TD Garden · at Celtics · Conference game
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | BOS | |
|---|---|---|
| 3-3 | Record | 5-1 |
| 3-3 | ATS | 3-3 |
| 1-5 | O/U | 2-4 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects BOS 120–105 · win probability BOS 84%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 224.8
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 212-225 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: BOS has more of the edges
WSH 1, BOS 6 · 2026-27 so far
WSH offense vs BOS defense
Offense 25th of 30 against a defense 5th, on the model’s ratings
Free throws
Free throw rate: WSH 34.2, BOS 32.3. Allowed: WSH 21.8, BOS 31.7
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WSH 14.6%, BOS 14.9%. Forced: WSH 13.3%, BOS 17.8%
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WSH 20.9%, BOS 28.3%. Defensive: WSH 68.0%, BOS 68.4%
BOS offense vs WSH defense
Offense 15th of 30 against a defense 23rd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
BOS at home. This season: BOS 4-0 at home, WSH 1-2 away
Three-pointers
WSH hits 29.3% and allows 28.7%; BOS hits 35.5% and allows 33.8%. Threes are 37.6% and 45.9% of their shots
Even
Recent form
Last 5: WSH 2-3 ATS, margin -1.4; BOS 3-2 ATS, margin +13.0
Even
Shooting
Effective FG%: WSH 52.1 and allows 48.1; BOS 55.0 and allows 51.3
Context
Tempo
About 103 possessions: WSH plays 102.3 a game (20th fastest), BOS 103.0 (16th). Faster games mean more points
Context
Schedule so far
WSH has played the 26th-hardest schedule, BOS the 25th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Even
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WSH 100%, BOS 100%. Transfers in: WSH 0, BOS 0. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Market vs model
The model’s numbers beside the market’s
MarketModelModel edge
Spread
Market—
ModelBOS -14.1
Model edge—
Total
Market—
Model224.8
Model edge—
Projected score
WSH 105.4 · BOS 119.5
Win probability
BOS 84%
1st half
Spread
BOS -7.8
Total
112.7
Projected score
WSH 52.5 · BOS 60.3
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Last 10 games
2026-27, before tip-off
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-3 50% | 3-3 50% | 1-5 17% | |
| 5-1 83% | 3-3 50% | 2-4 33% |
Recent meetings
Last 5 of 18 since 2021-22
WSH 3–15 BOSBOS leads · 18 games since 2021-22 · BOS has won the last 11 meetings · WSH 7-11 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2025-26 | WSH 100 @ BOS 111 | BOS -20.5 | WSH W |
| Dec 4, 2025-26 | BOS 146 @ WSH 101 | WSH +10.5 | BOS W |
| Nov 5, 2025-26 | WSH 107 @ BOS 136 | BOS -13.5 | BOS W |
| Apr 6, 2024-25 | WSH 90 @ BOS 124 | BOS -19.5 | BOS W |
| Dec 15, 2024-25 | BOS 112 @ WSH 98 | WSH +17.5 | WSH W |
ATS History · 2026-27
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Wizards
6 games played
Straight up
3-3
50% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg +3.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
1-5
17% overs · avg −14 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
21
vs
MIL
W 128-116
+7.5
23
vs
TOR
L 102-112
−0.5
24
@
CHI
W 124-120
+5.5
26
@
CHA
L 103-110
−4.5
28
@
CLE
L 111-121
−0.5
30
vs
CHA
W 95-79
+14.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg +3.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
21
vs
MIL
W 128-116
+4.5
23
vs
TOR
L 102-112
−22.5
24
@
CHI
W 124-120
−0.5
26
@
CHA
L 103-110
−12.5
28
@
CLE
L 111-121
−8.5
30
vs
CHA
W 95-79
−44.5
over 1under 5avg −14 ptslonger = bigger margin
Celtics
6 games played
Straight up
5-1
83% wins
Against the spread
3-3
50% covers · avg +0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
2-4
