Reynolds Center · at Tulsa
LineNo line yet
Total—
| This season | TLSA | |
|---|---|---|
| 0-0 | Record | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | ATS | 0-0 |
| 0-0 | O/U | 0-0 |
ATS = covered-didn’t-push · O/U = overs-unders
Model: projects TLSA 81–74 · win probability TLSA 72%
Pick this game
Your picksMy picks ›
Winner
Line
—
no line yet
Total
—
model 154.7
Model edge
—
No market line yet
Public
—
No split yet for this game
The model has not beaten the closing line: with an edge of 3 or more it went 409-367 in 2025-26. Model record
What could decide it: TLSA has more of the edges
WKU 2, TLSA 5 · 2025-26 numbers until both teams have played three games
Shooting
Effective FG%: WKU 47.5 and allows 51.2; TLSA 55.4 and allows 49.5
Three-pointers
WKU hits 33.4% and allows 34.3%; TLSA hits 38.5% and allows 32.4%. Threes are 39.5% and 46.7% of their shots
Free throws
Free throw rate: WKU 41.2, TLSA 41.4. Allowed: WKU 46.8, TLSA 32.0
Turnovers
Turnover rate: WKU 14.5%, TLSA 15.6%. Forced: WKU 17.2%, TLSA 15.4%
TLSA offense vs WKU defense
Offense 99th of 366 against a defense 169th, on the model’s ratings
Home court
TLSA at home. This season: TLSA 0-0 at home, WKU 0-0 away
Context
Schedule so far
WKU has played the 160th-hardest schedule, TLSA the 111th. A record against a soft schedule means less
Who is back
Minutes back from last season: WKU 44%, TLSA 18%. Transfers in: WKU 4, TLSA 7. Early in a season, turnover makes teams harder to price
Even
Rebounding
Offensive rebound rate: WKU 31.8%, TLSA 32.8%. Defensive: WKU 70.5%, TLSA 71.0%
Context
Tempo
About 71 possessions: WKU plays 71.5 a game (52nd fastest), TLSA 70.1 (115th). Faster games mean more points
Even
WKU offense vs TLSA defense
Offense 115th of 366 against a defense 133rd, on the model’s ratings
Market
Open → current
Spread
Open—
no open
Now—
Opening line not available
Total
Open—
no open
Now—
Moneyline
—
Pre-game lines only (ESPN, DraftKings first). After tip-off the line shown is the closing line.
Model vs market
| Market | Model | Model edge | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spread | — | TLSA -6.5 | — |
| Total | — | 154.7 | — |
| Projected score | — | WKU 74.1 · TLSA 80.6 |
1st-half model
| Model | Actual | |
|---|---|---|
| 1H spread | TLSA -3.8 | — |
| 1H total | 72.3 | — |
| 1H projected score | WKU 34.3 · TLSA 38 | — |
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Last 10 games
2025-26
| Straight up | Spread | Over / under | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 60% | 4-6 40% | 7-3 70% | |
| 8-2 80% | 4-6 40% | 6-4 60% |
Recent meetings
Since 2021-22
WKU 0–1 TLSATLSA leads · 1 game since 2021-22 · WKU 1-0 ATS
| Date | Result | Line | Covered |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2025-26 | TLSA 82 @ WKU 81 | WKU +2.5 | WKU W |
ATS History · 2025-26
