Credit Union 1 Arena · at UIC
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | UIC | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects UIC 78–69 · win probability UIC 80%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 146.5
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: UIC has more of the edges
RMU 3, UIC 6 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Free throws
Free throw rate: RMU 28.0, UIC 36.2. Allowed: RMU 40.1, UIC 33.9
Three-pointers
RMU hits 38.0% and allows 33.2%; UIC hits 31.6% and allows 33.4%. Threes are 40.7% and 32.8% of their shots
Turnovers
Turnover rate: RMU 18.6%, UIC 17.6%. Forced: RMU 15.8%, UIC 19.7%
Context
Schedule so far
RMU has played the 280th-hardest schedule, UIC the 161st. A record against a soft schedule means less
Shooting
Effective FG%: RMU 54.9 and allows 50.0; UIC 49.8 and allows 50.5
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: RMU 37.5%, UIC 36.3%. Defensive: RMU 71.2%, UIC 68.0%
RMU offense vs UIC defense
Offense 179th of 366 against a defense 106th, on the model’s ratings
UIC offense vs RMU defense
Offense 117th of 366 against a defense 183rd, on the model’s ratings
Home court
UIC at home. This season: UIC 0-0 at home, RMU 0-0 away
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: RMU 32%, UIC 60%. Transfers in: RMU 4, UIC 4. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Context
Tempo
About 68 possessions: RMU plays 67.5 a game (256th fastest), UIC 68.1 (227th). Faster games mean more points
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | UIC -9.6 | — |
| Total | — | 146.5 | — |
| Projected score | — | RMU 68.5 · UIC 78.1 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | UIC -5.6 | — |
| 1H total | 68.5 | — |
| 1H projected score | RMU 31.5 · UIC 37.1 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8-2 80% | 8-2 80% | 3-7 30% | |
| 6-4 60% | 6-4 60% | 5-5 50% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
RMU 1–2 UICUIC leads · 3 games since 2021-22 · RMU 2-1 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2025-26 | UIC 74 @ RMU 88 | RMU +1.5 | RMU W |
| Feb 19, 2021-22 | UIC 96 @ RMU 88 | RMU -1.5 | UIC W |
| Feb 3, 2021-22 | RMU 75 @ UIC 80 | UIC -6 | RMU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Robert Morris
31 games played
Straight up
20-11
65% wins
Against the spread
20-11
65% covers · avg +2.4 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-15
52% overs · avg +0.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4 | @ | L 69-101 | +22.5 | L −9.5 | 136.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 6 | @ | W 81-79 | +7.5 | W +9.5 | 151.5 | O 160 |
| Nov 20 | @ | L 61-75 | +11.5 | L −2.5 | 146.5 | U 136 |
| Nov 23 | @ | L 70-71 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 148.5 | U 141 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 88-74 | +1.5 | W +15.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 61-54 | -8.5 | L −1.5 | 152.5 | U 115 |
| Nov 30 | vs | W 80-62 | -11.5 | W +6.5 | 142.5 | U 142 |
| Dec 4 | @ | W 80-78 | -1.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 158 |
| Dec 6 | @ | L 72-74 | +4.5 | W +2.5 | 153.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 75-70 | +1.5 | W +6.5 | 154.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 17 | vs | W 80-77 | -2.5 | W +0.5 | 140.5 | O 157 |
| Dec 20 | @ | W 79-70 | -13.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | O 149 |
