 51
=Even
G L. Toews TR6.3 pts · 1.6 reb · 2.2 ast
Score 45
F I. Johnson-Arigu TR10.7 pts · 4 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 67
=Even
F M. Kell TR13.6 pts · 4.7 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 59
F I. Smikle TR2.8 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 14
→FURBig
F C. Johnston9.6 pts · 8.9 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 66
Northern IowaBetterFurman
UNI offense204th of 366 · -6.3
→FURSmall
FUR defense146th of 366 · -3.2
UNI defense92nd of 366 · -0.3
←UNISmall
FUR offense166th of 366 · -5.1
Backcourt-0.4 · 3 players
←UNISmall
Backcourt-1.4 · 3 players
Frontcourt-0.7 · 2 players
→FURSmall
Frontcourt+0.9 · 2 players
Bench-1.6 · 2 players
=Even
Bench-2.5 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestUNI betterFUR betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. McCubbin30 min · TRG. Uelmen29 min · TRC. Vis15 min · TRG. Hutchins7 minR. BornNewC. CourbatNew
Forwards
I. Johnson-Arigu22 min · TRI. Smikle14 min · TRK. Pock12 minJ. WilsonNewJ. IsebaertNewW. GerdesNew
Guards
J. Bell26 min · TRC. Bowser23 minL. Toews21 min · TRA. Franklin11 minC. O'Neal11 minG. LewisNew
Forwards
M. Kell30 min · TRC. Johnston29 minM. Smith12 minJ. Butler9 min · TRO. Ritger7 minD. MolnarNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.6 #303 | Points per game | 74.9 #164 |
| 1.08 #198 | Points per possession | 1.11 #114 |
| 63.9 #361 | Pace (possessions) | 67.2 #273 |
| Shooting | ||
| 53.8 #73 | Effective FG% | 54.8 #43 |
| 34.7 #136 | 3-point % | 33.4 #204 |
| 39.1 #189 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.5 #40 |
| 25.6 #362 | Free throw rate | 32.7 #246 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.5 #41 | Turnover rate | 17.8 #260 |
| 21.8 #357 | Offensive rebound rate | 30.5 #180 |
| 14.6 #114 | Assists per game | 14.9 #91 |
| Defense | ||
| 62.5 #2 | Points allowed | 72.5 #116 |
| 0.98 #12 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #163 |
| 47.5 #31 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.2 #112 |
| 29.1 #3 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.3 #75 |
| 18.0 #97 | Turnovers forced | 13.7 #342 |
| 73.5 #24 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.8 #72 |
| 6.2 #212 | Steals per game | 4.4 #357 |
| 3.1 #211 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #183 |
Northern Iowa
22-13 in 2025-26 overall · 15-9 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs St John's53–79
- Wvs UIC84–69
- Wvs Bradley73–69
- Wvs Illinois St74–52
- Wvs Evansville68–59
A week or more of rest.
Furman
19-13 in 2025-26 overall · 13-8 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UConn71–82
- Wvs ETSU76–61
- Wvs UNC Greensboro81–75
- Wvs Samford86–81
- L@ W Carolina67–86
A week or more of rest.