Ford Center · at Evansville · Conference game
Line
SIU -2.5moved 1 toward EVAN
Total140.5down 2 from 142.5
| This season | EVAN | |
|---|---|---|
| 7-12 | Record | 3-15 |
| 8-11 | ATS | 8-10 |
| 6-13 | O/U | 7-11 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects SIU 75–70 · win probability SIU 67%
Line
SIU -2.5
moved 1 toward EVAN
Total
140.5
model 144.7 · Over by 4
Model edge
SIU by 2.5
model vs market
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: SIU has more of the edges
SIU 5, EVAN 2 · 2025-26 so far
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: SIU 30.9%, EVAN 22.0%. Defensive: SIU 72.7%, EVAN 69.8%
Turnovers
Turnover rate: SIU 17.1%, EVAN 19.1%. Forced: SIU 18.5%, EVAN 15.4%
Shooting
Effective FG%: SIU 49.1 and allows 49.0; EVAN 49.3 and allows 55.1
Three-pointers
SIU hits 27.8% and allows 30.4%; EVAN hits 32.3% and allows 37.6%. Threes are 29.2% and 43.1% of their shots
EVAN offense vs SIU defense
Offense 277th of 366 against a defense 181st, on the model’s ratings
Context
Tempo
About 69 possessions: SIU plays 70.6 a game (91st fastest), EVAN 67.9 (232nd). Faster games mean more points
Home court
EVAN at home. This season: EVAN 1-7 at home, SIU 2-8 away
Rest
SIU 4 days since its last game, EVAN 5
Even
Recent form
Last 5: SIU 1-4 ATS, margin -5.2; EVAN 2-3 ATS, margin -10.4
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: SIU 22%, EVAN 35%. Transfers in: SIU 0, EVAN 2. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: SIU 31.3, EVAN 29.8. Allowed: SIU 31.4, EVAN 31.4
Context
Schedule so far
SIU has played the 139th-hardest schedule, EVAN the 127th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
SIU offense vs EVAN defense
Offense 227th of 366 against a defense 220th, on the model’s ratings
How games like this went
Division I games since 2023-24, closing lines
| Situation | Games | Favorite won | Favorite covered | Went over |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Road favorites of under 3 | 1412 | 54% | 50% | 50% |
| Conference games at this spread | 2832 | 55% | 51% | 49% |
| Lines that moved 1+ toward the underdog | 4513 | 74% | 51% | 50% |
| Games with a total of 140 to 144.5 | 3570 | 72% | 50% | 50% |
Market
Open → current
Spread
OpenSIU -3.5
1 → EVAN
NowSIU -2.5
1 pt toward EVAN
Total
Open142.5
▼ 2
Now140.5
Down 2 since the open
Moneyline
SIU -162 · EVAN +136
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened SIU -3.5 · closed SIU -2.5 · moved 1 toward EVANmodel SIU -5
model SIU -5
Opened 142.5 · closed 140.5 · moved 2 downmodel 144.5
model 144.5
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | SIU -2.5 | SIU -4.9 | SIU +2.4 |
| Total | 140.5 | 144.7 | Over 4.2 |
| Projected score | — | SIU 74.8 · EVAN 69.9 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | SIU -3.1 | — |
| 1H total | 67.8 | — |
| 1H projected score | SIU 35.4 · EVAN 32.3 | — |
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-8 20% | 3-7 30% | 2-8 20% | |
| 1-9 10% | 4-6 40% | 3-7 30% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 7 since 2021-22
SIU 6–1 EVANSIU leads · 7 games since 2021-22 · SIU 3-4 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2024-25 | SIU 68 @ EVAN 59 | EVAN -1.5 | SIU W |
| Jan 1, 2024-25 | EVAN 68 @ SIU 53 | SIU -7.5 | EVAN W |
| Feb 25, 2023-24 | SIU 65 @ EVAN 53 | EVAN +3.5 | SIU W |
| Jan 17, 2022-23 | EVAN 70 @ SIU 77 | SIU -17.5 | EVAN W |
| Nov 30, 2022-23 | SIU 80 @ EVAN 53 | EVAN +8.5 | SIU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
S Illinois
19 games played
Straight up
7-12
37% wins
Against the spread
8-11
42% covers · avg +0.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
6-13
32% overs · avg −1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 101-78 | -12.5 | W +10.5 | 141.5 | O 179 |