| Dec 29 | vs | L 77-79 | +1.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 156 |
| Jan 2 | @ | W 85-77 | -3.5 | W +4.5 | 148.5 | O 162 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 73-96 | +1.5 | L −21.5 | 161.5 | O 169 |
| Jan 11 | vs | L 74-79 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Jan 15 | @ | L 93-96 | -5.5 | L −8.5 | 160.5 | O 189 |
| Jan 17 | @ | W 92-89 | +7.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | O 181 |
| Jan 22 | vs | W 88-76 | -4.5 | W +7.5 | 152.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 24 | vs | L 67-71 | -6.5 | L −10.5 | 142.5 | U 138 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 74-58 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 162.5 | U 132 |
| Jan 31 | @ | L 71-83 | +2.5 | L −9.5 | 145.5 | O 154 |
| Feb 4 | vs | W 72-66 | +1.5 | W +7.5 | 147.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 7 | @ | W 72-66 | +3.5 | W +9.5 | 143.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 85-68 | -3.5 | W +13.5 | 154.5 | U 153 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 93-69 | -1.5 | W +22.5 | 156.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 22 | @ | W 81-68 | +4.5 | W +17.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Feb 25 | vs | W 73-62 | -8.5 | W +2.5 | 150.5 | U 135 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 83-64 | -12.5 | W +6.5 | 157.5 | U 147 |
| Mar 4 | vs | W 68-53 | -3.5 | W +11.5 | 143.5 | U 121 |
| Mar 9 | vs | L 64-70 | -4.5 | L −10.5 | 146.5 | U 134 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
4
@
IOWA
L 69-101
−9.5
6
@
DRKE
W 81-79
+9.5
20
@
SBU
L 61-75
−2.5
23
@
MONM
L 70-71
+1.5
26
vs
UIC
W 88-74
+15.5
28
vs
SUU
W 61-54
−1.5
30
vs
STET
W 80-62
+6.5
4
@
GB
W 80-78
+0.5
6
@
MILW
L 72-74
+2.5
13
vs
TOL
W 75-70
+6.5
17
vs
YSU
W 80-77
+0.5
20
@
SFPA
W 79-70
−4.5
29
vs
NKU
L 77-79
−0.5
2
@
DETM
W 85-77
+4.5
4
@
OAK
L 73-96
−21.5
11
vs
PFW
L 74-79
−9.5
15
@
IUIN
L 93-96
−8.5
17
@
NKU
W 92-89
+10.5
22
vs
MILW
W 88-76
+7.5
24
vs
GB
L 67-71
−10.5
28
vs
IUIN
W 74-58
+7.5
31
@
PFW
L 71-83
−9.5
4
vs
WRST
W 72-66
+7.5
7
@
YSU
W 72-66
+9.5
12
@
CLE
W 85-68
+13.5
15
vs
OAK
W 93-69
+22.5
22
@
WRST
W 81-68
+17.5
25
vs
DETM
W 73-62
+2.5
28
vs
CLE
W 83-64
+6.5
4
vs
YSU
W 68-53
+11.5
9
vs
DETM
L 64-70
−10.5
covered 20didn’t cover 11avg +2.4 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
4
@
IOWA
L 69-101
+33.5
6
@
DRKE
W 81-79
+8.5
20
@
SBU
L 61-75
−10.5
23
@
MONM
L 70-71
−7.5
26
vs
UIC
W 88-74
+10.5
28
vs
SUU
W 61-54
−37.5
30
vs
STET
W 80-62
−0.5
4
@
GB
W 80-78
+17.5
6
@
MILW
L 72-74
−7.5
13
vs
TOL
W 75-70
−9.5
17
vs
YSU
W 80-77
+16.5
20
@
SFPA
W 79-70
+3.5
29
vs
NKU
L 77-79
+6.5
2
@
DETM
W 85-77
+13.5
4
@
OAK
L 73-96
+7.5
11
vs
PFW
L 74-79
+6.5
15
@
IUIN
L 93-96
+28.5
17
@
NKU
W 92-89
+27.5
22
vs
MILW
W 88-76
+11.5
24
vs
GB
L 67-71
−4.5
28
vs
IUIN
W 74-58
−30.5
31
@
PFW
L 71-83
+8.5
4
vs
WRST
W 72-66
−9.5
7
@
YSU
W 72-66
−5.5
12
@
CLE
W 85-68
−1.5
15
vs
OAK
W 93-69
+5.5
22
@
WRST
W 81-68
+2.5
25
vs
DETM
W 73-62
−15.5
28
vs
CLE
W 83-64
−10.5
4
vs
YSU
W 68-53
−22.5
9
vs
DETM
L 64-70
−12.5
over 16under 15avg +0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
UIC
33 games played
Straight up
17-16
52% wins
Against the spread
18-15
55% covers · avg +3 pts vs the line
Over / Under
16-17
48% overs · avg −0.7 pts vs the total
Against the spread
18-1555%
2 straight misses ATS2 of last 4 covered
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 91-71 | -9.5 | W +10.5 | 142.5 | O 162 |
