Acrisure Arena · Neutral site
LineNo line yet
Total—
 FOR | This season | PORT |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects FOR 76–69 · win probability FOR 73%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 144.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: FOR has more of the edges
FOR 5, PORT 1 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
FORBigRebounding
Offensive rebound rate: FOR 34.1%, PORT 28.1%. Defensive: FOR 73.2%, PORT 67.5%
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: FOR plays 64.8 a game (349th fastest), PORT 70.2 (106th). Faster games mean more points
FORSmallPORT offense vs FOR defense
Offense 156th of 366 against a defense 71st, on the model’s ratings
FORSmallFOR offense vs PORT defense
Offense 119th of 366 against a defense 202nd, on the model’s ratings
FORSmallThree-pointers
FOR hits 28.9% and allows 33.4%; PORT hits 29.9% and allows 36.1%. Threes are 38.3% and 35.4% of their shots
FORSmallTurnovers
Turnover rate: FOR 17.2%, PORT 19.6%. Forced: FOR 17.2%, PORT 17.0%
PORTSmallFree throws
Free throw rate: FOR 26.4, PORT 34.4. Allowed: FOR 30.3, PORT 32.6
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: FOR 63%, PORT 41%. Transfers in: FOR 4, PORT 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: FOR 48.6 and allows 49.9; PORT 51.2 and allows 52.7
Context
Schedule so far
FOR has played the 136th-hardest schedule, PORT the 124th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Context
Neutral floor
No home court: the model takes it out of the line
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelFOR -6.9
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model144.4
Model edge—
Projected score
FOR 75.7 · PORT 68.8
Win probability
FOR 73%
1st half
Spread
FOR -4.2
Total
67.6
Projected score
FOR 35.9 · PORT 31.7
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FOR | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | 3-7 30% |
| PORT | 5-5 50% | 5-5 50% | 4-6 40% |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Fordham
29 games played
Straight up
14-15
48% wins
Against the spread
16-13
55% covers · avg +1.5 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-22
24% overs · avg −7.3 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | vs NJIT | L 61-72 | -14.5 | L −25.5 | 147.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 11 | vs WAG | W 63-61 | -12.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 124 |
| Nov 14 | @ IONA | L 71-76 | +5.5 | W +0.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 20 | vs LIU | W 69-53 | -4.5 | W +11.5 | 145.5 | U 122 |
| Nov 29 | vs UALB | W 88-68 | -10.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | O 156 |
| Nov 30 | vs COLG | L 62-72 | +1.5 | L −8.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 6 | vs HC | L 69-70 | -10.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Dec 10 | vs FDU | W 75-54 | -11.5 | W +9.5 | 141.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 13 | vs MAN | W 82-53 | -8.5 | W +20.5 | 147.5 | U 135 |
| Dec 22 | vs NHVN | W 65-47 | -13.5 | W +4.5 | 127.5 | U 112 |
| Dec 31 | @ DAY | L 56-63 | +16.5 | W +9.5 | 139.5 | U 119 |
| Jan 4 | vs RICH | L 75-83 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 7 | vs GMU | L 58-67 | +5.5 | L −3.5 | 134.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 10 | @ SBU | W 81-77 | +8.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 14 | @ SLU | L 56-78 | +17.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | U 134 |
| Jan 17 | vs DUQ | L 63-74 | +1.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 21 | @ DAV | L 63-68 | +4.5 | L −0.5 | 135.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | vs LAS | W 64-58 | -5.5 | W +0.5 | 136.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 31 | @ GW | W 79-65 | +11.5 | W +25.5 | 150.5 | U 144 |
