Arena-Auditorium · at Wyoming
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | WYO | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects WYO 83–66 · win probability WYO 94%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 148.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: WYO has more of the edges
IDST 1, WYO 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
WYO offense vs IDST defense
Offense 124th of 366 against a defense 349th, on the model’s ratings
IDST offense vs WYO defense
Offense 324th of 366 against a defense 130th, on the model’s ratings
Context
Schedule so far
IDST has played the 295th-hardest schedule, WYO the 105th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Turnovers
Turnover rate: IDST 17.1%, WYO 16.3%. Forced: IDST 14.6%, WYO 16.8%
Free throws
Free throw rate: IDST 38.0, WYO 35.5. Allowed: IDST 38.0, WYO 47.9
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: IDST 6%, WYO 45%. Transfers in: IDST 1, WYO 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Home court
WYO at home. This season: WYO 0-0 at home, IDST 0-0 away
Shooting
Effective FG%: IDST 51.9 and allows 54.5; WYO 51.8 and allows 52.0
Even
Three-pointers
IDST hits 33.6% and allows 34.5%; WYO hits 33.0% and allows 32.8%. Threes are 41.9% and 43.0% of their shots
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: IDST 32.8%, WYO 34.0%. Defensive: IDST 72.1%, WYO 72.0%
Context
Tempo
About 67 possessions: IDST plays 67.3 a game (266th fastest), WYO 67.6 (252nd). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | WYO -17.7 | — |
| Total | — | 148.8 | — |
| Projected score | — | IDST 65.5 · WYO 83.3 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | WYO -10.4 | — |
| 1H total | 69.6 | — |
| 1H projected score | IDST 29.6 · WYO 40 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 3-7 30% | 6-4 60% | |
| 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Idaho St
30 games played
Straight up
10-20
33% wins
Against the spread
14-16
47% covers · avg −2.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
17-13
57% overs · avg +5.4 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | @ | W 71-68 | +4.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | U 139 |
| Nov 9 | @ | L 57-73 | +21.5 | W +5.5 | 135.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | @ | L 74-83 | +11.5 | W +2.5 | 138.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 18 | @ | L 55-64 | +14.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | U 119 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 81-84 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 142.5 | O 165 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 82-50 | -1.5 | W +30.5 | 148.5 | U 132 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 68-59 | -5.5 | W +3.5 | 137.5 | U 127 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 93-79 | -8.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 69-73 | +9.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 83-93 | -5.5 | L −15.5 | 143.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 97-84 | -8.5 | W +4.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 3 | vs | L 87-93 | -3.5 | L −9.5 | 142.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 72-85 | +4.5 | L −8.5 | 155.5 | O 157 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 81-79 | -4.5 | L −2.5 | 139.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 15 | vs | W 76-68 | -2.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 66-84 | -6.5 | L −24.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 22 | @ | L 62-74 | +5.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 60-69 | +4.5 | L −4.5 | 148.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 79-81 | +2.5 | W +0.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 65-88 | +7.5 | L −15.5 | 136.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 73-79 | -8.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | O 152 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 61-69 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 150.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | @ | L 75-88 | +2.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 69-99 | +6.5 | L −23.5 | 146.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 19 | vs | W 73-69 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Feb 21 | vs | W 91-76 | +1.5 | W +16.5 | 144.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 28 | vs | L 73-83 | -2.5 | L −12.5 | 152.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 2 | @ | L 65-83 | -1.5 | L −19.5 | 160.5 | U 148 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 73-65 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 78-85 | +5.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 163 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
