Coastal Carolina @ Temple: Result, Lines & ATS Trends (Week 3, 2024)

Sat, Sep 14, 2024, 2:00 PM EDTWeek 3 · at Temple

Weather at kickoff85°F8 mphgusts 18DryWeather watch ›

Coastal Carolina

2-0 · Power #101

▲ winner

Final

Temple

0-2 · Power #127

final

Closing spread

CCU -17.5

✓ TEM W

Total

51.5

▼ Under · 48 pts

Model before kickoff

CCU 36–18 TEM

✓ CCU (90%) won

Closing line · ESPN BET

SourceESPN BET closing line

OpenCCU -17

CloseCCU -17.5

Total52.5 → 51.5

Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.

Loading the recap…

Market

Open → close

Spread

OpenCCU -17

0.5 → CCU

CloseCCU -17.5

0.5 pts toward Coastal Carolina

Total

Open52.5

▼ 1

Close51.5

Down 1 since the open

Line movement

Opening and closing line · tap a dot

Opened CCU -17 · closed CCU -17.5 · moved 0.5 toward CCUmodel CCU -18.5

model CCU -18.5

Openline modelKickoff

Closing line · ESPN BET

SourceESPN BET closing line

OpenCCU -17

CloseCCU -17.5

Total52.5 → 51.5

Books differ and lines move; check your sportsbook before betting.

Similar games

The recent games that looked most like this one before kickoff, and how they turned out

In the 4 games most like CCU as a 17.5-point road favorite at TEM, the favorite won 3, covered 2, and 3 went over the total.

Compare by

Customize filters

Only include

Show up to

games

This game: CCU won 28–20; the favorite didn’t cover, as in 2 of the 4 similar games. 48 points stayed under 51.5, as in 1 of 4.

Favorite won

3 of 475%

Normal range · usually 87%

Favorite covered

2 of 450%

Normal range · usually 51%

Went over

3 of 475%

Normal range · usually 48%

Only 4 close matches, too few to read much into. Average result: favorite by 16.3 against an average line of 18.5; 52.3 points a game (usually 54.5). When games like this go over ›

All 4 games

Match	Game	Line	Final	Covered	O/U
Loose	UCLA @ COLO 2022 · Week 4 · loose · similar rest & situation	-22	45–17	W	O57
Loose	MRSH @ BGSU 2022 · Week 3 · loose · similar rest & situation	-17	31–34	L	O50
Loose	RUTG @ TEM 2022 · Week 3 · loose · similar rest & spread	-18	16–14	L	U42.75
Loose	BAY @ KU 2021 · Week 3 · loose · similar spread & rest	-17	45–7	W	O48.5

History, not a prediction. Every FBS game from 2021 on is compared with this one as it looked before kickoff (team strength, the betting line, season form, situation, venue and rest), and only close matches are kept. How matches are found

ATS

Records before kickoff

	Season	Cover	Venue	Role
CCU WW	2-0	100%	1-0	1-0
TEM LL	0-2	0%	—	0-2

Venue/role: CCU away, as favorite; TEM home, as underdog. Squares: last 5 games ATS (W covered, L didn’t), oldest first.

Totals

Over/under before kickoff

	O-U	Over %	SU
CCU OO	2-0	100%	2-0
TEM UO	1-1	50%	0-2

Stayed under: it needed 7 in the 4th quarter and got 3. 55% of games with totals 47.5–55.5 went over.

When games like this go over ›

Squares: last 5 games (O over, U under), oldest first. Hover for the score and line.

Last 10 games

Before kickoff, this and last season

	Straight up	Spread	Over / under
CCU	8-2 80%	8-2 80%	5-5 50%
TEM	1-9 10%	2-8 20%	5-4 56%

Wins-losses (pushes and ties last). Spread and over / under skip games without a line.

Matchup stats

Season to date before kickoff · ranks among 137 FBS teams

Power rating this season

pts vs an average team · #rank · tap a dot

CCU−2.5 →−1.1▲ 1.4#71

TEM−13.8 →−20.3▼ 6.5#133

Predashed line = average team · hover or tap a dotW2

CCU

Longer bar = better

TEM

#30

Offense

◀ CCU better

#135

#61

Defense

◀ CCU better

#125

+1.0 #40

Turnovers

◀ CCU better

−4.5 #137

75 plays #19

Pace

◀ CCU faster

64 plays #85

Unit by unitEach offense against the other's defense

When CCU has the ball

Advantage: CCU offense

	CCU off	TEM def	Edge
Points / game	47.5 #13	44.5 #134	CCU
Yards / play	6.72 #41	6.30 #114	CCU
PPA / play	+0.27 #46	+0.38 #132	CCU
Success rate	53% #18	48% #119	CCU

When TEM has the ball

Advantage: CCU defense

	TEM off	CCU def	Edge
Points / game	7.0 #136	24.0 #90	CCU
Yards / play	4.01 #130	5.37 #81	CCU
PPA / play	−0.35 #137	−0.19 #17	CCU
Success rate	25% #137	36% #55	CCU

Bars show league standing (dashed mark = league middle); Offense and Defense use the average rank across the four stats below. In the tables, a highlighted value and the Edge column mark the side ranked better by at least 15% of the league; defense values are what that team allows. Yards and turnovers from ESPN box scores; PPA from CollegeFootballData (garbage time excluded). Descriptive only: the model already uses these.

Points by quarter and half

Per game this season before kickoff · ranks among 30 FBS teams

CCU scoring against the TEM defense

	Q1	Q2	1H	Q3	Q4	2H
CCU scored	15.5	13.5	29.0	10.0	8.5	18.5
TEM allowed	13.0	15.5	28.5	9.0	7.0	16.0

TEM scoring against the CCU defense

	Q1	Q2	1H	Q3	Q4	2H
TEM scored	0.0	1.5	1.5	1.5	4.0	5.5
CCU allowed	1.5	7.0	8.5	3.5	12.0	15.5

Regulation only (overtime is left out). 1H = Q1 + Q2, 2H = Q3 + Q4. #1 scores the most, or allows the fewest. Season to date, not adjusted for opponents.