WwinLloss·Wats winLats lossPpush·Owent over the totalUwent under the total
Western KY
30 games played
Straight up
16-14
53% wins
Against the spread
15-15
50% covers · avg −0.7 pts vs the line
Over / Under
15-15
50% overs · avg +1 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | vs | W 82-70 | -14.5 | L −2.5 | 153.5 | U 152 |
| Nov 10 | @ | W 87-79 | -1.5 | W +6.5 | 162.5 | O 166 |
| Nov 16 | vs | W 95-82 | -12.5 | W +0.5 | 167.5 | O 177 |
| Nov 26 | vs | L 78-83 | +18.5 | W +13.5 | 168.5 | U 161 |
| Nov 27 | vs | L 91-97 | +7.5 | W +1.5 | 167.5 | O 188 |
| Nov 28 | vs | W 75-70 | +4.5 | W +9.5 | 155.5 | U 145 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 80-79 | -11.5 | L −10.5 | 147.5 | O 159 |
| Dec 10 | @ | L 61-77 | +1.5 | L −14.5 | 159.5 | U 138 |
| Dec 19 | vs | L 81-82 | +2.5 | W +1.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 29 | @ | L 67-78 | -2.5 | L −13.5 | 142.5 | O 145 |
| Jan 2 | vs | W 102-91 | -5.5 | W +5.5 | 168.5 | O 193 |
| Jan 4 | vs | W 66-61 | -9.5 | L −4.5 | 145.5 | U 127 |
| Jan 8 | @ | L 64-80 | +2.5 | L −13.5 | 154.5 | U 144 |
| Jan 10 | @ | W 68-56 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 144.5 | U 124 |
| Jan 14 | vs | W 87-72 | -6.5 | W +8.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Jan 17 | vs | L 65-81 | -7.5 | L −23.5 | 165.5 | U 146 |
| Jan 21 | vs | L 69-76 | +1.5 | L −5.5 | 148.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 24 | @ | L 58-73 | +5.5 | L −9.5 | 156.5 | U 131 |
| Jan 28 | @ | L 69-72 | +4.5 | W +1.5 | 160.5 | U 141 |
| Jan 31 | @ | W 65-60 | +6.5 | W +11.5 | 140.5 | U 125 |
| Feb 5 | vs | L 66-71 | -4.5 | L −9.5 | 140.5 | U 137 |
| Feb 7 | vs | W 80-70 | -4.5 | W +5.5 | 159.5 | U 150 |
| Feb 14 | vs | W 82-80 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Feb 18 | @ | W 88-87 | -4.5 | L −3.5 | 139.5 | O 175 |
| Feb 21 | @ | W 94-73 | +7.5 | W +28.5 | 147.5 | O 167 |
| Feb 26 | vs | W 93-70 | -4.5 | W +18.5 | 151.5 | O 163 |
| Feb 28 | vs | W 97-65 | -9.5 | W +22.5 | 145.5 | O 162 |
| Mar 5 | @ | L 74-87 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | O 161 |
| Mar 7 | @ | L 67-92 | -1.5 | L −26.5 | 160.5 | U 159 |
| Mar 12 | vs | L 87-96 | -1.5 | L −10.5 | 159.5 | O 183 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
3
vs
TNTC
W 82-70
−2.5
10
@
EKU
W 87-79
+6.5
16
vs
TNST
W 95-82
+0.5
26
vs
VAN
L 78-83
+13.5
27
vs
USF
L 91-97
+1.5
28
vs
WICH
W 75-70
+9.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 80-79
−10.5
10
@
MRSH
L 61-77
−14.5
19
vs
TLSA
L 81-82
+1.5
29
@
JXST
L 67-78
−13.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 102-91
+5.5
4
vs
LT
W 66-61
−4.5
8
@
NMSU
L 64-80
−13.5
10
@
UTEP
W 68-56
+8.5
14
vs
MOST
W 87-72
+8.5
17
vs
KENN
L 65-81
−23.5
21
vs
LIB
L 69-76
−5.5
24
@
SHSU
L 58-73
−9.5
28
@
KENN
L 69-72
+1.5
31
@
MTSU
W 65-60
+11.5
5
vs
JXST
L 66-71
−9.5
7
vs
FIU
W 80-70
