Freedom Hall (TN) · at ETSU
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | ETSU | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects ETSU 77–71 · win probability ETSU 72%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 147.9
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: ETSU has more of the edges
LONG 1, ETSU 4 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: LONG 49.7 and allows 53.8; ETSU 55.3 and allows 51.0
Three-pointers
LONG hits 31.4% and allows 33.8%; ETSU hits 34.7% and allows 32.9%. Threes are 34.8% and 37.8% of their shots
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: LONG plays 71.5 a game (54th fastest), ETSU 67.0 (279th). Faster games mean more points
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: LONG 34.6%, ETSU 28.3%. Defensive: LONG 72.3%, ETSU 72.1%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: LONG 19.2%, ETSU 15.2%. Forced: LONG 19.7%, ETSU 18.4%
Home court
ETSU at home. This season: ETSU 0-0 at home, LONG 0-0 away
Even
LONG offense vs ETSU defense
Offense 182nd of 366 against a defense 140th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
LONG has played the 330th-hardest schedule, ETSU the 309th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: LONG 41.4, ETSU 35.0. Allowed: LONG 42.1, ETSU 36.4
Even
ETSU offense vs LONG defense
Offense 224th of 366 against a defense 242nd, on the model’s ratings
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: LONG 28%, ETSU 29%. Transfers in: LONG 6, ETSU 5. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelETSU -6.5
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model147.9
Model edge—
Projected score
LONG 70.7 · ETSU 77.2
Win probability
ETSU 72%
1st half
Spread
ETSU -3.8
Total
69.2
Projected score
LONG 32.7 · ETSU 36.5
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 40% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Longwood
29 games played
Straight up
13-16
45% wins
Against the spread
13-16
45% covers · avg −0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-13
55% overs · avg +2.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | L 60-78 | +14.5 | L −3.5 | 145.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 82-72 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 90-82 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 147.5 | O 172 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 82-83 | -17.5 | L −18.5 | 138.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 70-95 | +3.5 | L −21.5 | 153.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 28 | vs | L 63-70 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 65-61 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 138.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 66-92 | +5.5 | L −20.5 | 148.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | @ | W 84-80 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 76-81 | -13.5 | L −18.5 | 139.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 17 | @ | L 68-71 | +24.5 | W +21.5 | 163.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 74-72 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 82-70 | +7.5 | W +19.5 | 161.5 | U 152 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 67-80 | +16.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 61-72 | +2.5 | L −8.5 | 148.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 77-70 | -3.5 | W +3.5 | 139.5 | O 147 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 83-85 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 91-56 | -16.5 | W +18.5 | 155.5 | U 147 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 81-79 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 156.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 29 | @ | L 60-65 | -1.5 | L −6.5 | 147.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 59-71 | +9.5 | L −2.5 | 156.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 86-66 | -12.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 74-79 | +10.5 | W +5.5 | 153.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 12 | vs | L 74-79 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-75 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 19 | @ | L 65-72 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 107-96 | +2.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | O 203 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 90-74 | -1.5 | W +14.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Mar 6 | vs | L 82-85 | -1.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | O 167 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
PITT
L 60-78
−3.5
12
vs
JMU
W 82-72
+11.5
15
vs
BING
W 90-82
−7.5
18
vs
UMES
L 82-83
−18.5
23