| Nov 7 | @ | L 73-76 | +6.5 | W +3.5 | 146.5 | O 149 |
| Nov 15 | @ | W 67-63 | -9.5 | L −5.5 | 156.5 | U 130 |
| Nov 20 | vs | L 80-90 | +10.5 | W +0.5 | 158.5 | O 170 |
| Nov 22 | vs | W 84-73 | -11.5 | L −0.5 | 153.5 | O 157 |
| Nov 26 | @ | L 74-88 | -1.5 | L −15.5 | 151.5 | O 162 |
| Dec 3 | vs | L 62-63 | -16.5 | L −17.5 | 163.5 | U 125 |
| Dec 7 | @ | L 66-80 | +12.5 | L −1.5 | 148.5 | U 146 |
| Dec 13 | @ | L 84-87 | +12.5 | W +9.5 | 154.5 | O 171 |
| Dec 17 | vs | L 54-60 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 133.5 | U 114 |
| Dec 21 | @ | L 76-88 | +1.5 | L −10.5 | 137.5 | O 164 |
| Jan 1 | vs | L 77-81 | +5.5 | W +1.5 | 159.5 | U 158 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 59-66 | +2.5 | L −4.5 | 144.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 7 | vs | W 70-57 | +1.5 | W +14.5 | 146.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 63-59 | +10.5 | W +14.5 | 141.5 | U 122 |
| Jan 13 | @ | W 69-61 | +6.5 | W +14.5 | 128.5 | O 130 |
| Jan 17 | vs | W 74-67 | -5.5 | W +1.5 | 139.5 | O 141 |
| Jan 20 | vs | W 76-49 | -8.5 | W +18.5 | 139.5 | U 125 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 85-70 | +7.5 | W +22.5 | 144.5 | O 155 |
| Jan 27 | vs | W 76-74 | -5.5 | L −3.5 | 147.5 | O 150 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 68-66 | +3.5 | W +5.5 | 142.5 | U 134 |
| Feb 3 | @ | L 74-81 | +6.5 | L −0.5 | 157.5 | U 155 |
| Feb 6 | vs | L 62-68 | +1.5 | L −4.5 | 151.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 12 | @ | W 80-70 | -1.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 150 |
| Feb 15 | vs | W 83-56 | +1.5 | W +28.5 | 140.5 | U 139 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 84-46 | -8.5 | W +29.5 | 140.5 | U 130 |
| Feb 21 | vs | L 67-71 | -7.5 | L −11.5 | 138.5 | U 138 |
| Feb 24 | vs | W 93-86 | -1.5 | W +5.5 | 141.5 | O 179 |
| Mar 1 | @ | L 63-79 | -3.5 | L −19.5 | 144.5 | U 142 |
| Mar 6 | vs | W 92-79 | -1.5 | W +11.5 | 150.5 | O 171 |
| Mar 7 | vs | W 72-51 | -4.5 | W +16.5 | 144.5 | U 123 |
| Mar 8 | vs | L 69-84 | +2.5 | L −12.5 | 125.5 | O 153 |
| Mar 18 | @ | L 73-91 | +6.5 | L −11.5 | 150.5 | O 164 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
DETM
W 91-71
+10.5
7
@
ORST
L 73-76
+3.5
15
@
CHST
W 67-63
−5.5
20
vs
HPU
L 80-90
+0.5
22
vs
USI
W 84-73
−0.5
26
@
RMU
L 74-88
−15.5
3
vs
UAPB
L 62-63
−17.5
7
@
YALE
L 66-80
−1.5
13
@
BEL
L 84-87
+9.5
17
vs
UNI
L 54-60
−0.5
21
@
CLT
L 76-88
−10.5
1
vs
MUR
L 77-81
+1.5
4
@
VAL
L 59-66
−4.5
7
vs
SIU
W 70-57
+14.5
10
@
ILST
W 63-59
+14.5
13
@
UNI
W 69-61
+14.5
17
vs
DRKE
W 74-67
+1.5
20
vs
EVAN
W 76-49
+18.5
24
@
BRAD
W 85-70
+22.5
27
vs
INST
W 76-74
−3.5
31
@
SIU
W 68-66
+5.5
3
@
MUR
L 74-81
−0.5
6
vs
BEL
L 62-68
−4.5
12
@
DRKE
W 80-70
+8.5
15
vs
ILST
W 83-56
+28.5
18
@
EVAN
W 84-46
+29.5
21
vs
VAL
L 67-71
−11.5
24
vs
BRAD
W 93-86
+5.5
1
@
INST
L 63-79
−19.5
6
vs
MUR
W 92-79
+11.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 72-51
+16.5
8
vs
UNI
L 69-84
−12.5
18
@
CAL
L 73-91
−11.5
covered 18didn’t cover 15avg +3 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
DETM
W 91-71
+19.5
7
@
ORST
L 73-76
+2.5
15
@
CHST
W 67-63
−26.5
20
vs
HPU
L 80-90
+11.5
22
vs
USI
W 84-73
+3.5
26
@
RMU
L 74-88
+10.5
3
vs
UAPB
L 62-63
−38.5
7
@
YALE
L 66-80
−2.5
13
@
BEL
L 84-87
+16.5
17
vs
UNI
L 54-60
−19.5
21
@
CLT
L 76-88
+26.5
1
vs
MUR
L 77-81
−1.5
4
@
VAL
L 59-66
−19.5
7
vs
SIU
W 70-57
−19.5
10
@
ILST
W 63-59
−19.5
13
@
UNI
W 69-61
+1.5
17
vs
DRKE
W 74-67
+1.5
20
vs
EVAN
W 76-49