+5.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 82-80
−1.5
18
@
DEL
W 88-87
−3.5
21
@
LIB
W 94-73
+28.5
26
vs
NMSU
W 93-70
+18.5
28
vs
UTEP
W 97-65
+22.5
5
@
MOST
L 74-87
−14.5
7
@
FIU
L 67-92
−26.5
12
vs
KENN
L 87-96
−10.5
covered 15didn’t cover 15avg −0.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
3
vs
TNTC
W 82-70
−1.5
10
@
EKU
W 87-79
+3.5
16
vs
TNST
W 95-82
+9.5
26
vs
VAN
L 78-83
−7.5
27
vs
USF
L 91-97
+20.5
28
vs
WICH
W 75-70
−10.5
6
vs
EVAN
W 80-79
+11.5
10
@
MRSH
L 61-77
−21.5
19
vs
TLSA
L 81-82
+4.5
29
@
JXST
L 67-78
+2.5
2
vs
SHSU
W 102-91
+24.5
4
vs
LT
W 66-61
−18.5
8
@
NMSU
L 64-80
−10.5
10
@
UTEP
W 68-56
−20.5
14
vs
MOST
W 87-72
+10.5
17
vs
KENN
L 65-81
−19.5
21
vs
LIB
L 69-76
−3.5
24
@
SHSU
L 58-73
−25.5
28
@
KENN
L 69-72
−19.5
31
@
MTSU
W 65-60
−15.5
5
vs
JXST
L 66-71
−3.5
7
vs
FIU
W 80-70
−9.5
14
vs
MTSU
W 82-80
+16.5
18
@
DEL
W 88-87
+35.5
21
@
LIB
W 94-73
+19.5
26
vs
NMSU
W 93-70
+11.5
28
vs
UTEP
W 97-65
+16.5
5
@
MOST
L 74-87
+8.5
7
@
FIU
L 67-92
−1.5
12
vs
KENN
L 87-96
+23.5
over 15under 15avg +1 ptslonger = bigger margin
Tulsa
36 games played
Straight up
28-8
78% wins
Against the spread
19-17
53% covers · avg +4.2 pts vs the line
Over / Under
24-12
67% overs · avg +4.7 pts vs the total
Game by game: lines, results and totals
Lines, results and totalsCover margin by game · points beyond the lineTotal margin by game · points over or under the total
| Date | Opp | Result | Line | ATS | Total | O/U |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 | vs | W 82-65 | +3.5 | W +20.5 | 153.5 | U 147 |
| Nov 12 | @ | W 88-87 | -5.5 | L −4.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Nov 17 | @ | L 83-84 | +12.5 | W +11.5 | 160.5 | O 167 |
| Nov 21 | vs | W 84-75 | -8.5 | W +0.5 | 148.5 | O 159 |
| Nov 25 | vs | W 81-51 | -5.5 | W +24.5 | 149.5 | U 132 |
| Nov 26 | vs | W 63-60 | +2.5 | W +5.5 | 137.5 | U 123 |
| Dec 6 | vs | W 98-74 | -7.5 | W +16.5 | 142.5 | O 172 |
| Dec 10 | vs | W 117-84 | -25.5 | W +7.5 | 155.5 | O 201 |
| Dec 13 | vs | W 83-70 | -4.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 153 |
| Dec 19 | @ | W 82-81 | -2.5 | L −1.5 | 158.5 | O 163 |
| Dec 22 | vs | W 90-85 | -16.5 | L −11.5 | 160.5 | O 175 |
| Dec 31 | vs | W 97-48 | -12.5 | W +36.5 | 152.5 | U 145 |
| Jan 4 | @ | L 67-72 | -2.5 | L −7.5 | 138.5 | O 139 |
| Jan 10 | vs | L 78-93 | -1.5 | L −16.5 | 163.5 | O 171 |
| Jan 14 | @ | W 86-74 | -3.5 | W +8.5 | 146.5 | O 160 |
| Jan 18 | @ | W 99-77 | +1.5 | W +23.5 | 159.5 | O 176 |
| Jan 21 | vs | W 83-66 | -6.5 | W +10.5 | 153.5 | U 149 |
| Jan 24 | @ | W 87-81 | -8.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 168 |
| Jan 28 | vs | W 82-66 | -8.5 | W +7.5 | 141.5 | O 148 |
| Feb 1 | vs | W 93-83 | -5.5 | W +4.5 | 154.5 | O 176 |
| Feb 4 | @ | W 78-76 | -3.5 | L −1.5 | 162.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 8 | @ | L 74-80 | +4.5 | L −1.5 | 170.5 | U 154 |