@
COLU
L 70-95
−21.5
28
vs
SIE
L 63-70
−1.5
29
vs
ME
W 65-61
−1.5
30
@
AMER
L 66-92
−20.5
6
@
MORG
W 84-80
−1.5
13
vs
DSU
L 76-81
−18.5
17
@
WAKE
L 68-71
+21.5
20
@
NCCU
W 74-72
−1.5
31
vs
WIN
W 82-70
+19.5
3
@
HPU
L 67-80
+3.5
7
@
UNCA
L 61-72
−8.5
10
vs
PRES
W 77-70
+3.5
17
@
RAD
L 83-85
+2.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 91-56
+18.5
23
vs
CHSO
W 81-79
+0.5
29
@
UPST
L 60-65
−6.5
31
vs
HPU
L 59-71
−2.5
4
@
GWEB
W 86-66
+7.5
7
@
WIN
L 74-79
+5.5
12
vs
UNCA
L 74-79
−7.5
14
vs
UPST
W 82-75
+0.5
19
@
PRES
L 65-72
−4.5
21
@
CHSO
W 107-96
+13.5
28
vs
RAD
W 90-74
+14.5
6
vs
UNCA
L 82-85
−4.5
covered 13didn’t cover 16avg −0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
PITT
L 60-78
−7.5
12
vs
JMU
W 82-72
+4.5
15
vs
BING
W 90-82
+24.5
18
vs
UMES
L 82-83
+26.5
23
@
COLU
L 70-95
+11.5
28
vs
SIE
L 63-70
−12.5
29
vs
ME
W 65-61
−12.5
30
@
AMER
L 66-92
+9.5
6
@
MORG
W 84-80
+9.5
13
vs
DSU
L 76-81
+17.5
17
@
WAKE
L 68-71
−24.5
20
@
NCCU
W 74-72
−0.5
31
vs
WIN
W 82-70
−9.5
3
@
HPU
L 67-80
−13.5
7
@
UNCA
L 61-72
−15.5
10
vs
PRES
W 77-70
+7.5
17
@
RAD
L 83-85
+10.5
21
vs
GWEB
W 91-56
−8.5
23
vs
CHSO
W 81-79
+3.5
29
@
UPST
L 60-65
−22.5
31
vs
HPU
L 59-71
−26.5
4
@
GWEB
W 86-66
+4.5
7
@
WIN
L 74-79
−0.5
12
vs
UNCA
L 74-79
+11.5
14
vs
UPST
W 82-75
+9.5
19
@
PRES
L 65-72
−2.5
21
@
CHSO
W 107-96
+48.5
28
vs
RAD
W 90-74
+9.5
6
vs
UNCA
L 82-85
+26.5
over 16under 13avg +2.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
ETSU
32 games played
Straight up
21-11
66% wins
Against the spread
14-18
44% covers · avg +0.3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-15
53% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | @ | L 64-68 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 141.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 12 | vs | W 75-63 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 78-74 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 145.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 77-62 | -10.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 97-55 | -19.5 | W +22.5 | 146.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 80-57 | -12.5 | W +10.5 | 144.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 2 | @ | L 71-88 | +11.5 | L −5.5 | 140.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 5 | vs | W 91-65 | -7.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 12 | @ | L 75-76 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 143.5 | O 151 |
| Dec 16 | @ | L 58-77 | +17.5 | L −1.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 75-81 | -9.5 | L −15.5 | 134.5 | O 156 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 74-49 | -12.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 77-71 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 81-67 | -16.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | O 148 |
| Jan 10 | vs | W 86-60 | -11.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 14 | @ | L 68-72 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 76-75 | -3.5 | L −2.5 | 148.5 | O 151 |
| Jan 21 | @ | W 67-66 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 143.5 | U 133 |
| Jan 23 | vs | W 84-55 | -17.5 | W +11.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Jan 29 | vs | L 88-90 | -9.5 | L −11.5 | 145.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 1 | @ | W 86-72 | -1.5 | W +12.5 | 146.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 75-71 | -5.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 146 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 87-70 | -14.5 | W +2.5 | 143.5 | O 157 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 73-61 | -10.5 | W +1.5 | 145.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 14 | vs | L 72-82 | -7.5 | L −17.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 78-69 | +1.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 87-75 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 25 | vs | L 69-72 | -6.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | U 141 |
| Feb 28 | @ | L 76-82 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 149.5 | O 158 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 83-76 | -14.5 | L −7.5 | 139.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 69-67 | -2.5 | L −0.5 | 145.5 | U 136 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 61-76 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 139.5 | U 137 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
@
PRES
L 64-68
−10.5
12
vs
NKU
W 75-63
+5.5
15
@
UNA
W 78-74
+5.5
21
vs
MORE
W 77-62
+4.5
23
vs
ULM
W 97-55
+22.5
29
vs
CARK
W 80-57
+10.5
2
@
DAY
L 71-88
−5.5
5
vs
USA
W 91-65
+18.5
12
@
APSU
L 75-76
−4.5
16
@
UNC
L 58-77
−1.5
20
vs
JXST
L 75-81
