LJVM Coliseum · at Wake Forest · Conference game
Closing line
WAKE -3.5✓ WAKE covered by 1.5
Closing total152.5Over by 18.5
| This season | WAKE | |
|---|---|---|
| 15-13 | Record | 14-14 |
| 14-14 | ATS | 11-17 |
| 15-13 | O/U | 16-12 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model before tip-off: SYR 76–80 WAKE · ✓ WAKE (62%) won
Loading the game…
Box score
Score by half
| 1H | 2H | T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SYR | 46 | 37 | 83 |
| WAKE | 42 | 46 | 88 |
1st half: SYR 46, WAKE 42 (SYR by 4). The model had WAKE by 2.0 and a total of 72.9 (actual 88).
Team stats
| SYR | WAKE | |
|---|---|---|
| 28-54 52% | Field goals | 33-57 58% |
| 13-26 50% | 3-pointers | 9-16 56% |
| 14-17 82% | Free throws | 13-15 87% |
| 18 5 off | Rebounds | 30 10 off |
| 16 | Assists | 19 |
| 5 | Steals | 6 |
| 0 | Blocks | 5 |
| 8 | Turnovers | 11 |
| 14 | Fouls | 16 |
| 20 | Points in paint | 46 |
| 8 | Fast-break points | 7 |
Players
| SYR | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naithan George G | 37 | 13 | 3 | 10 | 4-8 | 1-3 |
| Donnie Freeman F | 36 | 28 | 5 | 0 | 9-13 | 4-7 |
| Nate Kingz G | 33 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 7-12 | 5-9 |
| J.J. Starling G | 32 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1-6 | 0-1 |
| William Kyle III F | 27 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Sadiq White Jr. F | 12 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 5-8 | 2-2 |
| Tyler Betsey F | 11 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1-3 | 1-3 |
| Kiyan Anthony G | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-3 | 0-1 |
| Akir Souare F | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Tiefing Diawara, Luke Fennell, Calvin Russell III, Aaron Womack III, Noah Lobdell, Bryce Zephir
| WAKE | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myles Colvin G | 37 | 32 | 8 | 3 | 9-12 | 7-8 |
| Juke Harris G | 37 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 4-15 | 1-6 |
| Tre'Von Spillers F | 33 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 8-12 | 0-0 |
| Omaha Biliew F | 22 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-1 |
| Isaac Carr G | 19 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 3-5 | 0-0 |
| Bench | ||||||
| Cooper Schwieger F | 25 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5-5 | 1-1 |
| Sebastian Akins G | 21 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 4-7 | 0-0 |
| Mekhi Mason G | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
Did not play: Anson Beard Jr., Dimitrije Kovacevic, Jaylen Cross, Will Underwood, Vincent Ricchiuti, Marqus Marion, Nate Calmese, Owen Kmety
Loading the game…
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edgeResult
Spread
MarketWAKE -3.5
ModelWAKE -3.6
Model edgeWAKE +0.1
W WAKE covered
Total
Market152.5
Model155.9
Model edgeOver 3.4
W Over
Projected score
SYR 76.2 · WAKE 79.7
SYR 83 · WAKE 88
Win probability
WAKE 62%
1st half
Spread
WAKE -2.0
SYR -4.0
Total
72.9
88 points
Projected score
SYR 35.4 · WAKE 37.5
SYR 46 · WAKE 42
Market
Open → close
Spread
OpenWAKE -4.5
1 → SYR
CloseWAKE -3.5
1 pt toward SYR
Total
Open151.5
▲ 1
Close152.5
Up 1 since the open
Moneyline
SYR +145 · WAKE -175
Line movement
Opening and closing line · tap a dot
Opened WAKE -4.5 · closed WAKE -3.5 · moved 1 toward SYRmodel WAKE -3.5 matches the line
model WAKE -3.5 = line ✓
Opened 151.5 · closed 152.5 · moved 1 upmodel 156
model 156
Openline modelTip-off
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2025-26, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-7 30% | 5-5 50% | 6-4 60% | |
| 3-7 30% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 6 since 2021-22
SYR 2–4 WAKEWAKE leads · 6 games since 2021-22 · WAKE has won the last 3 meetings · SYR 3-3 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2024-25 | WAKE 81 @ SYR 71 | SYR +2.5 | WAKE W |
| Feb 3, 2023-24 | SYR 70 @ WAKE 99 | WAKE -8.5 | WAKE W |
| Mar 8, 2022-23 | WAKE 77 vs SYR 74 | SYR +2.5 | WAKE W |
| Mar 4, 2022-23 | WAKE 63 @ SYR 72 | SYR +1.5 | SYR W |
| Jan 29, 2021-22 | WAKE 72 @ SYR 94 | SYR -1.5 | SYR W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Syracuse
28 games played
Straight up
15-13
54% wins
Against the spread