| Feb 11 | vs | L 63-68 | -10.5 | L −15.5 | 161.5 | U 131 |
| Feb 14 | @ | L 77-81 | +1.5 | L −2.5 | 152.5 | O 158 |
| Feb 18 | vs | W 79-74 | -12.5 | L −7.5 | 151.5 | O 153 |
| Feb 22 | vs | W 100-74 | -21.5 | W +4.5 | 159.5 | O 174 |
| Feb 25 | @ | W 90-56 | -5.5 | W +28.5 | 156.5 | U 146 |
| Mar 5 | @ | W 93-66 | -8.5 | W +18.5 | 156.5 | O 159 |
| Mar 8 | vs | W 78-76 | -11.5 | L −9.5 | 149.5 | O 154 |
| Mar 13 | vs | W 90-84 | -7.5 | L −1.5 | 141.5 | O 174 |
| Mar 14 | vs | L 68-81 | -1.5 | L −14.5 | 152.5 | U 149 |
| Mar 17 | vs | W 89-84 | -5.5 | L −0.5 | 149.5 | O 173 |
| Mar 22 | vs | W 77-66 | -4.5 | W +6.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Mar 24 | vs | W 83-79 | -4.5 | L −0.5 | 154.5 | O 162 |
| Apr 2 | vs | W 74-69 | +2.5 | W +7.5 | 161.5 | U 143 |
| Apr 5 | vs | L 86-92 | +5.5 | L −0.5 | 158.5 | O 178 |
Day
Opp
Result
MissedCovered
Margin
7
vs
URI
W 82-65
+20.5
12
@
ORU
W 88-87
−4.5
17
@
KSU
L 83-84
+11.5
21
vs
APSU
W 84-75
+0.5
25
vs
SJSU
W 81-51
+24.5
26
vs
UNI
W 63-60
+5.5
6
vs
MOST
W 98-74
+16.5
10
vs
UAPB
W 117-84
+7.5
13
vs
NMSU
W 83-70
+8.5
19
@
WKU
W 82-81
−1.5
22
vs
DEN
W 90-85
−11.5
31
vs
RICE
W 97-48
+36.5
4
@
UNT
L 67-72
−7.5
10
vs
USF
L 78-93
−16.5
14
@
CLT
W 86-74
+8.5
18
@
UAB
W 99-77
+23.5
21
vs
MEM
W 83-66
+10.5
24
@
RICE
W 87-81
−2.5
28
vs
UNT
W 82-66
+7.5
1
vs
WICH
W 93-83
+4.5
4
@
FAU
W 78-76
−1.5
8
@
USF
L 74-80
−1.5
11
vs
UAB
L 63-68
−15.5
14
@
WICH
L 77-81
−2.5
18
vs
CLT
W 79-74
−7.5
22
vs
UTSA
W 100-74
+4.5
25
@
TULN
W 90-56
+28.5
5
@
ECU
W 93-66
+18.5
8
vs
TEM
W 78-76
−9.5
13
vs
UNT
W 90-84
−1.5
14
vs
WICH
L 68-81
−14.5
17
vs
SFA
W 89-84
−0.5
22
vs
UNLV
W 77-66
+6.5
24
vs
WICH
W 83-79
−0.5
2
vs
UNM
W 74-69
+7.5
5
vs
AUB
L 86-92
−0.5
covered 19didn’t cover 17avg +4.2 ptslonger = bigger margin
Day
Opp
Result
UnderOver
Margin
7
vs
URI
W 82-65
−6.5
12
@
ORU
W 88-87
+14.5
17
@
KSU
L 83-84
+6.5
21
vs
APSU
W 84-75
+10.5
25
vs
SJSU
W 81-51
−17.5
26
vs
UNI
W 63-60
−14.5
6
vs
MOST
W 98-74
+29.5
10
vs
UAPB
W 117-84
+45.5
13
vs
NMSU
W 83-70
+6.5
19
@
WKU
W 82-81
+4.5
22
vs
DEN
W 90-85
+14.5
31
vs
RICE
W 97-48
−7.5
4
@
UNT
L 67-72
+0.5
10
vs
USF
L 78-93
+7.5
14
@
CLT
W 86-74
+13.5
18
@
UAB
W 99-77
+16.5
21
vs
MEM
W 83-66
−4.5
24
@
RICE
W 87-81
+15.5
28
vs
UNT
W 82-66
+6.5
1
vs
WICH
W 93-83
+21.5
4
@
FAU
W 78-76
−8.5
8
@
USF
L 74-80
−16.5
11
vs
UAB
L 63-68
−30.5
14
@
WICH
L 77-81
+5.5
18
vs
CLT
W 79-74
+1.5
22
vs
UTSA
W 100-74
+14.5
25
@
TULN
W 90-56
−10.5
5
@
ECU
W 93-66
+2.5
8
vs
TEM
W 78-76
+4.5
13
vs
UNT
W 90-84
+32.5
14
vs
WICH
L 68-81
−3.5
17
vs
SFA
W 89-84
+23.5
22
vs
UNLV
W 77-66
−18.5
24
vs
WICH
W 83-79
+7.5
2
vs
UNM
W 74-69
−18.5
5
vs
AUB
L 86-92
+19.5
over 24under 12avg +4.7 ptslonger = bigger margin
Line = the team’s closing spread (negative = favored). ATS number = points beyond the line; total number = combined points.
