United Center · at Bulls · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | CHI | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-4 | Record | 1-5 |
| 2-4 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 3-3 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects MIA 126–119 · win probability MIA 69%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 244.4
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: MIA has more of the edges
MIA 4, CHI 3 · 2026-27 so far
MIA offense vs CHI defense
Offense 1st of 30 against a defense 30th, on the model’s ratings
CHI offense vs MIA defense
Offense 12th of 30 against a defense 26th, on the model’s ratings
Turnovers
Turnover rate: MIA 14.1%, CHI 16.2%. Forced: MIA 15.4%, CHI 14.7%
Shooting
Effective FG%: MIA 54.6 and allows 56.8; CHI 48.2 and allows 56.0
Three-pointers
MIA hits 34.1% and allows 40.6%; CHI hits 28.1% and allows 39.3%. Threes are 41.7% and 47.9% of their shots
Home court
CHI at home. This season: CHI 0-2 at home, MIA 1-1 away
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: MIA 24.5%, CHI 29.2%. Defensive: MIA 72.3%, CHI 69.8%
Context
Schedule so far
MIA has played the 11th-hardest schedule, CHI the 14th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Recent form
Last 5: MIA 2-3 ATS, margin +1.2; CHI 3-2 ATS, margin -10.4
Even
Free throws
Free throw rate: MIA 27.3, CHI 38.3. Allowed: MIA 23.2, CHI 33.5
Context
Tempo
About 108 possessions: MIA plays 106.2 a game (5th fastest), CHI 109.8 (1st). Faster games mean more points
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: MIA 100%, CHI 100%. Transfers in: MIA 0, CHI 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelMIA -6.9
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model244.4
Model edge—
Projected score
MIA 125.7 · CHI 118.8
Win probability
MIA 69%
1st half
Spread
MIA -4.0
Total
121.9
Projected score
MIA 63 · CHI 58.9
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2-4 33% | 2-4 33% | 3-3 50% | |
| 1-5 17% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 21 since 2021-22
MIA 12–9 CHIMIA leads · 21 games since 2021-22 · MIA 11-10 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2025-26 | CHI 91 @ MIA 134 | MIA -5.5 | MIA W |
| Jan 31, 2025-26 | CHI 125 @ MIA 118 | MIA -5.5 | CHI W |
| Jan 29, 2025-26 | MIA 116 @ CHI 113 | CHI +2.5 | MIA W |
| Nov 21, 2025-26 | MIA 143 @ CHI 107 | CHI -2.5 | MIA W |
| Apr 16, 2024-25 | MIA 109 @ CHI 90 | CHI -1.5 | MIA W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Heat
6 games played
Straight up
2-4
33% wins
Against the spread
2-4
33% covers · avg −6 pts vs the line
Over / Under
3-3
50% overs · avg +2.5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
MIN
L 106-131
−26.5
23
vs
DET
L 111-128
−14.5
24
@
CHA
L 110-115
−9.5
26
vs
DAL
L 109-113
−11.5
28
@
ATL
W 129-117
+14.5
30
vs
IND
W 145-125
+11.5
covered 2didn’t cover 4avg −6 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
MIN
L 106-131
−3.5
23
vs
DET
L 111-128
+3.5
24
@
CHA
L 110-115
−2.5
26
vs
DAL
L 109-113
−18.5
28
@
ATL
W 129-117
+2.5
30
vs
IND
W 145-125
+33.5
over 3under 3avg +2.5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Bulls
6 games played
Straight up
1-5
17% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg −8 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +5 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−32.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+8.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−5.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−20.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+1.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