14-14
50% covers · avg −1.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-13
54% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 85-47 | -21.5 | W +16.5 | 153.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 8 | vs | W 83-43 | -26.5 | W +13.5 | 157.5 | U 126 |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 80-50 | -11.5 | W +18.5 | 143.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 18 | vs | W 78-73 | -21.5 | L −16.5 | 145.5 | O 151 |
| Nov 24 | vs | L 74-78 | +14.5 | W +10.5 | 140.5 | O 152 |
| Nov 25 | vs | L 60-71 | +4.5 | L −6.5 | 144.5 | U 131 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 64-95 | +10.5 | L −20.5 | 145.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 2 | vs | W 62-60 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 147.5 | U 122 |
| Dec 11 | vs | W 71-63 | -11.5 | L −3.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
| Dec 13 | vs | L 69-70 | -9.5 | L −10.5 | 139.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 76-62 | -24.5 | L −10.5 | 131.5 | O 138 |
| Dec 20 | vs | W 91-83 | -14.5 | L −6.5 | 140.5 | O 174 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 77-48 | -22.5 | W +6.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 31 | vs | L 61-64 | +1.5 | L −1.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 6 | @ | W 82-72 | -2.5 | W +7.5 | 146.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 83-72 | +1.5 | W +12.5 | 142.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 13 | vs | W 94-86 | -4.5 | W +3.5 | 160.5 | O 180 |
| Jan 17 | @ | L 73-81 | -5.5 | L −13.5 | 141.5 | O 154 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 74-76 | -3.5 | L −5.5 | 152.5 | U 150 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 76-85 | +1.5 | L −7.5 | 149.5 | O 161 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 68-88 | +10.5 | L −9.5 | 151.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | W 86-72 | -6.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 2 | @ | L 77-87 | +11.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 164 |
| Feb 7 | @ | L 59-72 | +13.5 | W +0.5 | 147.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 11 | vs | W 107-100 | -6.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 207 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 79-78 | +1.5 | W +2.5 | 157.5 | U 157 |
| Feb 16 | @ | L 64-101 | +20.5 | L −16.5 | 144.5 | O 165 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 64-77 | -2.5 | L −15.5 | 154.5 | U 141 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
BING
W 85-47
+16.5
8
vs
DSU
W 83-43
+13.5
15
vs
DREX
W 80-50
+18.5
18
vs
MONM
W 78-73
−16.5
24
vs
HOU
L 74-78
+10.5
25
vs
KU
L 60-71
−6.5
26
vs
ISU
L 64-95
−20.5
2
vs
TENN
W 62-60
+9.5
11
vs
JOES
W 71-63
−3.5
13
vs
HOF
L 69-70
−10.5
17
vs
MERC
W 76-62
−10.5
20
vs
NE
W 91-83
−6.5
22
vs
STO
W 77-48
+6.5
31
vs
CLEM
L 61-64
−1.5
6
@
GT
W 82-72
+7.5
10
@
PITT
W 83-72
+12.5
13
vs
FSU
W 94-86
+3.5
17
@
BC
L 73-81
−13.5
21
vs
VT
L 74-76
−5.5
24
vs
MIA
L 76-85
−7.5
27
@
NCSU
L 68-88
−9.5
31
vs
ND
W 86-72
+7.5
2
@
UNC
L 77-87
+1.5
7
@
UVA
L 59-72
+0.5
11
vs
CAL
W 107-100
+0.5
14
vs
SMU
W 79-78
+2.5
16
@
DUKE
L 64-101
−16.5
21
vs
UNC
L 64-77
−15.5
covered 14didn’t cover 14avg −1.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
BING
W 85-47
−21.5
8
vs
DSU
W 83-43
−31.5
15
vs
DREX
W 80-50
−13.5
18
vs
MONM
W 78-73
+5.5
24
vs
HOU
L 74-78
+11.5
25
vs
KU
L 60-71
−13.5
26
vs
ISU
L 64-95
+13.5
2
vs
TENN
W 62-60
−25.5
11
vs
JOES
W 71-63
−12.5
13
vs
HOF
L 69-70
−0.5
17
vs
MERC
W 76-62
+6.5
20
vs
NE
W 91-83
+33.5
22
vs
STO
W 77-48
−15.5
31
vs
CLEM
L 61-64
−15.5
6
@
GT
W 82-72
+7.5
10
@
PITT
W 83-72
+12.5
13
vs
FSU
W 94-86
+19.5
17
@
BC
L 73-81
+12.5
21
vs
VT
L 74-76
−2.5
24
vs
MIA
L 76-85
+11.5
27
@
NCSU
L 68-88
+4.5
31
vs
ND
W 86-72
+10.5
2
@
UNC
L 77-87
+5.5
7
@
UVA
L 59-72
−16.5
11
vs
CAL
W 107-100
+58.5
14
vs
SMU
W 79-78
−0.5
16
@
DUKE
L 64-101
+20.5
21
vs
UNC
L 64-77
−13.5
over 15under 13avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Wake Forest
28 games played
Straight up
14-14
50% wins
Against the spread
11-17
39% covers · avg −0.9 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-12