| Nov 12 | @ | L 81-86 | +11.5 | W +6.5 | 152.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 85-92 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 23 | vs | W 79-59 | -8.5 | W +11.5 | 153.5 | U 138 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 73-81 | +2.5 | L −5.5 | 161.5 | U 154 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 58-74 | +10.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 74-65 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 141.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 3 | @ | W 86-84 | +9.5 | W +11.5 | 162.5 | O 170 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 83-54 | -8.5 | W +20.5 | 146.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 84-93 | +3.5 | L −5.5 | 153.5 | O 177 |
| Dec 18 | vs | L 68-75 | -1.5 | L −8.5 | 153.5 | U 143 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 69-73 | +6.5 | W +2.5 | 152.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 81-84 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | U 165 |
| Jan 1 | vs | W 75-70 | -7.5 | L −2.5 | 145.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | @ | W 68-67 | +6.5 | W +7.5 | 158.5 | U 135 |
| Jan 7 | @ | L 57-70 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 14 | vs | L 73-76 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 144.5 | O 149 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 68-73 | +3.5 | L −1.5 | 151.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 21 | @ | L 63-69 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 142.5 | U 132 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
KC
W 101-78
+10.5
12
@
NEV
L 81-86
+6.5
17
@
NDSU
L 85-92
−5.5
23
vs
DEL
W 79-59
+11.5
24
vs
UAB
L 73-81
−5.5
26
@
MEM
L 58-74
−5.5
29
vs
LR
W 74-65
−4.5
3
@
HPU
W 86-84
+11.5
10
vs
UTM
W 83-54
+20.5
13
@
RICH
L 84-93
−5.5
18
vs
ILST
L 68-75
−8.5
21
@
BRAD
L 69-73
+2.5
29
@
MUR
L 81-84
+3.5
1
vs
VAL
W 75-70
−2.5
4
@
BEL
W 68-67
+7.5
7
@
UIC
L 57-70
−14.5
14
vs
DRKE
L 73-76
−8.5
17
vs
BEL
L 68-73
−1.5
21
@
VAL
L 63-69
−4.5
covered 8didn’t cover 11avg +0.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
KC
W 101-78
+37.5
12
@
NEV
L 81-86
+14.5
17
@
NDSU
L 85-92
+23.5
23
vs
DEL
W 79-59
−15.5
24
vs
UAB
L 73-81
−7.5
26
@
MEM
L 58-74
−24.5
29
vs
LR
W 74-65
−2.5
3
@
HPU
W 86-84
+7.5
10
vs
UTM
W 83-54
−9.5
13
@
RICH
L 84-93
+23.5
18
vs
ILST
L 68-75
−10.5
21
@
BRAD
L 69-73
−10.5
29
@
MUR
L 81-84
−0.5
1
vs
VAL
W 75-70
−0.5
4
@
BEL
W 68-67
−23.5
7
@
UIC
L 57-70
−19.5
14
vs
DRKE
L 73-76
+4.5
17
vs
BEL
L 68-73
−10.5
21
@
VAL
L 63-69
−10.5
over 6under 13avg −1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Evansville
18 games played
Straight up
3-15
17% wins
Against the spread
8-10
44% covers · avg −3.6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
7-11
39% overs · avg −1.1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 51-82 | +33.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 133 |
| Nov 12 | vs | L 72-77 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 140.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 18 | vs | L 76-84 | -2.5 | L −10.5 | 138.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 73-69 | +6.5 | W +10.5 | 136.5 | O 142 |
| Nov 23 | vs | L 59-97 | +11.5 | L −26.5 | 156.5 | U 156 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 59-78 | +4.5 | L −14.5 | 141.5 | U 137 |
| Dec 3 | vs | W 64-52 | -6.5 | W +5.5 | 136.5 | U 116 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 79-80 | +11.5 | W +10.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 58-82 | +14.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 140 |
| Dec 16 | vs | L 78-83 | +8.5 | W +3.5 | 147.5 | O 161 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 65-66 | -2.5 | L −3.5 | 141.5 | U 131 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 68-76 | +11.5 | W +3.5 | 144.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 1 | @ | L 47-73 | +12.5 | L −13.5 | 144.5 | U 120 |
| Jan 4 | vs | L 48-62 | +4.5 | L −9.5 | 131.5 | U 110 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 69-79 | +8.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | U 148 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 72-69 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 145.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 13 | vs | L 90-94 | +7.5 | W +3.5 | 142.5 | O 184 |