@
USD
W 71-68
+7.5
9
@
SDSU
L 57-73
+5.5
15
@
SEA
L 74-83
+2.5
18
@
SCU
L 55-64
+5.5
26
vs
SHSU
L 81-84
−1.5
28
vs
CSUN
W 82-50
+30.5
3
@
KC
W 68-59
+3.5
6
vs
DEN
W 93-79
+5.5
10
@
UVU
L 69-73
+5.5
21
vs
UCD
L 83-93
−15.5
1
vs
SAC
W 97-84
+4.5
3
vs
PRST
L 87-93
−9.5
8
@
UNCO
L 72-85
−8.5
10
@
NAU
W 81-79
−2.5
15
vs
IDHO
W 76-68
+5.5
17
vs
EWU
L 66-84
−24.5
22
@
MTST
L 62-74
−6.5
24
@
MONT
L 60-69
−4.5
31
@
WEB
L 79-81
+0.5
2
@
PRST
L 65-88
−15.5
5
vs
NAU
L 73-79
−14.5
7
vs
UNCO
L 61-69
−5.5
12
@
EWU
L 75-88
−10.5
14
@
IDHO
L 69-99
−23.5
19
vs
MONT
W 73-69
+5.5
21
vs
MTST
W 91-76
+16.5
28
vs
WEB
L 73-83
−12.5
2
@
SAC
L 65-83
−19.5
7
vs
NAU
W 73-65
+3.5
8
vs
PRST
L 78-85
−1.5
covered 14didn’t cover 16avg −2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
@
USD
W 71-68
−13.5
9
@
SDSU
L 57-73
−5.5
15
@
SEA
L 74-83
+18.5
18
@
SCU
L 55-64
−22.5
26
vs
SHSU
L 81-84
+22.5
28
vs
CSUN
W 82-50
−16.5
3
@
KC
W 68-59
−10.5
6
vs
DEN
W 93-79
+29.5
10
@
UVU
L 69-73
+0.5
21
vs
UCD
L 83-93
+32.5
1
vs
SAC
W 97-84
+27.5
3
vs
PRST
L 87-93
+37.5
8
@
UNCO
L 72-85
+1.5
10
@
NAU
W 81-79
+20.5
15
vs
IDHO
W 76-68
−5.5
17
vs
EWU
L 66-84
−2.5
22
@
MTST
L 62-74
−8.5
24
@
MONT
L 60-69
−19.5
31
@
WEB
L 79-81
+8.5
2
@
PRST
L 65-88
+16.5
5
vs
NAU
L 73-79
+10.5
7
vs
UNCO
L 61-69
−20.5
12
@
EWU
L 75-88
+15.5
14
@
IDHO
L 69-99
+21.5
19
vs
MONT
W 73-69
−7.5
21
vs
MTST
W 91-76
+22.5
28
vs
WEB
L 73-83
+3.5
2
@
SAC
L 65-83
−12.5
7
vs
NAU
W 73-65
−4.5
8
vs
PRST
L 78-85
+21.5
over 17under 13avg +5.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Wyoming
32 games played
Straight up
17-15
53% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg +1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-16
50% overs · avg +0.2 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8 | vs | W 92-82 | -15.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | O 174 |
| Nov 11 | vs | W 79-65 | -5.5 | W +8.5 | 153.5 | U 144 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 93-56 | -11.5 | W +25.5 | 160.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 19 | @ | L 70-78 | +1.5 | L −6.5 | 156.5 | U 148 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 75-67 | -15.5 | L −7.5 | 141.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 101-59 | -9.5 | W +32.5 | 153.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 30 | @ | L 72-76 | +19.5 | W +15.5 | 152.5 | U 148 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 93-80 | -14.5 | L −1.5 | 156.5 | O 173 |
| Dec 9 | vs | W 106-79 | -14.5 | W +12.5 | 161.5 | O 185 |
| Dec 15 | vs | W 87-72 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 20 | vs | L 70-82 | -2.5 | L −14.5 | 147.5 | O 152 |
| Dec 30 | @ | W 68-56 | -14.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 3 | @ | L 58-78 | +7.5 | L −12.5 | 151.5 | U 136 |
| Jan 6 | vs | W 98-66 | -4.5 | W +27.5 | 154.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 83-92 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 143.5 | O 175 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 57-74 | +1.5 | L −15.5 | 148.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 60-63 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 145.5 | U 123 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 65-81 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 145.5 | O 146 |
| Jan 24 | vs | W 66-62 | -13.5 | L −9.5 | 141.5 | U 128 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 62-94 | +13.5 | L −18.5 | 148.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 68-57 | -1.5 | W +9.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 63-72 | +12.5 | W +3.5 | 141.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 83-85 | +9.5 | W +7.5 | 149.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 68-79 | +3.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | O 147 |
| Feb 17 | vs | W 92-82 | -9.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 70-65 | +7.5 | W +12.5 | 144.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 24 | @ | L 62-72 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 66-62 | -20.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | U 128 |
| Mar 3 | vs | W 83-73 | +1.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Mar 7 | @ | W 88-78 | -6.5 | W +3.5 | 148.5 | O 166 |
| Mar 11 | vs | L 70-73 | +2.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 17 | @ | L 70-74 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 144 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
8
vs
CSUF
W 92-82
−5.5
11
vs
APSU
W 79-65
+8.5
15
vs
PORT
W 93-56
+25.5
19
@
SHSU
L 70-78
−6.5
23
vs
NORF
W 75-67
−7.5
26
vs
DEN
W 101-59
+32.5
30
@
TTU
L 72-76
+15.5
6
vs
DART
