The Citadel Bulldogs at Loyola Chicago Ramblers: Model Line and Edge

Mon, Nov 2, 8:00 PM ETGentile Arena · at Loyola Chicago

LineLUC -14.5moved 2 toward CIT

Total142.5down 1 from 143.5

Season records: The Citadel and Loyola Chicago
CIT	This season	LUC
0-0	Record	0-0
0-0	ATS	0-0
0-0	O/U	0-0

ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders

Model: projects LUC 80–62 · win probability LUC 94%

Pick this game

Your picksMy picks ›

Spread

Total

Winner

Line

LUC -14.5

moved 2 toward CIT

Total

142.5

model 142.1

Model edge

LUC by 3.5

model vs market

Public on the spread

97% CIT

97% of the money

The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record

What could decide it: LUC has more of the edges

CIT 1, LUC 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games

LUCBig

CIT offense vs LUC defense

Offense 343rd of 366 against a defense 90th, on the model’s ratings

LUCBig

LUC offense vs CIT defense

Offense 132nd of 366 against a defense 314th, on the model’s ratings

Context

Schedule so far

CIT has played the 233rd-hardest schedule, LUC the 112th. A record against a soft schedule means less

CITBig

Turnovers

Turnover rate: CIT 16.3%, LUC 19.8%. Forced: CIT 14.8%, LUC 12.9%

LUCSmall

Rebounding

Offensive rebound rate: CIT 27.9%, LUC 30.5%. Defensive: CIT 68.5%, LUC 70.3%

LUCSmall

Shooting

Effective FG%: CIT 49.5 and allows 57.5; LUC 49.8 and allows 52.0

LUCSmall

Free throws

Free throw rate: CIT 30.0, LUC 34.8. Allowed: CIT 33.3, LUC 33.6

LUCSmall

Home court

LUC at home. This season: LUC 0-0 at home, CIT 0-0 away

Even

Three-pointers

CIT hits 32.0% and allows 36.6%; LUC hits 31.7% and allows 36.8%. Threes are 47.8% and 47.7% of their shots

Even

Who is back

Minutes back from last season: CIT 18%, LUC 22%. Transfers in: CIT 6, LUC 9. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price

Context

Tempo

About 66 possessions: CIT plays 66.1 a game (313th fastest), LUC 66.1 (309th). Faster games mean more points

Sorted by how lopsided each matchup is, from national ranks. Reasons to look, not picks: the market already knows most of this.

How games like this went

Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines

Situation	Games	Favorite won	Favorite covered	Went over
Home favorites of 10 to 14.5	1928	88%	48%	52%
Non-conference games at this spread	988	88%	50%	51%
Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog	4513	74%	51%	50%
Games with a total of 140 to 144.5	3570	72%	50%	50%

A bet at standard prices needs 52.4% to break even, and most situations sit near 50%. Past rates, not a prediction.

Market

Open → current

Spread

OpenLUC -16.5

2 → CIT

NowLUC -14.5

2 pts toward CIT

Total

Open143.5

▼ 1

Now142.5

Down 1 since the open

Moneyline

CIT +850 · LUC -1658

Line movement

Median of 7 sportsbooks, pre-tip-off · tap a dot

Opened LUC -16.5 · now LUC -15 · moved 1.5 toward CITmodel LUC -18

model LUC -18

Openline modelNow

Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.

Public betting

Share of bets and of money

CIT +14.5Spread

LUC -14.5

Bets

97%

Money

97%

Over 142.5TotalUnder 142.5

Bets

36%64%

Money

37%63%

CITWinner

LUC

Bets

98%

Money

97%

Sports Betting Dime, an average of sportsbooks. Read Mon, Nov 2, 4:41 AM ET. ⓘ

Books

7 sportsbooks · current prices

SpreadTotalMoneyline

Book	Spread		Total		Moneyline
Book	CIT	LUC	Over	Under	CIT	LUC
BetMGMMGM	-14.5-102	+14.5-118	143.5-105	143.5-115	+850	-1600
BetOnline.agBetOnline.ag	-15-110	+15-110	143-110	143-110	—	—
BetRiversBetRivers	-15.5-122	+15.5-105	143.5-115	143.5-110	+800	-1667
BetUSBetUS	-15-110	+15-110	143-110	143-110	—	—
BovadaBovada	-15-115	+15-105	143-110	143-110	+850	-1800
DraftKingsDK	-14.5-102	+14.5-118	142.5-115	142.5-105	+950	-1650
LowVig.agLowVig.ag	-15-106	+15-106	143-108	143-108	—	—

Prices from The Odds API, updated Nov 1, 8:00 PM ET. Green = best price in the column.