| Jan 20 | @ | L 49-76 | +8.5 | L −18.5 | 139.5 | U 125 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
PUR
L 51-82
+2.5
12
vs
MTSU
L 72-77
−7.5
18
vs
UTA
L 76-84
−10.5
21
vs
ORST
W 73-69
+10.5
23
vs
AKR
L 59-97
−26.5
24
vs
COFC
L 59-78
−14.5
3
vs
BALL
W 64-52
+5.5
6
@
WKU
L 79-80
+10.5
13
@
ND
L 58-82
−9.5
16
vs
BEL
L 78-83
+3.5
21
vs
DRKE
L 65-66
−3.5
29
@
BRAD
L 68-76
+3.5
1
@
ILST
L 47-73
−13.5
4
vs
UNI
L 48-62
−9.5
7
vs
MUR
L 69-79
−1.5
10
@
INST
W 72-69
+10.5
13
vs
BRAD
L 90-94
+3.5
20
@
UIC
L 49-76
−18.5
covered 8didn’t cover 10avg −3.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
PUR
L 51-82
−17.5
12
vs
MTSU
L 72-77
+8.5
18
vs
UTA
L 76-84
+21.5
21
vs
ORST
W 73-69
+5.5
23
vs
AKR
L 59-97
−0.5
24
vs
COFC
L 59-78
−4.5
3
vs
BALL
W 64-52
−20.5
6
@
WKU
L 79-80
+11.5
13
@
ND
L 58-82
+3.5
16
vs
BEL
L 78-83
+13.5
21
vs
DRKE
L 65-66
−10.5
29
@
BRAD
L 68-76
−0.5
1
@
ILST
L 47-73
−24.5
4
vs
UNI
L 48-62
−21.5
7
vs
MUR
L 69-79
−5.5
10
@
INST
W 72-69
−4.5
13
vs
BRAD
L 90-94
+41.5
20
@
UIC
L 49-76
−14.5
over 7under 11avg −1.1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
The starting fives are even
Position by position: S Illinois 1, Evansville 1, even 3
S IllinoisBetterEvansville
G J. Haynes7.9 pts · 2.4 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 71
←SIUBig
G B. Quinet8.6 pts · 2 reb · 2.4 ast
Score 31
G C. Hawkins1.1 pts · 0.3 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
G M. Langenfeld TR2.6 pts · 0.7 reb · 0.5 ast
Not ranked
F M. Pikaar1.7 pts · 1.8 reb · 0.3 ast
Score 19
→EVANBig
F A. Casey13.9 pts · 6 reb · 2 ast
Score 86
F D. Hill NEWNo Division I numbers yet
Not ranked
=No call
F G. Winther TR7.9 pts · 4.1 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 51
C J. Webber1.2 pts · 1.6 reb · 0.3 ast
Not ranked
=No call
F J. Dyson-Merwe2.3 pts · 3.1 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 8
S IllinoisBetterEvansville
SIU offense227th of 366 · -7.0
=Even
EVAN defense220th of 366 · -5.7
SIU defense181st of 366 · -4.1
←SIUSmall
EVAN offense277th of 366 · -8.5
Backcourt+0.1 · 2 players
←SIUSmall
Backcourt-2.2 · 2 players
Frontcourt-1.0 · 3 players
→EVANSmall
Frontcourt+0.8 · 3 players
BenchNo numbers yet
=No call
BenchNo numbers yet
Score, worst to bestSIU betterEVAN betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
J. Haynes21 minC. Hawkins5 minB. McClureNewJ. FugateNewL. WalshNewJ. JacksonNew
Forwards
M. Pikaar11 minD. HillNewD. PauliukonisNewP. RanieriNewT. LaurNew
Centers
J. Webber7 min
Guards
B. Quinet27 minM. Langenfeld7 min · TRM. RiekNewL. EllspermannNewA. GutmanNewR. MasumyanNew
Forwards
A. Casey30 minG. Winther22 min · TRJ. Dyson-Merwe13 minD. NejezchlebNewY. PinasNewJ. GenschawNew
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72.7 #229 | Points per game | 65.8 #347 |
| 1.03 #285 | Points per possession | 0.97 #344 |
| 70.6 #91 | Pace (possessions) | 67.9 #232 |
| Shooting | ||
| 49.1 #286 | Effective FG% | 49.3 #280 |
| 27.8 #363 | 3-point % | 32.3 #268 |
| 29.2 #355 | 3-point attempt rate | 43.1 #109 |
| 31.3 #275 | Free throw rate | 29.8 #315 |
| Possessions | ||
| 17.1 #207 | Turnover rate | 19.1 #324 |
| 30.9 #167 | Offensive rebound rate | 22.0 #355 |
| 13.3 #188 | Assists per game | 12.6 #245 |
| Defense | ||
| 70.5 #62 | Points allowed | 78.3 #275 |
| 1.00 #25 | Points allowed per possession | 1.15 #329 |
| 49.0 #70 | Opponent effective FG% | 55.1 #332 |
| 30.4 #17 | Opponent 3-point % | 37.6 #351 |
| 18.5 #74 | Turnovers forced | 15.4 #258 |
| 72.7 #44 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.8 #170 |
| 8.0 #38 | Steals per game | 5.0 #335 |
| 3.4 #157 | Blocks per game | 3.3 #171 |
S Illinois
7-12 overall · 2-7 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Valparaiso63–69
- Lvs Belmont68–73
- Lvs Drake73–76
- L@ UIC57–70
- W@ Belmont68–67
4 days since their last game.
Evansville
3-15 overall · 1-8 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ UIC49–76
- Lvs Bradley90–94
- W@ Indiana St72–69
- Lvs Murray St69–79
- Lvs Northern Iowa48–62
5 days since their last game.