−14.5
24
@
BRAD
W 85-70
+10.5
27
vs
INST
W 76-74
+2.5
31
@
SIU
W 68-66
−8.5
3
@
MUR
L 74-81
−2.5
6
vs
BEL
L 62-68
−21.5
12
@
DRKE
W 80-70
+3.5
15
vs
ILST
W 83-56
−1.5
18
@
EVAN
W 84-46
−10.5
21
vs
VAL
L 67-71
−0.5
24
vs
BRAD
W 93-86
+37.5
1
@
INST
L 63-79
−2.5
6
vs
MUR
W 92-79
+20.5
7
vs
DRKE
W 72-51
−21.5
8
vs
UNI
L 69-84
+27.5
18
@
CAL
L 73-91
+13.5
over 16under 17avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
UIC has the better starters
Position by position: Robert Morris 1, UIC 2, even 2
Robert MorrisBetterUIC
G A. Valentine TR12 pts · 4 reb · 3.8 ast
Score 71
=Even
G B. Gealer TR10.9 pts · 2.5 reb · 1.7 ast
Score 79
G D. Livingston9.6 pts · 2 reb · 2.9 ast
Score 23
→UICSmall
G A. Johnson11 pts · 3.4 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 55
G T. Smith6.7 pts · 2.2 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 30
→UICBig
G A. Thomas TR11.7 pts · 3.5 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 69
F J. Dunkley TR12.4 pts · 6.7 reb · 1 ast
Score 74
←RMUSmall
G M. Lowery7.8 pts · 5.6 reb · 2 ast
Score 59
F K. Ugwuakazi TR5.2 pts · 5.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 63
=Even
G R. Washington8.8 pts · 5.1 reb · 0.6 ast
Score 77
Robert MorrisBetterUIC
RMU offense179th of 366 · -5.5
→UICSmall
UIC defense106th of 366 · -1.0
RMU defense183rd of 366 · -4.2
→UICSmall
UIC offense117th of 366 · -2.6
Backcourt-2.8 · 3 players
→UICBig
Backcourt+2.1 · 5 players
Frontcourt+1.5 · 2 players
=No call
FrontcourtNo numbers yet
Bench-0.3 · 3 players
=Even
Bench+0.5 · 4 players
Score, worst to bestRMU betterUIC betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
A. Valentine33 min · TRD. Livingston26 minT. Smith19 minK. Garris16 min · TRE. Cooke9 minL. SloaneNew
Forwards
J. Dunkley29 min · TRK. Ugwuakazi19 min · TRS. Obenjo9 minD. StolbetskiyNewB. OderinloNew
Guards
B. Gealer30 min · TRA. Johnson29 minA. Thomas28 min · TRM. Lowery26 minR. Washington23 minA. Henderson21 min
Forwards
J. Nathaniel20 minL. Scroggins17 min · TRN. BarrantesNewD. HudsonNewD. ShawNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 76.8 #122 | Points per game | 73.9 #196 |
| 1.14 #67 | Points per possession | 1.09 #171 |
| 67.5 #256 | Pace (possessions) | 68.1 #227 |
| Shooting | ||
| 54.9 #39 | Effective FG% | 49.8 #245 |
| 38.0 #18 | 3-point % | 31.6 #300 |
| 40.7 #154 | 3-point attempt rate | 32.8 #319 |
| 28.0 #343 | Free throw rate | 36.2 #145 |
| Possessions | ||
| 18.6 #305 | Turnover rate | 17.6 #247 |
| 37.5 #11 | Offensive rebound rate | 36.3 #22 |
| 17.6 #13 | Assists per game | 14.1 #143 |
| Defense | ||
| 73.4 #139 | Points allowed | 71.2 #81 |
| 1.08 #174 | Points allowed per possession | 1.05 #83 |
| 50.0 #100 | Opponent effective FG% | 50.5 #125 |
| 33.2 #135 | Opponent 3-point % | 33.4 #147 |
| 15.8 #230 | Turnovers forced | 19.7 #30 |
| 71.2 #98 | Defensive rebound rate | 68.0 #255 |
| 5.5 #292 | Steals per game | 7.6 #70 |
| 2.5 #308 | Blocks per game | 3.6 #126 |
Robert Morris
20-11 in 2025-26 overall · 14-8 in conference · Horizon League
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Detroit Mercy64–70
- Wvs Youngstown St68–53
- Wvs Cleveland St83–64
- Wvs Detroit Mercy73–62
- W@ Wright St81–68
A week or more of rest.
UIC
17-16 in 2025-26 overall · 14-9 in conference · Missouri Valley Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- L@ California73–91
- Lvs Northern Iowa69–84
- Wvs Drake72–51
- Wvs Murray St92–79
- L@ Indiana St63–79
A week or more of rest.