Model vs market

	Market	Model	Model edge
Spread	LUC -14.5	LUC -18.1	LUC +3.6
Total	142.5	142.1	Under 0.4
Projected score	—	CIT 62 · LUC 80.1

1st-half model

1st-half slate ›

	Model	Actual
1H spread	LUC -10.6	—
1H total	66.5	—
1H projected score	CIT 27.9 · LUC 38.6	—

The 1st-half model is fitted from the full-game model and past halves. ESPN has no 1st-half lines for college games, so there is no market to compare it with.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

ATS

2025-26 season

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
CIT LLWWW	15-15	50%	7-8	14-15
LUC WWWWW	13-20	39%	6-10	2-6

Venue/role: CIT away, as underdog; LUC home, as favorite. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

2025-26 season

	O-U	Over %	SU
CIT OUOOO	15-15	50%	8-22
LUC UUUOU	15-18	45%	9-24

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Tap for the score and line.

Last 10 games

2025-26

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
CIT	3-7 30%	5-5 50%	6-4 60%
LUC	4-6 40%	7-3 70%	2-8 20%

Wins-losses (pushes last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Next 3 games

With how the last meeting with each opponent went

The Citadel

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 14	@ UNF	No recent meeting
Nov 16	@ CLEM	L69–80WO
Nov 20	vs SCST	L57–74LU

Loyola Chicago

Date	Game	Last meeting
Nov 5	vs WGA	No recent meeting
Nov 11	@ AF	No recent meeting
Nov 14	@ CSU	L67–80LU

Last meeting: result, against the spread, over / under. Hover a result for its date.

ATS History · 2025-26

WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total

The Citadel

30 games played

Straight up

8-22

27% wins

Against the spread

15-15

50% covers · avg −0.2 pts vs the line

Over / Under

15-15

50% overs · avg +2.6 pts vs the total

Straight up

8-2227%

L L L L L L L L L L L L L W L W W L W W L W L L L L L W W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

