Kimmel Arena · at UNC Asheville
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UNCA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WCU 74–73 · win probability WCU 52%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.3
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UNCA has more of the edges
WCU 2, UNCA 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WCU 35.4%, UNCA 29.8%. Defensive: WCU 73.7%, UNCA 68.7%
Three-pointers
WCU hits 33.5% and allows 36.7%; UNCA hits 35.1% and allows 32.6%. Threes are 40.9% and 33.6% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: WCU 31.3, UNCA 40.0. Allowed: WCU 37.8, UNCA 38.7
Shooting
Effective FG%: WCU 50.5 and allows 54.9; UNCA 51.0 and allows 51.3
WCU offense vs UNCA defense
Offense 171st of 366 against a defense 230th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
UNCA at home. This season: UNCA 0-0 at home, WCU 0-0 away
Even
UNCA offense vs WCU defense
Offense 294th of 366 against a defense 256th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
WCU has played the 177th-hardest schedule, UNCA the 214th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: WCU plays 69.3 a game (162nd fastest), UNCA 68.0 (230th). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WCU 16%, UNCA 30%. Transfers in: WCU 6, UNCA 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WCU 16.7%, UNCA 17.4%. Forced: WCU 14.6%, UNCA 15.5%
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WCU -0.7 | — |
| Total | — | 147.3 | — |
| Projected score | — | WCU 74 · UNCA 73.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WCU -0.5 | — |
| 1H total | 68.9 | — |
| 1H projected score | WCU 34.7 · UNCA 34.2 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7-3 70% | 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% | |
| 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
WCU 2–3 UNCAUNCA leads · 5 games since 2021-22 · WCU 2-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2025-26 | UNCA 73 @ WCU 80 | WCU +1.5 | WCU W |
| Dec 14, 2024-25 | WCU 61 @ UNCA 78 | UNCA -7.5 | UNCA W |
| Dec 9, 2023-24 | UNCA 63 @ WCU 78 | WCU -3.5 | WCU W |
| Nov 26, 2022-23 | WCU 61 @ UNCA 73 | UNCA -7.5 | UNCA W |
| Dec 11, 2021-22 | UNCA 73 @ WCU 72 | WCU PK | UNCA W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
W Carolina
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
14-15
48% covers · avg +2.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | @ | L 63-94 | +22.5 | L −8.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 54-95 | +36.5 | L −4.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 76-65 | -12.5 | L −1.5 | 155.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 19 | vs | W 80-73 | +1.5 | W +8.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 22 | @ | L 62-83 | +5.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | U 145 |
| Nov 29 | @ | L 73-93 | +16.5 | L −3.5 | 159.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 67-78 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 149.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 11 | @ | L 74-96 | +20.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 18 | @ | L 82-112 | +32.5 | W +2.5 | 167.5 | O 194 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 74-79 | +2.5 | L −2.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Jan 3 | @ | W 80-77 | +8.5 | W +11.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 77-82 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 77-79 | -6.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 72-68 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 82-90 | -1.5 | L −9.5 | 150.5 | O 172 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 76-88 | +8.5 | L −3.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 88-58 | -8.5 | W +21.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 29 | @ | W 90-88 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 1 | vs | L 74-88 | +1.5 | L −12.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 4 | @ | L 78-81 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | O 159 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 66-77 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 87-49 | -9.5 | W +28.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Feb 14 | @ | W 81-76 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 151.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 91-77 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 155.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 81-62 | -8.5 | W +10.5 | 154.5 | U 143 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 78-74 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 156.5 | U 152 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 86-67 | +1.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 77-73 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | U 150 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 67-69 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