−15.5
30
@
CIT
W 74-49
+12.5
3
vs
MER
W 77-71
−1.5
7
vs
VMI
W 81-67
−2.5
10
vs
UNCG
W 86-60
+14.5
14
@
WCU
L 68-72
−10.5
17
@
SAM
W 76-75
−2.5
21
@
UTC
W 67-66
−3.5
23
vs
CIT
W 84-55
+11.5
29
vs
WCU
L 88-90
−11.5
1
@
WOF
W 86-72
+12.5
4
vs
FUR
W 75-71
−1.5
7
@
VMI
W 87-70
+2.5
11
vs
UTC
W 73-61
+1.5
14
vs
SAM
L 72-82
−17.5
18
@
FUR
W 78-69
+10.5
21
@
UNCG
W 87-75
+5.5
25
vs
WOF
L 69-72
−9.5
28
@
MER
L 76-82
−4.5
7
vs
CIT
W 83-76
−7.5
8
vs
WCU
W 69-67
−0.5
9
vs
FUR
L 61-76
−16.5
covered 14didn’t cover 18avg +0.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
@
PRES
L 64-68
−9.5
12
vs
NKU
W 75-63
−4.5
15
@
UNA
W 78-74
+6.5
21
vs
MORE
W 77-62
−5.5
23
vs
ULM
W 97-55
+5.5
29
vs
CARK
W 80-57
−7.5
2
@
DAY
L 71-88
+18.5
5
vs
USA
W 91-65
+12.5
12
@
APSU
L 75-76
+7.5
16
@
UNC
L 58-77
−15.5
20
vs
JXST
L 75-81
+21.5
30
@
CIT
W 74-49
−17.5
3
vs
MER
W 77-71
−0.5
7
vs
VMI
W 81-67
+1.5
10
vs
UNCG
W 86-60
−2.5
14
@
WCU
L 68-72
−7.5
17
@
SAM
W 76-75
+2.5
21
@
UTC
W 67-66
−10.5
23
vs
CIT
W 84-55
−2.5
29
vs
WCU
L 88-90
+32.5
1
@
WOF
W 86-72
+11.5
4
vs
FUR
W 75-71
+4.5
7
@
VMI
W 87-70
+13.5
11
vs
UTC
W 73-61
−11.5
14
vs
SAM
L 72-82
+8.5
18
@
FUR
W 78-69
+6.5
21
@
UNCG
W 87-75
+13.5
25
vs
WOF
L 69-72
−8.5
28
@
MER
L 76-82
+8.5
7
vs
CIT
W 83-76
+19.5
8
vs
WCU
W 69-67
−9.5
9
vs
FUR
L 61-76
−2.5
over 17under 15avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Longwood has the better starters
Position by position: Longwood 3, ETSU 1, even 1
LongwoodBetterETSU
G M. Williams TR9.9 pts · 3.6 reb · 4.1 ast
Score 65
←LONGBig
G B. Ward TR11.4 pts · 2.1 reb · 3.6 ast
Score 29
G A. Billups7.8 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 47
=Even
G J. Cooper TR11.2 pts · 2.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 34
G J. Benard7.3 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 44
←LONGSmall
G T. Hennig TR9.5 pts · 2.7 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 24
G T. Robinson TR9.5 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 64
←LONGBig
G M. Johnson5.8 pts · 3.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 28
G E. Kelly2.1 pts · 1.7 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 28
→ETSUSmall
F J. McCullum7.8 pts · 3.6 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 49
LongwoodBetterETSU
LONG offense182nd of 366 · -5.7
=Even
ETSU defense140th of 366 · -2.9
LONG defense242nd of 366 · -6.4
=Even
ETSU offense224th of 366 · -6.9
Backcourt-1.7 · 5 players
←LONGBig
Backcourt-7.6 · 4 players
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
=No call
Frontcourt-0.3 · 1 player
Bench-1.7 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-1.5 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestLONG betterETSU betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
M. Williams24 min · TRA. Billups23 minJ. Benard20 minT. Robinson19 min · TRE. Kelly11 minB. Wesson2 min · TR
Forwards
D. Kauzonas10 min · TRL. Milosevic8 min · TRK. Musungay4 min · TRI. Kalala3 min
Guards
B. Ward31 min · TRJ. Cooper31 min · TRT. Hennig25 min · TRM. Johnson22 minT. Mason17 min · TRD. PayneNew
Forwards
J. McCullum22 minB. Crump15 minM. Marion12 min · TRK. CampbellNewE. SmithNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 75.9 #143 | Points per game | 76.8 #121 |
| 1.07 #215 | Points per possession | 1.15 #59 |
| 71.5 #54 | Pace (possessions) | 67.0 #279 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.7 #254 | Effective FG% | 55.3 #33 |
| 31.4 #309 | 3-point % | 34.7 #132 |
| 34.8 #279 | 3-point attempt rate | 37.8 #216 |
| 41.4 #40 | Free throw rate | 35.0 #180 |
| Possessions | ||
| 19.2 #327 | Turnover rate | 15.2 #79 |
| 34.6 #57 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #252 |
| 12.2 #270 | Assists per game | 13.9 #154 |
| Defense | ||
| 76.2 #223 | Points allowed | 70.1 #61 |
| 1.06 #113 | Points allowed per possession | 1.04 #77 |
| 53.8 #293 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.0 #161 |
| 33.8 #171 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.9 #110 |
| 19.7 #31 | Turnovers forced | 18.4 #79 |
| 72.3 #58 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.1 #64 |
| 8.3 #28 | Steals per game | 8.6 #16 |
| 2.0 #347 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #180 |
Longwood
13-16 in 2025-26 overall · 8-9 in conference · Big South Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs UNC Asheville82–85
- Wvs Radford90–74
- W@ Charleston So107–96
- L@ Presbyterian65–72
- Wvs SC Upstate82–75
A week or more of rest.
ETSU
21-11 in 2025-26 overall · 15-6 in conference · Southern Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Furman61–76
- Wvs W Carolina69–67
- Wvs The Citadel83–76
- L@ Mercer76–82
- Lvs Wofford69–72
A week or more of rest.