15-1550%

L L L L L L W W W L L W L W W W W L W W L W L L W L L W W W

3 straight covers3 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

15-1550%

U O O U U U O U O U U O O O U O O U U U U O U U O O U O O O

3 straight overs3 of last 4 over

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 6	@BC	L 47-76	+15.5	L −13.5	144.5	U 123
Nov 10	vsCHSO	L 86-96	+2.5	L −7.5	145.5	O 182
Nov 14	@WGA	L 92-100	+6.5	L −1.5	150.5	O 192
Nov 24	vsBELL	L 58-70	+3.5	L −8.5	156.5	U 128
Nov 26	vsHCU	L 65-72	+1.5	L −5.5	137.5	U 137
Nov 30	vsPRES	L 41-69	+8.5	L −19.5	133.5	U 110
Dec 4	@DAV	L 63-79	+18.5	W +2.5	137.5	O 142
Dec 13	@SC	L 55-71	+22.5	W +6.5	141.5	U 126
Dec 17	@COFC	L 78-82	+17.5	W +13.5	146.5	O 160
Dec 20	@RICH	L 56-80	+18.5	L −5.5	146.5	U 136
Dec 30	vsETSU	L 49-74	+12.5	L −12.5	140.5	U 123
Jan 3	vsWOF	L 86-95	+9.5	W +0.5	144.5	O 181
Jan 7	@MER	L 63-101	+16.5	L −21.5	147.5	O 164
Jan 10	vsWCU	W 79-77	+6.5	W +8.5	148.5	O 156
Jan 15	@UNCG	L 66-69	+9.5	W +6.5	148.5	U 135
Jan 17	@VMI	W 82-68	+6.5	W +20.5	143.5	O 150
Jan 21	vsFUR	W 77-75	+11.5	W +13.5	142.5	O 152
Jan 23	@ETSU	L 55-84	+17.5	L −11.5	141.5	U 139
Jan 29	vsVMI	W 80-56	-2.5	W +21.5	142.5	U 136
Jan 31	vsUNCG	W 71-66	+2.5	W +7.5	147.5	U 137
Feb 5	@SAM	L 64-78	+13.5	L −0.5	146.5	U 142
Feb 7	@UTC	W 78-71	+9.5	W +16.5	142.5	O 149
Feb 11	@WCU	L 49-87	+9.5	L −28.5	145.5	U 136
Feb 14	vsMER	L 54-70	+11.5	L −4.5	147.5	U 124
Feb 19	vsSAM	L 75-78	+10.5	W +7.5	143.5	O 153
Feb 21	vsUTC	L 72-93	+4.5	L −16.5	144.5	O 165
Feb 25	@FUR	L 51-72	+15.5	L −5.5	143.5	U 123
Feb 28	@WOF	W 93-90	+11.5	W +14.5	148.5	O 183
Mar 6	vsUTC	W 88-85	+7.5	W +10.5	148.5	O 173
Mar 7	vsETSU	L 76-83	+14.5	W +7.5	139.5	O 159

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

L 47-76

−13.5

CHSO

L 86-96

−7.5

WGA

L 92-100

−1.5

BELL

L 58-70

−8.5

HCU

L 65-72

−5.5

PRES

L 41-69

−19.5

DAV

L 63-79

+2.5

L 55-71

+6.5

COFC

L 78-82

+13.5

RICH

L 56-80

−5.5

ETSU

L 49-74

−12.5

WOF

L 86-95

+0.5

MER

L 63-101

−21.5

WCU

W 79-77

+8.5

UNCG

L 66-69

+6.5

VMI

W 82-68

+20.5

FUR

W 77-75

+13.5

ETSU

L 55-84

−11.5

VMI

W 80-56

+21.5

UNCG

W 71-66

+7.5

SAM

L 64-78

−0.5

UTC

W 78-71

+16.5

WCU

L 49-87

−28.5

MER

L 54-70

−4.5

SAM

L 75-78

+7.5

UTC

L 72-93

−16.5

FUR

L 51-72

−5.5

WOF

W 93-90

+14.5

UTC

W 88-85

+10.5

ETSU

L 76-83

+7.5

covered 15didn’t cover 15avg −0.2 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