@
CIN
L 63-94
−8.5
8
@
DUKE
L 54-95
−4.5
16
vs
STET
W 76-65
−1.5
19
vs
UNCA
W 80-73
+8.5
22
@
LIP
L 62-83
−15.5
29
@
HPU
L 73-93
−3.5
6
@
UPST
L 67-78
−8.5
11
@
VT
L 74-96
−1.5
18
@
UGA
L 82-112
+2.5
31
vs
WOF
L 74-79
−2.5
3
@
FUR
W 80-77
+11.5
7
@
SAM
L 77-82
−0.5
10
@
CIT
L 77-79
−8.5
14
vs
ETSU
W 72-68
+10.5
17
vs
UTC
L 82-90
−9.5
21
@
MER
L 76-88
−3.5
24
vs
VMI
W 88-58
+21.5
29
@
ETSU
W 90-88
+11.5
1
vs
SAM
L 74-88
−12.5
4
@
UNCG
L 78-81
−4.5
7
@
WOF
L 66-77
−7.5
11
vs
CIT
W 87-49
+28.5
14
@
UTC
W 81-76
+6.5
18
vs
UNCG
W 91-77
+8.5
21
@
VMI
W 81-62
+10.5
25
vs
MER
W 78-74
+5.5
28
vs
FUR
W 86-67
+20.5
7
vs
MER
W 77-73
+5.5
8
vs
ETSU
L 67-69
+0.5
covered 14didn’t cover 15avg +2.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
@
CIN
L 63-94
+13.5
8
@
DUKE
L 54-95
−3.5
16
vs
STET
W 76-65
−14.5
19
vs
UNCA
W 80-73
+0.5
22
@
LIP
L 62-83
−6.5
29
@
HPU
L 73-93
+6.5
6
@
UPST
L 67-78
−4.5
11
@
VT
L 74-96
+17.5
18
@
UGA
L 82-112
+26.5
31
vs
WOF
L 74-79
−1.5
3
@
FUR
W 80-77
−0.5
7
@
SAM
L 77-82
+5.5
10
@
CIT
L 77-79
+7.5
14
vs
ETSU
W 72-68
−7.5
17
vs
UTC
L 82-90
+21.5
21
@
MER
L 76-88
+5.5
24
vs
VMI
W 88-58
−6.5
29
@
ETSU
W 90-88
+32.5
1
vs
SAM
L 74-88
+7.5
4
@
UNCG
L 78-81
+3.5
7
@
WOF
L 66-77
−11.5
11
vs
CIT
W 87-49
−9.5
14
@
UTC
W 81-76
+5.5
18
vs
UNCG
W 91-77
+12.5
21
@
VMI
W 81-62
−11.5
25
vs
MER
W 78-74
−4.5
28
vs
FUR
W 86-67
+5.5
7
vs
MER
W 77-73
−4.5
8
vs
ETSU
L 67-69
−9.5
over 15under 14avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
UNC Asheville
29 games played
Straight up
12-17
41% wins
Against the spread
15-14
52% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-14
52% overs · avg −3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 58-75 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 157.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 8 | @ | L 90-93 | +5.5 | W +2.5 | 162.5 | O 183 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 69-64 | -6.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 73-80 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 152.5 | O 153 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 73-75 | -5.5 | L −7.5 | 164.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 67-55 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 137.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 82-77 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 143.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 63-75 | +28.5 | W +16.5 | 155.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 10 | vs | L 87-90 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 59-80 | +3.5 | L −17.5 | 148.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 47-72 | +13.5 | L −11.5 | 151.5 | U 119 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 69-87 | +10.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 83-86 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 151.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 72-61 | -2.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 91-72 | +4.5 | W +23.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 70-71 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 138.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 67-69 | +5.5 | W +3.5 | 152.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 83-69 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Jan 29 | vs | W 69-50 | -17.5 | W +1.5 | 149.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-84 | +9.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 155 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 76-67 | -6.5 | W +2.5 | 139.5 | O 143 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 79-74 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 57-58 | -5.5 | L −6.5 | 137.5 | U 115 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 48-74 | +14.5 | L −11.5 | 152.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 74-73 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 149.5 | U 147 |
| Feb 26 | @ | W 77-71 | -12.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 75-92 | -4.5 | L −21.5 | 148.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 85-82 | +1.5 | W +4.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
| Mar 7 | vs | L 71-75 | +14.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | U 146 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
WICH
L 58-75
−10.5
8
@
GASO
L 90-93
+2.5
11
vs
LIP
W 69-64
−1.5
19
@
WCU
L 73-80
−8.5
25
vs
TNST
L 73-75
−7.5
30
vs
APP
W 67-55
+10.5
2