+0.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg −8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
@
TOR
L 92-135
−10.5
23
@
MIL
W 132-125
+15.5
24
vs
WSH
L 120-124
−0.5
26
@
BOS
L 99-134
−0.5
28
vs
NY
L 127-133
+26.5
30
@
BOS
L 111-125
−0.5
over 2under 4avg +5 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Heat has the better starters
Position by position: Heat 3, Bulls 1, even 1
HeatBetterBulls
G D. Mitchell16.2 pts · 1.7 reb · 8.2 ast
Score 48
→CHISmall
G N. Powell20.7 pts · 2.7 reb · 2 ast
Score 71
G K. Thompson10.7 pts · 1.3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 20
=Even
G J. Giddey8.5 pts · 5.3 reb · 7.5 ast
Score 29
F G. Antetokounmpo28.2 pts · 12.3 reb · 5.5 ast
Score 89
←MIABig
F C. Wilson21.2 pts · 6.7 reb · 2.5 ast
Score 6
F A. Wiggins10.8 pts · 3 reb · 1.3 ast
Score 62
←MIABig
F M. Buzelis14.5 pts · 4.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 4
C B. Adebayo16.3 pts · 7.8 reb · 3.3 ast
Score 66
←MIABig
F P. Williams7 pts · 3 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 19
HeatBetterBulls
MIA offense1st of 30 · +4.9
←MIABig
CHI defense30th of 30 · -9.4
MIA defense26th of 30 · -5.2
→CHIBig
CHI offense12th of 30 · +1.2
Backcourt+0.0 · 2 players
→CHIBig
Backcourt+5.1 · 2 players
Frontcourt+23.1 · 3 players
←MIABig
Frontcourt-24.0 · 3 players
Bench-1.8 · 5 players
←MIABig
Bench-6.9 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestMIA betterCHI betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
D. Mitchell34 minK. Thompson21 minP. Larsson30 minD. Smith10 minR. Conwell4 min
Forwards
G. Antetokounmpo32 minA. Wiggins27 minB. Portis23 minS. Fontecchio17 minN. Jovic13 minM. Gardner9 min
Centers
B. Adebayo32 minN. Richards15 min
Out
T. HardawayDay-To-Day
Guards
N. Powell30 minJ. Giddey27 minT. Jones18 minB. Hield14 minJ. Hawkins14 minD. Swain12 min
Forwards
C. Wilson34 minM. Buzelis25 minP. Williams21 minL. Miller19 minZ. Collins18 minI. Okoro18 min
Out
J. SmithDay-To-DayT. AwakaDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 118.3 #9 | Points per game | 113.5 #16 |
| 1.11 #14 | Points per possession | 1.04 #26 |
| 106.2 #5 | Pace (possessions) | 109.8 #1 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.6 #12 | Effective FG% | 48.2 #30 |
| 34.1 #19 | 3-point % | 28.1 #30 |
| 41.7 #20 | 3-point attempt rate | 47.9 #4 |
| 27.3 #19 | Free throw rate | 38.3 #1 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.1 #5 | Turnover rate | 16.2 #20 |
| 24.5 #24 | Offensive rebound rate | 29.2 #9 |
| 28.8 #3 | Assists per game | 24.3 #25 |
| Defense | ||
| 121.5 #26 | Points allowed | 129.3 #30 |
| 1.15 #26 | Points allowed per possession | 1.17 #27 |
| 56.8 #27 | Opponent effective FG% | 56.0 #26 |
| 40.6 #29 | Opponent 3-point % | 39.3 #28 |
| 15.4 #18 | Turnovers forced | 14.7 #21 |
| 72.3 #17 | Defensive rebound rate | 69.8 #24 |
| 8.3 #19 | Steals per game | 8.7 #17 |
| 5.0 #13 | Blocks per game | 5.0 #12 |
Heat
2-4 overall · 2-2 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Pacers145–125
- W@ Hawks129–117
- Lvs Mavericks109–113
- L@ Hornets110–115
- Lvs Pistons111–128
A week or more of rest.
Bulls
1-5 overall · 1-5 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- L@ Celtics111–125
- Lvs Knicks127–133
- L@ Celtics99–134
- Lvs Wizards120–124
- W@ Bucks132–125
A week or more of rest.