Western KY has the better starters
Position by position: Western KY 3, Tulsa 1, even 1
Western KYBetterTulsa
G T. Moore19.2 pts · 5.7 reb · 1.8 ast
Score 99
←WKUBig
G K. Williams TR14.2 pts · 2.6 reb · 1.4 ast
Score 46
G N. Norgaard TR7.8 pts · 2 reb · 1.6 ast
Score 11
→TLSABig
G J. Johnson TR15 pts · 3.5 reb · 2 ast
Score 69
G A. Boone10.6 pts · 6.1 reb · 2.1 ast
Score 61
=Even
G B. Moss TR9.6 pts · 4.4 reb · 0.9 ast
Score 54
G L. Hackman8.8 pts · 2.9 reb · 1.5 ast
Score 64
←WKUBig
F M. Emory TR11.3 pts · 6.4 reb · 1.2 ast
Score 27
F E. Erkins-Ford TR8.6 pts · 3.6 reb · 1 ast
Score 71
←WKUBig
F C. Loofe TR7.1 pts · 6.2 reb · 0.7 ast
Score 26
Western KYBetterTulsa
WKU offense115th of 366 · -2.4
=Even
TLSA defense133rd of 366 · -2.5
WKU defense169th of 366 · -3.9
→TLSASmall
TLSA offense99th of 366 · -0.8
Backcourt+3.0 · 4 players
←WKUBig
Backcourt-0.9 · 3 players
Frontcourt+0.8 · 1 player
←WKUBig
Frontcourt-3.8 · 2 players
Bench-3.8 · 3 players
→TLSABig
Bench+1.3 · 5 players
Score, worst to bestWKU betterTLSA betterTR transfer · NEW no Division I numbers
Depth chart
Projected rotation by position, starters outlined
Guards
T. Moore30 minN. Norgaard25 min · TRA. Boone25 minL. Hackman22 minS. Young19 min · TRK. Unseld11 min
Forwards
E. Erkins-Ford22 min · TRE. Walker16 min · TRM. KonareNewG. WeisNewJ. AdebayoNew
Guards
K. Williams36 min · TRJ. Johnson33 min · TRB. Moss27 min · TRM. Williams21 min · TRM. Rigsby19 minJ. Lawal13 min
Forwards
M. Emory37 min · TRC. Loofe26 min · TRK. Banks16 min · TRD. DesireNewA. DimitrijevicNew
Showing 2025-26 until both teams have played this season.
Matchup stats
2025-26 · rank among 365 teams
Scoring
Points per game
Points per possession
Pace (possessions)
Shooting
Effective FG%
3-point %
3-point attempt rate
Free throw rate
Possessions
Turnover rate
Offensive rebound rate
Assists per game
Defense
Points allowed
Points allowed per possession
Opponent effective FG%
Opponent 3-point %
Turnovers forced
Defensive rebound rate
Steals per game
Blocks per game
| Scoring | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.9 #95 | Points per game | 83.9 #20 |
| 1.09 #163 | Points per possession | 1.20 #16 |
| 71.5 #52 | Pace (possessions) | 70.1 #115 |
| Shooting | ||
| 47.5 #327 | Effective FG% | 55.4 #29 |
| 33.4 #205 | 3-point % | 38.5 #10 |
| 39.5 #184 | 3-point attempt rate | 46.7 #37 |
| 41.2 #42 | Free throw rate | 41.4 #39 |
| Possessions | ||
| 14.5 #42 | Turnover rate | 15.6 #109 |
| 31.8 #134 | Offensive rebound rate | 32.8 #95 |
| 12.9 #215 | Assists per game | 15.1 #79 |
| Defense | ||
| 77.0 #241 | Points allowed | 74.4 #172 |
| 1.08 #155 | Points allowed per possession | 1.06 #111 |
| 51.2 #169 | Opponent effective FG% | 49.5 #82 |
| 34.3 #205 | Opponent 3-point % | 32.4 #85 |
| 17.2 #134 | Turnovers forced | 15.4 #260 |
| 70.5 #135 | Defensive rebound rate | 71.0 #108 |
| 7.4 #90 | Steals per game | 6.6 #170 |
| 2.3 #327 | Blocks per game | 2.5 #306 |
Western KY
16-14 in 2025-26 overall · 11-10 in conference · Conference USA
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Kennesaw St87–96
- L@ FIU67–92
- L@ Missouri St74–87
- Wvs UTEP97–65
- Wvs New Mexico St93–70
A week or more of rest.
Tulsa
28-8 in 2025-26 overall · 14-6 in conference · American Conference
Last five, 2025-26
- Lvs Auburn86–92
- Wvs New Mexico74–69
- Wvs Wichita St83–79
- Wvs UNLV77–66
- Wvs SF Austin89–84
A week or more of rest.