W 93-80
−1.5
9
vs
SDAK
W 106-79
+12.5
15
vs
SDST
W 87-72
+11.5
20
vs
GCU
L 70-82
−14.5
30
@
AF
W 68-56
−2.5
3
@
UNM
L 58-78
−12.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 98-66
+27.5
10
@
NEV
L 83-92
−5.5
14
vs
SDSU
L 57-74
−15.5
17
@
FRES
L 60-63
−6.5
20
vs
BOIS
L 65-81
−14.5
24
vs
SJSU
W 66-62
−9.5
28
@
USU
L 62-94
−18.5
31
vs
CSU
W 68-57
+9.5
3
@
SDSU
L 63-72
+3.5
7
vs
USU
L 83-85
+7.5
14
@
CSU
L 68-79
−7.5
17
vs
FRES
W 92-82
+0.5
21
@
GCU
W 70-65
+12.5
24
@
BOIS
L 62-72
−1.5
28
vs
AF
W 66-62
−16.5
3
vs
NEV
W 83-73
+11.5
7
@
SJSU
W 88-78
+3.5
11
vs
UNLV
L 70-73
−0.5
17
@
WICH
L 70-74
+1.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg +1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
8
vs
CSUF
W 92-82
+19.5
11
vs
APSU
W 79-65
−9.5
15
vs
PORT
W 93-56
−11.5
19
@
SHSU
L 70-78
−8.5
23
vs
NORF
W 75-67
+0.5
26
vs
DEN
W 101-59
+6.5
30
@
TTU
L 72-76
−4.5
6
vs
DART
W 93-80
+16.5
9
vs
SDAK
W 106-79
+23.5
15
vs
SDST
W 87-72
+9.5
20
vs
GCU
L 70-82
+4.5
30
@
AF
W 68-56
−22.5
3
@
UNM
L 58-78
−15.5
6
vs
UNLV
W 98-66
+9.5
10
@
NEV
L 83-92
+31.5
14
vs
SDSU
L 57-74
−17.5
17
@
FRES
L 60-63
−22.5
20
vs
BOIS
L 65-81
+0.5
24
vs
SJSU
W 66-62
−13.5
28
@
USU
L 62-94
+7.5
31
vs
CSU
W 68-57
−17.5
3
@
SDSU
L 63-72
−6.5
7
vs
USU
L 83-85
+18.5
14
@
CSU
L 68-79
+6.5
17
vs
FRES
W 92-82
+25.5
21
@
GCU
W 70-65
−9.5
24
@
BOIS
L 62-72
−12.5
28
vs
AF
W 66-62
−17.5
3
vs
NEV
W 83-73
+12.5
7
@
SJSU
W 88-78
+17.5
11
vs
UNLV
L 70-73
−10.5
17
@
WICH
L 70-74
−4.5
over 16under 16avg +0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: Idaho St 0, Wyoming 0, even 5
Idaho StBetterWyoming
G L. Birley0.5 pts · 0.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G C. Jefferson TR12.7 pts · 1.9 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 48
G E. Harel TR0 pts · 0 reb · 0 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G K. Bennett10.1 pts · 4.8 reb · 2.8 ast
Score 76
G A. Goffe NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
G N. Meyer12.7 pts · 4.9 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 83
G J. Dorsey NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F R. Sondors TR10.4 pts · 4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 15
F Q. Patterson0.9 pts · 0.6 reb · 0.1 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F G. Gores7.3 pts · 3.4 reb · 0.4 ast
Score 65
Idaho StBetterWyoming
IDST offense324th of 366 · -10.6
→WYOBig
WYO defense130th of 366 · -2.4
IDST defense349th of 366 · -9.6
→WYOBig
WYO offense124th of 366 · -3.3
Backcourt-0.3 · 4 players
→WYOSmall
Backcourt+1.8 · 3 players
Frontcourt-1.3 · 1 player
=Even
Frontcourt-2.2 · 2 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
Bench-1.4 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestIDST betterWYO betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
L. Birley4 minE. Harel1 min · TRA. GoffeNewJ. DorseyNewM. MorrisNewT. VirgilNew
Forwards
Q. Patterson7 minM. JohnsonNewI. PalmerNewK. DeMuynckNewM. JohnsonNewB. LowenbachNew
Guards
C. Jefferson31 min · TRK. Bennett28 minN. Meyer28 minU. Rojas17 minP. Gerrits10 min · TRM. De MartinNew
Forwards
R. Sondors29 min · TRG. Gores18 minM. Curtis9 min · TRM. MoraNewN. SummersNewC. PohlNew
Centers
L. RufNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 73.6 #213 | Points per game | 76.2 #137 |
| 1.10 #135 | Points per possession | 1.13 #92 |
| 67.3 #266 | Pace (possessions) | 67.6 #252 |
| Shooting | ||
| 51.9 #151 | Effective FG% | 51.8 #154 |
| 33.6 #192 | 3-point % | 33.0 #234 |
| 41.9 #137 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.0 #116 |
| 38.0 #104 | Free throw rate | 35.5 #166 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #213 | Turnover rate | 16.3 #155 |
| 32.8 #94 | Offensive rebound rate | 34.0 #66 |
| 11.8 #302 | Assists per game | 14.1 #141 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.6 #255 | Points allowed | 72.9 #131 |
| 1.14 #314 | Points allowed per possession | 1.08 #169 |
| 54.5 #315 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.0 #211 |
| 34.5 #220 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.8 #108 |
| 14.6 #316 | Turnovers forced | 16.8 #164 |
| 72.1 #63 | Defensive rebound rate | 72.0 #66 |
| 5.2 #322 | Steals per game | 6.6 #169 |
| 4.0 #78 | Blocks per game | 2.4 #318 |
Idaho St
10-20 in 2025-26 overall · 6-14 in conference · Big Sky Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Portland St78–85
- Wvs N Arizona73–65
- L@ Sacramento St65–83
- Lvs Weber St73–83
- Wvs Montana St91–76
A week or more of rest.
Wyoming
17-15 in 2025-26 overall · 9-12 in conference · Mountain West Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Wichita St70–74
- Lvs UNLV70–73
- W@ San José St88–78
- Wvs Nevada83–73
- Wvs Air Force66–62
A week or more of rest.