L 47-76

−21.5

CHSO

L 86-96

+36.5

WGA

L 92-100

+41.5

BELL

L 58-70

−28.5

HCU

L 65-72

−0.5

PRES

L 41-69

−23.5

DAV

L 63-79

+4.5

L 55-71

−15.5

COFC

L 78-82

+13.5

RICH

L 56-80

−10.5

ETSU

L 49-74

−17.5

WOF

L 86-95

+36.5

MER

L 63-101

+16.5

WCU

W 79-77

+7.5

UNCG

L 66-69

−13.5

VMI

W 82-68

+6.5

FUR

W 77-75

+9.5

ETSU

L 55-84

−2.5

VMI

W 80-56

−6.5

UNCG

W 71-66

−10.5

SAM

L 64-78

−4.5

UTC

W 78-71

+6.5

WCU

L 49-87

−9.5

MER

L 54-70

−23.5

SAM

L 75-78

+9.5

UTC

L 72-93

+20.5

FUR

L 51-72

−20.5

WOF

W 93-90

+34.5

UTC

W 88-85

+24.5

ETSU

L 76-83

+19.5

over 15under 15avg +2.6 ptslonger = bigger margin

Loyola Chicago

33 games played

Straight up

9-24

27% wins

Against the spread

13-20

39% covers · avg −4.5 pts vs the line

Over / Under

15-18

45% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total

Straight up

9-2427%

W L L L L L L L W W L L W W L L L L L L L L L W L L L L W L W W L

2 of last 4 wonno streak

Against the spread

13-2039%

L L L L L L L L W L L L W W W L L W L L L L W W L L W L W W W W W

5 straight covers4 of last 4 covered

Over / Under

15-1845%

O U U O U U U U O O O O O U U O O O U O U O O U O U U U U U U O U

1 of last 4 overno streak

Game by game: lines, results and totals

TableATSO/U

Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total

Date	Opp	Result	Line	ATS	Total	O/U
Nov 3	vsCLE	W 91-88	-17.5	L −14.5	151.5	O 179
Nov 6	vsMERC	L 65-73	-21.5	L −29.5	144.5	U 138
Nov 9	vsUNT	L 62-64	-1.5	L −3.5	138.5	U 126
Nov 13	@WICH	L 74-95	+5.5	L −15.5	153.5	O 169
Nov 16	vsCSU	L 67-80	+3.5	L −9.5	151.5	U 147
Nov 21	vsNIU	L 59-76	-13.5	L −30.5	148.5	U 135
Nov 25	vsUNI	L 51-72	+8.5	L −12.5	134.5	U 123
Nov 26	vsSJSU	L 51-63	+1.5	L −10.5	136.5	U 114
Dec 2	vsCMU	W 83-72	-6.5	W +4.5	140.5	O 155
Dec 6	vsPRIN	W 73-68	-6.5	L −1.5	136.5	O 141
Dec 14	vsCHST	L 75-84	-15.5	L −24.5	140.5	O 159
Dec 17	@SF	L 71-85	+11.5	L −2.5	143.5	O 156
Dec 20	vsSCU	W 80-78	+15.5	W +17.5	151.5	O 158
Dec 31	@URI	W 61-57	+9.5	W +13.5	145.5	U 118
Jan 3	vsDAY	L 68-70	+7.5	W +5.5	140.5	U 138
Jan 7	vsDAV	L 64-79	+1.5	L −13.5	136.5	O 143
Jan 10	@GW	L 66-101	+14.5	L −20.5	154.5	O 167
Jan 13	vsGMU	L 74-82	+11.5	W +3.5	140.5	O 156
Jan 16	@DAY	L 51-78	+16.5	L −10.5	141.5	U 129
Jan 20	@SBU	L 70-84	+10.5	L −3.5	147.5	O 154
Jan 24	vsDUQ	L 59-71	+5.5	L −6.5	152.5	U 130
Jan 27	vsJOES	L 64-85	+1.5	L −19.5	143.5	O 149
Jan 30	@VCU	L 75-89	+18.5	W +4.5	150.5	O 164
Feb 3	vsLAS	W 71-61	-2.5	W +7.5	140.5	U 132
Feb 6	@DAV	L 64-84	+9.5	L −10.5	140.5	O 148
Feb 13	vsSLU	L 59-86	+17.5	L −9.5	155.5	U 145
Feb 18	@FOR	L 59-62	+8.5	W +5.5	135.5	U 121
Feb 21	@JOES	L 61-75	+9.5	L −4.5	142.5	U 136
Feb 28	vsRICH	W 69-66	+2.5	W +5.5	146.5	U 135
Mar 4	@SLU	L 65-79	+21.5	W +7.5	155.5	U 144
Mar 7	vsGW	W 68-62	+9.5	W +15.5	148.5	U 130
Mar 11	vsRICH	W 75-67	+4.5	W +12.5	141.5	O 142
Mar 12	vsDAV	L 59-64	+5.5	W +0.5	132.5	U 123