57% overs · avg −0.6 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 88-74 | -19.5 | L −5.5 | 139.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 81-65 | -22.5 | L −6.5 | 152.5 | U 146 |
| Nov 11 | vs | L 84-85 | +15.5 | W +14.5 | 168.5 | O 169 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 109-75 | -30.5 | W +3.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 83-84 | +9.5 | W +8.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 69-68 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 160.5 | U 137 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 99-51 | -17.5 | W +30.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 86-73 | -17.5 | L −4.5 | 154.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 2 | vs | L 68-86 | -4.5 | L −22.5 | 159.5 | U 154 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 75-66 | +2.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 141 |
| Dec 14 | vs | W 111-73 | -18.5 | W +19.5 | 165.5 | O 184 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 71-68 | -24.5 | L −21.5 | 163.5 | U 139 |
| Dec 21 | vs | L 67-98 | +5.5 | L −25.5 | 164.5 | O 165 |
| Dec 31 | @ | L 57-70 | +10.5 | L −2.5 | 159.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 3 | vs | W 81-78 | -5.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 7 | vs | L 77-81 | -1.5 | L −5.5 | 157.5 | O 158 |
| Jan 10 | @ | L 84-87 | +10.5 | W +7.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 69-68 | -1.5 | L −0.5 | 168.5 | U 137 |
| Jan 20 | vs | L 79-91 | -1.5 | L −13.5 | 157.5 | O 170 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 69-90 | +19.5 | L −1.5 | 153.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 27 | @ | L 76-80 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 150.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 31 | vs | L 78-96 | +5.5 | L −12.5 | 156.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 7 | vs | L 80-88 | +9.5 | W +1.5 | 162.5 | O 168 |
| Feb 11 | @ | W 83-67 | -3.5 | W +12.5 | 158.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 68-63 | -4.5 | W +0.5 | 150.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 85-77 | +4.5 | W +12.5 | 140.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 21 | @ | L 63-82 | +3.5 | L −15.5 | 150.5 | U 145 |
| Feb 25 | @ | L 67-68 | -3.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 135 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
AMER
W 88-74
−5.5
7
vs
MORE
W 81-65
−6.5
11
vs
MICH
L 84-85
+14.5
16
vs
UML
W 109-75
+3.5
20
vs
TTU
L 83-84
+8.5
21
vs
MEM
W 69-68
−1.5
25
vs
CAM
W 99-51
+30.5
28
vs
NE
W 86-73
−4.5
2
vs
OU
L 68-86
−22.5
6
vs
WVU
W 75-66
+11.5
14
vs
QUC
W 111-73
+19.5
17
vs
LONG
W 71-68
−21.5
21
vs
VAN
L 67-98
−25.5
31
@
NCSU
L 57-70
−2.5
3
vs
VT
W 81-78
−2.5
7
vs
MIA
L 77-81
−5.5
10
@
UNC
L 84-87
+7.5
17
@
FSU
W 69-68
−0.5
20
vs
SMU
L 79-91
−13.5
24
@
DUKE
L 69-90
−1.5
27
@
PITT
L 76-80
−2.5
31
vs
NCSU
L 78-96
−12.5
7
vs
LOU
L 80-88
+1.5
11
@
GT
W 83-67
+12.5
14
vs
STAN
W 68-63
+0.5
18
vs
CLEM
W 85-77
+12.5
21
@
VT
L 63-82
−15.5
25
@
BC
L 67-68
−4.5
covered 11didn’t cover 17avg −0.9 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
AMER
W 88-74
+22.5
7
vs
MORE
W 81-65
−6.5
11
vs
MICH
L 84-85
+0.5
16
vs
UML
W 109-75
+18.5
20
vs
TTU
L 83-84
+6.5
21
vs
MEM
W 69-68
−23.5
25
vs
CAM
W 99-51
−9.5
28
vs
NE
W 86-73
+4.5
2
vs
OU
L 68-86
−5.5
6
vs
WVU
W 75-66
−2.5
14
vs
QUC
W 111-73
+18.5
17
vs
LONG
W 71-68
−24.5
21
vs
VAN
L 67-98
+0.5
31
@
NCSU
L 57-70
−32.5
3
vs
VT
W 81-78
+5.5
7
vs
MIA
L 77-81
+0.5
10
@
UNC
L 84-87
+16.5
17
@
FSU
W 69-68
−31.5
20
vs
SMU
L 79-91
+12.5
24
@
DUKE
L 69-90
+5.5
27
@
PITT
L 76-80
+5.5
31
vs
NCSU
L 78-96
+17.5
7
vs
LOU
L 80-88
+5.5
11
@
GT
W 83-67
−8.5
14
vs
STAN
W 68-63
−19.5
18
vs
CLEM
W 85-77
+21.5
21
@
VT
L 63-82
−5.5
25
@
BC
L 67-68
−10.5
over 16under 12avg −0.6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Syracuse
15-13 overall · 6-9 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs North Carolina64–77
- L@ Duke64–101
- Wvs SMU79–78
- Wvs California107–100
- L@ Virginia59–72
A week or more of rest.
Wake Forest
14-14 overall · 5-10 in conference · Atlantic Coast Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ Boston College67–68
- L@ Virginia Tech63–82
- Wvs Clemson85–77
- Wvs Stanford68–63
- W@ Georgia Tech83–67
3 days since their last game.