33% overs · avg +1.8 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
−9.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
+1.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
+20.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
−12.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
+4.5
covered 3didn’t cover 3avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
20
@
DET
L 113-121
+13.5
23
vs
NY
W 107-103
−10.5
26
vs
CHI
W 134-99
−0.5
27
vs
BKN
W 125-124
+25.5
30
vs
CHI
W 125-111
−0.5
1
@
ORL
W 108-97
−16.5
over 2under 4avg +1.8 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Celtics has the better starters
Position by position: Wizards 0, Celtics 3, even 2
WizardsBetterCeltics
G T. Young20.7 pts · 3.8 reb · 10.2 ast
Score 23
→BOSBig
G D. White11.8 pts · 3.3 reb · 5.2 ast
Score 87
G B. Coulibaly8.3 pts · 4 reb · 0.5 ast
Score 4
→BOSBig
G J. Walsh4.3 pts · 3.8 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
F A. Davis22.3 pts · 9.2 reb · 2 ast
Score 86
=Even
F J. Tatum28.3 pts · 6 reb · 7.7 ast
Score 86
F K. George15.2 pts · 4.3 reb · 4.5 ast
Score 36
→BOSSmall
F P. George20.7 pts · 6 reb · 5 ast
Score 66
F A. Dybantsa18 pts · 5 reb · 1.5 ast
Not ranked
=No call
C N. Queta8.8 pts · 5.3 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 62
WizardsBetterCeltics
WSH offense25th of 30 · -2.5
→BOSBig
BOS defense5th of 30 · +4.6
WSH defense23rd of 30 · -2.9
→BOSSmall
BOS offense15th of 30 · +0.8
Backcourt-12.8 · 2 players
→BOSBig
Backcourt+15.6 · 2 players
Frontcourt+11.5 · 3 players
→BOSBig
Frontcourt+21.5 · 3 players
Bench-14.5 · 5 players
→BOSBig
Bench+32.1 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestWSH betterBOS betterNEW no NBA numbers yet
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Young36 minB. Coulibaly26 minW. Riley22 minT. Johnson21 minB. Carrington20 minT. Mann13 min
Forwards
A. Davis34 minK. George32 minA. Dybantsa29 minK. Middleton14 minF. Okpara1 min
Centers
D. Ayton14 min
Out
A. GillDay-To-DayJ. ChampagnieOutA. SarrDay-To-Day
Guards
D. White30 minJ. Walsh17 minP. Pritchard28 minB. Scheierman19 minM. Conley18 minH. Gonzalez12 min
Forwards
J. Tatum36 minP. George31 minS. Hauser20 minA. Williams7 minC. Cenac4 min
Centers
N. Queta21 minL. Garza11 min
Out
M. RobinsonDay-To-Day
Matchup stats
2026-27 · rank among 30 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 110.5 #20 | Points per game | 118.7 #8 |
| 1.08 #19 | Points per possession | 1.15 #6 |
| 102.3 #20 | Pace (possessions) | 103.0 #16 |
| Shooting | ||
| 52.1 #20 | Effective FG% | 55.0 #10 |
| 29.3 #29 | 3-point % | 35.5 #10 |
| 37.6 #28 | 3-point attempt rate | 45.9 #7 |
| 34.2 #5 | Free throw rate | 32.3 #7 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.6 #8 | Turnover rate | 14.9 #11 |
| 20.9 #29 | Offensive rebound rate | 28.3 #12 |
| 24.5 #24 | Assists per game | 28.0 #6 |
| Defense | ||
| 109.7 #11 | Points allowed | 109.2 #9 |
| 1.07 #11 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #9 |
| 48.1 #1 | Opponent effective FG% | 51.3 #7 |
| 28.7 #1 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.8 #12 |
| 13.3 #27 | Turnovers forced | 17.8 #3 |
| 68.0 #28 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.4 #27 |
| 7.2 #24 | Steals per game | 9.2 #9 |
| 5.3 #9 | Blocks per game | 4.0 #25 |
Wizards
3-3 overall · 3-3 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- Wvs Hornets95–79
- L@ Cavaliers111–121
- L@ Hornets103–110
- W@ Bulls124–120
- Lvs Raptors102–112
A week or more of rest.
Celtics
5-1 overall · 5-1 in conference · Eastern Conference
Last five, 2026-27
- W@ Magic108–97
- Wvs Bulls125–111
- Wvs Nets125–124
- Wvs Bulls134–99
- Wvs Knicks107–103
A week or more of rest.