| Feb 3 | vs VCU | L 59-63 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 7 | vsSBU | L 67-70 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 10 | @ JOES | W 68-64 | +3.5 | W +7.5 | 135.5 | U 132 |
| Feb 14 | @ URI | W 70-66 | +4.5 | W +8.5 | 134.5 | O 136 |
| Feb 18 | vs LUC | W 62-59 | -8.5 | L −5.5 | 135.5 | U 121 |
| Feb 21 | vsDAV | W 63-59 | +1.5 | W +5.5 | 131.5 | U 122 |
| Feb 28 | @VCU | L 63-82 | +12.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | O 145 |
| Mar 4 | @LAS | L 84-87 | -3.5 | L −6.5 | 131.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | vsURI | W 61-49 | -1.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | U 110 |
| Mar 12 | vsGW | L 62-66 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 128 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
vsNJIT
NJITL 61-72
−25.5
11
vsWAG
WAGW 63-61
−10.5
14
@IONA
IONAL 71-76
+0.5
20
vsLIU
LIUW 69-53
+11.5
29
vsUALB
UALBW 88-68
+9.5
30
vsCOLG
COLGL 62-72
−8.5
6
vsHC
HCL 69-70
−11.5
10
vsFDU
FDUW 75-54
+9.5
13
vsMAN
MANW 82-53
+20.5
22
vsNHVN
NHVNW 65-47
+4.5
31
@DAY
DAYL 56-63
+9.5
4
vsRICH
RICHL 75-83
−5.5
7
vsGMU
GMUL 58-67
−3.5
10
@SBU
SBUW 81-77
+12.5
14
@SLU
SLUL 56-78
−4.5
17
vsDUQ
DUQL 63-74
−9.5
21
@DAV
DAVL 63-68
−0.5
28
vsLAS
LASW 64-58
+0.5
31
@GW
GWW 79-65
+25.5
3
vsVCU
VCUL 59-63
+3.5
7
vsSBU
SBUL 67-70
−1.5
10
@JOES
JOESW 68-64
+7.5
14
@URI
URIW 70-66
+8.5
18
vsLUC
LUCW 62-59
−5.5
21
vsDAV
DAVW 63-59
+5.5
28
@VCU
VCUL 63-82
−6.5
4
@LAS
LASL 84-87
−6.5
7
vsURI
URIW 61-49
+10.5
12
vsGW
GWL 62-66
+3.5
covered 16didn’t cover 13avg +1.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
vsNJIT
NJITL 61-72
−14.5
11
vsWAG
WAGW 63-61
−15.5
14
@IONA
IONAL 71-76
−10.5
20
vsLIU
LIUW 69-53
−23.5
29
vsUALB
UALBW 88-68
+12.5
30
vsCOLG
COLGL 62-72
−8.5
6
vsHC
HCL 69-70
+0.5
10
vsFDU
FDUW 75-54
−12.5
13
vsMAN
MANW 82-53
−12.5
22
vsNHVN
NHVNW 65-47
−15.5
31
@DAY
DAYL 56-63
−20.5
4
vsRICH
RICHL 75-83
+15.5
7
vsGMU
GMUL 58-67
−9.5
10
@SBU
SBUW 81-77
+15.5
14
@SLU
SLUL 56-78
−20.5
17
vsDUQ
DUQL 63-74
−8.5
21
@DAV
DAVL 63-68
−4.5
28
vsLAS
LASW 64-58
−14.5
31
@GW
GWW 79-65
−6.5
3
vsVCU
VCUL 59-63
−24.5
7
vsSBU
SBUL 67-70
−4.5
10
@JOES
JOESW 68-64
−3.5
14
@URI
URIW 70-66
+1.5
18
vsLUC
LUCW 62-59
−14.5
21
vsDAV
DAVW 63-59
−9.5
28
@VCU
VCUL 63-82
+0.5
4
@LAS
LASL 84-87
+39.5
7
vsURI
URIW 61-49
−26.5
12
vsGW
GWL 62-66
−16.5
over 7under 22avg −7.3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Portland
32 games played
Straight up
13-19
41% wins
Against the spread
15-17
47% covers · avg +0.1 pts vs the line
Over / Under
14-18
44% overs · avg −1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6 | vs UAPB | W 83-74 | -12.5 | L −3.5 | 164.5 | U 157 |
| Nov 9 | vs UCD | W 67-63 | -1.5 | W +2.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 15 | @ WYO | L 56-93 | +11.5 | L −25.5 | 160.5 | U 149 |
| Nov 21 | vs CSUF | W 103-85 | -6.5 | W +11.5 | 164.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 22 | vs UNCO | L 80-86 | +3.5 | L −2.5 | 157.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 23 | vs STMN | L 66-76 | +5.5 | L −4.5 | 155.5 | U 142 |
| Nov 26 | vs LBSU | W 93-73 | -5.5 | W +14.5 | 148.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 1 | @ STAN | L 72-94 | +19.5 | L −2.5 | 156.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 14 | vs KENT | W 88-78 | +7.5 | W +17.5 | 160.5 | O 166 |
| Dec 17 | @ ORE | L 69-94 | +19.5 | L −5.5 | 154.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 22 | @ UCSB | L 61-79 | +9.5 | L −8.5 | 147.5 | U 140 |
| Dec 28 | vs WSU | L 62-67 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 129 |
| Dec 30 | vs SCU | L 85-92 | +13.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | O 177 |