Day

Opp

Result

MissedCovered

Margin

CLE

W 91-88

−14.5

MERC

L 65-73

−29.5

UNT

L 62-64

−3.5

WICH

L 74-95

−15.5

CSU

L 67-80

−9.5

NIU

L 59-76

−30.5

UNI

L 51-72

−12.5

SJSU

L 51-63

−10.5

CMU

W 83-72

+4.5

PRIN

W 73-68

−1.5

CHST

L 75-84

−24.5

L 71-85

−2.5

SCU

W 80-78

+17.5

URI

W 61-57

+13.5

DAY

L 68-70

+5.5

DAV

L 64-79

−13.5

L 66-101

−20.5

GMU

L 74-82

+3.5

DAY

L 51-78

−10.5

SBU

L 70-84

−3.5

DUQ

L 59-71

−6.5

JOES

L 64-85

−19.5

VCU

L 75-89

+4.5

LAS

W 71-61

+7.5

DAV

L 64-84

−10.5

SLU

L 59-86

−9.5

FOR

L 59-62

+5.5

JOES

L 61-75

−4.5

RICH

W 69-66

+5.5

SLU

L 65-79

+7.5

W 68-62

+15.5

RICH

W 75-67

+12.5

DAV

L 59-64

+0.5

covered 13didn’t cover 20avg −4.5 ptslonger = bigger margin

Day

Opp

Result

UnderOver

Margin

CLE

W 91-88

+27.5

MERC

L 65-73

−6.5

UNT

L 62-64

−12.5

WICH

L 74-95

+15.5

CSU

L 67-80

−4.5

NIU

L 59-76

−13.5

UNI

L 51-72

−11.5

SJSU

L 51-63

−22.5

CMU

W 83-72

+14.5

PRIN

W 73-68

+4.5

CHST

L 75-84

+18.5

L 71-85

+12.5

SCU

W 80-78

+6.5

URI

W 61-57

−27.5

DAY

L 68-70

−2.5

DAV

L 64-79

+6.5

L 66-101

+12.5

GMU

L 74-82

+15.5

DAY

L 51-78

−12.5

SBU

L 70-84

+6.5

DUQ

L 59-71

−22.5

JOES

L 64-85

+5.5

VCU

L 75-89

+13.5

LAS

W 71-61

−8.5

DAV

L 64-84

+7.5

SLU

L 59-86

−10.5

FOR

L 59-62

−14.5

JOES

L 61-75

−6.5

RICH

W 69-66

−11.5

SLU

L 65-79

−11.5

W 68-62

−18.5

RICH

W 75-67

+0.5

DAV

L 59-64

−9.5

over 15under 18avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin

Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.

Loyola Chicago has the better starters

Position by position: The Citadel 0, Loyola Chicago 3, even 2

The CitadelBetterLoyola Chicago

G E. Bronson TR5.5 pts · 1.7 reb · 1 ast Score 13

LUCBig

G D. Hand TR12.4 pts · 4.4 reb · 1.3 ast Score 58

G C. McKenzie TR2.7 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.3 ast Not ranked

No call

G D. Nessah TR15.8 pts · 6.3 reb · 2.4 ast Score 91

G M. Gonzales3.8 pts · 1.6 reb · 1.6 ast Score 17

Even

G R. Agarwal TR5.9 pts · 4.1 reb · 0.8 ast Score 26

G K. Davis4.3 pts · 1.3 reb · 0.6 ast Score 19

LUCSmall

F E. Ricks TR7.3 pts · 5.6 reb · 1.6 ast Score 53

F R. Bethea TR3.3 pts · 2.3 reb · 0.3 ast Score 32

LUCSmall

F X. Amos11.1 pts · 4.3 reb · 0.7 ast Score 65

The CitadelBetterLoyola Chicago

CIT offense343rd of 366 · -11.7

LUCBig

LUC defense90th of 366 · -0.2

CIT defense314th of 366 · -8.1

LUCBig

LUC offense132nd of 366 · -3.9

Backcourt-7.1 · 4 players

LUCBig

Backcourt+0.8 · 3 players

Frontcourt-0.6 · 1 player

LUCSmall

Frontcourt+0.4 · 2 players

Bench-2.7 · 5 players

LUCBig

Bench+0.6 · 5 players

Score, worst to bestCIT betterLUC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers

Projected starters: college teams publish no depth chart, so these come from minutes played, and a freshman or a new starter can change them. The score is the share of ranked players at the position that player is ahead of. Numbers are this season's once a player has 30 minutes, 2025-26's before that. Bench is the next five by minutes. Tap a player for the full numbers.