vs
UNCG
W 82-77
+0.5
6
@
NCSU
L 63-75
+16.5
10
vs
M-OH
L 87-90
+3.5
13
vs
STMN
L 59-80
−17.5
21
@
UAB
L 47-72
−11.5
31
vs
HPU
L 69-87
−7.5
3
@
CHSO
L 83-86
+1.5
7
vs
LONG
W 72-61
+8.5
10
@
RAD
W 91-72
+23.5
14
@
PRES
L 70-71
−3.5
17
vs
WIN
L 67-69
+3.5
21
@
UPST
W 83-69
+15.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 69-50
+1.5
31
@
WIN
L 71-84
−3.5
4
vs
UPST
W 76-67
+2.5
12
@
LONG
W 79-74
+7.5
14
vs
PRES
L 57-58
−6.5
19
@
HPU
L 48-74
−11.5
21
vs
RAD
W 74-73
−1.5
26
@
GWEB
W 77-71
−6.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 75-92
−21.5
6
vs
LONG
W 85-82
+4.5
7
vs
HPU
L 71-75
+10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 14avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
WICH
L 58-75
−24.5
8
@
GASO
L 90-93
+20.5
11
vs
LIP
W 69-64
−25.5
19
@
WCU
L 73-80
+0.5
25
vs
TNST
L 73-75
−16.5
30
vs
APP
W 67-55
−15.5
2
vs
UNCG
W 82-77
+15.5
6
@
NCSU
L 63-75
−17.5
10
vs
M-OH
L 87-90
+24.5
13
vs
STMN
L 59-80
−9.5
21
@
UAB
L 47-72
−32.5
31
vs
HPU
L 69-87
+4.5
3
@
CHSO
L 83-86
+17.5
7
vs
LONG
W 72-61
−15.5
10
@
RAD
W 91-72
+11.5
14
@
PRES
L 70-71
+2.5
17
vs
WIN
L 67-69
−16.5
21
@
UPST
W 83-69
+6.5
29
vs
GWEB
W 69-50
−30.5
31
@
WIN
L 71-84
+7.5
4
vs
UPST
W 76-67
+3.5
12
@
LONG
W 79-74
+11.5
14
vs
PRES
L 57-58
−22.5
19
@
HPU
L 48-74
−30.5
21
vs
RAD
W 74-73
−2.5
26
@
GWEB
W 77-71
+2.5
28
vs
CHSO
L 75-92
+18.5
6
vs
LONG
W 85-82
+26.5
7
vs
HPU
L 71-75
−1.5
over 15under 14avg −3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
W Carolina has the better starters
Position by position: W Carolina 4, UNC Asheville 0, even 1
W CarolinaBetterUNC Asheville
G M. Brown TR11.9 pts · 3.7 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 48
←WCUSmall
G K. Phipps TR4.1 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 15
G I. Manning TR9.6 pts · 3.3 reb · 1 ast
Score 64
←WCUBig
G K. Dunn TR7.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 9
G T. Bryson TR8.6 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 70
=No call
G J. Anderson TR1.7 pts · 3.3 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
G J. Prunty TR3.9 pts · 1.9 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 20
←WCUSmall
F M. Mayfield4 pts · 4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 5
F S. Dada6.2 pts · 7.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 77
←WCUBig
F D. Thomas2.6 pts · 5 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 5
W CarolinaBetterUNC Asheville
WCU offense171st of 366 · -5.2
←WCUSmall
UNCA defense230th of 366 · -6.1
WCU defense256th of 366 · -6.7
=Even
UNCA offense294th of 366 · -9.1
Backcourt-1.7 · 4 players
←WCUSmall
Backcourt-4.7 · 3 players
Frontcourt+1.1 · 1 player
←WCUBig
Frontcourt-5.8 · 2 players
Bench-1.5 · 4 players
←WCUSmall
Bench-2.6 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestWCU betterUNCA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Brown31 min · TRI. Manning20 min · TRT. Bryson18 min · TRJ. Prunty16 min · TRJ. Roberts8 min · TRD. Hollifield2 min
Forwards
S. Dada20 minT. Smith10 minD. Raymond6 min · TRF. SodipoNew
Guards
K. Phipps18 min · TRK. Dunn17 min · TRJ. Anderson17 min · TRC. Jones7 minT. ChatmanNewC. DubskyNew
Forwards
M. Mayfield23 minD. Thomas21 minA. Magassa10 min · TRS. Tolentino8 minB. RiversNewQ. MansfieldNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.3 #134 | Points per game | 71.9 #248 |
| 1.10 #140 | Points per possession | 1.06 #236 |
| 69.3 #162 | Pace (possessions) | 68.0 #230 |
| Shooting | ||
| 50.5 #218 | Effective FG% | 51.0 #194 |
| 33.5 #198 | 3-point % | 35.1 #110 |
| 40.9 #147 | 3-point attempt rate | 33.6 #307 |
| 31.3 #274 | Free throw rate | 40.0 #60 |
| Possessions | ||
| 16.7 #179 | Turnover rate | 17.4 #230 |
| 35.4 #36 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.8 #211 |
| 12.0 #286 | Assists per game | 10.1 #358 |
| Defense | ||
| 79.0 #299 | Points allowed | 74.2 #161 |
| 1.14 #307 | Points allowed per possession | 1.09 #203 |
| 54.9 #327 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #175 |
| 36.7 #337 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.6 #93 |
| 14.6 #318 | Turnovers forced | 15.5 #251 |
| 73.7 #22 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.7 #218 |
| 5.8 #266 | Steals per game | 5.1 #324 |
| 2.4 #315 | Blocks per game | 3.5 #133 |
W Carolina
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 11-9 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs ETSU67–69
- Wvs Mercer77–73
- Wvs Furman86–67
- Wvs Mercer78–74
- W@ VMI81–62
A week or more of rest.
UNC Asheville
12-17 in 2025-26 overall · 9-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs High Point71–75
- Wvs Longwood85–82
- Lvs Charleston So75–92
- W@ Gardner-Webb77–71
- Wvs Radford74–73
A week or more of rest.