| Jan 2 | @ SMC | L 57-78 | +18.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 4 | @ SF | L 68-73 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 147.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 8 | vs PAC | W 90-89 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 144.5 | O 179 |
| Jan 10 | vs ORST | W 82-76 | -2.5 | W +3.5 | 145.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 14 | @ PEPP | L 63-67 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 147.5 | U 130 |
| Jan 17 | @ LMU | W 71-58 | +8.5 | W +21.5 | 148.5 | U 129 |
| Jan 24 | vsSMC | L 69-75 | +14.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 28 | @PAC | L 51-74 | +8.5 | L −14.5 | 142.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 31 | @WSU | L 74-104 | +8.5 | L −21.5 | 152.5 | O 178 |
| Feb 4 | vs GONZ | W 87-80 | +22.5 | W +29.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 7 | vs SEA | W 54-53 | +3.5 | W +4.5 | 143.5 | U 107 |
| Feb 11 | @ USD | L 58-71 | +1.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | U 129 |
| Feb 18 | vsPEPP | L 87-95 | -7.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | O 182 |
| Feb 21 | @SEA | L 59-71 | +7.5 | L −4.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 25 | @GONZ | L 48-89 | +26.5 | L −14.5 | 150.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 28 | vsUSD | W 87-74 | -2.5 | W +10.5 | 148.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 5 | vsPEPP | W 77-68 | -3.5 | W +5.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Mar 6 | vsWSU | W 74-68 | +5.5 | W +11.5 | 149.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 7 | vsSF | L 65-82 | +6.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | O 147 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
6
vsUAPB
UAPBW 83-74
−3.5
9
vsUCD
UCDW 67-63
+2.5
15
@WYO
WYOL 56-93
−25.5
21
vsCSUF
CSUFW 103-85
+11.5
22
vsUNCO
UNCOL 80-86
−2.5
23
vsSTMN
STMNL 66-76
−4.5
26
vsLBSU
LBSUW 93-73
+14.5
1
@STAN
STANL 72-94
−2.5
14
vsKENT
KENTW 88-78
+17.5
17
@ORE
OREL 69-94
−5.5
22
@UCSB
UCSBL 61-79
−8.5
28
vsWSU
WSUL 62-67
−1.5
30
vsSCU
SCUL 85-92
+6.5
2
@SMC
SMCL 57-78
−2.5
4
@SF
SFL 68-73
+6.5
8
vsPAC
PACW 90-89
+4.5
10
vsORST
ORSTW 82-76
+3.5
14
@PEPP
PEPPL 63-67
−5.5
17
@LMU
LMUW 71-58
+21.5
24
vsSMC
SMCL 69-75
+8.5
28
@PAC
PACL 51-74
−14.5
31
@WSU
WSUL 74-104
−21.5
4
vsGONZ
GONZW 87-80
+29.5
7
vsSEA
SEAW 54-53
+4.5
11
@USD
USDL 58-71
−11.5
18
vsPEPP
PEPPL 87-95
−15.5
21
@SEA
SEAL 59-71
−4.5
25
@GONZ
GONZL 48-89
−14.5
28
vsUSD
USDW 87-74
+10.5
5
vsPEPP
PEPPW 77-68
+5.5
6
vsWSU
WSUW 74-68
+11.5
7
vsSF
SFL 65-82
−10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 17avg +0.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
6
vsUAPB
UAPBW 83-74
−7.5
9
vsUCD
UCDW 67-63
−21.5
15
@WYO
WYOL 56-93
−11.5
21
vsCSUF
CSUFW 103-85
+23.5
22
vsUNCO
UNCOL 80-86
+8.5
23
vsSTMN
STMNL 66-76
−13.5
26
vsLBSU
LBSUW 93-73
+17.5
1
@STAN
STANL 72-94
+9.5
14
vsKENT
KENTW 88-78
+5.5
17
@ORE
OREL 69-94
+8.5
22
@UCSB
UCSBL 61-79
−7.5
28
vsWSU
WSUL 62-67
−23.5
30
vsSCU
SCUL 85-92
+19.5
2
@SMC
SMCL 57-78
−11.5
4
@SF
SFL 68-73
−6.5
8
vsPAC
PACW 90-89
+34.5
10
vsORST
ORSTW 82-76
+12.5
14
@PEPP
PEPPL 63-67
−17.5
17
@LMU
LMUW 71-58
−19.5
24
vsSMC
SMCL 69-75
−0.5
28
@PAC
PACL 51-74
−17.5
31
@WSU
WSUL 74-104
+25.5
4
vsGONZ
GONZW 87-80
+14.5
7
vsSEA
SEAW 54-53
−36.5
11
@USD
USDL 58-71
−21.5
18
vsPEPP
PEPPL 87-95
+31.5
21
@SEA
SEAL 59-71
−10.5
25
@GONZ
GONZL 48-89
−13.5
28
vsUSD
USDW 87-74
+12.5
5
vsPEPP
PEPPW 77-68
−9.5
6
vsWSU
WSUW 74-68
−7.5
7
vsSF
SFL 65-82
+0.5
over 14under 18avg −1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Fordham has the better starters
Position by position: Fordham 3, Portland 2, even 0
FordhamBetterPortland
G A. Lindsey TR17.9 pts · 3.3 reb · 4.9 ast
Score 79
←FORSmall
G J. Olvera TR13.7 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.9 ast
Score 51