Depth chart

Projected rotation by position, starters outlined

The Citadel

Guards

E. Bronson19 min · TRC. McKenzie16 min · TRM. Gonzales13 minK. Davis12 minC. Cormier9 min · TRJ. Heck2 min

Forwards

R. Bethea13 min · TRT. Mrus10 min · TRJ. Hurlburt9 min · TRC. Bonjasky6 minL. Menefee3 minA. Alexander1 min

Centers

Y. AnsongNew

Loyola Chicago

Guards

D. Hand31 min · TRD. Nessah28 min · TRR. Agarwal22 min · TRN. Anderson17 minJ. Dawson10 min · TRC. Jeffrey8 min · TR

Forwards

E. Ricks27 min · TRX. Amos26 minE. Rapieque15 min · TRA. WingNew

Centers

J. Schofield17 min · TRM. Diallo7 min · TRR. KreagerNew

In order of minutes, from rosters as of today. ESPN lists players only as guards, forwards or centers, and no injury report exists for college basketball, so a player who is out may still show here.

Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.

Matchup stats

2025-26 · rank among 365 teams

ChartTable

Scoring

Points per game

CIT68.3 #309

LUC66.8 #337

Points per possession

CIT1.03 #283

LUC1.01 #313

Pace (possessions)

CIT66.1 #313

LUC66.1 #309

Shooting

Effective FG%

CIT49.5 #265

LUC49.8 #246

3-point %

CIT32.0 #283

LUC31.7 #296

3-point attempt rate

CIT47.8 #26

LUC47.7 #27

Free throw rate

CIT30.0 #309

LUC34.8 #188

Possessions

Turnover rate

CIT16.3 #156

LUC19.8 #343

Offensive rebound rate

CIT27.9 #270

LUC30.5 #179

Assists per game

CIT12.2 #272

LUC13.9 #151

Defense

Points allowed

CIT78.9 #293

LUC75.8 #212

Points allowed per possession

CIT1.20 #357

LUC1.14 #315

Opponent effective FG%

CIT57.5 #361

LUC52.0 #214

Opponent 3-point %

CIT36.6 #335

LUC36.8 #342

Turnovers forced

CIT14.8 #306

LUC12.9 #357

Defensive rebound rate

CIT68.5 #227

LUC70.3 #146

Steals per game

CIT5.2 #318

LUC4.1 #363

Blocks per game

CIT2.5 #304

LUC3.8 #101

CIT		LUC
Scoring
68.3 #309	Points per game	66.8 #337
1.03 #283	Points per possession	1.01 #313
66.1 #313	Pace (possessions)	66.1 #309
Shooting
49.5 #265	Effective FG%	49.8 #246
32.0 #283	3-point %	31.7 #296
47.8 #26	3-point attempt rate	47.7 #27
30.0 #309	Free throw rate	34.8 #188
Possessions
16.3 #156	Turnover rate	19.8 #343
27.9 #270	Offensive rebound rate	30.5 #179
12.2 #272	Assists per game	13.9 #151
Defense
78.9 #293	Points allowed	75.8 #212
1.20 #357	Points allowed per possession	1.14 #315
57.5 #361	Opponent effective FG%	52.0 #214
36.6 #335	Opponent 3-point %	36.8 #342
14.8 #306	Turnovers forced	12.9 #357
68.5 #227	Defensive rebound rate	70.3 #146
5.2 #318	Steals per game	4.1 #363
2.5 #304	Blocks per game	3.8 #101

From the box scores. A longer bar is a better national rank, on every row; the better team's bar is solid. A green rank is near the top of Division I, a red one near the bottom. Pace and 3-point rate are styles, so they have no better side.

The Citadel

8-22 in 2025-26 overall · 8-12 in conference · Southern Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs ETSU76–83
Wvs Chattanooga88–85
W@ Wofford93–90
L@ Furman51–72
Lvs Chattanooga72–93

A week or more of rest.

Loyola Chicago

9-24 in 2025-26 overall · 5-15 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference

Last five, 2025-26

Lvs Davidson59–64
Wvs Richmond75–67
Wvs G Washington68–62
L@ Saint Louis65–79
Wvs Richmond69–66

A week or more of rest.