G L. Patrick TR15 pts · 3.2 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 68
←FORBig
G K. Isaac TR5 pts · 1.8 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 10
F R. Schulte10.4 pts · 9.2 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 82
←FORBig
G D. Censori-Hercules3.2 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 22
F A. Jacobs7.2 pts · 4.8 reb · 0.8 ast
Score 27
→PORTSmall
F J. O'Donnell9.5 pts · 4.2 reb · 1.1 ast
Score 60
C J. Whitbourn8.4 pts · 8.4 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 63
→PORTSmall
F T. George11.7 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 93
FordhamBetterPortland
FOR offense119th of 366 · -2.7
←FORSmall
PORT defense202nd of 366 · -5.0
FOR defense71st of 366 · +0.8
←FORSmall
PORT offense156th of 366 · -4.7
Backcourt+2.1 · 2 players
←FORBig
Backcourt-5.2 · 3 players
Frontcourt+1.3 · 3 players
→PORTSmall
Frontcourt+2.9 · 2 players
Bench+0.2 · 5 players
=Even
Bench-0.2 · 3 players
Score, worst to bestFOR betterPORT betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
FordhamGuards
A. Lindsey38 min · TRL. Patrick29 min · TRK. Odih5 min · TRJ. Laboy4 min · TRA. Crotty1 minM. Miller1 min
Forwards
R. Schulte31 minA. Jacobs29 minA. Bodija19 minR. Akhuar19 minF. Siaca BeyNew
Centers
J. Whitbourn24 minO. EssamNew
PortlandGuards
J. Olvera29 min · TRK. Isaac24 min · TRD. Censori-Hercules21 minR. Parker19 minH. Adam15 min · TRR. NanceNew
Forwards
J. O'Donnell23 minT. George20 minV. Perkovic7 min · TRO. SukurNewH. SewellNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
FOR67.5 #323PORT72.1 #238Points per possession
FOR1.04 #262PORT1.02 #299Pace (possessions)
FOR64.8 #349PORT70.2 #106Shooting
Effective FG%
FOR48.6 #300PORT51.2 #1883-point %
FOR28.9 #356PORT29.9 #3443-point attempt rate
FOR38.3 #205PORT35.4 #263Free throw rate
FOR26.4 #354PORT34.4 #197Possessions
Turnover rate
FOR17.2 #219PORT19.6 #342Offensive rebound rate
FOR34.1 #64PORT28.1 #266Assists per game
FOR13.2 #200PORT15.9 #51Defense
Points allowed
FOR66.3 #17PORT78.1 #271Points allowed per possession
FOR1.02 #47PORT1.11 #258Opponent effective FG%
FOR49.9 #95PORT52.7 #255Opponent 3-point %
FOR33.4 #149PORT36.1 #308Turnovers forced
FOR17.2 #138PORT17.0 #148Defensive rebound rate
FOR73.2 #29PORT67.5 #281Steals per game
FOR7.0 #126PORT5.8 #251Blocks per game
FOR2.2 #335PORT2.9 #246| FOR | PORT | |
|---|---|---|
| Scoring | ||
| 67.5 #323 | Points per game | 72.1 #238 |
| 1.04 #262 | Points per possession | 1.02 #299 |
| 64.8 #349 | Pace (possessions) | 70.2 #106 |
| Shooting | ||
| 48.6 #300 | Effective FG% | 51.2 #188 |
| 28.9 #356 | 3-point % | 29.9 #344 |
| 38.3 #205 | 3-point attempt rate | 35.4 #263 |
| 26.4 #354 | Free throw rate | 34.4 #197 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.2 #219 | Turnover rate | 19.6 #342 |
| 34.1 #64 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.1 #266 |
| 13.2 #200 | Assists per game | 15.9 #51 |
| Defense | ||
| 66.3 #17 | Points allowed | 78.1 #271 |
| 1.02 #47 | Points allowed per possession | 1.11 #258 |
| 49.9 #95 | Opponent effective FG% | 52.7 #255 |
| 33.4 #149 | Opponent 3-point % | 36.1 #308 |
| 17.2 #138 | Turnovers forced | 17.0 #148 |
| 73.2 #29 | Defensive rebound rate | 67.5 #281 |
| 7.0 #126 | Steals per game | 5.8 #251 |
| 2.2 #335 | Blocks per game | 2.9 #246 |
Fordham
14-15 in 2025-26 overall · 8-11 in conference · Atlantic 10 Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs G Washington62–66
- Wvs Rhode Island61–49
- L@ La Salle84–87
- L@ VCU63–82
- Wvs Davidson63–59
A week or more of rest.
Portland
13-19 in 2025-26 overall · 8-13 in conference · West Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs San Francisco65–82
- Wvs Washington St74–68
- Wvs Pepperdine77–68
- Wvs San Diego87–74
- L@ Gonzaga48–89
A week or more of rest.